Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 17 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Cardiology

David vs. Bentall Procedure for Marfan Syndrome

At a Glance

The main difference between the David and Bentall procedures is that the David procedure saves your natural heart valve so you do not need lifelong blood thinners. The Bentall procedure uses a mechanical valve that is highly durable but requires daily blood-thinning medication.

If you are facing prophylactic surgery to repair an enlarged aortic root due to Marfan syndrome, the choice between the David procedure and the Bentall procedure comes down to a major trade-off: keeping your natural valve to avoid lifelong blood thinners (David) versus choosing a highly durable mechanical valve that requires daily medication (Bentall). Both surgeries have excellent survival rates and long-term track records, and often, your specific heart anatomy will dictate which option is safest for you [1][2].

The David Procedure (Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement)

The David procedure, technically called valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR), involves replacing the bulging section of your aorta with a synthetic tube (graft) while carefully preserving and reattaching your own natural aortic valve inside it [3]. Because this surgery requires intricate reshaping of the valve tissues, it has a steep learning curve and is best performed by surgeons at specialized centers who do a high volume of these specific procedures.

The Benefits:

  • No blood thinners: Because you keep your natural valve, you do not need to take lifelong anticoagulation (blood-thinning medications like warfarin) [4][5].
  • Safer for pregnancy: Because you are not on warfarin, you avoid the severe risks of birth defects associated with this blood thinner. For many young women with Marfan syndrome, this is a major deciding factor.
  • Lower risk of bleeding and clots: Avoiding blood thinners significantly reduces your long-term risk of major bleeding complications and thromboembolic events (blood clots) [6][7].

The Trade-off:

  • Risk of future valve repair: Since Marfan syndrome affects connective tissue throughout the body, your natural valve leaflets might stretch or leak over time, potentially requiring a second surgery decades later [8]. However, long-term data on the David procedure for Marfan patients is highly encouraging; studies tracking patients up to 20 years show exceptional durability and very low reoperation rates [9].

The Bentall Procedure (Composite Root Replacement)

The Bentall procedure replaces both your enlarged aorta and your aortic valve with a single, pre-assembled graft containing an artificial valve [10]. Because Marfan patients are usually young at the time of surgery, surgeons typically use a mechanical valve rather than a tissue (biological) valve. Biological valves wear out much faster in younger, active bodies, which would guarantee another open-heart surgery down the road.

The Benefits:

  • Highly durable: The mechanical Bentall procedure is considered a safe, standard operation that provides a permanent, reliable fix for both the root and the valve [10][11].

The Trade-offs:

  • Lifelong blood thinners: Mechanical valves carry a high risk of blood clots forming on the artificial material. To prevent this, you must take lifelong anticoagulation medication [8]. This requires routine blood tests, dietary consistency, and careful management of bleeding risks.
  • Pregnancy risks: Warfarin is teratogenic, meaning it poses a high risk of causing severe birth defects. This makes managing a pregnancy very complex and high-risk.
  • Audible ticking: Mechanical valves make a noticeable, rhythmic clicking or ticking sound. While many patients get used to this, it can be a psychological adjustment and sometimes noticeable in quiet rooms or when trying to sleep.

(Note: In some cases, a biological tissue valve can be used in a Bentall procedure if a patient absolutely cannot take blood thinners but does not qualify for a David procedure. However, this comes with the guarantee that the tissue valve will eventually fail and require a repeat operation.)

Comparing Your Options

Feature David Procedure (Valve-Sparing) Bentall Procedure (Mechanical)
Valve Used Your natural valve Artificial mechanical valve
Blood Thinners Not required Lifelong requirement
Pregnancy Safe (no warfarin risks) High risk (warfarin causes birth defects)
Future Surgery Possible, if your natural valve stretches over time Rare, the mechanical valve is essentially permanent
Daily Life No ticking sound, no dietary restrictions Audible ticking sound, frequent blood tests

How Your Anatomy Influences the Decision

While the David procedure is generally preferred for Marfan patients to avoid blood thinners [12][13], it is not an option for everyone. Your surgeon will carefully evaluate your heart using imaging like echocardiograms or cardiac MRIs to look at the exact shape and condition of your valve [14].

  • When David is possible: If your valve leaflets are healthy, symmetric, and not overly stretched, your surgeon can safely preserve them [15].
  • When Bentall is necessary: If your aortic root is extremely dilated, or if the valve leaflets are already severely stretched, damaged, or mismatched in size, preserving them could lead to a leaky valve (aortic regurgitation) right away [16][17]. In these cases, the Bentall procedure is the safest and most reliable choice [15].

Ultimately, the best procedure is the one that safely addresses the aneurysm while matching your specific anatomy and lifestyle goals.

Common questions in this guide

What is the main difference between the David and Bentall procedures?
The David procedure preserves your natural aortic valve, while the Bentall procedure replaces both your enlarged aorta and your valve with artificial parts. Because the Bentall procedure usually uses a mechanical valve, it requires taking lifelong blood-thinning medication.
Why is the David procedure generally preferred for young women with Marfan syndrome?
The David procedure allows you to avoid taking blood-thinning medications like warfarin. Warfarin carries a high risk of causing severe birth defects, making the David procedure significantly safer for patients who plan to become pregnant in the future.
Will I need another open-heart surgery if I choose the David procedure?
Because Marfan syndrome affects connective tissue, your natural valve could stretch or leak over time, which might require a second surgery decades later. However, long-term studies show that the David procedure is highly durable with very low reoperation rates.
Can everyone with Marfan syndrome have a David procedure?
No. The David procedure is only possible if your natural valve leaflets are healthy, symmetric, and not overly stretched. If your aortic root is extremely dilated or the valve is severely damaged, a Bentall procedure is the safest option.
What are the long-term effects of the Bentall procedure?
The Bentall procedure is a permanent, reliable fix for your aorta and valve, but you will need lifelong blood-thinning medication to prevent clots. You will also need routine blood tests, and you may hear a noticeable ticking sound from the mechanical valve.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Are my aortic valve leaflets currently healthy, symmetric, and suitable for a valve-sparing (David) procedure?
  2. 2.How many valve-sparing root replacements (David procedures) do you personally perform each year?
  3. 3.If we plan for a David procedure, what is your backup plan if you find my valve cannot be saved once surgery begins?
  4. 4.Given my age and family planning goals, how should we weigh the risks of mechanical valve anticoagulation against the potential need for future reoperations?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (17)
  1. 1

    Tricuspidization technique with reimplantation for a bicuspid aortic valve: a case report.

    Hohri Y, Numata S, Okita Y, Yaku H

    General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases 2022; (1(1)):3 doi:10.1186/s44215-022-00005-2.

    PMID: 39516987
  2. 2

    Valve Sparing vs Composite Valve Graft Root Replacement: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

    Ram E, Lau C, Dimagli A, et al.

    The Annals of thoracic surgery 2024; (117(1)):69-76 doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.05.049.

    PMID: 37541560
  3. 3

    Valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David I procedure) in Marfan disease: single-centre 20-year experience in more than 100 patients†.

    Martens A, Beckmann E, Kaufeld T, et al.

    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2019; (55(3)):476-483 doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy300.

    PMID: 30169770
  4. 4

    Aortopathy in repaired tetralogy of Fallot and David procedure.

    Ichikawa N, Shiina Y, Abe K, Niwa K

    Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy 2024; (14(6)):1228-1235 doi:10.21037/cdt-24-264.

    PMID: 39790192
  5. 5

    Short-term results of flanged Bentall de Bono and valve-sparing David V procedures for the treatment of aortic root aneurysms.

    Ergün S, Dedemoğlu M, Rabuş MB, et al.

    Cardiovascular journal of Africa 2018; (29(4)):241-245 doi:10.5830/CVJA-2018-021.

    PMID: 30059126
  6. 6

    Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: A comparison of Bentall versus aortic valve-sparing procedures.

    Price J, Magruder JT, Young A, et al.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2016; (151(2)):330-6.

    PMID: 26704057
  7. 7

    Outcomes of Aortic Valve-Sparing Operations in Marfan Syndrome.

    David TE, David CM, Manlhiot C, et al.

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015; (66(13)):1445-53.

    PMID: 26403341
  8. 8

    Bentall Procedure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Mookhoek A, Korteland NM, Arabkhani B, et al.

    The Annals of thoracic surgery 2016; (101(5)):1684-9.

    PMID: 26857635
  9. 9

    Improved Outcomes of Reimplantation vs Remodeling in Marfan Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Study.

    Elbatarny M, David TE, David CM, et al.

    The Annals of thoracic surgery 2023; (115(3)):576-582 doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.068.

    PMID: 35841950
  10. 10

    Eighteen years of clinical experience with a modification of the Bentall button technique for total root replacement.

    Karangelis D, Tzertzemelis D, Demis AA, et al.

    Journal of thoracic disease 2018; (10(12)):6733-6741 doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.11.61.

    PMID: 30746218
  11. 11

    Long term outcomes of valve sparing aortic root replacement versus conventional aortic root replacement using a mechanical prosthesis by propensity score matching.

    Güneş G, Tel Üstünışık Ç, Arapi B, et al.

    Scientific reports 2026; (16(1)):4004 doi:10.1038/s41598-025-34107-y.

    PMID: 41484192
  12. 12

    Early and late experience of the modified aortic reimplantation operation.

    Chemtob RA, Rajeswaran J, Kalahasti V, et al.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2025; (170(1)):126-134.e6 doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.08.025.

    PMID: 39181443
  13. 13

    Pseudoaneurysm formation after valve sparing root replacement in children with Loeys-Dietz syndrome.

    Liu RH, Fraser CD, Zhou X, et al.

    Journal of cardiac surgery 2018; (33(6)):339-343 doi:10.1111/jocs.13709.

    PMID: 29726037
  14. 14

    Mitral annular disjunction and its progression during childhood in Marfan syndrome.

    Doan TT, Iturralde Chavez A, Valdes SO, et al.

    European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging 2024; (25(9)):1306-1314 doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeae125.

    PMID: 38728377
  15. 15

    Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: a primer for cardiologists.

    Mazine A, Chu MWA, El-Hamamsy I, Peterson MD

    Current opinion in cardiology 2022; (37(2)):156-164 doi:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000951.

    PMID: 35058413
  16. 16

    Multicentre experience with valve-sparing aortic root replacement by means of combined remodelling and external aortic ring annuloplasty in patients with Marfan syndrome.

    Accord RE, Mecozzi G, Aalberts JJJ, et al.

    Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2023; (37(6)) doi:10.1093/icvts/ivad200.

    PMID: 38109664
  17. 17

    Impact of annulus-cusp mismatch on mid-term outcomes of aortic valve repair with valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

    Yamashita G, Sugaya A, Sakai J, et al.

    Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2025; (40(3)) doi:10.1093/icvts/ivaf048.

    PMID: 40036379

This page explains surgical options for Marfan syndrome for educational purposes only. Always consult your cardiothoracic surgeon to determine which procedure is safest for your specific anatomy and lifestyle.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Marfan syndrome.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.