Can Spinal Arthritis Falsely Raise Your DXA T-Score?
At a Glance
Spinal osteoarthritis can create bone spurs and other dense changes that make the spine look denser on a DXA scan, falsely raising the T-score. Doctors compare usable hip, forearm, and spine measurements with fracture history to assess osteoporosis risk.
Yes, spinal osteoarthritis and other age-related changes can make your bone density scan look better than it actually is. It is a common situation for conditions like arthritis in the lower back to create falsely high results on a DXA scan, which can sometimes mask underlying osteoporosis.
Discovering you might have osteoporosis can be worrying, and confusing test results do not help. Understanding how DXA scans work can empower you to ask the right questions about your bone health and your scan report.
What is a T-Score?
A DXA scan estimates your bone mineral density and reports it as a T-score. This number compares your bone density to the average bone density of a healthy young adult. In general, a normal T-score is -1.0 or higher, low bone mass (osteopenia) is between -1.0 and -2.5, and osteoporosis is -2.5 or lower. However, when extra bone or calcification is present in the scanned area, this score can become artificially inflated, making the bones look denser than they truly are [1] [2].
How Arthritis and Artifacts Interfere with the Measurement
When you get a DXA scan, the machine takes a two-dimensional picture to estimate how much mineral is in your bones. The machine cannot easily tell the difference between healthy, strong bone and extra, irregular bone or calcifications that form due to other conditions.
As we age, it is common to develop wear-and-tear arthritis (osteoarthritis or degenerative spondylosis) in the spine. This often causes the body to grow osteophytes, commonly known as bone spurs. Because the DXA scan measures all the X-ray-blocking material in its path, these dense bone spurs are added to your total measurement [1].
As a result, your spine’s T-score can be artificially raised [2]. In some cases, a normal-looking DXA T-score in the lower spine does not rule out osteoporosis and might underestimate your real risk for fractures [3].
Other conditions can also cause this diagnostic pitfall, including:
- Scoliosis (a sideways curvature of the spine) or positioning problems during the scan [2] [1].
- Vascular calcification (calcium buildup in the large blood vessels near the spine) [1].
- Previous spinal compression fractures. Important note: While a collapsed vertebra (spinal bone) adds dense, compressed material that artificially inflates the reading [1], a fragility fracture is itself a major sign of osteoporosis. You should not disregard sudden back pain, loss of height, or pain after a minor fall just because your scan looks “normal.”
Why Doctors Look at Multiple Areas
Because degenerative changes in the spine are so common, spine-hip discordance—where the spine score looks normal or high, but the hip score shows osteoporosis—is a frequent finding as people age [4] [5].
This discordance can sometimes just be a natural difference in your skeleton, but often it means the spine measurement is compromised [1]. Because of this, doctors do not rely on just one area. The total hip or the femoral neck (the top of the thigh bone) are usually less affected by the specific bone spurs that form in the spine, making them a very useful standard for diagnosis [6]. The hip can, however, be affected by its own arthritis, positioning problems, or surgical hardware. If neither the spine nor the hips can be interpreted accurately, doctors may look at the 1/3 radius (a specific measurement in the forearm).
Getting an Accurate Picture
If your doctor suspects that your spine T-score is affected by arthritis or artifacts, they will not just rely on a single number. They can take several steps to ensure your bone health is accurately assessed:
- Review the images: The clinician can look at the DXA images to identify bone spurs or fractures. They will often exclude specific vertebrae from the final score calculation if those bones are clearly distorted by an artifact (something that interferes with the measurement) [1] [2].
- Rely on valid sites and overall risk: Your care team will determine which scan sites are actually valid for diagnosis, because measurements across different skeletal sites are not always interchangeable [7]. Treatment decisions are based on your lowest valid T-score along with your age, medical history, medications, and any previous fragility fractures.
- Consider other tests: In cases of advanced degenerative changes where the DXA is completely uninterpretable, a doctor might suggest Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) [8] [9]. QCT takes a 3D image and measures the inner spongy bone separately from the outer bone spurs. However, QCT has different diagnostic thresholds, does not directly measure bone strength, involves more radiation and cost, and is not required for most patients.
Common questions in this guide
Can spinal osteoarthritis make my DXA T-score look higher than it really is?
Does a normal spine T-score rule out osteoporosis?
Which part of a DXA scan is used when the spine is affected by arthritis?
What happens if some vertebrae are distorted by arthritis on my scan?
Would I need another test if my DXA results are unclear?
Questions For You
Answer a question to get research tailored to you. Your answers are private.
Related questions
Show more
Get notified when new evidence is published on osteoporosis.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Which of my reported scan sites are valid for diagnosis, and is there a significant spine-hip discordance?
- 2.Were any individual vertebrae excluded from my spine score calculation due to arthritis or artifacts, and why?
- 3.How do my fracture history and other clinical risk factors affect my treatment plan, beyond just the T-score numbers?
- 4.Given my DXA results, do I need any additional assessment for an existing vertebral fracture?
References
References (9)
- 1
The Effect of the Lumbar Vertebral Malpositioning on Bone Mineral Density Measurements of the Lumbar Spine by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Izadyar S, Golbarg S, Takavar A, Zakariaee SS
Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2016; (19(3)):277-81.
PMID: 26778450 - 2
Artifacts affecting dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bone mineral density measurements: a case report and review of the literature.
White K, Shakir MKM, Nguyen C, Hoang TD
Journal of medical case reports 2025; (19(1)):290 doi:10.1186/s13256-025-05353-5.
PMID: 40544295 - 3
Advancing osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture prediction: role of quantitative CT and future research directions.
Mori Y, Mori N
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2024; (144(8)):3895-3896 doi:10.1007/s00402-024-05512-1.
PMID: 39180582 - 4
Quantitative computed tomography and opportunistic bone density screening by dual use of computed tomography scans.
Brett AD, Brown JK
Journal of orthopaedic translation 2015; (3(4)):178-184 doi:10.1016/j.jot.2015.08.006.
PMID: 30035056 - 5
Factors affecting spine-femur discordance in the percentage of young adult mean on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the elderly population: a retrospective study.
Akiyama S, Tanaka T, Udaka J, et al.
BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2022; (23(1)):76 doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05015-3.
PMID: 35062924 - 6
Osteoporosis should be evaluated by bone mineral density at the combination of the lumbar spine and ipsilateral femoral neck in female patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for knee arthroplasty: A retrospective observational study.
Kubo M, Nosaka Y, Hasegawa T, et al.
Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2025; (30(3)):513-517 doi:10.1016/j.jos.2024.07.005.
PMID: 39069429 - 7
Comparison of three plain radiography methods for evaluating proximal humerus bone strength in women.
Handa A, Uchiyama Y, Shinpuku E, Watanabe M
Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association 2019; (24(2)):243-249 doi:10.1016/j.jos.2018.09.020.
PMID: 30361168 - 8
Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance.
Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Morgan SL, et al.
Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2016; (19(2)):127-40.
PMID: 27020004 - 9
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density: 2022 Update.
, Yu JS, Krishna NG, et al.
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 2022; (19(11S)):S417-S432 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.007.
PMID: 36436967
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Ask your clinician to interpret your DXA results alongside your fracture history and other risk factors.