Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 14 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Dermatology

Are There New Treatments for Treatment-Resistant LPP?

At a Glance

For treatment-resistant lichen planopilaris, clinical trials and newer medicines may help control active inflammation, but evidence is still limited and some risks are serious. Treatment can prevent further scarring, but cannot regrow follicles already destroyed.

When standard treatments for lichen planopilaris (LPP) have not worked, there are newer therapies, off-label medications, and clinical trials currently being studied that you can discuss with a hair loss specialist. Navigating permanent hair loss is emotionally taxing, and it is natural to look for new solutions. While evidence for emerging options is still limited and many are considered preliminary, some approaches have shown promise in reducing active inflammation.

It is important to set realistic expectations: the medical goal of these treatments is to stabilize the condition and stop further scarring, as follicles that have already been destroyed by LPP cannot be restored. Discussing your exact diagnosis, past treatments, and personal risk tolerance with your doctor is the best way to determine if an emerging therapy or clinical trial is a safe and appropriate next step for you.

Understanding Clinical Trials and Active Disease

Researchers are actively testing new approaches for LPP through clinical trials. Before exploring trials or experimental therapies, your dermatologist will evaluate whether you have active inflammation (the immune system is currently attacking follicles) rather than just permanent scarring.

Assessing Disease Activity: Doctors typically look for signs of active disease through symptoms (itching, burning), a scalp examination, a “hair pull” test, and trichoscopy (using a special magnifier to look at the scalp). While a scalp biopsy can help confirm LPP or rule out other conditions, it is not always mandatory for diagnosis, and trial requirements vary [1][2].

What Joining a Trial Involves: Clinical trials are experiments to see if a treatment is safe and effective. Depending on the trial’s phase and design, participation may involve:

  • Randomization and Placebos: You might be randomly assigned to receive a placebo (an inactive substance) rather than the active drug.
  • Washout Periods: Trials often require you to stop your current treatments for a specific period before starting the study [2][3]. Never stop or taper your current treatments independently to try to qualify for a trial; doing so can cause your disease to flare.
  • Commitment: Trials usually require extra clinic visits, blood draws, standardized photographs, and sometimes scalp biopsies.
  • Rights: You always have the right to withdraw from a clinical trial at any time.

JAK Inhibitors: An Emerging Approach

The most discussed emerging class of medications for LPP are JAK inhibitors (Janus kinase inhibitors), which work by blocking specific inflammatory pathways. These medications are off-label (approved by the FDA for other diseases, but not specifically for LPP, meaning insurance coverage and monitoring may differ).

  • Tofacitinib: A retrospective study (looking back at past patient records) of 74 adults with treatment-resistant LPP found that oral tofacitinib significantly reduced disease activity [4]. However, in a 37-person randomized trial (the gold standard of studies), tofacitinib improved some clinical signs but did not significantly outperform a placebo in lowering the overall LPP Activity Index (a standardized score used to measure disease severity) [5].
  • Brepocitinib: A small 52-week Phase 2a trial (an early-stage trial testing basic safety and preliminary efficacy) involving patients with scarring alopecias found improvements in clinical severity and markers of inflammation [6].

Serious Safety Risks and Monitoring: It is crucial to understand that JAK inhibitors carry serious, potentially life-threatening risks. Regulatory agencies have issued warnings for some JAK inhibitors regarding increased risks of serious or opportunistic infections (like tuberculosis or shingles), major cardiovascular events (like heart attacks), blood clots, and certain cancers. These risks vary depending on the specific drug and your personal factors, such as age, smoking history, and history of cardiovascular disease or blood clots.
Taking a JAK inhibitor requires a strict safety plan [4]. This is not just “regular blood tests”; it involves baseline screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis, vaccination planning, and ongoing monitoring of liver function, kidney function, blood counts, and cholesterol (lipids) [4].

Seek urgent medical advice for serious infection symptoms, chest pain, shortness of breath, or a painful swollen leg if taking these medications.

Other Off-Label Systemic Medications

If standard therapies fail, a specialist may suggest other off-label immune-modulating medications. There is no universally agreed-upon sequence for these drugs; they are highly individualized based on your health profile.

Medication Evidence in LPP Major Safety Risks & Monitoring Needs
Methotrexate Shown to be effective in small trials, sometimes outperforming hydroxychloroquine [7]. Can suppress blood counts and cause serious pregnancy-related harm. Requires regular liver and blood count monitoring [7].
Cyclosporine Had similar efficacy to methotrexate in a small 6-month trial [8]. Can negatively affect kidney function and increase blood pressure. Requires close monitoring of both [8].
Mycophenolate Mofetil A meta-analysis of 94 patients showed partial or complete response in many, though adverse effects are common [9]. Can cause blood count suppression, serious pregnancy-related harm, liver enzyme elevation, and increased infection risk [9].
Pioglitazone A prospective study showed it helped prevent disease progression in some patients [10]. Requires consideration of heart failure risks, fluid retention, weight changes, and bone fracture risks [10].

Note: Never start, stop, or adjust immune-modulating medications without direct supervision from your doctor.

Biologics and Procedural Therapies

  • Biologics: Medications targeting specific immune proteins (like IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors) have been used in isolated case reports for LPP [11][12]. A case report is the lowest level of evidence; these drugs are not established therapies for LPP and require much more research [13].
  • Procedural Treatments: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and low-level light therapy have been explored in small studies [14][3]. While they may help improve symptoms or provide slight cosmetic density improvements, it is not established that they control the underlying follicular inflammation of LPP [14]. They can be costly out-of-pocket and should not replace proven anti-inflammatory medical treatments.

Common questions in this guide

Are clinical trials available for treatment-resistant lichen planopilaris?
Researchers are studying JAK inhibitors and other approaches for lichen planopilaris, but trial availability and recruiting status can change. Eligibility often depends on having active inflammation, previous treatments, overall health, and the study’s specific requirements.
What newer treatments are being considered for treatment-resistant LPP?
Options being studied or used off-label include JAK inhibitors, methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and pioglitazone. Biologic medicines, platelet-rich plasma, and low-level light therapy have also been reported, but evidence for many of these approaches remains limited.
Do JAK inhibitors work for treatment-resistant lichen planopilaris?
Research on JAK inhibitors in LPP is mixed. A retrospective study found improvement with tofacitinib, while a randomized trial did not show a significant overall advantage over placebo; a small early trial of brepocitinib reported improvements in scarring alopecia. These medicines are not specifically approved for LPP and can have serious risks.
What safety checks are needed before taking a JAK inhibitor for LPP?
Depending on the medicine and your health history, screening may include tests for tuberculosis and hepatitis, vaccination review, blood counts, liver and kidney tests, and cholesterol testing. Doctors also consider the risks of serious infections, cardiovascular events, blood clots, and certain cancers.
How can I tell whether my LPP is still active or has caused permanent scarring?
Active LPP may cause symptoms such as itching or burning and can be assessed with a scalp examination, hair-pull test, and trichoscopy. A scalp biopsy may help confirm the diagnosis or rule out other conditions, but it is not always required and trial requirements vary.
Can treatment regrow hair from follicles already destroyed by LPP?
No. Once LPP has permanently destroyed a hair follicle, treatment cannot restore that follicle. The main goal of treatment is to calm active inflammation and prevent additional scarring and hair loss.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Lichen planopilaris.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (14)
  1. 1

    Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: review and update of diagnostic and therapeutic features.

    Fechine COC, Valente NYS, Romiti R

    Anais brasileiros de dermatologia 2022; (97(3)):348-357 doi:10.1016/j.abd.2021.08.008.

    PMID: 35379508
  2. 2

    Valchlor® in the Treatment of Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Single Arm, Open-label, Exploratory Study.

    Pincelli TP, Heckman MG, Cochuyt JJ, Sluzevich JC

    International journal of trichology 2020; (12(5)):220-226 doi:10.4103/ijt.ijt_16_20.

    PMID: 33531744
  3. 3

    Application of superluminescent diodes (sLED) in the treatment of scarring alopecia - A pilot study.

    Gerkowicz A, Bartosińska J, Wolska-Gawron K, et al.

    Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2019; (28()):195-200 doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.09.006.

    PMID: 31546043
  4. 4

    Efficacy and Safety of Tofacitinib in Lichen Planopilaris: A Retrospective Series of 74 Patients.

    Goodarzi M, Dadkhahfar S, Yahyaei F, et al.

    Archives of Iranian medicine 2025; (28(1)):24-28 doi:10.34172/aim.33237.

    PMID: 40001326
  5. 5

    Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of adults with lichen planopilaris: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

    Mahmoudi H, Daneshpajooh M, Dadkhahfar S, et al.

    International immunopharmacology 2025; (162()):115129 doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115129.

    PMID: 40582144
  6. 6

    A phase 2a trial of brepocitinib for cicatricial alopecia.

    David E, Shokrian N, Del Duca E, et al.

    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2025; (92(3)):427-434 doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.073.

    PMID: 39461505
  7. 7

    Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Methotrexate versus Hydroxychloroquine in Preventing Lichen Planopilaris Progress: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Naeini FF, Saber M, Asilian A, Hosseini SM

    International journal of preventive medicine 2017; (8()):37 doi:10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_156_17.

    PMID: 28584619
  8. 8

    Cyclosporine or methotrexate, which one is more promising in the treatment of lichen planopilaris?; A comparative clinical trial.

    Fatemi Naeini F, Mohaghegh F, Jelvan M, et al.

    International immunopharmacology 2020; (86()):106765 doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106765.

    PMID: 32674048
  9. 9

    Mycophenolate mofetil and lichen planopilaris: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mostafa N, Phan K, Smith S

    The Journal of dermatological treatment 2022; (33(1)):369-372 doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1755416.

    PMID: 32281437
  10. 10

    Efficacy and safety of pioglitazone in lichen planopilaris in comparison with hydroxychloroquine: Prospective non-inferiority study.

    Kapetanovic I, Zivanovic D, Soldatovic I, et al.

    Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG 2026; doi:10.1111/ddg.70362.

    PMID: 42543900
  11. 11

    Successful treatment of rare linear lichen planopilaris with Ixekizumab.

    Ahmed H, Petkar M, Steinhoff M

    The Journal of dermatological treatment 2023; (34(1)):2201364 doi:10.1080/09546634.2023.2201364.

    PMID: 37026832
  12. 12

    Recalcitrant lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia responding to tildrakizumab.

    Trindade de Carvalho L, Meah N, Wall D, Sinclair R

    Dermatologic therapy 2020; (33(4)):e13694 doi:10.1111/dth.13694.

    PMID: 32458516
  13. 13

    Off-label use of biologics and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for scarring alopecias: a narrative review.

    Agarwal P, Ajuchi O, Lukowiak TM, Rao BK

    Archives of dermatological research 2025; (317(1)):803 doi:10.1007/s00403-025-04301-z.

    PMID: 40488905
  14. 14

    A systematic review of procedural modalities in the treatment of lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and discoid lupus erythematosus.

    Tanha AE, Ghane Y, Jafarzadeh A, Goodarzi A

    Lasers in medical science 2025; (40(1)):431 doi:10.1007/s10103-025-04704-4.

    PMID: 41081974

This page provides educational information about emerging treatments and clinical trials for treatment-resistant LPP; it does not replace medical advice. Discuss eligibility, medication risks, and monitoring with a dermatologist or hair-loss specialist, and do not change treatment without supervision.