Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 17 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Rheumatology · Eosinophilic Fasciitis

Eosinophilic Fasciitis vs Scleroderma: Key Differences

At a Glance

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) and systemic scleroderma both cause severe skin thickening, but they are very different diseases. EF affects the deep fascia tissue, spares the fingers and face, and does not damage internal organs. Crucially, EF responds well to corticosteroids, which are avoided in scleroderma.

If your skin biopsy returned a diagnosis of eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) instead of systemic scleroderma, your doctor has found that your condition is an entirely different disease with a generally favorable outlook. While both conditions cause severe skin thickening, eosinophilic fasciitis does not cause Raynaud’s phenomenon or damage to the nailfold capillaries, and it usually spares the fingers and face [1][2][3]. EF often features the “groove sign” (where veins look like sunken trenches on the arms or legs) [4][5][6]. Crucially, an EF diagnosis completely changes your treatment plan, as EF typically responds very well to corticosteroid medications, which are generally avoided in systemic scleroderma [7][8][9].

Why They Are Initially Confused

Eosinophilic fasciitis and systemic scleroderma are both rare conditions that cause your skin to become thick, hard, and bound down [10][2][3]. This severe skin thickening can restrict your movement and cause joint contractures (stiffness that prevents joints from fully straightening). Because of these visible similarities, EF is considered a major “mimic” of systemic scleroderma, and doctors often suspect systemic scleroderma first.

However, a deep skin biopsy reveals what is happening under the surface. Systemic scleroderma involves scarring in the upper layers of the skin (the dermis), while EF causes severe inflammation in the fascia—the deep layer of connective tissue that surrounds your muscles [10][3][11]. To accurately diagnose EF, doctors must perform a full-thickness biopsy that removes tissue all the way down to the muscle layer [12][13][14]. This is typically an outpatient procedure done under local anesthesia.

Key Differences in Symptoms

Your doctor rules out systemic scleroderma and confirms EF based on several specific clinical differences:

  • Raynaud’s Phenomenon: Almost all patients with systemic scleroderma experience Raynaud’s phenomenon (fingers turning white, blue, and red in the cold). This is typically absent in EF [1][2][3].
  • Capillary Changes: Systemic scleroderma damages the tiny blood vessels at the base of the fingernails. When your doctor looks at your cuticles under magnification, nailfold capillary abnormalities are absent in EF [2][3].
  • Location of Skin Thickening: Systemic scleroderma usually starts by affecting the fingers (a condition called sclerodactyly) and the face. EF typically spares the fingers and face, instead affecting the forearms, upper arms, lower legs, thighs, and trunk [1][2][3].
  • The “Groove Sign”: This is a classic hallmark of EF. Because the deep fascia becomes swollen and thick while the superficial veins remain normal, the veins appear to sink inward [3][5]. When you elevate your affected arm or leg, you may see visible depressions or “grooves” running along the path of the veins [4][5][6].
  • Internal Organ Involvement: Systemic scleroderma frequently causes scarring in internal organs, such as the lungs, esophagus, heart, and kidneys [2][3]. EF is primarily limited to the deep skin tissues and does not typically involve these internal organs, which gives EF a much more favorable long-term prognosis [2][3].
  • Blood Work: EF gets its name from eosinophils, a type of white blood cell. Many patients with EF initially have highly elevated levels of eosinophils in their bloodstream, which is not a defining feature of systemic scleroderma [15][10][8]. However, it is important to note that these levels can fluctuate and may be completely normal later in the disease or after starting treatment, so a normal eosinophil count does not rule out EF [15][8].

How the Diagnosis Changes Your Treatment

Getting the correct diagnosis of eosinophilic fasciitis is critical because the treatment path is entirely different from systemic scleroderma.

For EF, the first-line treatment is high-dose systemic corticosteroids (such as prednisone) [8][6][9]. Patients with EF usually have a dramatic and rapid improvement when treated with these steroids, often noticing reduced stiffness and skin softening quickly [8][6][9]. However, because high-dose steroids can cause side effects like weight gain, sleep disturbances, or mood changes, your doctor will monitor you closely and aim to slowly taper the dose as your symptoms improve.

In stark contrast, high-dose corticosteroids are usually avoided in systemic scleroderma. They are less effective for scleroderma skin thickening and can trigger a dangerous complication called scleroderma renal crisis, which severely damages the kidneys [7].

If your EF does not respond completely to corticosteroids alone, or if your doctor wants to reduce your steroid dose to minimize side effects, they may add a second-line immunosuppressive medication, such as methotrexate [12][16][17].

Common questions in this guide

How is eosinophilic fasciitis different from systemic scleroderma?
While both cause severe skin thickening, eosinophilic fasciitis typically spares your fingers and face and does not cause Raynaud's phenomenon. EF also involves inflammation deep in the fascia rather than the upper skin layers, and it rarely affects internal organs like the lungs or kidneys.
What is the groove sign in eosinophilic fasciitis?
The groove sign is a classic visual symptom of eosinophilic fasciitis where the veins on your arms or legs look like sunken trenches. This occurs because the deep fascia tissue swells and thickens while the superficial veins remain normal, creating visible depressions when you elevate the limb.
Why do eosinophilic fasciitis and scleroderma have completely different treatments?
Eosinophilic fasciitis usually responds very well to high-dose corticosteroids like prednisone, which quickly reduce stiffness. In contrast, high-dose steroids are usually avoided in systemic scleroderma because they are less effective for skin thickening and can trigger dangerous kidney complications.
How do doctors confirm an eosinophilic fasciitis diagnosis?
To accurately diagnose eosinophilic fasciitis, doctors must perform a deep, full-thickness skin biopsy that goes all the way down to the muscle layer. This allows the pathologist to see the severe inflammation in the deep fascia, which confirms EF and rules out scleroderma.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Since my biopsy shows eosinophilic fasciitis, what is the best starting dose of corticosteroids for my situation, and what side effects should I watch for?
  2. 2.How quickly should I expect to see an improvement in my skin tightness after starting corticosteroids?
  3. 3.Do I need any baseline blood work to check my eosinophil levels, and how often will we monitor them?
  4. 4.What are the criteria for potentially adding a second-line medication like methotrexate to my treatment plan?
  5. 5.Are there specific physical therapy exercises I should be doing to help with my joint stiffness and prevent contractures?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (17)
  1. 1

    Eosinophilic fasciitis following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

    Antuña VL, Puchades F, Tapial JM, et al.

    JAAD case reports 2023; (36()):11-14 doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.11.038.

    PMID: 37131494
  2. 2

    An unusual case of eosinophilia, myalgia and skin contractures: Shulman's disease revisited.

    Anadure RK, Shankar S, Mohimen A, et al.

    Medical journal, Armed Forces India 2022; (78(Suppl 1)):S273-S276 doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.12.006.

    PMID: 36147388
  3. 3

    Eosinophilic Fasciitis and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: An Exceptional Association in Young Adults.

    Jabbouri R, Bouanani N, Aniq Filali R, Aasfara J

    Cureus 2022; (14(4)):e23896 doi:10.7759/cureus.23896.

    PMID: 35530826
  4. 4

    Eosinophilic Fasciitis following Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy with Pembrolizumab.

    Zampeli E, Zervas E

    Mediterranean journal of rheumatology 2021; (32(4)):376-377 doi:10.31138/mjr.32.4.376.

    PMID: 35128334
  5. 5

    A "groovy" diagnosis: Eosinophilic fasciitis.

    Korsten P

    Clinical case reports 2020; (8(12)):3545-3546 doi:10.1002/ccr3.3128.

    PMID: 33363970
  6. 6

    Eosinophilic fasciitis: an atypical presentation of a rare disease.

    Cabral C, Novais A, Araujo D, et al.

    Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) 2019; (65(3)):326-329 doi:10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.326.

    PMID: 30994827
  7. 7

    Drug-induced scleroderma-like lesion.

    Hamaguchi Y

    Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology 2022; (71(2)):163-168 doi:10.1016/j.alit.2021.08.005.

    PMID: 34465533
  8. 8

    Lessons of the month 2: Connecting the clues: limb swelling and pain.

    Prossor T, Sriskandarajah K, Vonberg FW, Dani M

    Clinical medicine (London, England) 2020; (20(1)):105-106 doi:10.7861/clinmed.2019-0293.

    PMID: 31941742
  9. 9

    Eosinophilic fasciitis.

    Lamback EB, Resende FS, Lenzi TC

    Anais brasileiros de dermatologia 2016; (91(5 suppl 1)):57-59 doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164683.

    PMID: 28300895
  10. 10

    Eosinophilic Fasciitis Without Skin Sclerosis.

    Komori K, Rokutanda R

    The Journal of rheumatology 2023; (50(7)):963-964 doi:10.3899/jrheum.220600.

    PMID: 36455945
  11. 11

    Groove Sign in Eosinophilic Fasciitis.

    Mourad AI, Lehman JS, Mydlarski PR

    Mayo Clinic proceedings 2021; (96(8)):2184 doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.04.001.

    PMID: 34353471
  12. 12

    Diagnosis and treatment of early eosinophilic fasciitis: a case report.

    Ma J, Cai Y, Shao H, et al.

    Journal of medical case reports 2025; (19(1)):373 doi:10.1186/s13256-025-05440-7.

    PMID: 40731023
  13. 13

    MRI Findings of Eosinophilic Fasciitis.

    Kubincová M, Vanhoenacker FM

    Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology 2022; (106(1)):48 doi:10.5334/jbsr.2805.

    PMID: 35651918
  14. 14

    A Literature Review of Eosinophilic Fasciitis with an Illustrative Case.

    Das J, Chinoy H, Dick J, et al.

    Current rheumatology reviews 2017; (13(2)):113-120 doi:10.2174/1573397112666161007154703.

    PMID: 27839505
  15. 15

    [Clinical characteristics, ultrasonic diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of eosinophilic fasciitis: a retrospective single-center analysis of 45 cases].

    Yang J, Wan Y, Zhang J, Zhu J

    Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University 2023; (43(1)):145-152 doi:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.01.21.

    PMID: 36856224
  16. 16

    Eosinophilic fasciitis: a case series with an emphasis on therapy and induction of remission.

    Tull R, Hoover WD, De Luca JF, et al.

    Drugs in context 2018; (7()):212529 doi:10.7573/dic.212529.

    PMID: 30302114
  17. 17

    [Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman's disease): Diagnostic and therapeutic review].

    Sène D

    La Revue de medecine interne 2015; (36(11)):738-45.

    PMID: 26385125

This page explains the medical differences between eosinophilic fasciitis and systemic scleroderma for educational purposes only. Always consult your rheumatologist or dermatologist for an accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment plan.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Scleroderma.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.