Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 23 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Ophthalmology

Partial vs. Full Corneal Transplant: What's the Difference?

At a Glance

Partial-thickness corneal transplants (DMEK, DSAEK, DALK) replace only the diseased layers of the cornea, offering faster recovery and a lower risk of rejection compared to a full-thickness transplant (PKP), which replaces all corneal layers and requires stitches.

A corneal transplant replaces diseased or damaged corneal tissue with healthy donor tissue, but not all transplants are the same. A full-thickness transplant (also known as a Penetrating Keratoplasty, or PKP) replaces all layers of your cornea at once, while a partial-thickness transplant (often called a lamellar transplant) replaces only the specific layers that are damaged by your corneal dystrophy [1][2]. Today, partial-thickness transplants are heavily preferred whenever possible because they preserve your healthy tissue, lead to faster visual recovery, and significantly lower the risk of your body rejecting the new graft [3][1][4].

Decoding the “Alphabet Soup” of Transplant Surgery

When discussing your options, your doctor may use several acronyms. To understand them, it helps to know that the cornea is made of distinct layers, much like a plywood board. The main layers are the thin outer surface (epithelium), the thick middle layer (stroma), and the delicate inner pumping layer (endothelium). The endothelium rests on a very thin structural film called Descemet’s membrane.

Procedure What It Stands For Layers Replaced Best For
PKP Penetrating Keratoplasty All layers (Full-thickness) Advanced scarring, severe damage across all layers
DALK Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Middle/Outer (Stroma) Stromal dystrophies, Keratoconus
DSAEK Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Inner (Endothelium + tiny bit of stroma) Fuchs’ dystrophy, endothelial failure
DMEK Descemet’s Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Inner (Endothelium only) Fuchs’ dystrophy, endothelial failure

Full-Thickness: PKP

PKP (Penetrating Keratoplasty) is the traditional, full-thickness corneal transplant. During this procedure, the surgeon carefully removes a full circle of your cornea and sews a full-thickness donor cornea into place [1][2]. Because it replaces the full thickness of the cornea, it requires many microscopic stitches [5]. While the surgery is highly controlled and painless under anesthesia, it involves a larger surgical opening than newer partial-thickness techniques [6].

Partial-Thickness (Inner Layer): DSAEK and DMEK

These are Endothelial Keratoplasty procedures. They only replace the innermost layer (the endothelium and Descemet’s membrane) and are the standard of care for posterior corneal dystrophies like Fuchs’ dystrophy [1][7].

  • DSAEK: Replaces the diseased inner layer along with a very thin slice of the donor’s middle stromal layer [7][8].
  • DMEK: The most advanced and thinnest transplant. It replaces only the single inner cell layer and Descemet’s membrane, without any middle stromal tissue attached [9][10].

Important Recovery Note: Unlike PKP which uses stitches, DMEK and DSAEK grafts are typically held in place inside the eye using a temporary bubble of air or special gas [11]. Because air naturally floats up, patients must lie flat on their backs (supine positioning) for hours or even a few days after surgery to ensure the bubble presses the delicate new graft into the correct position [11].

Partial-Thickness (Middle/Outer Layers): DALK

DALK (Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty) is used when the front or middle of the cornea is diseased, such as in certain stromal dystrophies. It replaces the middle stroma but leaves your own healthy, natural inner endothelial layer perfectly intact [12][13].

Why Partial-Thickness Transplants Are Often Preferred

If your surgeon suggests a partial-thickness transplant (DMEK, DSAEK, or DALK), it is likely because these targeted procedures offer significant advantages over a full-thickness PKP.

  • Dramatically Lower Rejection Risk: Because less foreign tissue is introduced to your eye, your immune system is less likely to attack the graft [14][15]. DMEK offers the lowest rejection rate among these procedures [9][16]. For DALK, keeping your own endothelium intact practically eliminates the most severe form of graft rejection [17][18].
  • Faster and Better Visual Recovery: Because a full-thickness PKP requires completely replacing the cornea and using stitches, it dramatically alters the shape of the eye and can cause severe astigmatism [5][15]. Visual recovery from a PKP can take a year or more. Partial transplants like DMEK and DSAEK leave the structural shape of your eye intact, allowing for much faster recovery—often within a few weeks to a couple of months [14][19].
  • Safer, Stronger Eyes: Full-thickness PKP surgery requires cutting through the entire cornea, which can leave the eye structurally weaker and more susceptible to injury if struck [5][15]. Endothelial transplants (DMEK/DSAEK) are performed through a tiny incision, allowing the eye to remain much stronger and safer [14][20]. DALK also preserves the eye’s natural structural integrity much better than PKP [21][3].

Living with a Transplant: What to Expect Long-Term

Regardless of which procedure you undergo, corneal transplants are not always a permanent, lifelong fix. While survival rates are very good, over time, the transplanted cells can naturally deplete, and a graft might need to be replaced after 10 to 15 years [19][11]. To protect your transplant and prevent your immune system from rejecting it, you will likely need to use steroid eye drops for a long period, sometimes indefinitely [3][1].

When Is a Full-Thickness PKP Still Needed?

While partial transplants are highly preferred, PKP remains a vital, time-tested procedure. A full-thickness transplant is necessary when the disease or scarring affects all layers of the cornea, making it impossible to safely separate the healthy tissue from the diseased tissue [1]. If a partial-thickness transplant isn’t anatomically possible due to concurrent eye issues or extensive damage, PKP still provides excellent long-term success rates for restoring vision [22][23].

Common questions in this guide

What is the difference between a partial and full-thickness corneal transplant?
A full-thickness transplant (PKP) replaces all layers of your cornea and requires microscopic stitches. A partial-thickness transplant replaces only the specific diseased layers, leaving your healthy tissue intact for faster recovery and a much lower rejection risk.
Which type of corneal transplant is best for Fuchs' dystrophy?
Partial-thickness inner layer transplants, specifically DSAEK and DMEK, are the standard of care for posterior corneal dystrophies like Fuchs' dystrophy. They replace only the damaged inner pumping layer of the cornea.
Why do I have to lie flat on my back after a partial corneal transplant?
Inner-layer transplants like DMEK and DSAEK use a temporary bubble of air or gas to hold the new graft in place instead of stitches. Since air naturally floats up, lying flat on your back ensures the bubble presses the delicate graft securely into the correct position while it heals.
How long does a corneal transplant last?
While survival rates are excellent, corneal transplants are not always permanent. Transplanted cells can naturally deplete over time, meaning a graft might need to be replaced after 10 to 15 years.
Will I need to take medication after my corneal transplant?
Yes, to protect your new transplant and prevent your immune system from rejecting the foreign tissue, you will likely need to use steroid eye drops for a long period, and sometimes indefinitely.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Based on my specific type of corneal dystrophy, which layer of my cornea is damaged, and am I a candidate for a partial-thickness transplant?
  2. 2.If you are recommending DMEK or DSAEK, exactly how many days will I need to lie flat on my back after the surgery to keep the air bubble in place?
  3. 3.How frequently do you perform DMEK, DSAEK, or DALK procedures compared to full-thickness (PKP) transplants?
  4. 4.What is your personal rate of graft detachment or 'rebubbling' for the procedure you are proposing?
  5. 5.How long will I need to be on steroid eye drops, and what are the risks associated with long-term use?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (23)
  1. 1

    Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation.

    Hos D, Matthaei M, Bock F, et al.

    Progress in retinal and eye research 2019; (73()):100768 doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001.

    PMID: 31279005
  2. 2

    Indications for and techniques of keratoplasty at Vietnam National Institute of Ophthalmology.

    Dong PN, Han TN, Aldave AJ, Chau HT

    International journal of ophthalmology 2016; (9(3)):379-83 doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.03.09.

    PMID: 27158606
  3. 3

    [Corneal transplantation at the beginning of the 21th century].

    Módis L, Lukács M, Makhoul S

    Orvosi hetilap 2023; (164(28)):1087-1093 doi:10.1556/650.2023.32822.

    PMID: 37454331
  4. 4

    Posterior Lamellar Corneal Graft (DSAEK) in an Aphakic and Congenital Aniridic Single Eye: A Case Report Presenting a New Surgical Procedure.

    Majo F, Muraine M

    Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2023; (240(4)):394-397 doi:10.1055/a-2045-7314.

    PMID: 37164417
  5. 5

    Comparison of outcomes and complications of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty performed in a large group of patients with keratoconus.

    Khattak A, Nakhli FR, Al-Arfaj KM, Cheema AA

    International ophthalmology 2018; (38(3)):985-992 doi:10.1007/s10792-017-0548-9.

    PMID: 28534231
  6. 6

    Glaucoma management after corneal transplantation surgeries.

    Kornmann HL, Gedde SJ

    Current opinion in ophthalmology 2016; (27(2)):132-9 doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000237.

    PMID: 26595847
  7. 7

    Changes in Technique and Indications for Keratoplasty in Poland, 1989 to 2014: An Analysis of Corneal Transplantations Performed at Saint Barbara Hospital, Trauma Center, Sosnowiec, Poland.

    Jankowska-Szmul J, Dobrowolski D, Krysik K, et al.

    Transplantation proceedings 2016; (48(5)):1818-23.

    PMID: 27496499
  8. 8

    Unmasking of subclinical keratoconus with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.

    Yung M, Li JY

    Taiwan journal of ophthalmology 2023; (13(1)):110-113 doi:10.4103/2211-5056.363562.

    PMID: 37252168
  9. 9

    Graft rejection episodes after keratoplasty in Japanese eyes.

    Wajima H, Hayashi T, Kobayashi A, et al.

    Scientific reports 2023; (13(1)):2635 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29659-w.

    PMID: 36788300
  10. 10

    Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure.

    Stuart AJ, Romano V, Virgili G, Shortt AJ

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2018; (6()):CD012097 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012097.pub2.

    PMID: 29940078
  11. 11

    Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Treatment of Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty.

    Einan-Lifshitz A, Mednick Z, Belkin A, et al.

    Cornea 2019; (38(9)):1077-1082 doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001993.

    PMID: 31394551
  12. 12

    Surgical Corneal Anatomy in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: Suggestion of New Acronyms.

    Sarnicola E, Sarnicola C, Cheung AY, et al.

    Cornea 2019; (38(4)):515-522 doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001845.

    PMID: 30681518
  13. 13

    Complications in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty - A retrospective cross sectional interventional analysis in a large series.

    Kodavoor SK, Rathi N, Dandapani R

    Oman journal of ophthalmology 2023; (16(1)):23-29 doi:10.4103/ojo.ojo_72_22.

    PMID: 37007267
  14. 14

    Is There a Cutoff in Favor of Penetrating Keratoplasty Rather than Endothelial Keratoplasty for Long-Standing Endothelial Decompensation?

    Jeng BH

    Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2021; (238(8)):881-884 doi:10.1055/a-0838-6032.

    PMID: 31600815
  15. 15

    Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Children With Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy: Long-Term Results.

    Al-Dahan D, AlRajhi A, AlHazzani A, et al.

    Eye & contact lens 2022; (48(12)):521-526 doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000942.

    PMID: 36138016
  16. 16

    Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

    Dunker SL, Dickman MM, Wisse RPL, et al.

    Ophthalmology 2020; (127(9)):1152-1159 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.029.

    PMID: 32386811
  17. 17

    Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty Versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus.

    Song Y, Zhang J, Pan Z

    Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation 2020; (18(4)):417-428 doi:10.6002/ect.2019.0123.

    PMID: 31724924
  18. 18

    Results of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Advanced Keratoconus in Children Less Than 18 Years.

    Arora R, Jain P, Jain P, et al.

    American journal of ophthalmology 2016; (162()):191-198.e2.

    PMID: 26596397
  19. 19

    Risk Factors for Endothelial Decompensation after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Its Novel Therapeutic Strategies.

    Liu M, Hong J

    Journal of ophthalmology 2018; (2018()):1389486 doi:10.1155/2018/1389486.

    PMID: 30581601
  20. 20

    Manual deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after partial unintentional full-thickness trephination.

    Sarnicola E, Sarnicola C, Cheung AY, et al.

    European journal of ophthalmology 2021; (31(2)):774-777 doi:10.1177/1120672120932108.

    PMID: 32493069
  21. 21

    Main issues in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A systematic narrative review.

    Niazi S, Del Barrio JA, Doroodgar F, et al.

    Taiwan journal of ophthalmology 2024; (14(1)):34-43 doi:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-23-00175.

    PMID: 38654987
  22. 22

    Modeling Endothelial Cell Loss After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Data From 5 Years of Follow-up.

    Fajgenbaum MA, Hollick EJ

    Cornea 2017; (36(5)):553-560 doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001177.

    PMID: 28306600
  23. 23

    Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Asian Population with American Corneas.

    Hsiao FC, Chen PY, Meir YJ, et al.

    International journal of environmental research and public health 2019; (16(22)) doi:10.3390/ijerph16224547.

    PMID: 31744259

This page provides educational information on corneal transplant options. Always consult your ophthalmologist or corneal specialist to determine which surgical approach is safest and most appropriate for your specific eye condition.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Corneal dystrophy.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.