Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Urology · Prostate Cancer

How Are the Six Prostate Cancer Risk Groups Defined?

At a Glance

Prostate cancer risk groups from very-low to very-high are based on PSA, biopsy grade, how far the tumor has grown, how many biopsy samples contain cancer, and sometimes PSA density. They estimate progression risk in cancer that has not spread and help guide treatment discussions.

Prostate cancer is not just one disease; it ranges from very slow-growing tumors to aggressive cancers that require immediate treatment. To help you and your doctor decide on the best treatment plan, medical teams use a six-tier risk system (based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, or NCCN, guidelines) for clinically localized prostate cancer [1]. These groups—ranging from very-low to very-high risk—estimate the statistical likelihood of the cancer progressing or recurring. They are based on specific details from your biopsy, physical exam, and blood tests.

Scope: What Are These Categories For?

These groups apply only to prostate cancer that has not spread to lymph nodes or distant organs [1]. If imaging shows spread (cN1 or M1 disease), treatment follows a different framework. The risk group is a pre-treatment estimate used to guide decisions; it does not replace staging imaging or guarantee your personal biological outcome [1].

The Key Factors Used to Determine Your Risk

To find your risk group, your doctor looks at several specific inputs from your diagnostic tests:

  • PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen): The level of this protein in your blood.
  • Grade Group (and Gleason Score): A grading system that describes how abnormal the cancer cells look under a microscope [1]. Modern pathology uses a 1-to-5 scale:
    • Grade Group 1: Gleason 3+3=6 (Scores 2–5 are rarely assigned in modern systems) [2][3].
    • Grade Group 2: Gleason 3+4=7 [4].
    • Grade Group 3: Gleason 4+3=7 [5].
    • Grade Group 4: Gleason 8 [6].
    • Grade Group 5: Gleason 9 or 10 [6].
  • Clinical T Stage: An estimate of how far the tumor has grown, based primarily on a physical exam (digital rectal exam) and sometimes informed by imaging [1].
    • T1c: The tumor cannot be felt during an exam but was found on a needle biopsy (often done because of a high PSA) [7].
    • T2a, T2b, T2c: The tumor can be felt but is confined to the prostate. (T2a covers less than half of one side, T2b covers more than half of one side, T2c involves both sides) [2][8].
    • T3a: The cancer is growing just outside the prostate capsule (the outer lining of the prostate), also called extraprostatic extension [9].
    • T3b: The cancer has invaded the seminal vesicles (the glands behind the prostate that produce semen) [10].
    • T4: The cancer has invaded other specific nearby structures like the bladder or rectum [11].
  • Biopsy Core Details: The absolute number of positive cores (samples containing cancer) and the percentage of each core involved. Note: If you had both MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies, calculating the exact percentage of positive cores can be complex. Rely on your doctor’s calculation rather than just dividing the numbers yourself [12][13].
  • PSA Density: Your PSA level divided by the volume of your prostate [14].

The Six Risk Groups Defined

1. Very-Low Risk

This category indicates a very low likelihood of early progression. To be in this group, all of the following must be true:

  • Clinical stage T1c [7].
  • Grade Group 1 (Gleason 3+3=6) [7].
  • PSA level less than 10 ng/mL [7].
  • PSA density less than 0.15 ng/mL/cm³ [7].
  • Fewer than 3 positive biopsy cores (usually meaning exactly 1 or 2 cores containing cancer) [7][15].
  • No more than 50% cancer involvement in any single biopsy core [7][15].

2. Low Risk

This category also indicates a low likelihood of progression. You are in this group if your cancer meets the core low-risk criteria but fails at least one of the stricter very-low criteria (like stage, PSA density, or core counts). To be in this group, all of these must be true:

  • Clinical stage T1 to T2a [2].
  • Grade Group 1 (Gleason 3+3=6) [2].
  • PSA level less than 10 ng/mL [2].

3. Favorable-Intermediate Risk

Intermediate risk implies a moderate chance of progression, but “favorable” means it lacks the most concerning intermediate features. You must have all of the following to be in this category:

  • Exactly one intermediate-risk factor. (The three intermediate factors are: a PSA of 10 to 20 ng/mL inclusive, clinical stage T2b–T2c, or Grade Group 2 or 3) [8][12][4].
  • A Grade Group of 1 or 2 (meaning the primary, most common Gleason pattern is 3, such as in Gleason 3+3 or 3+4). Having Grade Group 3 (Gleason 4+3=7) automatically excludes you from the favorable group [4][12].
  • Less than 50% of your total biopsy cores containing cancer [12][4].

4. Unfavorable-Intermediate Risk

This group has features suggesting a higher likelihood of progression than the favorable group. You are placed in this category if you have any one of the following unfavorable features:

  • Two or more intermediate-risk factors [5][4].
  • Grade Group 3 (a primary Gleason pattern of 4, such as Gleason 4+3=7) [5][4].
  • 50% or more of your total biopsy cores contain cancer [5][16].

5. High Risk

High-risk prostate cancer has a higher probability of spreading outside the prostate. You are in this group if you have any one of these standard high-risk features:

  • Clinical stage T3a (extraprostatic extension) [9][10].
  • Grade Group 4 or 5 (Gleason score 8, 9, or 10) [17][9].
  • PSA level strictly greater than 20 ng/mL [17][9].

6. Very-High Risk

This category strongly suggests a significant likelihood of local spread or progression. You fall into this group if you have any one of the following criteria:

  • Clinical stage T3b or T4 (tumor invading seminal vesicles or nearby structures) [10][11].
  • A primary Gleason pattern of 5 (the most aggressive cell appearance) [17][11].
  • More than 4 biopsy cores (meaning 5 or more) that contain Grade Group 4 or 5 cancer (Gleason 8–10) [17][11].
  • Two or more of the standard high-risk features mentioned in the high-risk section above [11][18].

What This Risk Group Does and Does Not Tell You

Your risk group helps organize your treatment options, but it is not the only deciding factor. Age, life expectancy, overall health, genomic testing, and specific pathology features (such as cribriform or intraductal patterns) also influence recommendations.

  • Active Surveillance: Often recommended for very-low and low-risk cancers. This is a structured, active monitoring program using regular PSA tests, physical exams, MRIs, and repeat biopsies aiming to detect progression early while preserving quality of life [1]. This is different from Watchful Waiting, which is a symptom-focused approach usually chosen when curative treatment is less beneficial due to other major health conditions.
  • Active Treatment: Intermediate, high, and very-high-risk categories usually prompt discussions about active treatments. This could mean surgery (radical prostatectomy) or definitive radiation combined with androgen-deprivation therapy (hormone therapy). Treatment is personalized; not every high-risk patient undergoes surgery, and radiation is tailored to individual surgical or biopsy findings.

Seeing a risk label can be frightening. It is entirely reasonable to get a second opinion on your pathology slides or to consult with both a urologist (surgeon) and a radiation oncologist before making a decision.

Common questions in this guide

How is a prostate cancer risk group determined?
For prostate cancer that has not spread to lymph nodes or distant organs, clinicians combine the PSA blood test, biopsy Grade Group or Gleason score, clinical stage, which estimates how far the tumor has grown, biopsy core findings, and sometimes PSA density. The result is a pre-treatment estimate of progression or recurrence risk; it does not replace imaging or predict exactly what will happen to one person.
What qualifies as very-low-risk prostate cancer?
Very-low risk requires all of these: clinical stage T1c, Grade Group 1 (Gleason 3+3=6), PSA below 10 ng/mL, PSA density below 0.15 ng/mL/cm³, fewer than three positive biopsy cores, and no more than 50% cancer in any one core. This usually means one or two positive cores, although your care team should make the final calculation.
What is the difference between low-risk and very-low-risk prostate cancer?
Low-risk prostate cancer is clinical stage T1 to T2a, Grade Group 1, and PSA below 10 ng/mL. Very-low risk uses those favorable findings plus stricter limits on stage, PSA density, the number of positive biopsy cores, and the amount of cancer in each core. A cancer can therefore be low risk without meeting every very-low-risk requirement.
How are favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer different?
Favorable-intermediate risk has exactly one intermediate-risk feature—PSA of 10 to 20 ng/mL, stage T2b or T2c, or Grade Group 2 or 3—along with Grade Group 1 or 2 and cancer in less than 50% of biopsy cores. Unfavorable-intermediate risk includes two or more of those features, Grade Group 3, or cancer in at least 50% of biopsy cores. These distinctions help clinicians compare treatment options.
What makes prostate cancer high risk or very-high risk?
High-risk disease has at least one of these: stage T3a, Grade Group 4 or 5, or PSA above 20 ng/mL. Very-high-risk disease includes stage T3b or T4, a primary Gleason pattern of 5, more than four biopsy cores containing Grade Group 4 or 5 cancer, or at least two high-risk features. These categories indicate a greater chance of local spread or progression, but they do not by themselves prove that cancer has spread to distant organs.
Does a prostate cancer risk group show whether the cancer has spread?
No. The six groups are designed for clinically localized prostate cancer without lymph-node or distant-organ spread and are assigned before treatment. Imaging and other staging assessments are still needed, and the group estimates risk rather than guaranteeing an individual outcome.
What treatments are considered for each prostate cancer risk group?
Active surveillance is often considered for very-low- and low-risk cancer, using scheduled PSA tests, examinations, imaging, and sometimes repeat biopsies. Intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk cancer usually leads to discussions about active treatment, such as radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy with androgen-deprivation therapy. Watchful waiting is different from active surveillance and is generally focused on symptoms when curative treatment may offer less benefit.

Questions For You

Answer a question to get research tailored to you. Your answers are private.

Get notified when new evidence is published on prostate adenocarcinoma.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.What exact NCCN risk group am I in, and what specific clinical or pathology factors placed me in that category?
  2. 2.Did my biopsy include both targeted and systematic cores, and how did you count them to determine my percentage of positive cores for risk calculation?
  3. 3.What is my PSA density, and how does my prostate volume impact my overall risk group?
  4. 4.Does my pathology report note any specific features, such as intraductal or cribriform patterns, that might make my cancer act more aggressively than the standard risk group suggests?
  5. 5.Based on my overall health and risk group, what are the distinct pros and cons of active surveillance, surgery, and radiation therapy for my specific case?

References

References (18)
  1. 1

    Artificial Intelligence Versus Conventional Methods for NCCN Risk Stratification in Localized Prostate Cancer (2020-2025): A Systematic Review.

    Hassan WA, Meligy OAE, Talaat IM

    Prostate cancer 2026; (2026()):9923959 doi:10.1155/proc/9923959.

    PMID: 42483695
  2. 2

    Pattern of Radiotherapy Treatment in Low-Risk, Intermediate-Risk, and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Analysis of National Cancer Database.

    Agrawal R, Dey A, Datta S, et al.

    Cancers 2022; (14(22)) doi:10.3390/cancers14225503.

    PMID: 36428595
  3. 3

    Genomic Correlates to the Newly Proposed Grading Prognostic Groups for Prostate Cancer.

    Rubin MA, Girelli G, Demichelis F

    European urology 2016; (69(4)):557-560 doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.040.

    PMID: 26563871
  4. 4

    Optimizing Treatment in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

    Nabid A, Carrier N, Vigneault E, et al.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2021; (111(3)):732-740 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.04.013.

    PMID: 33901566
  5. 5

    Number of Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Factors Predicts Pathologic Upstaging and Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the SEARCH Database.

    Zumsteg ZS, Chen Z, Howard LE, et al.

    The Prostate 2017; (77(2)):154-163 doi:10.1002/pros.23255.

    PMID: 27683213
  6. 6

    Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy for Patients With Very-high Risk Localized Prostate Cancer in Clinical Stages T2 and T3a.

    Kikuchi D, Numakura K, Miyauchi K, et al.

    In vivo (Athens, Greece) 2026; (40(2)):1098-1105 doi:10.21873/invivo.14264.

    PMID: 41760337
  7. 7

    National Trends in the Utilization of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Very Low Risk Prostate Cancer.

    May A, Henke J, Au D, et al.

    Urology 2019; (130()):79-85 doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.043.

    PMID: 31047912
  8. 8

    Use and early mortality outcomes of active surveillance in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

    Butler SS, Mahal BA, Lamba N, et al.

    Cancer 2019; (125(18)):3164-3171 doi:10.1002/cncr.32202.

    PMID: 31150125
  9. 9

    Three-tiered Subclassification System of High-risk Prostate Cancer in Men Managed With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Treatment Decision-making.

    Lamba N, Butler S, Mahal BA, et al.

    Urology 2020; (145()):197-203 doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.040.

    PMID: 32763323
  10. 10

    Unification of favourable intermediate-, unfavourable intermediate-, and very high-risk stratification criteria for prostate cancer.

    Zumsteg ZS, Zelefsky MJ, Woo KM, et al.

    BJU international 2017; (120(5B)):E87-E95 doi:10.1111/bju.13903.

    PMID: 28464446
  11. 11

    Radiation Facility Volume and Survival for Men With Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radiation and Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

    Sebastian N, Goyal S, Liu Y, et al.

    JAMA network open 2023; (6(8)):e2327637 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27637.

    PMID: 37552479
  12. 12

    National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?

    Aghazadeh MA, Frankel J, Belanger M, et al.

    The Journal of urology 2018; (199(5)):1196-1201 doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.049.

    PMID: 29288120
  13. 13

    The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.

    Epstein JI, Amin MB, Fine SW, et al.

    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 2021; (145(4)):461-493 doi:10.5858/arpa.2020-0015-RA.

    PMID: 32589068
  14. 14

    Limited Relevance of the Very Low Risk Prostate Cancer Classification in the Modern Era: Results from a Large Institutional Active Surveillance Cohort.

    Shee K, Cowan JE, Balakrishnan A, et al.

    European urology 2023; (84(1)):9-12 doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.013.

    PMID: 36870794
  15. 15

    Pathological outcomes in men with prostate cancer who are eligible for active surveillance.

    Wang SC, Chen CC, Yang CK, et al.

    Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA 2018; (81(4)):348-351 doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2017.07.008.

    PMID: 28988599
  16. 16

    Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.

    Yang DD, Mahal BA, Muralidhar V, et al.

    European urology focus 2019; (5(1)):69-76 doi:10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.011.

    PMID: 28753811
  17. 17

    Outcomes of very high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: Validation study from 3 centers.

    Sundi D, Tosoian JJ, Nyame YA, et al.

    Cancer 2019; (125(3)):391-397 doi:10.1002/cncr.31833.

    PMID: 30423193
  18. 18

    Optimizing oncological and functional outcomes with wide resection techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for very high-risk prostate cancer: A single-institution retrospective study.

    Ozawa Y, Koike S, Aoki K, et al.

    Surgical oncology 2025; (59()):102192 doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102192.

    PMID: 39954455

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your urologist and oncology team should interpret your PSA, biopsy, stage, and treatment options in the context of your health.