Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 19 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Ophthalmology · Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy

How is ADOA Differentiated from Normal Tension Glaucoma?

At a Glance

ADOA and Normal Tension Glaucoma both cause optic nerve damage despite normal eye pressure. Doctors differentiate them by identifying central blind spots and macular thinning in ADOA, versus peripheral blind spots in glaucoma. ADOA is definitively confirmed via OPA1 genetic testing.

It is common for adults with Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy (ADOA) to be initially misdiagnosed with Normal Tension Glaucoma (NTG). Both conditions are characterized by progressive optic nerve damage and vision loss while intraocular pressure (the fluid pressure inside the eye) remains within normal limits [1]. Because glaucoma is much more common than hereditary optic atrophies, eye doctors may suspect NTG first. However, specialists can differentiate the two conditions by carefully analyzing high-resolution eye scans, evaluating visual field tests, and confirming the diagnosis with OPA1 genetic testing [2][3].

Why the Two Conditions Can Look Similar

The optic nerve acts like a cable connecting your eye to your brain. It is made up of millions of retinal ganglion cells and their nerve fibers. Both ADOA and NTG cause these essential cells to slowly die off over time, a process called atrophy [2].

When a doctor examines the eye, they see that the nerve fiber layer is thinning, but the pressure in the eye is normal [1]. If a patient does not have a known family history of early-onset vision loss—which can happen if the genetic mutation is new or symptoms in relatives were mild—the doctor may logically assume the damage is due to Normal Tension Glaucoma.

Differentiating Features on an Eye Exam

Although the conditions look similar on a surface level, specialized testing reveals clear differences in how the damage occurs.

Visual Field Testing (Perimetry)

Visual field testing maps your peripheral and central vision to detect blind spots. This is a gold-standard test for both conditions, but the patterns of vision loss usually differ:

  • ADOA: Vision loss typically starts in the center of your vision or between the center and the natural blind spot (central or cecocentral scotomas) [4][5].
  • NTG: Glaucoma often affects mid-peripheral or side vision first, commonly producing arch-shaped blind spots (arcuate defects) or steps in the nasal field of vision [6][7].

Distinct Patterns on OCT Scans

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive imaging test that takes high-resolution cross-section pictures of your retina. This scan is crucial for distinguishing ADOA from NTG:

  • Macular vs. Peripheral Thinning: In ADOA, cell loss is typically concentrated in the macula (the center of the retina responsible for detailed central vision) and the papillomacular bundle (the nerve fibers directly connecting the macula to the optic nerve) [8][9]. In contrast, glaucomatous damage like NTG usually causes localized, focal thinning in patterns that correspond to the mid-peripheral vision loss [10].
  • Optic Nerve Head Shape (The Lamina Cribrosa): OCT can also scan deep into the optic nerve to view a mesh-like structure called the lamina cribrosa. In NTG, this structure is typically pushed backward, appearing deeper and more curved due to structural remodeling [11]. In ADOA, this deep “cupping” is absent, and the deep structures look closer to those of a healthy eye [11].

Visual Appearance of the Optic Nerve

When your doctor looks directly at your optic nerve during a dilated eye exam, they observe different physical changes:

  • Optic Disc Pallor: In ADOA, the optic nerve typically appears abnormally pale (pallor), reflecting the underlying atrophy of the nerve fibers [4][12].
  • Optic Disc Cupping: In NTG, the nerve tissue usually thins at the rims, causing the center “cup” of the nerve to become enlarged and physically deepened [12][13].

Color Vision Changes

A hallmark of ADOA that is not typically seen in glaucoma is a specific difficulty with color vision. Many people with ADOA develop a blue-yellow color vision deficit (tritanopia) [14][15].

Summary of Clinical Differences

Feature Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy (ADOA) Normal Tension Glaucoma (NTG)
Visual Field Loss Central or cecocentral blind spots Mid-peripheral (arcuate/nasal) blind spots
Retinal Thinning (OCT) Macula and papillomacular bundle Localized patterns corresponding to field loss
Optic Disc Appearance Pale (Pallor) Deepened center (Cupping) and rim thinning
Deep Nerve Structure Normal depth Pushed backward / curved (Lamina cribrosa)
Color Vision Often affected (blue-yellow deficit) Usually unaffected until very late stages
Genetic Cause Usually an OPA1 gene mutation Typically multifactorial / complex

The Definitive Tiebreaker: OPA1 Genetic Testing

While advanced OCT scans and visual fields provide strong clinical evidence, genetic testing is the definitive tool used to confirm ADOA and rule out NTG completely [3][16].

The vast majority of ADOA cases are caused by mutations in the OPA1 gene. If your vision continues to worsen despite having low or medically controlled eye pressures, it is highly recommended to ask your eye doctor or a neuro-ophthalmologist about genetic testing. Identifying a pathogenic variant in the OPA1 gene confirms the diagnosis of ADOA and provides critical information about your genetic risks, which a genetic counselor can help you navigate [16][17].

Getting the correct diagnosis is critical. Glaucoma treatments, such as medicated eye drops or surgeries designed to lower eye pressure, will not stop or slow the progression of ADOA. (Safety Note: Never stop taking prescribed eye drops without consulting your doctor, as abruptly stopping glaucoma medication can be dangerous if you do have glaucoma.) Furthermore, confirming an OPA1 mutation allows doctors to screen for “ADOA plus,” a rarer form of the condition that can include other symptoms like hearing loss or muscle weakness [18][19]. Once diagnosed accurately, you and your care team can focus on appropriate low-vision management and connection with specialized support.

Common questions in this guide

Can ADOA be misdiagnosed as normal tension glaucoma?
Yes, because both conditions cause progressive optic nerve damage and vision loss while eye pressure remains normal, adults with ADOA are frequently misdiagnosed with Normal Tension Glaucoma initially. A lack of known family history can further contribute to this misdiagnosis.
How does vision loss differ between ADOA and glaucoma?
ADOA typically causes blind spots in the center of your vision and may cause a blue-yellow color vision deficit. In contrast, Normal Tension Glaucoma usually affects the side or mid-peripheral vision first, often producing arch-shaped blind spots.
How does an OCT scan tell the difference between ADOA and normal tension glaucoma?
An OCT scan reveals different patterns of cell loss. ADOA typically shows thinning concentrated in the macula and its nerve fibers, without deep structural cupping. Glaucoma causes focal thinning that corresponds to mid-peripheral vision loss and features deepened optic nerve cupping.
What is the most definitive test for Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy?
The definitive tool to confirm ADOA and completely rule out Normal Tension Glaucoma is genetic testing. Identifying a pathogenic mutation in the OPA1 gene confirms an ADOA diagnosis and allows for appropriate management.
Do glaucoma eye drops help with ADOA vision loss?
No, treatments designed to lower eye pressure, such as glaucoma eye drops or surgeries, will not stop or slow the vision loss caused by ADOA. However, you should never abruptly stop prescribed eye drops without consulting your eye doctor.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.If my eye pressure is normal and my vision is worsening, could my condition be related to a genetic optic atrophy like ADOA instead of glaucoma?
  2. 2.Do my OCT scans show thinning in the papillomacular bundle, or does the damage look more typical of glaucoma?
  3. 3.Does my visual field test show central blind spots or peripheral blind spots?
  4. 4.What is the process for getting OPA1 genetic testing, and would you recommend I see a neuro-ophthalmologist or ophthalmic geneticist?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (19)
  1. 1

    [Differential diagnosis of juvenile normal pressure glaucoma].

    Geidel K, Wiedemann P, Unterlauft JD

    Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft 2017; (114(9)):828-831 doi:10.1007/s00347-016-0407-5.

    PMID: 27921132
  2. 2

    Comparison of the clinical and genetic features of autosomal dominant optic atrophy and normal tension glaucoma in young Chinese adults.

    Zhang Y, Sun X, Tian G, Chen Y

    Eye (London, England) 2023; (37(4)):624-630 doi:10.1038/s41433-022-01990-y.

    PMID: 35273349
  3. 3

    Diagnostic genetic testing for patients with bilateral optic neuropathy and comparison of clinical features according to OPA1 mutation status.

    Gaier ED, Boudreault K, Nakata I, et al.

    Molecular vision 2017; (23()):548-560.

    PMID: 28848318
  4. 4

    Clinical and Genetic Findings in an Autosomal Dominant Optic Atrophy-Compatible Phenotype Harboring an OPA1 Variant: A Case Report.

    Murati Calderon RA, Landestoy G, Izquierdo N

    Cureus 2025; (17(10)):e95622 doi:10.7759/cureus.95622.

    PMID: 41322916
  5. 5

    Short Wavelength Automated Perimetry, Standard Automated Perimetry, and Optical Coherence Tomography in Dominant Optic Atrophy.

    Lombardo M, Cusumano A, Mancino R, et al.

    Journal of clinical medicine 2024; (13(7)) doi:10.3390/jcm13071971.

    PMID: 38610740
  6. 6

    Visual field patterns in glaucoma: A systematic review.

    Vandersnickt MF, van Eijgen J, Lemmens S, et al.

    Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society 2024; (38(4)):306-315 doi:10.4103/sjopt.sjopt_143_24.

    PMID: 39943959
  7. 7

    Investigation of progression pattern and associated risk factors in glaucoma patients with initial paracentral scotomas using Humphrey 10-2.

    Kim EK, Park HL, Hong KE, et al.

    Scientific reports 2021; (11(1)):18609 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97446-6.

    PMID: 34545112
  8. 8

    Assessment of the retinal posterior pole in dominant optic atrophy by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry.

    Cesareo M, Ciuffoletti E, Martucci A, et al.

    PloS one 2017; (12(3)):e0174560 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174560.

    PMID: 28358911
  9. 9

    Peripapillary and macular morpho-vascular changes in patients with genetic or clinical diagnosis of autosomal dominant optic atrophy: a case-control study.

    Martins A, Rodrigues TM, Soares M, et al.

    Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 2019; (257(5)):1019-1027 doi:10.1007/s00417-019-04267-5.

    PMID: 30798343
  10. 10

    Comparison of Patterns of Structural Progression in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma.

    Wy S, Lee YJ, Sun S, et al.

    Journal of glaucoma 2024; (33(3)):155-161 doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002348.

    PMID: 38129949
  11. 11

    Comparison of Lamina Cribrosa Morphology in Normal Tension Glaucoma and Autosomal-Dominant Optic Atrophy.

    Kim GN, Kim JA, Kim MJ, et al.

    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2020; (61(5)):9 doi:10.1167/iovs.61.5.9.

    PMID: 32392317
  12. 12

    Comparison of Optic Nerve Head Morphology in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

    Jurišić D, Novak Lauš K, Sesar I, Kuzman T

    Acta clinica Croatica 2017; (56(2)):227-235 doi:10.20471/acc.2017.56.02.05.

    PMID: 29485789
  13. 13

    The morphological difference between glaucoma and other optic neuropathies.

    Burgoyne C

    Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society 2015; (35 Suppl 1()):S8-S21 doi:10.1097/WNO.0000000000000289.

    PMID: 26274837
  14. 14

    [Hereditary Optic Neuropathies].

    Rüther K

    Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2018; (235(6)):747-763 doi:10.1055/a-0583-6290.

    PMID: 29490390
  15. 15

    Identification of copy number variation in the gene for autosomal dominant optic atrophy, OPA1, in a Chinese pedigree.

    Jin X, Chen YH, Liu Z, et al.

    Genetics and molecular research : GMR 2015; (14(3)):10961-72 doi:10.4238/2015.September.21.8.

    PMID: 26400325
  16. 16

    Exome sequencing identified a novel de novo OPA1 mutation in a consanguineous family presenting with optic atrophy.

    Cohen L, Tzur S, Goldenberg-Cohen N, et al.

    Genetics research 2016; (98()):e10 doi:10.1017/S0016672316000070.

    PMID: 27265430
  17. 17

    Mutation spectrum of the OPA1 gene in a large cohort of patients with suspected dominant optic atrophy: Identification and classification of 48 novel variants.

    Weisschuh N, Schimpf-Linzenbold S, Mazzola P, et al.

    PloS one 2021; (16(7)):e0253987 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253987.

    PMID: 34242285
  18. 18

    A novel OPA1 mutation causing variable age of onset autosomal dominant optic atrophy plus in an Australian family.

    Ahmad KE, Davis RL, Sue CM

    Journal of neurology 2015; (262(10)):2323-8 doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7849-6.

    PMID: 26194196
  19. 19

    Meta-analysis of genotype-phenotype analysis of OPA1 mutations in autosomal dominant optic atrophy.

    Ham M, Han J, Osann K, et al.

    Mitochondrion 2019; (46()):262-269 doi:10.1016/j.mito.2018.07.006.

    PMID: 30165240

This page explains the differences between ADOA and Normal Tension Glaucoma for educational purposes only. Always consult a neuro-ophthalmologist or ophthalmologist for an accurate eye diagnosis and treatment plan.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Autosomal dominant optic atrophy, classic form.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.