Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 112 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated

Research & Literature

Explore the leading researchers and institutions driving advances in this area, and dive into the full body of literature that informs this resource.

Explore the Literature Visualize citation networks across 112 referenced papers

Top Authors

Hölger Thiele
Leipzig Heart Institute
Navin K. Kapur
Tufts Medical Center
Dirk Westermann
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
Sean van Diepen
University of Alberta
Benedikt Schrage
Universität Hamburg
David A. Baran
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Jacob Eifer Møller
University of Southern Denmark
Srihari S. Naidu
Westchester Medical Center

Top Institutions

Ranked by publications Top 10 institutions

References

References (112)
  1. 1

    Factors Affecting Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in Relatives of Intensive Care Unit Patients.

    Köse I, Zincircioğlu Ç, Öztürk YK, et al.

    Journal of intensive care medicine 2016; (31(9)):611-7 doi:10.1177/0885066615595791.

    PMID: 26168801
  2. 2

    A team-based approach to patients in cardiogenic shock.

    Doll JA, Ohman EM, Patel MR, et al.

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2016; (88(3)):424-33 doi:10.1002/ccd.26297.

    PMID: 26526563
  3. 3

    Acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy and 5-year mortality after myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

    Lauridsen MD, Gammelager H, Schmidt M, et al.

    Critical care (London, England) 2015; (19()):452 doi:10.1186/s13054-015-1170-8.

    PMID: 26715162
  4. 4

    Beneficial Effects of Norepinephrine Alone on Cardiovascular Function and Tissue Oxygenation in a Pig Model of Cardiogenic Shock.

    Beurton A, Ducrocq N, Auchet T, et al.

    Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 2016; (46(2)):214-8 doi:10.1097/SHK.0000000000000579.

    PMID: 26849625
  5. 5

    Cardiogenic Shock in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Era of Mechanical Support.

    Miller L

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016; (67(16)):1881-4.

    PMID: 27102503
  6. 6

    Palliative Care in Critical Care Settings: A Systematic Review of Communication-Based Competencies Essential for Patient and Family Satisfaction.

    Schram AW, Hougham GW, Meltzer DO, Ruhnke GW

    The American journal of hospice & palliative care 2017; (34(9)):887-895 doi:10.1177/1049909116667071.

    PMID: 27582376
  7. 7

    Concomitant implantation of Impella® on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock.

    Pappalardo F, Schulte C, Pieri M, et al.

    European journal of heart failure 2017; (19(3)):404-412 doi:10.1002/ejhf.668.

    PMID: 27709750
  8. 8

    Temporal Trends in Predictors of Early and Late Mortality After Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

    Davierwala PM, Leontyev S, Verevkin A, et al.

    Circulation 2016; (134(17)):1224-1237 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.021092.

    PMID: 27777292
  9. 9

    [Use of vasopressors and inotropics in cardiogenic shock].

    Lemm H, Dietz S, Janusch M, Buerke M

    Herz 2017; (42(1)):3-10 doi:10.1007/s00059-016-4525-2.

    PMID: 28101622
  10. 10

    Altered mental status predicts mortality in cardiogenic shock - results from the CardShock study.

    Kataja A, Tarvasmäki T, Lassus J, et al.

    European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care 2018; (7(1)):38-44 doi:10.1177/2048872617702505.

    PMID: 28403620
  11. 11

    Effects of Low-Dose Recombinant Human Brain Natriuretic Peptide on Anterior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

    Pan Y, Lu Z, Hang J, et al.

    Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery 2017; (32(2)):96-103 doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2016-0007.

    PMID: 28492790
  12. 12

    Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al.

    Circulation 2017; (136(16)):e232-e268 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525.

    PMID: 28923988
  13. 13

    Circulating microparticles are associated with clinical severity of persistent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock.

    Sionis A, Suades R, Sans-Roselló J, et al.

    International journal of cardiology 2018; (258()):249-256 doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.044.

    PMID: 29544939
  14. 14

    Prevalence, Causes, and Predictors of 30-Day Readmissions Following Hospitalization With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated By Cardiogenic Shock: Findings From the 2013-2014 National Readmissions Database.

    Mahmoud AN, Elgendy IY, Mojadidi MK, et al.

    Journal of the American Heart Association 2018; (7(6)) doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.008235.

    PMID: 29572325
  15. 15

    'Combat' Approach to Cardiogenic Shock.

    Truesdell AG, Tehrani B, Singh R, et al.

    Interventional cardiology (London, England) 2018; (13(2)):81-86 doi:10.15420/icr.2017:35:3.

    PMID: 29928313
  16. 16

    Implementation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team and Clinical Outcomes (INOVA-SHOCK Registry): Observational and Retrospective Study.

    Tehrani B, Truesdell A, Singh R, et al.

    JMIR research protocols 2018; (7(6)):e160 doi:10.2196/resprot.9761.

    PMID: 29954728
  17. 17

    One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock.

    Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al.

    The New England journal of medicine 2018; (379(18)):1699-1710 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1808788.

    PMID: 30145971
  18. 18

    Cardiac Shock Care Centers: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

    Rab T, Ratanapo S, Kern KB, et al.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018; (72(16)):1972-1980 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.074.

    PMID: 30309475
  19. 19

    Aging and Postintensive Care Syndrome- Family: A Critical Need for Geriatric Psychiatry.

    Serrano P, Kheir YNP, Wang S, et al.

    The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 2019; (27(4)):446-454 doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2018.12.002.

    PMID: 30595492
  20. 20

    Outcomes after extracorporeal life support for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.

    Pozzi M, Alvau F, Armoiry X, et al.

    Journal of cardiac surgery 2019; (34(2)):74-81 doi:10.1111/jocs.13985.

    PMID: 30636172
  21. 21

    Reconsidering Vasopressors for Cardiogenic Shock: Everything Should Be Made as Simple as Possible, but Not Simpler.

    Squara P, Hollenberg S, Payen D

    Chest 2019; (156(2)):392-401 doi:10.1016/j.chest.2019.03.020.

    PMID: 30935893
  22. 22

    Improved Outcomes Associated with the use of Shock Protocols: Updates from the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.

    Basir MB, Kapur NK, Patel K, et al.

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2019; (93(7)):1173-1183 doi:10.1002/ccd.28307.

    PMID: 31025538
  23. 23

    Extracorporeal Life Support in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

    Brunner S, Guenther SPW, Lackermair K, et al.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019; (73(18)):2355-2357 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.044.

    PMID: 31072581
  24. 24

    SCAI clinical expert consensus statement on the classification of cardiogenic shock: This document was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) in April 2019.

    Baran DA, Grines CL, Bailey S, et al.

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2019; (94(1)):29-37 doi:10.1002/ccd.28329.

    PMID: 31104355
  25. 25

    Inotropes and vasopressors use in cardiogenic shock: when, which and how much?

    Levy B, Buzon J, Kimmoun A

    Current opinion in critical care 2019; (25(4)):384-390 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000632.

    PMID: 31166204
  26. 26

    Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Isolated Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection.

    Elamry E, Alkady HM, Menaissy Y, Abdalla O

    The heart surgery forum 2019; (22(3)):E191-E196 doi:10.1532/hsf.2415.

    PMID: 31237541
  27. 27

    Nonischemic Causes of Cardiogenic Shock.

    Wilcox SR

    Emergency medicine clinics of North America 2019; (37(3)):493-509 doi:10.1016/j.emc.2019.03.007.

    PMID: 31262417
  28. 28

    Causes and predictors of 30-day readmissions in patients with cardiogenic shock requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

    Tashtish N, Al-Kindi SG, Karnib M, et al.

    The International journal of artificial organs 2020; (43(4)):258-267 doi:10.1177/0391398819882025.

    PMID: 31642373
  29. 29

    Molecular signature of cardiogenic shock.

    Iborra-Egea O, Rueda F, García-García C, et al.

    European heart journal 2020; (41(39)):3839-3848 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz783.

    PMID: 31722370
  30. 30

    Application of the SCAI classification in a cohort of patients with cardiogenic shock.

    Schrage B, Dabboura S, Yan I, et al.

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2020; (96(3)):E213-E219 doi:10.1002/ccd.28707.

    PMID: 31925996
  31. 31

    Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.

    Vallabhajosyula S, Patlolla SH, Dunlay SM, et al.

    Circulation. Heart failure 2020; (13(2)):e006661 doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006661.

    PMID: 32059628
  32. 32

    Long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention to an unprotected left main coronary artery in cardiogenic shock.

    Yeoh J, Andrianopoulos N, Reid CM, et al.

    International journal of cardiology 2020; (308()):20-25 doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.005.

    PMID: 32192748
  33. 33

    The Critical Care Nurse Communicator Program: An Integrated Primary Palliative Care Intervention.

    O'Donnell A, Buffo A, Campbell TC, Ehlenbach WJ

    Critical care nursing clinics of North America 2020; (32(2)):265-279 doi:10.1016/j.cnc.2020.02.008.

    PMID: 32402321
  34. 34

    Vasopressor use in cardiogenic shock.

    Levy B, Klein T, Kimmoun A

    Current opinion in critical care 2020; (26(4)):411-416 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000743.

    PMID: 32487842
  35. 35

    How to Manage Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in the Critical Care Setting: Translating Physiology to the Bedside.

    Rao P, Katz D, Hieda M, Sabe M

    Heart failure clinics 2020; (16(3)):283-293 doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2020.03.001.

    PMID: 32503752
  36. 36

    Kidney and liver dysfunction in cardiogenic shock.

    Lassus J

    Current opinion in critical care 2020; (26(4)):417-423 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000746.

    PMID: 32520812
  37. 37

    Multidisciplinary Code Shock Team in Cardiogenic Shock: A Canadian Centre Experience.

    Lee F, Hutson JH, Boodhwani M, et al.

    CJC open 2020; (2(4)):249-257 doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.009.

    PMID: 32695976
  38. 38

    Short-term mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, TandemHeart): a review.

    Wong ASK, Sin SWC

    Annals of translational medicine 2020; (8(13)):829 doi:10.21037/atm-20-2171.

    PMID: 32793674
  39. 39

    Risk factors, resource use, and cost of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome.

    Duncan AE, Kartashov A, Robinson SB, et al.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2022; (163(5)):1890-1898.e10 doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.125.

    PMID: 32800368
  40. 40

    The New Era of Cardiogenic Shock: Progress in Mechanical Circulatory Support.

    Seliem A, Hall SA

    Current heart failure reports 2020; (17(6)):325-332 doi:10.1007/s11897-020-00490-y.

    PMID: 32936410
  41. 41

    Multidisciplinary shock team is associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing ECPR.

    Hryniewicz K, Hart M, Raile D, et al.

    The International journal of artificial organs 2021; (44(5)):310-317 doi:10.1177/0391398820962807.

    PMID: 33028139
  42. 42

    Left Ventricular Unloading Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From an International, Multicenter Cohort Study.

    Schrage B, Becher PM, Bernhardt A, et al.

    Circulation 2020; (142(22)):2095-2106 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048792.

    PMID: 33032450
  43. 43

    Arterial Lactate in Cardiogenic Shock: Prognostic Value of Clearance Versus Single Values.

    Fuernau G, Desch S, de Waha-Thiele S, et al.

    JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2020; (13(19)):2208-2216 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.037.

    PMID: 33032708
  44. 44

    Hemodynamic Profiles of Cardiogenic Shock Depending on Their Etiology.

    Gaubert M, Laine M, Resseguier N, et al.

    Journal of clinical medicine 2020; (9(11)) doi:10.3390/jcm9113384.

    PMID: 33105580
  45. 45

    Association between serum lactate levels and mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock receiving mechanical circulatory support: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

    Scolari FL, Schneider D, Fogazzi DV, et al.

    BMC cardiovascular disorders 2020; (20(1)):496 doi:10.1186/s12872-020-01785-7.

    PMID: 33234107
  46. 46

    Vasopressors and Inotropes as Predictors of Mortality in Acute Severe Cardiogenic Shock Treated With the Impella Device.

    Rohm CL, Gadidov B, Ray HE, et al.

    Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions 2021; (31()):71-75 doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2020.12.001.

    PMID: 33309042
  47. 47

    Right Atrial Pressure Is Associated With Outcomes in Patient With Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support.

    Davila CD, Esposito M, Hirst CS, et al.

    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 2021; (8()):563853 doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.563853.

    PMID: 33644126
  48. 48

    The Range of Cardiogenic Shock Survival by Clinical Stage: Data From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.

    Lawler PR, Berg DD, Park JG, et al.

    Critical care medicine 2021; (49(8)):1293-1302 doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004948.

    PMID: 33861557
  49. 49

    Managing the first 120 min of cardiogenic shock: from resuscitation to diagnosis.

    Jentzer JC, Tabi M, Burstein B

    Current opinion in critical care 2021; (27(4)):416-425 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000000839.

    PMID: 33967208
  50. 50

    Inotropic therapies in heart failure and cardiogenic shock: an educational review.

    DesJardin JT, Teerlink JR

    European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care 2021; (10(6)):676-686 doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuab047.

    PMID: 34219157
  51. 51

    Psychological distress among the family members of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients: A scoping review.

    Abdul Halain A, Tang LY, Chong MC, et al.

    Journal of clinical nursing 2022; (31(5-6)):497-507 doi:10.1111/jocn.15962.

    PMID: 34254377
  52. 52

    Biventricular Impella (Bi-Pella) in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: The First Case from the Middle East.

    Almejren A, Alenezi A

    Case reports in medicine 2021; (2021()):6676339 doi:10.1155/2021/6676339.

    PMID: 34335787
  53. 53

    Lactate Clearance Is Associated With Improved Survival in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factor Studies.

    Marbach JA, Stone S, Schwartz B, et al.

    Journal of cardiac failure 2021; (27(10)):1082-1089 doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.012.

    PMID: 34625128
  54. 54

    Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management Considerations: Review of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

    Abraham J, Blumer V, Burkhoff D, et al.

    Journal of cardiac failure 2021; (27(10)):1126-1140 doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.010.

    PMID: 34625131
  55. 55

    Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Review.

    Samsky MD, Morrow DA, Proudfoot AG, et al.

    JAMA 2021; (326(18)):1840-1850 doi:10.1001/jama.2021.18323.

    PMID: 34751704
  56. 56

    Basic mechanisms in cardiogenic shock: part 1-definition and pathophysiology.

    Krychtiuk KA, Vrints C, Wojta J, et al.

    European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care 2022; (11(4)):356-365 doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuac021.

    PMID: 35218350
  57. 57

    The landscape of cardiogenic shock: epidemiology and current definitions.

    Palacios Ordonez C, Garan AR

    Current opinion in cardiology 2022; (37(3)):236-240 doi:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000957.

    PMID: 35275890
  58. 58

    Norepinephrine use in cardiogenic shock patients is associated with increased 30 day mortality.

    Lu X, Wang X, Gao Y, et al.

    ESC heart failure 2022; (9(3)):1875-1883 doi:10.1002/ehf2.13893.

    PMID: 35289504
  59. 59

    Intervention Codesign in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit to Improve Family Meetings.

    Walter JK, Hill D, Drust WA, et al.

    Journal of pain and symptom management 2022; (64(1)):8-16 doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.03.010.

    PMID: 35339610
  60. 60

    Association Between the Acidemia, Lactic Acidosis, and Shock Severity With Outcomes in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.

    Jentzer JC, Schrage B, Patel PC, et al.

    Journal of the American Heart Association 2022; (11(9)):e024932 doi:10.1161/JAHA.121.024932.

    PMID: 35491996
  61. 61

    Cardiac power output index to define hemodynamic response to Impella support in cardiogenic shock.

    Sern Lim H

    The International journal of artificial organs 2022; (45(7)):598-603 doi:10.1177/03913988221100278.

    PMID: 35578554
  62. 62

    The use of multidisciplinary teams, electronic health records tools, and technology to optimize heart failure population health.

    Martyn T, Montgomery RA, Estep JD

    Current opinion in cardiology 2022; (37(3)):302-306 doi:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000968.

    PMID: 35612941
  63. 63

    Optimizing Foundational Therapies in Patients With HFrEF: How Do We Translate These Findings Into Clinical Care?

    Sharma A, Verma S, Bhatt DL, et al.

    JACC. Basic to translational science 2022; (7(5)):504-517 doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.10.018.

    PMID: 35663626
  64. 64

    Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity.

    Kapur NK, Kanwar M, Sinha SS, et al.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2022; (80(3)):185-198 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.

    PMID: 35835491
  65. 65

    Performance of Early Capillary Refill Time Measurement on Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock: An Observational, Prospective Multicentric Study.

    Merdji H, Curtiaud A, Aheto A, et al.

    American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2022; (206(10)):1230-1238 doi:10.1164/rccm.202204-0687OC.

    PMID: 35849736
  66. 66

    Escalating and De-escalating Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

    Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al.

    Circulation 2022; (146(6)):e50-e68 doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076.

    PMID: 35862152
  67. 67

    Survivors of veno-arterial membrane oxygenation have good long-term quality of life.

    North M, Samara M, Eckman PM, et al.

    The International journal of artificial organs 2022; (45(10)):826-832 doi:10.1177/03913988221113597.

    PMID: 35918847
  68. 68

    [Short- and long-term follow-up care in patients with infarction-related cardiogenic shock].

    Ruß M

    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 2022; (147(18)):1187-1194 doi:10.1055/a-1726-1315.

    PMID: 36070736
  69. 69

    SCAI stage reclassification at 24 h predicts outcome of cardiogenic shock: Insights from the Altshock-2 Registry.

    Serrao G, Dangas G

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2023; (101(3)):676 doi:10.1002/ccd.30566.

    PMID: 36748779
  70. 70

    Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) Inhibitors Use among Heart Failure Patients and the Role of Pharmacists in Early Initiation of Therapy.

    Aldhaeefi M, Beers B, Shah J, et al.

    Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) 2023; (11(2)) doi:10.3390/pharmacy11020058.

    PMID: 36961036
  71. 71

    The changing face of cardiogenic shock: definitions, epidemiology, and severity assessment.

    Jentzer JC, Baran DA

    Current opinion in critical care 2023; (29(4)):363-370 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001065.

    PMID: 37306542
  72. 72

    Application of Cardiogenic Shock Working Group-defined Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (CSWG-SCAI) Staging of Cardiogenic Shock to the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database.

    John KJ, Stone SM, Zhang Y, et al.

    Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions 2023; (57()):82-90 doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.019.

    PMID: 37400345
  73. 73

    Circulatory shock in adults in emergency department.

    Pannu AK

    Turkish journal of emergency medicine 2023; (23(3)):139-148 doi:10.4103/2452-2473.367400.

    PMID: 37529784
  74. 74

    Unique Gene Expression Signature in Periadrenal Adipose Tissue Identifies a High Blood Pressure Group in Patients With Cushing Syndrome.

    Stifel U, Vogel F, Caratti G, et al.

    Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) 2023; (80(11)):2333-2344 doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21185.

    PMID: 37646167
  75. 75

    Risk factors associated with post-intensive care syndrome in family members (PICS-F): A prospective observational study.

    Lobato CT, Camões J, Carvalho D, et al.

    Journal of the Intensive Care Society 2023; (24(3)):247-257 doi:10.1177/17511437221108904.

    PMID: 37744068
  76. 76

    Monitoring MCS patients on the intensive care unit: integrating haemodynamic assessment, laboratory data, and imaging techniques for timely detection of deterioration and recovery.

    Vandenbriele C, Baldetti L, Beneduce A, et al.

    European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology 2023; (25(Suppl I)):I24-I31 doi:10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad130.

    PMID: 38093766
  77. 77

    PROGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF SERIAL DETERMINATION OF THE SOCIETY FOR CARDIOVASCULAR ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTIONS SHOCK CLASSIFICATION IN ADULTS WITH CRITICAL ILLNESS.

    Jentzer JC, Sanghavi D, Patel PC, et al.

    Shock (Augusta, Ga.) 2024; (61(2)):246-252 doi:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002292.

    PMID: 38150371
  78. 78

    Impact of a Cardiogenic Shock Program on Mortality in a Non-Transplant Hospital.

    Aboal J, Pascual J, Loma-Osorio P, et al.

    Heart, lung & circulation 2024; (33(1)):38-45 doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2023.11.010.

    PMID: 38151398
  79. 79

    Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock.

    Møller JE, Engstrøm T, Jensen LO, et al.

    The New England journal of medicine 2024; (390(15)):1382-1393 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2312572.

    PMID: 38587239
  80. 80

    Cardiogenic shock and chronic kidney disease: Dangerous liaisons.

    Cherbi M, Bonnefoy E, Puymirat E, et al.

    Archives of cardiovascular diseases 2024; (117(4)):255-265 doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2024.01.006.

    PMID: 38594150
  81. 81

    Management of Heart Failure in a Resource-Limited Setting: Expert Opinion from India.

    Jain P, Guha S, Kumar S, et al.

    Cardiology and therapy 2024; (13(2)):243-266 doi:10.1007/s40119-024-00367-4.

    PMID: 38687432
  82. 82

    Cardiogenic shock trajectories: is the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions definition the right one?

    Dorian D, Thomson RJ, Lim HS, Proudfoot AG

    Current opinion in critical care 2024; (30(4)):324-332 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001168.

    PMID: 38841918
  83. 83

    What is cardiogenic shock? New clinical criteria urgently needed.

    Ostadal P, Belohlavek J

    Current opinion in critical care 2024; (30(4)):319-323 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001172.

    PMID: 38841985
  84. 84

    Beyond one-size-fits-all in cardiogenic shock: impella, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or tailored use of mechanical circulatory support?

    Rob D, Belohlavek J

    Current opinion in critical care 2024; (30(4)):371-378 doi:10.1097/MCC.0000000000001165.

    PMID: 38872369
  85. 85

    Prognostic performance of the SCAI shock classification at admission and during ICU treatment: A retrospective, observational cohort study.

    Britsch S, Britsch M, Hahn L, et al.

    Heart & lung : the journal of critical care 2024; (68()):52-59 doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.06.012.

    PMID: 38924856
  86. 86

    Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter Type 2 Inhibitors Use in Elderly Polypathological Patients with Acute Heart Failure: PROFUND-IC Registry.

    Guzmán-Carreras A, Vellisca-González AM, Molina-Puente JI, et al.

    Journal of clinical medicine 2024; (13(12)) doi:10.3390/jcm13123485.

    PMID: 38930015
  87. 87

    A pharmacist-led heart failure stewardship initiative for guideline-directed medical therapy in hospitalized patients with reduced ejection fraction.

    MacDonald GA, Johnston RM, Flewelling AJ

    Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC 2024; (157(4)):181-189 doi:10.1177/17151635241249952.

    PMID: 39092082
  88. 88

    No time to wait in cardiogenic shock!

    Rab T

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2024; (104(4)):773-774 doi:10.1002/ccd.31186.

    PMID: 39169692
  89. 89

    Serial Shock Severity Assessment Within 72 Hours After Diagnosis: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report.

    Ton VK, Li S, John K, et al.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2024; doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.069.

    PMID: 39217545
  90. 90

    Assessment of the frequency and risk factors of gastrointestinal bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass in paediatric cases.

    Ozyilmaz I, Öztürk E, Ozalp S, et al.

    Cardiology in the young 2024; (34(12)):2557-2561 doi:10.1017/S1047951124026106.

    PMID: 39370982
  91. 91

    Biomarkers in cardiogenic shock: old pals, new friends.

    Jozwiak M, Lim SY, Si X, Monnet X

    Annals of intensive care 2024; (14(1)):157 doi:10.1186/s13613-024-01388-x.

    PMID: 39414666
  92. 92

    Cardiogenic shock.

    Lüsebrink E, Binzenhöfer L, Adamo M, et al.

    Lancet (London, England) 2024; (404(10466)):2006-2020 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01818-X.

    PMID: 39550175
  93. 93

    Improving Cardiogenic Shock Team Activation Through Nurse Education and Alert Implementation.

    Krais S, Sheasby J, Banwait J, et al.

    Critical care nurse 2024; (44(6)):24-30 doi:10.4037/ccn2024259.

    PMID: 39615540
  94. 94

    Optimizing Guideline-directed Medical Therapies for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction During Hospitalization.

    Dixit NM, Shah S, Ziaeian B, et al.

    US cardiology 2021; (15()):e07 doi:10.15420/usc.2020.29.

    PMID: 39720493
  95. 95

    Implementation of guideline-recommended therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction according to heart failure duration: An analysis of 55 581 patients from the Swedish Heart Failure (SwedeHF) Registry.

    Shahim A, Linde C, Savarese G, et al.

    European journal of heart failure 2025; (27(3)):421-431 doi:10.1002/ejhf.3565.

    PMID: 39783801
  96. 96

    Improving Communication and Workflow Among Advanced Practice Providers and Nurses on Night Shift in an Intensive Care Unit.

    Massey CAD, Selph MJ, Mitchell S

    Critical care nurse 2025; (45(1)):36-51 doi:10.4037/ccn2025358.

    PMID: 39889802
  97. 97

    The Comparative Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management of Cardiogenic Shock Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Advanced Heart Failure.

    Randhawa VK, Baran DA, Kanwar MK, et al.

    The Canadian journal of cardiology 2025; (41(4)):573-586 doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2025.01.027.

    PMID: 39892612
  98. 98

    Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Cardiogenic Shock Team in a Nonacademic Canadian Heart Centre: An Implementation Study.

    El-Mughayyar D, Marshall T, D'Souza K, et al.

    CJC open 2025; (7(2)):231-238 doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.11.007.

    PMID: 40060208
  99. 99

    Patterns of Disease Progression and Outcomes of Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The Multicenter INSTINCT Registry.

    Botti G, Pieri M, Cappannoli L, et al.

    Journal of clinical medicine 2025; (14(7)) doi:10.3390/jcm14072231.

    PMID: 40217681
  100. 100

    Temporary Mechanical Support in Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Heart Failure: An Evolving Paradigm.

    Nair N, Du D, Mahesh B

    Journal of personalized medicine 2025; (15(5)) doi:10.3390/jpm15050184.

    PMID: 40423056
  101. 101

    Tricuspid regurgitation and chronic kidney disease in patients with cardiogenic shock: Review of the literature and real-world experience from a single center.

    Oren D, Ramchandani S, Lorenzana A, et al.

    International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature 2025; (59()):101716 doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101716.

    PMID: 40535596
  102. 102

    Renal Dysfunction Across the Spectrum of Cardiogenic Shock: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Therapeutic Strategies.

    De Oliveira-Gomes D, Guilliod C, Vavilin I, et al.

    Current heart failure reports 2025; (22(1)):19 doi:10.1007/s11897-025-00706-z.

    PMID: 40560292
  103. 103

    Microaxial flow pump in cardiogenic shock: a retrospective cohort study on outcomes and feasibility as a bridge to LVAD implantation.

    Balder JW, Kraaijeveld A, Szymanski M, et al.

    Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation 2025; (33(7-8)):226-231 doi:10.1007/s12471-025-01963-2.

    PMID: 40608285
  104. 104

    Clinical impact of congestion in patients admitted for cardiogenic shock.

    Cherbi M, Roubille F, Bonnefoy E, et al.

    Archives of cardiovascular diseases 2026; (119(3)):201-209 doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2025.08.006.

    PMID: 40967978
  105. 105

    Incidence of post-intensive care syndrome and its impact on the quality of life of the family caregiver.

    Quiñonez-Mora MA, Villada-Gómez JS, León-Giraldo H, Casallas-Vega A

    Revista Cuidarte 2025; (16(2)):e4527 doi:10.15649/cuidarte.4527.

    PMID: 40989545
  106. 106

    Clinical diagnostic criteria for cardiogenic shock should be based on pathophysiology.

    Ostadal P

    Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology 2026; (104()):1-5 doi:10.1139/cjpp-2025-0224.

    PMID: 41135108
  107. 107

    Cardiogenic Shock.

    Thiele H, Hassager C

    The New England journal of medicine 2026; (394(1)):62-77 doi:10.1056/NEJMra2312086.

    PMID: 41467651
  108. 108

    Gender-specific associations between personality traits and mental health status of intensive care unit patients' family members.

    Wang C, Yi S, Tian T, et al.

    European journal of medical research 2026; (31(1)):253 doi:10.1186/s40001-025-03821-8.

    PMID: 41521285
  109. 109

    Cardiogenic Shock: A State-of-the-Art Review.

    Samuels A, Zolotarova T, Eisenberg MJ

    The American journal of cardiology 2026; (266()):42-51 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2026.02.024.

    PMID: 41708042
  110. 110

    Etiology, Management, and Outcomes of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Stage B Cardiogenic Shock.

    Mehta C, Has P, Mehta A, et al.

    Circulation. Heart failure 2026; e013814 doi:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.125.013814.

    PMID: 41711037
  111. 111

    Lactate/albumin ratio predicts 90-day mortality of cardiogenic shock patients.

    Liu H, Zhou J, Liu M, et al.

    Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) 2026; (21(1)):20251355 doi:10.1515/med-2025-1355.

    PMID: 41726146
  112. 112

    Prognostic validation and risk stratification of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions cardiogenic shock classification in a large, real-world intensive care unit cohort in South Korea.

    Cho H, Kang J, Han M, et al.

    Acute and critical care 2026; (41(1)):117-125 doi:10.4266/acc.004500.

    PMID: 41834637