How Is the ETV Success Score Calculated for Hydrocephalus?
At a Glance
The ETV Success Score estimates the chance that an endoscopic third ventriculostomy will avoid another hydrocephalus surgery within six months. It adds points for age, cause, and prior shunt history, but does not predict each person’s long-term outcome.
The ETV Success Score (ETVSS) is a practical calculation originally developed for pediatric patients to estimate the likelihood that an Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV) will successfully treat hydrocephalus [1]. In this medical context, “success” is specifically defined as not needing a follow-up surgery (such as placing a shunt or repeating the ETV) within six months of the procedure [1][2].
The final score ranges from 0 to 90, representing an estimated, population-level probability of success. For example, a score of 80 estimates roughly an 80% chance of success at six months [3]. However, because the score was developed and validated primarily in children, its accuracy can be different for adults (anyone 10 or older receives the same maximum age points), and it is not a perfect personal guarantee [4].
The Three Factors in the Score
The ETVSS calculation adds up points from three key factors [1].
1. Age
Generally, older patients have higher estimated ETV success rates [1].
- Under 1 month: 0 points
- 1 month to less than 6 months: 10 points
- 6 months to less than 1 year: 30 points
- 1 year to less than 10 years: 40 points
- 10 years or older (including adults): 50 points
2. Etiology (Cause of Hydrocephalus)
The underlying reason for your hydrocephalus strongly impacts your score. Aqueductal stenosis (a narrowing of the fluid pathway in the brain) is considered highly favorable for an ETV [1].
- Post-infectious hydrocephalus: 0 points
- Myelomeningocele (a severe form of spina bifida), intraventricular hemorrhage (bleeding inside the brain’s fluid spaces), or non-tectal brain tumor: 20 points
- Aqueductal stenosis, tectal brain tumors (tumors in the midbrain), or other causes: 30 points
3. Previous Shunt History
ETVs are more likely to succeed if they are the first surgical treatment for hydrocephalus [1].
- Previously had a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt: 0 points
- No previous shunt: 10 points
Calculating the Percentage
To calculate the final ETVSS, your neurosurgeon adds the points from these three categories together [3].
Example for a 2-year-old with aqueductal stenosis and no prior shunt:
- Age 2 years = 40 points
- Aqueductal stenosis = 30 points
- No previous shunt = 10 points
- Total = 80 points (an estimated 80% chance of success at 6 months).
What the Score Tells You (and What It Doesn’t)
While a higher score generally indicates a better chance of avoiding another surgery within six months [5], the ETVSS is only one piece of the puzzle. It does not automatically mean an ETV is a better choice than a traditional CSF shunt.
When discussing your score, keep these limitations in mind:
- It does not account for your specific anatomy: The ETVSS relies only on age, cause, and shunt history. It does not factor in important MRI details, such as the bowing of the third ventricle floor or the position of surrounding blood vessels, which your surgeon evaluates separately to determine if the surgery is safe and likely to work for you [6].
- It only looks at 6 months: A high score predicts early success, but it does not guarantee that the ETV will work forever. Late failures can happen even years after a successful procedure [7][8].
- It is not a personal guarantee: As a statistical estimate based on large groups, real-world outcomes for individuals can sometimes vary from what the score predicts [9].
Safety Warning: Because ETVs can fail at any time, it is vital to know the signs of returning hydrocephalus. Seek immediate emergency medical care if you or your child experience worsening headaches, repeated vomiting, unusual sleepiness, confusion, visual changes, or seizures—even if your initial ETVSS score was very high.
Common questions in this guide
What does the ETV Success Score estimate?
How is my ETVSS number worked out?
What ETVSS would a 2-year-old with aqueductal stenosis and no prior shunt receive?
Does the ETV Success Score work equally well for adults?
What does the ETVSS leave out?
What symptoms after ETV need urgent medical attention?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.What is my specific ETV Success Score, and what age bracket or etiology category did you use to calculate it?
- 2.Because the ETVSS was originally built for pediatric patients, how accurate do you feel this score is for someone my age?
- 3.Are there any anatomical features on my MRI, such as the bowing of the third ventricle floor, that make my chances of success higher or lower than the ETVSS predicts?
- 4.How does your personal success rate performing ETVs on patients with aqueductal stenosis compare to the ETVSS prediction?
- 5.If my ETV fails after the 6-month mark, what are the exact symptoms I should watch for, and what is our backup plan?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (9)
- 1
Revisiting the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score using machine learning: can we do better?
Adil SM, Seas A, Sexton DP, et al.
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 2025; (35(3)):246-254 doi:10.3171/2024.9.PEDS24146.
PMID: 39642367 - 2
A re-evaluation of the Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success Score: a Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network study.
Verhey LH, Kulkarni AV, Reeder RW, et al.
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 2024; (33(5)):417-427 doi:10.3171/2023.12.PEDS23401.
PMID: 38335514 - 3
Failure of ETV in patients with the highest ETV success scores.
Gianaris TJ, Nazar R, Middlebrook E, et al.
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 2017; (20(3)):225-231 doi:10.3171/2016.7.PEDS1655.
PMID: 28686122 - 4
Predicting success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: validation of the ETV Success Score in a mixed population of adult and pediatric patients.
Labidi M, Lavoie P, Lapointe G, et al.
Journal of neurosurgery 2015; (123(6)):1447-55 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS141240.
PMID: 26207604 - 5
Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV Success Score.
Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Kestle JR, et al.
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 2010; (6(4)):310-5 doi:10.3171/2010.8.PEDS103.
PMID: 20887100 - 6
Combined Predictive Model for Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy Success in Adults and Children.
Sistiaga IL, Catalán-Uribarrena G, Pérez-Fernández S, et al.
World neurosurgery 2024; (185()):e721-e730 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.119.
PMID: 38423458 - 7
The long-term outcomes of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in pediatric hydrocephalus, with an emphasis on future intellectual development and shunt dependency.
Hong S, Hirokawa D, Usami K, Ogiwara H
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 2019; (23(1)):104-108.
PMID: 30497212 - 8
Long-Term Success of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in the Pediatric Population with Aqueductal Stenosis.
García-Milán V, Moreno-Madueño G, Urreta Juárez G, et al.
World neurosurgery 2024; (189()):e364-e369 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.056.
PMID: 38901481 - 9
External validation of the ETV success score in 313 pediatric patients: a Brazilian single-center study.
Furtado LMF, da Costa Val Filho JA, Dos Santos Júnior EC
Neurosurgical review 2021; (44(5)):2727-2734 doi:10.1007/s10143-020-01461-6.
PMID: 33389340
This page explains the ETV Success Score for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your neurosurgeon should interpret your score alongside your MRI, medical history, and symptoms.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Hydrocephalus with stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.