NET vs. NEC Neuroendocrine Tumors: What's the Difference?
At a Glance
The primary difference between a NET (Neuroendocrine Tumor) and a NEC (Neuroendocrine Carcinoma) is cell appearance and growth rate. NETs are usually slower-growing with cells that look normal, while NECs are aggressive, fast-growing tumors with highly abnormal cells requiring different treatments.
In this answer
4 sections
When you or a loved one is diagnosed with a neuroendocrine neoplasm (tumor) — which often starts in the GI tract, pancreas, or lungs — you might see the acronyms NET or NEC on your pathology report. While they sound very similar, they represent two distinct types of tumors with very different behaviors and treatment plans. Simply put, NET stands for Neuroendocrine Tumor, which is typically slower-growing and made of cells that look similar to normal cells. NEC stands for Neuroendocrine Carcinoma, which is fast-growing and made of cells that look very abnormal [1][2].
Understanding the difference between a NET and a NEC is crucial because this distinction heavily dictates the severity of the diagnosis and the types of treatments your care team will recommend [1][3].
Quick Comparison: NET vs. NEC
| Feature | NET (Neuroendocrine Tumor) | NEC (Neuroendocrine Carcinoma) |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Appearance | Well-differentiated (looks more normal) | Poorly differentiated (looks very abnormal) |
| Growth Pace | Generally slower-growing | Aggressive, fast-growing |
| Ki-67 Index | Usually low to moderate (often under 20%) | High (always over 20%, often over 55%) |
| Typical Treatments | Targeted therapy, PRRT, hormone analogs | Traditional chemotherapy, immunotherapy |
What is a Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET)?
A NET is described by pathologists as “well-differentiated.” This means that under a microscope, the tumor cells still look and act somewhat like normal, healthy neuroendocrine cells [1].
Key characteristics of NETs include:
- Slower Growth: NETs generally grow and spread at a slower rate, which usually translates to a more favorable long-term prognosis [4][5].
- Lower Proliferation Rate: Doctors measure how fast cells are dividing using a marker called the Ki-67 index, which is reported as a percentage. Most NETs have lower Ki-67 scores (typically under 20%), with the exception of Grade 3 NETs, which are discussed below [6][7].
- Targeted Treatments: Because they grow slower and maintain specific features on their cell surfaces, NETs are often treated with therapies that specifically target these traits. Common treatments include somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), or targeted oral medications [8][9].
What is a Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC)?
A NEC is described as “poorly differentiated.” This means the tumor cells have mutated significantly and no longer resemble normal, healthy cells [1][2].
Key characteristics of NECs include:
- Aggressive Growth: NECs are fast-growing and tend to spread (metastasize) quickly. Because of this, a NEC diagnosis requires a prompt, proactive treatment plan from a specialized care team [4][5].
- High Proliferation Rate: NECs always have a very high Ki-67 index (greater than 20%, and frequently over 55%). This means a large percentage of the cells are actively dividing at any given time [7][4].
- Genetic Changes: NECs frequently have specific genetic mutations, such as the inactivation of the TP53 and RB1 genes, which drive their rapid growth [10][11].
- Chemotherapy-Based Treatments: Because NEC cells divide so rapidly and behave aggressively, they often respond better to traditional, platinum-based chemotherapy, and sometimes emerging treatments like immunotherapy [12][13].
The Exception: Grade 3 NETs
There is a specific, often-confusing subcategory called a Grade 3 NET. While Grade 3 NETs have a high Ki-67 index (over 20%, meaning fast growth) just like a NEC, their cells still look “well-differentiated” (like normal cells).
It is vital to know that a Grade 3 NET is a completely distinct diagnosis from a NEC, and it is usually treated differently. If your report shows a high Ki-67 index, your care team must determine if it is a Grade 3 NET or a true NEC by looking at cell differentiation and genetics [6][11].
Reading Your Pathology Report
To figure out whether a tumor is a NET or a NEC, a pathologist looks at a biopsy sample under a microscope. They focus on three main factors to classify your tumor:
- Differentiation: How much the tumor cells look like normal cells (well-differentiated vs. poorly differentiated) [14].
- Ki-67 Index: A chemical stain used to calculate the exact percentage of tumor cells that are actively dividing and preparing to multiply [14][6].
- Mitotic Rate: While the Ki-67 test uses a chemical stain, the mitotic rate is a manual count. The pathologist literally counts the number of dividing cells (mitoses) they can see in a specific area under the microscope [14][6].
Common questions in this guide
What is the main difference between a NET and a NEC?
What does well-differentiated mean on my pathology report?
Why is the Ki-67 index important for neuroendocrine tumors?
Can a tumor have a high Ki-67 score but still be a NET?
How are treatments different for a NET versus a NEC?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.What is the specific Ki-67 index percentage and mitotic rate on my pathology report?
- 2.Are my tumor cells described as 'well-differentiated' (a NET) or 'poorly-differentiated' (a NEC)?
- 3.If I have a high Ki-67 index (over 20%), is my tumor a Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC) or a Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumor (NET)?
- 4.Based on whether my tumor is a NET or a NEC, what are our primary treatment options?
- 5.Should we be testing my biopsy sample for genetic mutations like TP53 or RB1 to help guide my treatment plan?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (14)
- 1
Emerging Therapeutic Concepts and Latest Diagnostic Advancements Regarding Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Gynecologic Tract.
Georgescu TA, Bohiltea RE, Munteanu O, et al.
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 2021; (57(12)) doi:10.3390/medicina57121338.
PMID: 34946283 - 2
The Problem of High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors, Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, and Beyond.
Sorbye H, Baudin E, Perren A
Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America 2018; (47(3)):683-698 doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2018.05.001.
PMID: 30098724 - 3
The New World Health Organization Classification for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasia.
Inzani F, Petrone G, Rindi G
Endocrinology and metabolism clinics of North America 2018; (47(3)):463-470 doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2018.04.008.
PMID: 30098710 - 4
Tumor Differentiation is the Dominant Prognostic Factor for Patients with Colorectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Distant Metastasis.
Wang Z, Shi S, Ren H, Liu Q
International journal of endocrinology 2022; (2022()):1720624 doi:10.1155/2022/1720624.
PMID: 36578535 - 5
Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms in a Chinese population: a large, retrospective single-centre study.
Zhang M, Zhao P, Shi X, et al.
BMC endocrine disorders 2017; (17(1)):39 doi:10.1186/s12902-017-0190-6.
PMID: 28705205 - 6
Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement.
Coriat R, Walter T, Terris B, et al.
The oncologist 2016; (21(10)):1191-1199 doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0476.
PMID: 27401895 - 7
Neuroendocrine Carcinomas with Atypical Proliferation Index and Clinical Behavior: A Systematic Review.
Feola T, Centello R, Sesti F, et al.
Cancers 2021; (13(6)) doi:10.3390/cancers13061247.
PMID: 33809007 - 8
Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Characteristics, Treatments, and Outcomes From a Population-Based Study.
Boutin M, Mathews A, Badesha J, et al.
Pancreas 2022; (51(7)):756-762 doi:10.1097/MPA.0000000000002100.
PMID: 36395400 - 9
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning EP
Hematology/oncology clinics of North America 2016; (30(1)):179-91.
PMID: 26614376 - 10
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Basic Biology, Current Treatment Strategies and Prospects for the Future.
Ohmoto A, Rokutan H, Yachida S
International journal of molecular sciences 2017; (18(1)) doi:10.3390/ijms18010143.
PMID: 28098761 - 11
An analysis of 130 neuroendocrine tumors G3 regarding prevalence, origin, metastasis, and diagnostic features.
Kasajima A, Konukiewitz B, Schlitter AM, et al.
Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology 2022; (480(2)):359-368 doi:10.1007/s00428-021-03202-6.
PMID: 34499237 - 12
Bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI after failure of platinum-etoposide first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced neuroendocrine carcinoma (PRODIGE 41-BEVANEC): a randomised, multicentre, non-comparative, open-label, phase 2 trial.
Walter T, Lievre A, Coriat R, et al.
The Lancet. Oncology 2023; (24(3)):297-306 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00001-3.
PMID: 36739879 - 13
A Phase II Basket Trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART SWOG 1609) in Patients with Nonpancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Patel SP, Othus M, Chae YK, et al.
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; (26(10)):2290-2296 doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3356.
PMID: 31969335 - 14
Differentiating well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas and adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: a comprehensive review.
Bahceci D, Adsay V, Basturk O
Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology 2026; (488(1)):45-64 doi:10.1007/s00428-025-04336-7.
PMID: 41276674
This page explains the differences between NET and NEC terminology for educational purposes. Your oncologist and pathologist are the best sources for interpreting your specific neuroendocrine pathology report.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Tumor of endocrine glands.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.