Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Oncology · Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

How Common Is Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Compared With DCIS?

At a Glance

In U.S. estimates, DCIS makes up about 20% to 25% of new breast cancer diagnoses, while invasive cancers make up 75% to 80%; about 70% to 80% of invasive cancers are IDC. “Invasive” means the cancer has moved beyond its original duct or lobule, not that it is automatically metastatic.

Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)—increasingly referred to by pathologists as invasive carcinoma of no special type—is the most common type of breast cancer. When looking at broad United States population estimates for all new breast cancer diagnoses, roughly 20% to 25% are ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), while the remaining 75% to 80% are invasive breast cancers [1][2].

Of those invasive cancers, approximately 70% to 80% are invasive ductal carcinoma [3].

A critical fact to understand right away: “invasive” does not mean your cancer is metastatic or Stage IV. “Invasive” simply means the cancer cells have stepped outside the exact location where they formed, but many invasive cancers are caught early and remain localized to the breast or nearby lymph nodes.

Invasive Breast Cancer vs. DCIS

Breast cancers are broadly categorized based on whether the abnormal cells have broken through the natural barriers of the breast’s milk ducts or milk-producing glands (lobules).

  • Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): DCIS is defined as non-invasive (or pre-invasive) because the abnormal cells are confined entirely within the milk ducts [4]. They have not broken through the duct wall (the basement membrane) into the surrounding breast tissue [5]. Roughly 50,000 cases of DCIS are diagnosed each year in the United States [6], accounting for about 1 in 5 (20–25%) of all new breast cancer diagnoses [1][2].
  • Invasive Breast Cancer: If the cancer cells break through the basement membrane of a duct or lobule into the surrounding breast tissue, the diagnosis becomes invasive [4][5]. The vast majority of newly diagnosed breast cancers (close to 80%) fall into this category [7].

If your biopsy shows both DCIS and an invasive cancer, your care team will primarily base your treatment plan and overall stage on the invasive component.

Breakdown of Invasive Breast Cancers

When a tumor is invasive, pathologists further classify it by its histology, which means how the cells look under a microscope. While percentages can vary slightly depending on the specific registry and year, general estimates show:

  • Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC): This is the most common subtype, representing about 70% to 80% of all invasive breast cancers [3].
  • Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC): The second most common type, making up approximately 10% to 15% of invasive breast cancers [8][9].
  • Mixed and Rare Subtypes: A small percentage of cancers have a mix of ductal and lobular features, or belong to rarer subtypes like tubular or mucinous carcinomas [10][11].

What Do These Statistics Mean for My Outlook?

While it is natural to wonder what incidence statistics mean for your future, how common a cancer is does not determine its severity or your prognosis. Knowing that IDC is the most common type of breast cancer simply means that oncologists have extensive experience treating it, and there is a wealth of research guiding standard-of-care treatments.

Instead of population statistics, your individual outlook is determined by a formal assessment called prognostic staging [12][13]. This formal stage combines:

  • Anatomic Stage: The physical size of the tumor and whether cancer cells have spread to nearby lymph nodes or other parts of the body [12].
  • Tumor Biology (Biomarkers): Whether your cancer cells are fueled by hormones (estrogen and progesterone receptors, or ER/PR) or overexpress a growth-promoting protein called HER2 [14].
  • Tumor Grade: How abnormal the cancer cells look compared to healthy cells, which helps estimate how aggressively the cancer may behave [15].

Beyond formal staging, other personal factors guide your specific treatment decisions:

  • Genomic Assays: For certain early-stage, hormone-receptor-positive cancers, specialized tests (like Oncotype DX or MammaPrint) analyze the genes within the tumor. These help predict recurrence risk and whether chemotherapy will be beneficial, though they are not used for every patient [14].
  • Your Age and Overall Health: Your body’s ability to tolerate different treatments and any other health conditions you may have play a major role in your care plan [16].

Because breast cancer is biologically complex, two people with IDC can have completely different treatment paths and outlooks [17][18]. Discussing your specific pathology report with your care team will give you a much more accurate picture of your outlook than general population statistics [14].

Common questions in this guide

How common are DCIS and invasive breast cancers in the United States?
Broad U.S. estimates suggest that DCIS accounts for about 20% to 25% of new breast cancer diagnoses, while invasive breast cancers account for about 75% to 80%. About 70% to 80% of invasive breast cancers are invasive ductal carcinoma.
Is invasive ductal carcinoma always metastatic or stage IV?
No. “Invasive” means cancer cells have broken through the normal barrier around a duct or lobule into nearby breast tissue; it does not mean the cancer has spread to distant organs. Many invasive breast cancers are found while still limited to the breast or nearby lymph nodes.
What happens if a biopsy shows both DCIS and invasive cancer?
When both are present, the invasive component generally guides the overall stage and the main treatment plan. Your team will also consider tumor size, lymph node findings, biomarkers, and grade when planning care.
What factors matter more than IDC’s overall frequency for my outlook?
Your outlook depends mainly on anatomic stage, including tumor size and lymph node status, along with ER, PR, and HER2 results and tumor grade. For some early-stage hormone-receptor-positive cancers, genomic tests can help estimate recurrence risk and the likely benefit of chemotherapy; age and overall health also matter.
Is IDC the most common type of invasive breast cancer?
Yes. Invasive ductal carcinoma accounts for roughly 70% to 80% of invasive breast cancers, making it the most common subtype. Invasive lobular carcinoma is the next most common, at approximately 10% to 15%.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Is there an invasive component as well as DCIS in my specimen, and which measurement determines my stage?
  2. 2.What are my specific ER, PR, HER2, and tumor grade results, and are any of these still pending?
  3. 3.What is my anatomic stage based on the size of the tumor and my lymph node status?
  4. 4.Do my specific tumor characteristics make me a candidate for genomic testing like Oncotype DX or MammaPrint?
  5. 5.How does my formal prognostic stage influence the treatment options you are recommending?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (18)
  1. 1

    Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question.

    van Seijen M, Lips EH, Thompson AM, et al.

    British journal of cancer 2019; (121(4)):285-292 doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0478-6.

    PMID: 31285590
  2. 2

    Microcalcification crystallography as a potential marker of DCIS recurrence.

    Gosling SB, Arnold EL, Davies SK, et al.

    Scientific reports 2023; (13(1)):9331 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33547-8.

    PMID: 37291276
  3. 3

    Proteomics-Based Identification of Dysregulated Proteins and Biomarker Discovery in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, the Most Common Breast Cancer Subtype.

    Neagu AN, Whitham D, Seymour L, et al.

    Proteomes 2023; (11(2)) doi:10.3390/proteomes11020013.

    PMID: 37092454
  4. 4

    Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast arising in a solitary intraductal papilloma.

    Badrawi N, AlSayegh AA

    Radiology case reports 2023; (18(2)):449-451 doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2022.11.014.

    PMID: 36439917
  5. 5

    Single Cell Expression Analysis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Identifies Complex Genotypic-Phenotypic Relationships Altering Epithelial Composition.

    Qin X, Strand SH, Lee MR, et al.

    bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2024; doi:10.1101/2023.10.10.561724.

    PMID: 39386437
  6. 6

    Chemokine Signaling Facilitates Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survival and Invasion through Fibroblast-Dependent Mechanisms.

    Brummer G, Acevedo DS, Hu Q, et al.

    Molecular cancer research : MCR 2018; (16(2)):296-308 doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0308.

    PMID: 29133591
  7. 7

    The Association Between Periodontal Disease and Breast Cancer in a Prospective Cohort Study.

    Jia M, Wu Z, Vogtmann E, et al.

    Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2020; (13(12)):1007-1016 doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0018.

    PMID: 32727823
  8. 8

    Lobular breast cancer: incidence and genetic and non-genetic risk factors.

    Dossus L, Benusiglio PR

    Breast cancer research : BCR 2015; (17()):37 doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0546-7.

    PMID: 25848941
  9. 9

    Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Invasive Lobular Cancer.

    Pramod N, Nigam A, Basree M, et al.

    The oncologist 2021; (26(6)):e943-e953 doi:10.1002/onco.13734.

    PMID: 33641217
  10. 10

    The Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes of Different Histological Subtypes in Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

    Liao HY, Zhang WW, Sun JY, et al.

    Journal of Cancer 2018; (9(2)):296-303 doi:10.7150/jca.22280.

    PMID: 29344276
  11. 11

    The 21-gene recurrence score in early non-ductal breast cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis.

    Makower D, Qin J, Lin J, et al.

    NPJ breast cancer 2022; (8(1)):4 doi:10.1038/s41523-021-00368-9.

    PMID: 35027533
  12. 12

    Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.

    Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, et al.

    CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2017; (67(4)):290-303 doi:10.3322/caac.21393.

    PMID: 28294295
  13. 13

    Validation Study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast Cancer.

    Weiss A, Chavez-MacGregor M, Lichtensztajn DY, et al.

    JAMA oncology 2018; (4(2)):203-209 doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4298.

    PMID: 29222540
  14. 14

    Clinical use of biomarkers in breast cancer: Updated guidelines from the European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM).

    Duffy MJ, Harbeck N, Nap M, et al.

    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 2017; (75()):284-298 doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.017.

    PMID: 28259011
  15. 15

    Incorporating Biology Into Breast Cancer Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Eighth Edition, Revisions and Beyond.

    Mittendorf EA, Bartlett JMS, Lichtensztajn DL, Chandarlapaty S

    American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting 2018; (38()):38-46 doi:10.1200/EDBK_200981.

    PMID: 30231409
  16. 16

    Validation of the newly proposed American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) breast cancer prognostic staging group and proposing a new staging system using the National Cancer Database.

    Li X, Zhang Y, Meisel J, et al.

    Breast cancer research and treatment 2018; (171(2)):303-313 doi:10.1007/s10549-018-4832-9.

    PMID: 29948405
  17. 17

    Breast Cancer Staging: Updates in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition, and Current Challenges for Radiologists, From the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging.

    Teichgraeber DC, Guirguis MS, Whitman GJ

    AJR. American journal of roentgenology 2021; (217(2)):278-290 doi:10.2214/AJR.20.25223.

    PMID: 33594908
  18. 18

    Breast cancer.

    Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, et al.

    Nature reviews. Disease primers 2019; (5(1)):66 doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2.

    PMID: 31548545

This page explains population differences between invasive ductal carcinoma and DCIS for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your breast cancer care team can interpret your pathology and prognosis.

Get notified when new evidence is published on breast ductal adenocarcinoma.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.