Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 13 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Medical Genetics · Mucopolysaccharidosis type I

What Causes a False Positive MPS I Newborn Screening?

At a Glance

A positive newborn screen for MPS I is often a false alarm caused by harmless genetic variations, like pseudodeficiency alleles or being a carrier. These babies are completely healthy. Follow-up GAG and genetic testing is required to determine if the result is a false positive or true disease.

Getting a call that your baby’s newborn screening came back positive for Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a terrifying experience. It is entirely normal to feel anxious, overwhelmed, and scared. However, a positive screen does not mean your baby has the disease.

In fact, the vast majority of initial positive screens for MPS I turn out to be a “false positive” or a “false alarm.” Furthermore, babies born with true MPS I typically look and act completely healthy at birth, so closely watching your baby for “symptoms” right now will only increase your anxiety without providing any answers. Understanding why false alarms happen and what the next steps are can help you navigate this difficult waiting period.

How the Newborn Screen Works

The newborn screening test uses a few drops of blood taken from your baby’s heel shortly after birth. For MPS I, the test measures the activity of an enzyme called alpha-L-iduronidase (IDUA).

Enzymes are specialized proteins that act like recycling centers in the body’s cells. In true cases of MPS I, the baby’s body does not produce enough working IDUA enzyme. This means complex sugars called glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) build up in the cells and cause damage.

The newborn screen is designed to be extremely sensitive to catch any baby who might have low enzyme levels. Because the test is designed to cast a wide net, it often flags babies whose enzyme levels are lower than normal for reasons completely unrelated to the actual disease [1][2].

Why False Positives Happen

False positive results in newborn screening for MPS I are very common. They are almost always caused by harmless genetic variations rather than true disease [3][4]. There are two main reasons why a healthy baby might have a false positive result:

Pseudodeficiency Alleles

The most common cause of a false positive MPS I screen is a genetic quirk known as a pseudodeficiency allele [5].

An “allele” is simply a version of a gene. We all have normal variations in our genes that make us unique, much like variations that dictate eye or hair color. A pseudodeficiency allele is a specific, harmless variation in the IDUA gene.

If your baby has a pseudodeficiency allele, the enzyme acts a bit “shy” in the laboratory test tube. The newborn screening equipment registers the enzyme’s activity as very low [5][6]. However, inside your baby’s body, the enzyme is working perfectly well—breaking down the complex sugars just like it is supposed to. Babies with a pseudodeficiency allele are completely healthy and will never develop MPS I [5][7].

Being a Carrier (Heterozygosity)

Every person has two copies of the IDUA gene—one inherited from each parent. A baby is a carrier if they have one normal gene and one gene that doesn’t work well. This is scientifically referred to as heterozygosity.

Carriers do not have MPS I. The single working gene produces more than enough enzyme to keep them healthy. However, because they only have one fully functioning gene copy instead of two, their overall enzyme levels in the blood spot might be slightly lower than average—sometimes just low enough to trip the sensitive alarm on the newborn screen [3][4]. If your baby turns out to be a carrier, you and your partner may want to speak with a genetic counselor to discuss your own carrier status and family planning.

Next Steps: Confirming or Ruling Out MPS I

Because the initial screen casts such a wide net, a positive result requires immediate follow-up testing (sometimes called second-tier testing) to confirm or definitively rule out the diagnosis [8][1]. While waiting for results is agonizing, doctors will typically run two types of tests to figure out if it was a false alarm:

1. Biomarker Testing (GAG Analysis)

The most critical follow-up test measures the actual buildup of the complex sugars (GAGs) in your baby’s blood or urine.

  • If a baby truly has MPS I, the enzyme isn’t working, and GAG levels will be very high.
  • If the baby has a pseudodeficiency or is a carrier (a false positive), the enzyme is working fine inside the body, and their GAG levels will be completely normal [3][8].

Measuring GAGs is incredibly accurate at distinguishing a false alarm from true MPS I [8]. In many modern newborn screening programs, state labs automatically test GAG levels on the original blood spot before ever calling the parents, though procedures vary by hospital [8][9]. If a new sample is needed, GAG results often come back faster than genetic testing.

2. DNA Sequencing (Genetic Testing)

The doctor will also order a genetic test to look at your baby’s exact IDUA genes. By reading the DNA code, doctors can look for known pseudodeficiency alleles or identify true disease-causing mutations.

While genetic testing is very helpful, interpreting the results can sometimes be complex if a baby has a rare or unique genetic variation [10][11]. In some instances, the genetic testing reveals a “grey area” (variants of uncertain significance), and doctors may recommend watchful waiting and regular monitoring rather than immediate treatment. This is why doctors rely heavily on the GAG analysis alongside the genetic test to make a final determination.

If the follow-up tests confirm that your baby truly has severe MPS I, your medical team will move quickly. Early identification through this screening process is critical because it allows for prompt, life-saving treatments like enzyme replacement therapy or a stem cell transplant before irreversible damage occurs [12][13]. But until those confirmatory results return, remember that the highest likelihood is that your baby is completely healthy.

Common questions in this guide

What does a positive newborn screen for MPS I mean?
A positive screen means your baby's blood sample showed lower-than-normal activity for the IDUA enzyme. However, this does not mean your baby has MPS I, as false positives are very common. Follow-up testing is needed to confirm or definitively rule out the diagnosis.
What is a pseudodeficiency allele?
A pseudodeficiency allele is a harmless genetic variation that makes an enzyme appear inactive in a laboratory test tube. If your baby has this, their enzyme works perfectly fine inside their body, and they will never develop MPS I.
Can being a carrier cause a false positive MPS I test?
Yes. If a baby inherits one normal gene and one non-working gene, they are a genetic carrier. Carriers are healthy, but their overall enzyme levels might be slightly lower than average, triggering a false positive on a highly sensitive newborn screen.
What follow-up tests are done after a positive MPS I screen?
Doctors will typically order a biomarker test to measure complex sugars called GAGs in the blood or urine. They will also order a genetic test (DNA sequencing) to look at the exact IDUA genes. Together, these tests distinguish false alarms from actual disease.
When will I get the follow-up GAG test results?
In many modern newborn screening programs, state labs automatically test GAG levels on the original blood spot before notifying parents. If a new sample is needed, GAG test results usually come back faster than genetic testing.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Has a second-tier GAG (glycosaminoglycan) test been run on the original blood spot yet, and if not, when will it be done?
  2. 2.What was the specific alpha-iduronidase (IDUA) enzyme activity level reported on the initial screen?
  3. 3.Are we waiting on DNA sequencing results for the IDUA gene, and what is the expected turnaround time for those results?
  4. 4.Can you refer us to a pediatric genetic counselor to help interpret the final results and discuss our own carrier status?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (13)
  1. 1

    Taiwan National Newborn Screening Program by Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Mucopolysaccharidoses Types I, II, and VI.

    Chan MJ, Liao HC, Gelb MH, et al.

    The Journal of pediatrics 2019; (205()):176-182 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.063.

    PMID: 30409495
  2. 2

    Digital Microfluidics in Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses: A Progress Report.

    Washburn J, Millington DS

    International journal of neonatal screening 2020; (6(4)) doi:10.3390/ijns6040078.

    PMID: 33124616
  3. 3

    Incorporation of Second-Tier Biomarker Testing Improves the Specificity of Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I.

    Peck DS, Lacey JM, White AL, et al.

    International journal of neonatal screening 2020; (6(1)):10.

    PMID: 33073008
  4. 4

    The combined use of enzyme activity and metabolite assays as a strategy for newborn screening of mucopolysaccharidosis type I.

    Polo G, Gueraldi D, Giuliani A, et al.

    Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2020; (58(12)):2063-2072 doi:10.1515/cclm-2020-0064.

    PMID: 32432561
  5. 5

    Reclassifying IDUA c.250G>A (p.Gly84Ser): Evidence for a Possible Pseudodeficiency Allele.

    Connolly C, Fisher R, Yang C, et al.

    International journal of neonatal screening 2025; (11(4)) doi:10.3390/ijns11040100.

    PMID: 41283362
  6. 6

    High prevalence of GAA c.[752C > T;761C > T] haplotype complicates high-risk screening for Pompe disease in the Chinese population.

    Jiao K, Wang Y, Zhou J, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2026; (148(4)):110187 doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2026.110187.

    PMID: 42320386
  7. 7

    Muscle biochemical and pathological diagnosis in Pompe disease.

    Saito Y, Nakamura K, Fukuda T, et al.

    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 2022; doi:10.1136/jnnp-2022-329085.

    PMID: 35470251
  8. 8

    High precision newborn screening for mucopolysaccharidosis type I by enzymatic activity followed by endogenous, non-reducing end glycosaminoglycan analysis.

    Herbst ZM, Kubaski F, Pollard L, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2025; (144(2)):108612 doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2024.108612.

    PMID: 39645522
  9. 9

    Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis I: Moving Forward Learning from Experience.

    Clarke LA, Dickson P, Ellinwood NM, Klein TL

    International journal of neonatal screening 2020; (6(4)) doi:10.3390/ijns6040091.

    PMID: 33227921
  10. 10

    Genotype-phenotype relationships in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I): Insights from the International MPS I Registry.

    Clarke LA, Giugliani R, Guffon N, et al.

    Clinical genetics 2019; (96(4)):281-289 doi:10.1111/cge.13583.

    PMID: 31194252
  11. 11

    Neurocognition across the spectrum of mucopolysaccharidosis type I: Age, severity, and treatment.

    Shapiro EG, Nestrasil I, Rudser K, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2015; (116(1-2)):61-8.

    PMID: 26095521
  12. 12

    First Three Years' Experience of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type-I Newborn Screening in California.

    Fillman T, Matteson J, Tang H, et al.

    The Journal of pediatrics 2023; (263()):113644 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113644.

    PMID: 37516270
  13. 13

    Two-Tiered Newborn Screening with Post-Analytical Tools for Pompe Disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I Results in Performance Improvement and Future Direction.

    Hall PL, Sanchez R, Hagar AF, et al.

    International journal of neonatal screening 2020; (6(1)) doi:10.3390/ijns6010002.

    PMID: 32064362

This page provides educational information about MPS I newborn screening results and false positives. It does not replace professional medical advice, so please consult a pediatric geneticist or your pediatrician to interpret your baby's specific test results.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Mucopolysaccharidosis type 1.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.