Do I Need a Hysteroscopic Specialist for Asherman Surgery?
At a Glance
For Asherman syndrome surgery, choose a surgeon with substantial experience using operative hysteroscopy to remove uterine scar tissue. Direct camera-guided treatment can protect the remaining lining, but repeat surgery and uncertain fertility outcomes remain possible.
In this answer
4 sections
Yes, you should seek a surgeon with substantial, documented experience in treating Asherman syndrome. While a regular OB/GYN is highly skilled in many areas of women’s health, removing intrauterine adhesions (scar tissue) requires specialized techniques to safely open the uterus without damaging the remaining healthy tissue [1]. Because the stakes for your future fertility and menstrual health are high, traveling to see an expert or seeking a second opinion is often a necessary and justified step in your care.
The Risks of “Blind” Procedures
A traditional Dilation and Curettage (D&C) is considered a “blind” procedure because the doctor uses instruments inside the uterus without a camera. Using blind scraping to remove established Asherman syndrome adhesions carries significant risks.
Without direct visualization, a surgeon cannot selectively target the scar tissue. This means they can easily scrape away the delicate basal layer of your endometrium (the base layer from which your uterine lining grows each month), which can cause further damage and lead to more severe adhesions [2] [3].
Instead, specialists use operative hysteroscopy. A thin, lighted tube with a camera (a hysteroscope) is inserted into the uterus, allowing the surgeon to see the scar tissue directly and selectively remove it while leaving the healthy lining intact [1].
“Cold” Scissors vs. Thermal Energy
One of the main reasons to seek an expert is their choice of surgical tools. Many regular surgical procedures use thermal energy (heat or electricity) to cut tissue and stop bleeding. However, experts in Asherman syndrome typically use “cold” microscopic scissors [4] [5].
“Cold” means the instruments do not use heat or electricity. Using thermal energy inside the uterus can risk burning the extremely fragile, thin patches of healthy lining that remain. By using cold scissors, a specialist can carefully snip away the adhesions, leaving a healthy, vascular (blood-rich) surface behind [4]. Protecting this delicate remaining lining drastically improves the chances of restoring the cavity and recovering your fertility [4] [6]. (While cold scissors are widely preferred to minimize thermal injury, it is worth noting that some experienced surgeons safely use specific electrosurgical tools depending on the case, and randomized trials have shown similar outcomes when performed by experts [7].)
Navigating a Distorted Uterus
Severe Asherman syndrome can completely glue the walls of the uterine cavity together. When the cavity is heavily scarred, it becomes incredibly difficult to tell where the scar tissue ends and the normal uterine wall begins.
If a surgeon without extensive Asherman’s experience attempts the surgery, there is a higher risk of uterine perforation (accidentally poking a hole through the wall of the uterus) [8] [9]. To reduce this risk, specialists often perform the surgery under simultaneous ultrasound guidance or use a laparoscope (a camera in the belly) to monitor the outside of the uterus while they work on the inside [3] [10].
What Surgery Can and Cannot Guarantee
Surgery is often not a one-time fix. Adhesions have a high rate of recurrence (around 25% or more), especially in severe cases, meaning you may need multiple procedures [11]. After surgery, experts often use barriers (like balloons or special gels) and hormone therapy to prevent scar tissue from reforming, followed by a “second-look” hysteroscopy a few weeks later to clear any new, mild scarring [11] [12].
Furthermore, while surgery can successfully open the cavity, it cannot guarantee normal lining regeneration or pregnancy. Your reproductive prognosis depends heavily on how much healthy endometrial tissue survived the initial trauma [13]. If you do achieve pregnancy after being treated for severe Asherman syndrome, you will need close obstetric monitoring, as there is an increased risk of placental complications (such as placenta accreta) and miscarriage [14].
Common questions in this guide
Why should I choose a specialist for Asherman syndrome surgery?
Is operative hysteroscopy safer than D&C for Asherman syndrome?
Are cold scissors better than heat for removing Asherman adhesions?
Can ultrasound or laparoscopy help during severe Asherman surgery?
Will surgery for Asherman syndrome restore my fertility?
What follow-up helps prevent Asherman adhesions from returning?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.How many hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (scar removal) procedures for Asherman syndrome do you perform each year?
- 2.Do you prefer to use 'cold' microscopic scissors or thermal energy to remove the scar tissue, and why?
- 3.Would ultrasound or laparoscopic guidance be useful in my specific case to help reduce the risk of perforation?
- 4.What is your postoperative plan for preventing the adhesions from returning, and when is a 'second-look' procedure typically scheduled?
- 5.Based on my imaging and history, what are realistic expectations for restoring my periods and future fertility?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (14)
- 1
Etiology, Risk Factors, and Management of Asherman Syndrome.
Khan Z
Obstetrics and gynecology 2023; (142(3)):543-554 doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005309.
PMID: 37490750 - 2
A System Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Intrauterine Adhesions.
Ma H, Yang M
Obstetrical & gynecological survey 2026; (81(6)):293-303 doi:10.1097/OGX.0000000000001555.
PMID: 42241335 - 3
Asherman's syndrome: current perspectives on diagnosis and management.
Dreisler E, Kjer JJ
International journal of women's health 2019; (11()):191-198 doi:10.2147/IJWH.S165474.
PMID: 30936754 - 4
Hysteroscopic Intrauterine Adhesiolysis Using the "Ploughing" Technique With Cold Scissors.
Zhang A, Jamail G, Xue M, et al.
Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2015; (22(6)):934-5.
PMID: 25999022 - 5
Adhesions and Anti-Adhesion Systems Highlights.
Torres-De La Roche LA, Campo R, Devassy R, et al.
Facts, views & vision in ObGyn 2019; (11(2)):137-149.
PMID: 31824635 - 6
Comparison of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with electrosurgery instrument or hysteroscopic scissors in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions of infertile or recurrent pregnancy loss women.
Li Y, Li Y, Wang Y, et al.
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2025; (311(4)):1063-1071 doi:10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8.
PMID: 39673604 - 7
Cold scissors ploughing technique versus electrosurgical excision for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Liu Y, Xie X, Xue P, et al.
International journal of surgery (London, England) 2025; (111(2)):2002-2009 doi:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002182.
PMID: 39715152 - 8
A Challenging Case Report of Severe Asherman's Syndrome: Managing Uterine Perforation During Surgery.
Hayati K, Susilo AFP, Ritonga MA, Djuwantono T
Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology 2026; (2026()):8897371 doi:10.1155/crog/8897371.
PMID: 42006529 - 9
Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: efficacy and safety.
Sanad AS, Aboulfotouh ME
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2016; (294(2)):411-6 doi:10.1007/s00404-016-4107-9.
PMID: 27129970 - 10
A Novel Ultrasound-Guided Technique for Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis in High-Risk Patients.
Kriseman M, Schutt A, Appleton J, et al.
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 2019; (38(5)):1383-1387 doi:10.1002/jum.14815.
PMID: 30208242 - 11
Results of centralized Asherman surgery, 2003-2013.
Hanstede MM, van der Meij E, Goedemans L, Emanuel MH
Fertility and sterility 2015; (104(6)):1561-8.e1.
PMID: 26428306 - 12
Adjuvants to prevent reformation of adhesions following adhesiolysis for Asherman syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guo J, Shi X, Yu F, et al.
Human fertility (Cambridge, England) 2023; (26(4)):797-814 doi:10.1080/14647273.2023.2254492.
PMID: 37778374 - 13
Dominant factors affecting reproductive outcomes of fertility-desiring young women with intrauterine adhesions.
Zhao J, Chen Q, Cai D, et al.
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2017; (295(4)):923-927 doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4314-z.
PMID: 28233115 - 14
Treatment of intrauterine adhesions and subsequent pregnancy outcomes in an in vitro fertilization population.
Mortimer RM, Lanes A, Srouji SS, et al.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2024; (231(5)):536.e1-536.e10 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.026.
PMID: 38777163
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Discuss your surgeon’s experience, surgical approach, and fertility goals with a qualified clinician.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Asherman syndrome.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.