What Biomarkers Should Be Tested in Esophageal Cancer?
At a Glance
In advanced esophageal cancer, biomarker testing commonly includes HER2, PD-L1 with a CPS score, dMMR/MSI, and TMB. For HER2-negative adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction, CLDN18.2 testing and broad NGS may identify additional treatment or trial options.
When you are diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer (meaning the cancer is recurrent, cannot be removed by surgery, or has spread to other parts of the body), analyzing the tumor’s specific characteristics is a critical step in care [1]. Besides standard markers like HER2 and PD-L1, it is important to ask your doctor about testing for Mismatch Repair (dMMR) / Microsatellite Instability (MSI), Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), and, in specific cases, newer targets like Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2).
Knowing your tumor’s profile helps your care team determine if adding a targeted therapy or immunotherapy to traditional chemotherapy could be beneficial for you. Biomarker testing is complex and involves different types of laboratory tests; some look at proteins on the surface of cells, while others look deep into the tumor’s DNA and RNA.
Protein Staining Tests (IHC and ISH)
Many of the most important biomarkers in esophageal cancer are proteins. Pathologists usually test for these using a technique called Immunohistochemistry (IHC), sometimes combined with In Situ Hybridization (ISH) to confirm the results.
- HER2: This is a protein that can promote the growth of cancer cells. Testing is particularly important if you have esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, as about 20% of advanced gastric and GEJ adenocarcinomas overexpress this protein [1][2]. If an IHC test (and ISH confirmation, if needed) shows the tumor is HER2-positive, your doctor may recommend a treatment plan that combines standard chemotherapy with a HER2-targeted medication [1][3].
- PD-L1: PD-L1 is a protein that helps cancers hide from your immune system. This test is relevant for both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [4][5]. It is measured using a Combined Positive Score (CPS), which counts PD-L1 expression on both tumor cells and surrounding immune cells [4]. A higher CPS indicates the tumor may be more likely to respond to certain immunotherapy drugs (like pembrolizumab), though it does not guarantee a response, and the exact threshold for treatment varies by drug and region [4][6].
- Mismatch Repair (dMMR) / MSI-H: This tests for the cancer’s inability to properly repair mistakes made when DNA is copied. Found in a small percentage of esophageal cancers, dMMR (tested via IHC) or MSI-H (tested via PCR or sequencing) are markers that often predict a strong response to immune checkpoint inhibitors [7][8]. Finding dMMR/MSI-H can open up specific immunotherapy options and may also prompt your doctor to recommend genetic counseling, as it can sometimes be linked to inherited conditions like Lynch syndrome [7][9].
- Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2): This is a newer protein target. Recently, a targeted therapy (zolbetuximab) was approved in certain regions for patients with HER2-negative, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) [10][11]. Eligibility requires a specific validated IHC test showing moderate-to-strong membranous staining in at least 75% of tumor cells [10][12]. It is not currently a blanket approval for primary esophageal cancer, but if your tumor is an adenocarcinoma located near the stomach (the GEJ), this is an important test to discuss [11][13].
Genomic Sequencing (NGS)
While IHC looks at proteins, Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) or Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) looks at the tumor’s DNA and RNA. NGS complements, but does not replace, protein tests like PD-L1 or HER2 IHC.
- Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB): Usually measured by NGS, TMB counts the number of mutations per megabase of tumor DNA. Tumors with a high number of mutations (TMB-high) might be more easily recognized by the immune system [14][15]. In some regions, a TMB-high result can make a patient eligible for tissue-agnostic immunotherapy, typically if prior treatments have failed and there are no satisfactory alternatives [14][15].
- Broad NGS Panels: A broad panel can test hundreds of genes at once [16][17]. It may discover rare but actionable changes—such as EGFR amplifications or NTRK/RET fusions—which might qualify you for specific clinical trials or off-label treatments [18][19]. However, it can also return “variants of uncertain significance” (mutations that don’t yet have a known treatment) or occasionally flag a potential inherited mutation that requires separate germline testing [18][19].
The Testing Process and Biopsies
Testing can often be done on tissue from an initial biopsy or surgery. If that tissue is too small or too old, a new biopsy may be considered by your oncology team [20][21]. In some cases, a “liquid biopsy” (a blood test looking for tumor DNA) might be used, though a negative liquid biopsy often still requires confirmation with a tissue sample [22][20]. Remember that finding a biomarker does not guarantee a cure or a perfect treatment, but it gives your oncology team the clearest evidence available for navigating your therapy choices.
Common questions in this guide
Which biomarker tests are usually recommended for advanced esophageal cancer?
What can HER2 and PD-L1 results tell me?
How do dMMR, MSI-H, and TMB results affect treatment?
When is CLDN18.2 testing useful for esophageal cancer?
Could broad NGS testing find another treatment option?
Can my old biopsy or a blood test provide enough tissue for biomarker testing?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Is my tumor an adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, and is it located at the gastroesophageal junction?
- 2.Has my tumor tissue been tested for HER2, PD-L1 (with a CPS score), and mismatch repair (dMMR/MSI)?
- 3.Based on my tumor's location and HER2 status, am I a candidate for Claudin 18.2 testing?
- 4.Would Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (NGS) be appropriate for me to look for rare mutations or clinical trial options?
- 5.Do we have enough tissue from my previous biopsy to run these tests, or will I need a new tissue or liquid biopsy?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (22)
- 1
HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Bartley AN, Washington MK, Colasacco C, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017; (35(4)):446-464 doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4836.
PMID: 28129524 - 2
The KEYNOTE-811 trial of dual PD-1 and HER2 blockade in HER2-positive gastric cancer.
Janjigian YY, Kawazoe A, Yañez P, et al.
Nature 2021; (600(7890)):727-730 doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04161-3.
PMID: 34912120 - 3
Biomarker-targeted therapies for advanced-stage gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers: an emerging paradigm.
Nakamura Y, Kawazoe A, Lordick F, et al.
Nature reviews. Clinical oncology 2021; (18(8)):473-487 doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00492-2.
PMID: 33790428 - 4
Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
Kojima T, Shah MA, Muro K, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020; (38(35)):4138-4148 doi:10.1200/JCO.20.01888.
PMID: 33026938 - 5
Selected updates in molecular and genomic pathology of esophageal cancer.
Liu Y, Zhao L, Xue L, Hou Y
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2020; (1482(1)):225-235 doi:10.1111/nyas.14527.
PMID: 33215736 - 6
Expression and correlation of PD-L1 and HER2 in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Rong L, Zhao H, Li Y, et al.
Journal of clinical pathology 2024; (77(4)):233-238 doi:10.1136/jcp-2022-208665.
PMID: 36650045 - 7
Expression of DNA Mismatch Repair Proteins, PD1 and PDL1 in Barrett's Neoplasia.
Saller JJ, Mora LB, Nasir A, et al.
Cancer genomics & proteomics 2022; (19(2)):145-150 doi:10.21873/cgp.20310.
PMID: 35181584 - 8
Expression of therapy target molecules in esophagogastric junction and Barrett's adenocarcinoma.
Abe H, Urabe M, Yagi K, et al.
Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2025; (28(2)):264-274 doi:10.1007/s10120-024-01573-8.
PMID: 39663311 - 9
Significance of druggable targets (PD-L1, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, MSI, and HPV) on curatively resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Lee HK, Kwon MJ, Ra YJ, et al.
Diagnostic pathology 2020; (15(1)):126 doi:10.1186/s13000-020-01045-4.
PMID: 33054840 - 10
Analytical and Clinical Performance of the VENTANA CLDN18 (43-14A) RxDx Assay in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma Tissue Samples in SPOTLIGHT and GLOW.
Stratton SP, Pang L, Pugh J, et al.
Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc 2025; (38(12)):100844 doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2025.100844.
PMID: 40680855 - 11
Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized, phase 3 GLOW trial.
Shah MA, Shitara K, Ajani JA, et al.
Nature medicine 2023; (29(8)):2133-2141 doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02465-7.
PMID: 37524953 - 12
Global Ring Study to Investigate the Comparability of Total Assay Performance of Commercial Claudin 18 Antibodies for Evaluation in Gastric Cancer.
Jasani B, Taniere P, Schildhaus HU, et al.
Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 2024; (104(1)):100284 doi:10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100284.
PMID: 37949357 - 13
Zolbetuximab: First Approval.
Keam SJ
Drugs 2024; (84(8)):977-983 doi:10.1007/s40265-024-02056-x.
PMID: 38967717 - 14
The New Era of Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer.
Takei S, Kawazoe A, Shitara K
Cancers 2022; (14(4)) doi:10.3390/cancers14041054.
PMID: 35205802 - 15
Biomarkers for precision immunotherapy in the metastatic setting: hope or reality?
Sajjadi E, Venetis K, Scatena C, Fusco N
Ecancermedicalscience 2020; (14()):1150 doi:10.3332/ecancer.2020.1150.
PMID: 33574895 - 16
Clinical and Diagnostic Utility of Genomic Profiling for Digestive Cancers: Real-World Evidence from Japan.
Ishikawa M, Nakamura K, Kawano R, et al.
Cancers 2024; (16(8)) doi:10.3390/cancers16081504.
PMID: 38672586 - 17
PIK3CA mutation is a favorable prognostic factor in esophageal cancer: molecular profile by next-generation sequencing using surgically resected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.
Yokota T, Serizawa M, Hosokawa A, et al.
BMC cancer 2018; (18(1)):826 doi:10.1186/s12885-018-4733-7.
PMID: 30115035 - 18
Whole genome sequencing analysis identifies recurrent structural alterations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Dutta M, Nakagawa H, Kato H, et al.
PeerJ 2020; (8()):e9294 doi:10.7717/peerj.9294.
PMID: 32617189 - 19
Gefitinib and EGFR Gene Copy Number Aberrations in Esophageal Cancer.
Petty RD, Dahle-Smith A, Stevenson DAJ, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017; (35(20)):2279-2287 doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.70.3934.
PMID: 28537764 - 20
Detection of circulating tumour DNA after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer.
Eyck BM, Jansen MP, Noordman BJ, et al.
The Journal of pathology 2023; (259(1)):35-45 doi:10.1002/path.6016.
PMID: 36196486 - 21
Liquid biopsy in esophageal cancer: a case report of false-positive circulating tumor DNA detection due to clonal hematopoiesis.
Spoor J, Eyck BM, Atmodimedjo PN, et al.
Annals of translational medicine 2021; (9(15)):1264 doi:10.21037/atm-21-525.
PMID: 34532401 - 22
Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease After Chemoradiotherapy for Localized Esophageal Cancer.
Azad TD, Chaudhuri AA, Fang P, et al.
Gastroenterology 2020; (158(3)):494-505.e6 doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.039.
PMID: 31711920
This page explains biomarker testing for advanced esophageal cancer for informational purposes only and does not replace medical advice. Your oncology and pathology teams can interpret your results and recommend appropriate next steps.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Carcinoma of esophagus.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.