Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 11 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Radiology · Intracranial Aneurysm

How Is Brain Aneurysm Growth Confirmed on Imaging?

At a Glance

A 1-millimeter increase on a brain aneurysm report does not by itself prove true growth. Specialists confirm progression by comparing original images from similar scans, checking for shape changes, and using DSA only when clearer imaging could change management.

When a radiology report indicates that an unruptured brain aneurysm is slightly larger than it was on a previous scan, it is completely normal to feel anxious. However, a small numerical difference—such as a 1-millimeter increase—does not automatically mean the aneurysm has truly grown biologically [1]. To confirm true growth, specialized doctors (such as neuroradiologists, vascular neurologists, or cerebrovascular neurosurgeons) review the actual image files side-by-side to determine if the difference is real progression or simply a variation in how the scan was acquired or measured [1][2].

The “1 Millimeter” Problem: Growth vs. Measurement Variability

In research and clinical practice, an increase of 1 mm is often used as a common threshold or baseline warning sign that an aneurysm might be growing [3]. However, modern medical imaging is subject to measurement variability—expected, small inconsistencies depending on the scanner, the angle of the image, the image quality, and how the doctor draws the measuring line on the screen.

In some studies evaluating paired MRI scans, the natural measurement variability for an aneurysm was frequently between 1.5 and 2.0 mm [1]. Therefore, if an aneurysm is reported as 4 mm on one scan and 5 mm a year later, it might represent true growth, but it could also be normal measurement variation. When researchers use stricter statistical thresholds for detectable change rather than a blanket 1-mm rule, the number of aneurysms classified as definitively “growing” drops significantly [1].

Because measurement variability depends heavily on the aneurysm’s size, its location, and the type of scan used, a reported 1-millimeter change usually prompts a closer specialist review rather than an immediate diagnosis of growth.

How Doctors Investigate Apparent Growth

To distinguish real disease progression from normal measurement variability, your care team will take several specific steps.

1. Comparing Similar Scans

To accurately track size, doctors strongly prefer to compare the same type of scan. A Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) (which uses X-rays and contrast dye) and a Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) (which uses magnetic fields) create images in very different ways. Because of how they process blood flow and surrounding tissues, their measurements are not identical [4][5]. While doctors can compare different modalities (e.g., comparing a CTA to an MRA), small differences are much harder to interpret, so sticking to the same scan type and imaging protocol is preferred when possible [4].

2. Side-by-Side Review of the Images

Rather than just comparing the typed numbers on old and new radiology reports, specialists review the original image files side-by-side. They often use specialized software to view thin “slices” of the brain in multiple planes [2]. Many specialists may also use 3D reconstructions to compare the volume of the aneurysm, which some studies suggest is more reproducible than relying on a single 2D line measurement [1].

3. Looking for Shape (Morphological) Changes

Aneurysms do not always act like perfectly round balloons. True growth is often accompanied by changes in the aneurysm’s morphology (shape). When evaluating scans, specialists will look for:

  • An aneurysm that is bulging more in one specific direction [6].
  • The appearance of a new bleb or daughter sac (a small blister or out-pouching on the main aneurysm dome) [7][3].
  • A previously smooth edge that has become irregular [8].

Apparent shape changes can sometimes be caused by the scan angle or imaging artifacts. However, when a specialist confirms that a size increase is paired with a new bleb or irregular shape on the actual images, it provides stronger evidence that the aneurysm is actively changing [7].

When is a Catheter Angiogram (DSA) Needed?

CTA and MRA are excellent, non-invasive ways to monitor aneurysms over time [9]. However, they occasionally struggle to provide a crystal-clear picture of very small aneurysms or complex vessel shapes [10].

If a non-invasive scan shows ambiguous, borderline growth, and clarifying that difference is required to decide whether to recommend treatment or continued surveillance, your doctor may recommend a Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). A DSA is an invasive procedure where a tiny catheter is threaded through the blood vessels to the brain to inject contrast dye while X-rays are taken. Combined with 3D rotational technology, DSA provides highly detailed resolution of the brain’s blood vessels and can clarify details that CTA or MRA cannot resolve [9][10].

However, DSA carries procedural risks, which can include a small risk of stroke, bleeding at the catheter site, contrast reactions, and kidney concerns [11]. Because of these risks, DSA is typically reserved for situations where maximum imaging clarity is highly likely to change your medical management plan, not just because a report is slightly ambiguous [10].

Next Steps If Your Report Suggests Growth

If a radiology report mentions “interval growth” or a size increase:

  1. Don’t panic: A small numerical change on a report does not automatically mean you need a procedure.
  2. Gather your images: Ensure your treating specialist has the actual image files (on a disc or digital transfer) from both your past and current scans, not just the paper reports.
  3. Request a specialist review: Discuss the scans with a cerebrovascular specialist who can interpret the imaging context, your aneurysm’s shape, and your personal risk factors (such as age, health history, and blood pressure control).

⚠️ Emergency Warning Signs

This page discusses routine imaging surveillance. However, if you experience the sudden onset of the “worst headache of your life,” sudden weakness or numbness, trouble speaking, sudden severe vision changes, a seizure, or loss of consciousness, call emergency services (such as 911) immediately. These can be signs of an aneurysm rupture or other medical emergency and require immediate hospital evaluation, not a routine imaging review.

Common questions in this guide

Does a 1-millimeter increase prove that a brain aneurysm has grown?
No. A small difference may reflect normal measurement variability caused by the scan type, image quality, viewing angle, or how the measurement was drawn. Specialists usually review the original images before confirming true growth.
How do doctors tell real aneurysm growth from a measurement difference?
They compare the original scans side-by-side, preferably using the same imaging method and protocol. They assess the aneurysm in multiple viewing planes and look for consistent size changes, new bulging, a bleb, or an irregular edge.
Should CTA and MRA measurements of an aneurysm be compared directly?
CTA and MRA create images in different ways, so their measurements may not match exactly. Comparing the same type of scan over time is preferred when possible, because switching methods can make small changes harder to interpret.
When might I need a catheter angiogram or DSA for possible aneurysm growth?
A DSA may be considered when CTA or MRA leaves an important question unresolved, especially if a clearer image could change treatment or continued monitoring. Because DSA is invasive and carries risks such as stroke, bleeding, contrast reactions, and kidney problems, it is not used for every small or uncertain difference.
What should I do if my report says that my brain aneurysm has grown?
Try not to assume that a small numerical change proves biological growth. Ask your care team to obtain the original image files and have a cerebrovascular specialist compare the scans, rather than relying only on the written reports. Sudden severe headache, weakness, trouble speaking, seizure, loss of consciousness, or major vision changes require emergency evaluation.

Questions For You

Answer a question to get research tailored to you. Your answers are private.

Get notified when new evidence is published on brain aneurysm.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Were the two scans performed using the same imaging technology, and have the actual image files been reviewed side-by-side by a specialist?
  2. 2.Given the type of scan and the location of my aneurysm, does this millimeter difference fall within the expected margin of measurement variability?
  3. 3.Did you notice any confirmed changes in the shape, such as a new bleb or irregular contour, or just a change in the maximum diameter?
  4. 4.Would a catheter angiogram (DSA) provide information that would actually change our management plan, or do the risks outweigh the benefits right now?

References

References (11)
  1. 1

    Reliability and Agreement of 2D and 3D Measurements on MRAs for Growth Assessment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

    Timmins KM, Kuijf HJ, Vergouwen MDI, et al.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2021; (42(9)):1598-1603 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7186.

    PMID: 34210663
  2. 2

    A Volumetric Metric for Monitoring Intracranial Aneurysms: Repeatability and Growth Criteria in a Longitudinal MR Imaging Study.

    Liu X, Haraldsson H, Wang Y, et al.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2021; (42(9)):1591-1597 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7190.

    PMID: 34167960
  3. 3

    Risk of Rupture After Intracranial Aneurysm Growth.

    van der Kamp LT, Rinkel GJE, Verbaan D, et al.

    JAMA neurology 2021; (78(10)):1228-1235 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2915.

    PMID: 34459846
  4. 4

    Intraobserver and interobserver variability in CT angiography and MR angiography measurements of the size of cerebral aneurysms.

    Kim HJ, Yoon DY, Kim ES, et al.

    Neuroradiology 2017; (59(5)):491-497 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1826-y.

    PMID: 28343249
  5. 5

    Intra- and inter-observer variability in intracranial aneurysm segmentation: comparison between CT angiography (semi-automated segmentation software stroke VCAR) and digital subtraction angiography (3D rotational angiography).

    D'Argento F, Pedicelli A, Ciardi C, et al.

    La Radiologia medica 2021; (126(3)):484-493 doi:10.1007/s11547-020-01275-y.

    PMID: 32902826
  6. 6

    Relationship between 3D Morphologic Change and 2D and 3D Growth of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

    Timmins KM, Kuijf HJ, Vergouwen MDI, et al.

    AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 2022; (43(3)):416-421 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7418.

    PMID: 35144935
  7. 7

    Impact of Morphological Factors on the Future Growth of Unruptured Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms.

    Tsutsui T, Ikedo T, Kitazawa Y, et al.

    World neurosurgery 2023; (175()):e897-e903 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.039.

    PMID: 37075892
  8. 8

    Prediction model for 3-year rupture risk of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Japanese patients.

    Tominari S, Morita A, Ishibashi T, et al.

    Annals of neurology 2015; (77(6)):1050-9 doi:10.1002/ana.24400.

    PMID: 25753954
  9. 9

    Comprehensive review of imaging of intracranial aneurysms and angiographically negative subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Howard BM, Hu R, Barrow JW, Barrow DL

    Neurosurgical focus 2019; (47(6)):E20.

    PMID: 31786554
  10. 10

    Detection of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on noninvasive imaging. Is there still a role for digital subtraction angiography?

    Rustemi O, Alaraj A, Shakur SF, et al.

    Surgical neurology international 2015; (6()):175 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.170029.

    PMID: 26674519
  11. 11

    Intracranial aneurysms in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: prevalence, risk of rupture, and management. A systematic review.

    Cagnazzo F, Gambacciani C, Morganti R, Perrini P

    Acta neurochirurgica 2017; (159(5)):811-821 doi:10.1007/s00701-017-3142-z.

    PMID: 28283868

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. A cerebrovascular specialist should interpret your scans and discuss whether further imaging or DSA is appropriate; seek emergency care for sudden severe neurological symptoms.