How Common Is Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Compared With DCIS?
At a Glance
In U.S. estimates, DCIS makes up about 20% to 25% of new breast cancer diagnoses, while invasive cancers make up 75% to 80%; about 70% to 80% of invasive cancers are IDC. “Invasive” means the cancer has moved beyond its original duct or lobule, not that it is automatically metastatic.
In this answer
3 sections
Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)—increasingly referred to by pathologists as invasive carcinoma of no special type—is the most common type of breast cancer. When looking at broad United States population estimates for all new breast cancer diagnoses, roughly 20% to 25% are ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), while the remaining 75% to 80% are invasive breast cancers [1][2].
Of those invasive cancers, approximately 70% to 80% are invasive ductal carcinoma [3].
A critical fact to understand right away: “invasive” does not mean your cancer is metastatic or Stage IV. “Invasive” simply means the cancer cells have stepped outside the exact location where they formed, but many invasive cancers are caught early and remain localized to the breast or nearby lymph nodes.
Invasive Breast Cancer vs. DCIS
Breast cancers are broadly categorized based on whether the abnormal cells have broken through the natural barriers of the breast’s milk ducts or milk-producing glands (lobules).
- Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): DCIS is defined as non-invasive (or pre-invasive) because the abnormal cells are confined entirely within the milk ducts [4]. They have not broken through the duct wall (the basement membrane) into the surrounding breast tissue [5]. Roughly 50,000 cases of DCIS are diagnosed each year in the United States [6], accounting for about 1 in 5 (20–25%) of all new breast cancer diagnoses [1][2].
- Invasive Breast Cancer: If the cancer cells break through the basement membrane of a duct or lobule into the surrounding breast tissue, the diagnosis becomes invasive [4][5]. The vast majority of newly diagnosed breast cancers (close to 80%) fall into this category [7].
If your biopsy shows both DCIS and an invasive cancer, your care team will primarily base your treatment plan and overall stage on the invasive component.
Breakdown of Invasive Breast Cancers
When a tumor is invasive, pathologists further classify it by its histology, which means how the cells look under a microscope. While percentages can vary slightly depending on the specific registry and year, general estimates show:
- Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC): This is the most common subtype, representing about 70% to 80% of all invasive breast cancers [3].
- Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC): The second most common type, making up approximately 10% to 15% of invasive breast cancers [8][9].
- Mixed and Rare Subtypes: A small percentage of cancers have a mix of ductal and lobular features, or belong to rarer subtypes like tubular or mucinous carcinomas [10][11].
What Do These Statistics Mean for My Outlook?
While it is natural to wonder what incidence statistics mean for your future, how common a cancer is does not determine its severity or your prognosis. Knowing that IDC is the most common type of breast cancer simply means that oncologists have extensive experience treating it, and there is a wealth of research guiding standard-of-care treatments.
Instead of population statistics, your individual outlook is determined by a formal assessment called prognostic staging [12][13]. This formal stage combines:
- Anatomic Stage: The physical size of the tumor and whether cancer cells have spread to nearby lymph nodes or other parts of the body [12].
- Tumor Biology (Biomarkers): Whether your cancer cells are fueled by hormones (estrogen and progesterone receptors, or ER/PR) or overexpress a growth-promoting protein called HER2 [14].
- Tumor Grade: How abnormal the cancer cells look compared to healthy cells, which helps estimate how aggressively the cancer may behave [15].
Beyond formal staging, other personal factors guide your specific treatment decisions:
- Genomic Assays: For certain early-stage, hormone-receptor-positive cancers, specialized tests (like Oncotype DX or MammaPrint) analyze the genes within the tumor. These help predict recurrence risk and whether chemotherapy will be beneficial, though they are not used for every patient [14].
- Your Age and Overall Health: Your body’s ability to tolerate different treatments and any other health conditions you may have play a major role in your care plan [16].
Because breast cancer is biologically complex, two people with IDC can have completely different treatment paths and outlooks [17][18]. Discussing your specific pathology report with your care team will give you a much more accurate picture of your outlook than general population statistics [14].
Common questions in this guide
How common are DCIS and invasive breast cancers in the United States?
Is invasive ductal carcinoma always metastatic or stage IV?
What happens if a biopsy shows both DCIS and invasive cancer?
What factors matter more than IDC’s overall frequency for my outlook?
Is IDC the most common type of invasive breast cancer?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Is there an invasive component as well as DCIS in my specimen, and which measurement determines my stage?
- 2.What are my specific ER, PR, HER2, and tumor grade results, and are any of these still pending?
- 3.What is my anatomic stage based on the size of the tumor and my lymph node status?
- 4.Do my specific tumor characteristics make me a candidate for genomic testing like Oncotype DX or MammaPrint?
- 5.How does my formal prognostic stage influence the treatment options you are recommending?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (18)
- 1
Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question.
van Seijen M, Lips EH, Thompson AM, et al.
British journal of cancer 2019; (121(4)):285-292 doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0478-6.
PMID: 31285590 - 2
Microcalcification crystallography as a potential marker of DCIS recurrence.
Gosling SB, Arnold EL, Davies SK, et al.
Scientific reports 2023; (13(1)):9331 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33547-8.
PMID: 37291276 - 3
Proteomics-Based Identification of Dysregulated Proteins and Biomarker Discovery in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, the Most Common Breast Cancer Subtype.
Neagu AN, Whitham D, Seymour L, et al.
Proteomes 2023; (11(2)) doi:10.3390/proteomes11020013.
PMID: 37092454 - 4
Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast arising in a solitary intraductal papilloma.
Badrawi N, AlSayegh AA
Radiology case reports 2023; (18(2)):449-451 doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2022.11.014.
PMID: 36439917 - 5
Single Cell Expression Analysis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Identifies Complex Genotypic-Phenotypic Relationships Altering Epithelial Composition.
Qin X, Strand SH, Lee MR, et al.
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2024; doi:10.1101/2023.10.10.561724.
PMID: 39386437 - 6
Chemokine Signaling Facilitates Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survival and Invasion through Fibroblast-Dependent Mechanisms.
Brummer G, Acevedo DS, Hu Q, et al.
Molecular cancer research : MCR 2018; (16(2)):296-308 doi:10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0308.
PMID: 29133591 - 7
The Association Between Periodontal Disease and Breast Cancer in a Prospective Cohort Study.
Jia M, Wu Z, Vogtmann E, et al.
Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) 2020; (13(12)):1007-1016 doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0018.
PMID: 32727823 - 8
Lobular breast cancer: incidence and genetic and non-genetic risk factors.
Dossus L, Benusiglio PR
Breast cancer research : BCR 2015; (17()):37 doi:10.1186/s13058-015-0546-7.
PMID: 25848941 - 9
Comprehensive Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Features of Invasive Lobular Cancer.
Pramod N, Nigam A, Basree M, et al.
The oncologist 2021; (26(6)):e943-e953 doi:10.1002/onco.13734.
PMID: 33641217 - 10
The Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes of Different Histological Subtypes in Triple-negative Breast Cancer.
Liao HY, Zhang WW, Sun JY, et al.
Journal of Cancer 2018; (9(2)):296-303 doi:10.7150/jca.22280.
PMID: 29344276 - 11
The 21-gene recurrence score in early non-ductal breast cancer: a National Cancer Database analysis.
Makower D, Qin J, Lin J, et al.
NPJ breast cancer 2022; (8(1)):4 doi:10.1038/s41523-021-00368-9.
PMID: 35027533 - 12
Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.
Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, et al.
CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 2017; (67(4)):290-303 doi:10.3322/caac.21393.
PMID: 28294295 - 13
Validation Study of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Prognostic Stage Compared With the Anatomic Stage in Breast Cancer.
Weiss A, Chavez-MacGregor M, Lichtensztajn DY, et al.
JAMA oncology 2018; (4(2)):203-209 doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4298.
PMID: 29222540 - 14
Clinical use of biomarkers in breast cancer: Updated guidelines from the European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM).
Duffy MJ, Harbeck N, Nap M, et al.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 2017; (75()):284-298 doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.017.
PMID: 28259011 - 15
Incorporating Biology Into Breast Cancer Staging: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Eighth Edition, Revisions and Beyond.
Mittendorf EA, Bartlett JMS, Lichtensztajn DL, Chandarlapaty S
American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting 2018; (38()):38-46 doi:10.1200/EDBK_200981.
PMID: 30231409 - 16
Validation of the newly proposed American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) breast cancer prognostic staging group and proposing a new staging system using the National Cancer Database.
Li X, Zhang Y, Meisel J, et al.
Breast cancer research and treatment 2018; (171(2)):303-313 doi:10.1007/s10549-018-4832-9.
PMID: 29948405 - 17
Breast Cancer Staging: Updates in the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition, and Current Challenges for Radiologists, From the AJR Special Series on Cancer Staging.
Teichgraeber DC, Guirguis MS, Whitman GJ
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 2021; (217(2)):278-290 doi:10.2214/AJR.20.25223.
PMID: 33594908 - 18
Breast cancer.
Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, et al.
Nature reviews. Disease primers 2019; (5(1)):66 doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2.
PMID: 31548545
This page explains population differences between invasive ductal carcinoma and DCIS for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your breast cancer care team can interpret your pathology and prognosis.
Get notified when new evidence is published on breast ductal adenocarcinoma.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.