How Are Brain & Spine Solitary Fibrous Tumors Graded?
Published: | Updated:
Brain and spine solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are evaluated using the WHO grading system (Grades 1, 2, or 3) based on cell division and tissue characteristics. Standard soft tissue scores aren't used because the primary risk in the central nervous system is local regrowth rather than spreading.
Key Takeaways
- • Brain and spinal solitary fibrous tumors are classified as WHO Grade 1, 2, or 3 based on cell density, mitotic rate, and tissue necrosis.
- • The term hemangiopericytoma is an older diagnosis that is now officially classified as a central nervous system solitary fibrous tumor.
- • The Demicco risk score is not used for central nervous system SFTs because tumor size and clinical risks differ vastly in the confined space of the brain.
- • The primary goal of treatment for all grades is a complete surgical removal, often followed by adjuvant radiation therapy for Grade 3 or partially removed tumors.
- • Lifelong monitoring with MRI scans is required for brain and spine SFTs because they can recur locally or spread many years after the initial treatment.
Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) located in the central nervous system (CNS)—the brain and spinal cord—are graded differently than SFTs found elsewhere in the body. If your SFT is in your brain or spine, your pathology report will use the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumours, which assigns a Grade 1, 2, or 3 [1][2]. In contrast, SFTs in the soft tissue (like the limbs, abdomen, or chest) are typically assessed using the Demicco risk score [3]. Because the brain and spine are closed, highly sensitive environments, standard soft tissue scoring systems do not accurately predict how a tumor will behave in the CNS [4].
The WHO Grading System for Brain and Spine SFTs
In the past, higher-grade SFTs in the brain were commonly called “hemangiopericytomas.” You might still see this term in older research, and some doctors may still use it out of habit, but the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) update officially combined them under the single name “solitary fibrous tumor” [5]. Pathologists now determine the tumor’s grade by looking at a biopsy sample under a microscope and evaluating specific features [1]:
- Grade 1: These tumors are considered lower risk. They are hypocellular (having fewer cells spread further apart) and contain a lot of collagen (connective tissue) [1][6]. They have a low mitotic rate—meaning very few cells are actively dividing (typically fewer than 5 dividing cells per 10 high-power fields, or per mm², under the microscope) [1].
- Grade 2: These tumors look structurally different from Grade 1. They are highly cellular, meaning the cells are packed densely together [1]. However, like Grade 1, they still have a relatively low mitotic rate (fewer than 5 dividing cells per 10 high-power fields) and no tissue death [1].
- Grade 3 (sometimes historically called Anaplastic): These are the most aggressive CNS SFTs. To be classified as Grade 3, a tumor typically shows a high mitotic rate (5 or more dividing cells per 10 high-power fields or per mm²) [1][7]. Pathologists also look for necrosis, which are areas of dead tumor tissue caused by the tumor growing faster than its blood supply [1]. Grade 3 tumors have a higher risk of growing back locally or spreading outside the nervous system [8].
Why the Demicco Score Isn’t Used for the Brain
If you have been reading general information about SFTs online, you have likely seen references to the Demicco risk score. This tool is widely used for soft tissue SFTs in the body to predict the likelihood of the tumor spreading (metastasizing) [9].
The Demicco score relies heavily on three factors: the patient’s age, the tumor’s mitotic count, and the size of the tumor [10]. Specifically, it assigns higher risk points for tumors that are 10 centimeters (about 4 inches) or larger [10].
However, this system does not work well for brain or spine tumors for a few key reasons:
- Size means something different in the brain: A 10-centimeter tumor in the thigh might be caught relatively early and be fairly easy to remove. A 10-centimeter tumor in the skull is massive, immediately life-threatening, and severely constrained by the tight space of the skull [4].
- Different clinical risks: Soft tissue SFTs are primarily evaluated for their risk of spreading to other organs [9]. While brain SFTs can spread, the most immediate and common risk is local recurrence—the tumor growing back in the same spot where it was removed [11].
- Surgical factors matter more: In the CNS, whether the surgeon could remove the entire tumor (gross total resection) is often the most important predictor of a patient’s outcome [8][12]. Soft tissue models like Demicco simply don’t account for how difficult it is to safely remove a tumor from sensitive brain or spinal tissue [4].
What Your Grade Means for Treatment
Your WHO grade helps your neurosurgeon and neuro-oncologist decide on the best follow-up plan after your surgery.
- Complete Removal is Key: For all grades, safely removing as much of the tumor as possible is the primary goal [8].
- Radiation Therapy: If you have a Grade 3 SFT, or if your surgeon was only able to perform a partial removal (subtotal resection) of a Grade 1 or 2 tumor, your care team will likely recommend radiation therapy to help prevent the tumor from returning [13][14].
- Long-Term Monitoring: Because CNS SFTs can sometimes recur many years after treatment regardless of their initial grade, you will need monitoring for a very long time—often for life [15]. This includes regular MRI scans of your brain and spine. Because higher-grade tumors carry a risk of spreading outside the nervous system, your team may also recommend systemic monitoring, such as CT scans or PET scans of your chest and abdomen [8][15].
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between Grade 1, 2, and 3 brain SFTs?
Why isn't the Demicco risk score used for brain and spine SFTs?
Does my SFT grade affect whether I need radiation?
What is a hemangiopericytoma?
How often will I need scans after brain SFT surgery?
Questions for Your Doctor
- • Was my surgery considered a gross total resection (complete removal) or a subtotal resection?
- • What was the mitotic count on my pathology report, and was there any evidence of necrosis?
- • Will my case be reviewed by a multidisciplinary tumor board to discuss my post-surgery treatment options?
- • Given my specific WHO grade and extent of surgery, do you recommend adjuvant radiation therapy?
- • How often will I need follow-up MRI scans, and will I also need regular body scans (like CT or PET scans) to monitor for systemic spread?
Questions for You
- • Have I obtained a complete copy of my surgical notes and pathology report for my own records?
- • How comfortable do I feel with my current care team's experience in treating rare central nervous system tumors?
- • What are my primary physical and emotional goals for my recovery right now, and what kind of support do I need to achieve them?
Want personalized information?
Type your question below to get evidence-based answers tailored to your situation.
References
- 1
Two cases of solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma with different clinical features according to the World Health Organization classification: case report and review of the literature.
Nishii T, Nagashima Y, Nishimura Y, et al.
Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) 2021; (7(4)):532-539 doi:10.21037/jss-21-83.
PMID: 35128128 - 2
Descriptive epidemiology of 399 histologically confirmed newly diagnosed meningeal solitary fibrous tumours and haemangiopericytomas in France: 2006-2015.
Champeaux Depond C, Zouaoui S, Darlix A, et al.
Acta neurochirurgica 2024; (166(1)):320 doi:10.1007/s00701-024-06191-y.
PMID: 39093339 - 3
Risk assessment in solitary fibrous tumors: validation and refinement of a risk stratification model.
Demicco EG, Wagner MJ, Maki RG, et al.
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc 2017; (30(10)):1433-1442 doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.54.
PMID: 28731041 - 4
Risk Stratification for Management of Solitary Fibrous Tumor/Hemangiopericytoma of the Central Nervous System.
Kinslow CJ, Rae AI, Kumar P, et al.
Cancers 2023; (15(3)) doi:10.3390/cancers15030876.
PMID: 36765837 - 5
Solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma of the cervical spine: A systematic review of the literature with an illustrative case.
Colamaria A, Carbone F, Sacco M, et al.
Surgical neurology international 2022; (13()):532 doi:10.25259/SNI_722_2022.
PMID: 36447863 - 6
The impact of histopathology and NAB2-STAT6 fusion subtype in classification and grading of meningeal solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma.
Fritchie K, Jensch K, Moskalev EA, et al.
Acta neuropathologica 2019; (137(2)):307-319 doi:10.1007/s00401-018-1952-6.
PMID: 30584643 - 7
The association between WHO grading and the long-term outcomes and radiotherapy efficacy of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors.
Ren L, Hua L, Feng AO, et al.
Acta neuropathologica communications 2025; (13(1)):167 doi:10.1186/s40478-025-02086-w.
PMID: 40770814 - 8
Clinical outcomes of solitary fibrous tumors and hemangiopericytomas and risk factors related to recurrence and survival based on the 2021 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.
Wu Y, Zhao T, Cai Y, et al.
Journal of neurosurgery 2024; (140(1)):69-79 doi:10.3171/2023.4.JNS23147.
PMID: 37310060 - 9
Metastatic Patterns of Solitary Fibrous Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience.
O'Neill AC, Tirumani SH, Do WS, et al.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 2017; (208(1)):2-9 doi:10.2214/AJR.16.16662.
PMID: 27762594 - 10
Comparison of Risk Stratification Models to Predict Recurrence and Survival in Pleuropulmonary Solitary Fibrous Tumor.
Reisenauer JS, Mneimneh W, Jenkins S, et al.
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 2018; (13(9)):1349-1362 doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2018.05.040.
PMID: 29935303 - 11
Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumor/Hemangiopericytoma Treated with Microsurgical Resection: Retrospective Cohort Analysis of a Single-Center Experience.
Swaminathan S, Ruzevick J, Venur V, et al.
Therapeutics and clinical risk management 2022; (18()):901-912 doi:10.2147/TCRM.S375064.
PMID: 36092453 - 12
Diagnosis and treatment of solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma of central nervous system. Retrospective report of 17 patients and literature review.
Ma L, Wang L, Fang X, et al.
Neuro endocrinology letters 2018; (39(2)):88-94.
PMID: 30183202 - 13
Central nervous system solitary fibrous tumors: Case series in accordance with the WHO 2021 reclassification. Framework for patient surveillance.
Matthijs V, Beckers R, Broecke CV, et al.
Acta neurochirurgica 2024; (166(1)):414 doi:10.1007/s00701-024-06304-7.
PMID: 39417883 - 14
Reappraisal of morphological and immunohistochemical spectrum of intracranial and spinal solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas with impact on long-term follow-up.
Shukla P, Gulwani HV, Kaur S, Shanmugasundaram D
Indian journal of cancer 2018; (55(3)):214-221 doi:10.4103/ijc.IJC_631_17.
PMID: 30693881 - 15
Solitary fibrous tumor of the greater omentum: case report and review of literature.
Eltawil KM, Whalen C, Knapp B
Surgical case reports 2021; (7(1)):94 doi:10.1186/s40792-021-01176-w.
PMID: 33856588
This information explains solitary fibrous tumor grading for educational purposes only. Always discuss your specific WHO grade, pathology report, and treatment options with your neuro-oncologist or neurosurgeon.
Stay up to date
Get notified when new research about Solitary Fibrous Tumor (SFT) is published.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.