Genetic Testing and Understanding Your Results
At a Glance
Genetic testing for hereditary cancer uses multi-gene panels to find mutations that increase your risk. While a positive result can change your screening plan, a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) is treated as a normal result and should not be used to make major medical decisions like surgery.
Genetic testing is no longer just about two genes. While BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most well-known, we now know that several other genes can also increase the risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers [1][2]. Testing is usually performed using a multi-gene panel, which is a single blood or saliva test that looks at many high-risk and moderate-risk genes simultaneously [3][1].
Who Should Consider Testing?
Doctors use specific “red flags” to determine who should be offered genetic testing. According to national guidelines (NCCN), you may be a candidate for testing if you or your family history includes:
- Early Onset: Breast cancer diagnosed at age 50 or younger [4].
- Specific Cancer Types: Any diagnosis of ovarian, pancreatic, or metastatic prostate cancer, regardless of age [5][6].
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Especially if diagnosed at age 60 or younger [4].
- Family Clusters: Multiple relatives on the same side of the family with breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancers [4][5].
- Ashkenazi Jewish Heritage: Due to a higher frequency of specific “founder” mutations in this population [5][7].
The Genes Beyond BRCA
Modern panels often look for other “drivers” of cancer risk. These include:
- PALB2: A high-risk gene that carries a lifetime breast cancer risk similar to BRCA2 [8][9].
- ATM and CHEK2: These are “moderate-penetrance” genes, meaning they increase risk, but often not as significantly as BRCA or PALB2 [9][10].
- TP53, CDH1, and PTEN: Mutations in these genes are rarer and are often associated with specific syndromes that may involve other organs, such as the stomach or thyroid [11][12].
Understanding Your Results
Genetic test results typically fall into one of three categories:
1. Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic
This is often called a “positive” result. It means a mutation was found that is known to increase cancer risk [2]. This result is actionable, meaning it will likely change your medical management, such as starting screenings earlier or considering preventive surgery [13][14].
2. Benign or Likely Benign
This is a “negative” result. It means the laboratory found no mutations or only found common genetic variations that do not affect your health [15].
3. Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
A Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) is a common but often confusing result. It means the lab found a change in a gene, but they do not yet have enough data to know if it is harmful or harmless [16][15].
- The Golden Rule for VUS: A VUS should not be used to make major medical decisions, such as choosing to have a double mastectomy [16][17].
- Management: Clinically, a VUS is treated as a “negative” or “normal” result. You should follow the screening guidelines based on your personal and family history, not the VUS itself [16][18]. Over time, most VUS results are eventually reclassified as benign [19][20].
Cascade Testing: Protecting Your Family
If you test positive for a pathogenic mutation, your biological relatives (parents, siblings, and children) have a 50% chance of carrying the same mutation [21].
Cascade testing is the process of testing these relatives for that specific mutation [21][22]. This is a powerful preventive tool because it allows your family members to learn their risk and start life-saving screenings before cancer ever develops [23][24]. Your genetic counselor can often provide a “family letter” to help you share this information with your loved ones [22].
Common questions in this guide
Who should consider genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer?
Does genetic testing only look for BRCA mutations?
What does a pathogenic or positive result mean on my genetic test?
What is a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)?
What is cascade testing for cancer genes?
Questions for Your Doctor
5 questions
- •Which specific genes were included in my testing panel, and why were those chosen?
- •If my result is a VUS, how often does your office check to see if that variant has been reclassified?
- •Do my test results change the age at which I should start cancer screenings?
- •Can you provide a 'family letter' that I can share with my relatives to help explain why they might need testing?
- •Does my insurance typically cover the cost of testing for my family members (cascade testing)?
Questions for You
3 questions
- •Which family members on both my mother's and father's sides have had cancer, and what types were they?
- •How do I feel about sharing my genetic test results with my siblings, children, or extended family?
- •If my result is a VUS, am I comfortable following the standard screening guidelines rather than seeking more aggressive surgery?
References
References (24)
- 1
Clinical Validity of Next-Generation Sequencing Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Detecting Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.
Yoo J, Lee GD, Kim JH, et al.
Annals of laboratory medicine 2020; (40(2)):148-154 doi:10.3343/alm.2020.40.2.148.
PMID: 31650731 - 2
A dominant RAD51C pathogenic splicing variant predisposes to breast and ovarian cancer in the Newfoundland population due to founder effect.
Dawson LM, Smith KN, Werdyani S, et al.
Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2020; (8(2)):e1070 doi:10.1002/mgg3.1070.
PMID: 31782267 - 3
Clinical Actionability of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment.
Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, et al.
JAMA oncology 2015; (1(7)):943-51 doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2690.
PMID: 26270727 - 4
Population prevalence of individuals meeting criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer testing.
Greenberg S, Buys SS, Edwards SL, et al.
Cancer medicine 2019; (8(15)):6789-6798 doi:10.1002/cam4.2534.
PMID: 31531966 - 5
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020.
Daly MB, Pilarski R, Yurgelun MB, et al.
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN 2020; (18(4)):380-391.
PMID: 32259785 - 6
Prevalence of Suspected Hereditary Cancer Syndromes and Germline Mutations Among a Diverse Cohort of Probands Reporting a Family History of Prostate Cancer: Toward Informing Cascade Testing for Men.
Chandrasekar T, Gross L, Gomella LG, et al.
European urology oncology 2020; (3(3)):291-297 doi:10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.010.
PMID: 31278035 - 7
Genetic education and peer support among Ashkenazi Jewish women in the United States at risk for and surviving with breast cancer.
Zamir T, Statman MR, Sleiman MM, et al.
Journal of genetic counseling 2025; (34(5)):e70121 doi:10.1002/jgc4.70121.
PMID: 41077736 - 8
Germline pathogenic variants of 11 breast cancer genes in 7,051 Japanese patients and 11,241 controls.
Momozawa Y, Iwasaki Y, Parsons MT, et al.
Nature communications 2018; (9(1)):4083 doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06581-8.
PMID: 30287823 - 9
Moderate penetrance genes complicate genetic testing for breast cancer diagnosis: ATM, CHEK2, BARD1 and RAD51D.
Graffeo R, Rana HQ, Conforti F, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2022; (65()):32-40 doi:10.1016/j.breast.2022.06.003.
PMID: 35772246 - 10
Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk Among Carriers of Germline Pathogenic Variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2.
Yadav S, Boddicker NJ, Na J, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2023; (41(9)):1703-1713 doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01239.
PMID: 36623243 - 11
Managing patients at genetic risk of breast cancer.
Pederson HJ, Padia SA, May M, Grobmyer S
Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine 2016; (83(3)):199-206 doi:10.3949/ccjm.83a.14057.
PMID: 26974991 - 12
Molecular Features and Clinical Management of Hereditary Gynecological Cancers.
Ueki A, Hirasawa A
International journal of molecular sciences 2020; (21(24)) doi:10.3390/ijms21249504.
PMID: 33327492 - 13
Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, et al.
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN 2021; (19(1)):77-102.
PMID: 33406487 - 14
The Role of Risk-Reducing Surgery in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
Hartmann LC, Lindor NM
The New England journal of medicine 2016; (374(5)):454-68 doi:10.1056/NEJMra1503523.
PMID: 26840135 - 15
Improving genetic diagnosis of hereditary tumor syndromes: From expanded gene panels to functional genomics.
Sauer M, Lucas MC, Prokosch V, et al.
International journal of cancer 2025; doi:10.1002/ijc.70274.
PMID: 41347847 - 16
Impact of Variant Reclassification in Cancer Predisposition Genes on Clinical Care.
Chiang J, Chia TH, Yuen J, et al.
JCO precision oncology 2021; (5()):577-584 doi:10.1200/PO.20.00399.
PMID: 34994607 - 17
Consensus Guidelines on Genetic` Testing for Hereditary Breast Cancer from the American Society of Breast Surgeons.
Manahan ER, Kuerer HM, Sebastian M, et al.
Annals of surgical oncology 2019; (26(10)):3025-3031 doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07549-8.
PMID: 31342359 - 18
Prevalence and molecular characteristics of DNA mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer in a Japanese hospital-based population.
Yamamoto A, Yamaguchi T, Suzuki O, et al.
Japanese journal of clinical oncology 2021; (51(1)):60-69 doi:10.1093/jjco/hyaa142.
PMID: 32844218 - 19
Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing.
Mersch J, Brown N, Pirzadeh-Miller S, et al.
JAMA 2018; (320(12)):1266-1274 doi:10.1001/jama.2018.13152.
PMID: 30264118 - 20
Reclassification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants of Unknown Significance in a Turkish Cohort; A Single-Center, Retrospective Study.
Özer L, Aktuna S, Ünsal E
European journal of breast health 2025; (21(4)):295-300 doi:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-5-2.
PMID: 40851390 - 21
Mainstreaming germline BRCA1/2 testing in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer in the North West of England.
Flaum N, Morgan RD, Burghel GJ, et al.
European journal of human genetics : EJHG 2020; (28(11)):1541-1547 doi:10.1038/s41431-020-0692-y.
PMID: 32651552 - 22
Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients.
George A, Riddell D, Seal S, et al.
Scientific reports 2016; (6()):29506 doi:10.1038/srep29506.
PMID: 27406733 - 23
Germline Pathogenic Variant Prevalence Among Latin American and US Hispanic Individuals Undergoing Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Ossa Gomez CA, Achatz MI, Hurtado M, et al.
JCO global oncology 2022; (8()):e2200104 doi:10.1200/GO.22.00104.
PMID: 35867948 - 24
Lynch syndrome in Mexican-Mestizo families: Genotype, phenotypes, and challenges in cascade testing among relatives at risk.
Rivero-García P, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Rodríguez Olivares JL, et al.
Heliyon 2024; (10(11)):e31855 doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31855.
PMID: 38947473
This page provides educational information about cancer genetic testing and interpreting results. Always consult your genetic counselor or oncologist for medical advice regarding your specific test results and screening plan.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.