Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 29 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Medical Genetics · Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer

What Genes Besides BRCA Cause Breast & Ovarian Cancer?

At a Glance

While BRCA genes are the most well-known, mutations in other genes like PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, CDH1, and PTEN also increase the risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Multi-gene panel testing is now the standard way to identify these broader cancer risks.

For many years, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were the primary focus when evaluating a person’s genetic risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. However, we now know that changes (mutations) in several other genes can also significantly increase your risk for these and other cancers [1][2]. Because of this, modern genetic testing has moved away from looking only at BRCA1 and BRCA2. Today, multi-gene panels—tests that look at dozens of cancer-risk genes simultaneously—are the standard of care [3][4].

Discovering a genetic mutation can be overwhelming, especially when modern panels test for risks beyond just breast or ovarian cancer. This is why it is highly recommended to work closely with a genetic counselor who can help you prepare for these possibilities before you even take the test.

High vs. Moderate Penetrance Genes

Genes linked to cancer risk are often described by their penetrance, which simply means how likely it is that a person with a mutation in that gene will actually develop cancer during their lifetime [5].

High-Penetrance Genes

Mutations in these genes carry a very high lifetime risk for cancer. For context, these mutations can increase your breast cancer risk to more than four times that of the general population [6][7].

  • PALB2: Similar to BRCA mutations, changes in PALB2 carry a high risk for breast cancer, as well as an increased risk for ovarian and pancreatic cancers [8].
  • CDH1: This gene is strongly associated with a specific type of breast cancer called lobular breast cancer, carrying a lifetime breast cancer risk of around 37% [9][10]. It is also linked to hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Because the stomach cancer risk is so severe, discussions around this gene often involve preventive stomach removal [11].
  • PTEN: Mutations here cause PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (including Cowden syndrome), which significantly increases the risk for breast, thyroid, and uterine cancers [12][13]. A hamartoma is a type of non-cancerous growth.
  • TP53: Associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, mutations in this gene dramatically increase the risk for breast cancer (often at a very young age), as well as sarcomas (cancers of the bone or muscle), brain tumors, and other cancers [14]. Finding out you have a massive risk for unexpected cancers like brain tumors can be frightening, which is why a genetic counselor’s guidance is vital. People with this mutation must also be cautious with radiation therapy due to an impaired ability to repair DNA [15].

Moderate-Penetrance Genes

These genes increase your cancer risk, but not as severely as high-penetrance genes. They generally double or triple the average risk [5].

  • ATM and CHEK2: Both are linked to an increased risk of breast cancer (often estrogen-receptor positive) [14].
  • RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1: These genes are primarily known for increasing the risk of ovarian cancer [1][16]. For instance, a mutation in BRIP1 is often considered a reason to discuss preventive removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes between ages 45 and 50 [17]. While preventing cancer is the goal, it is important to acknowledge that this surgery forces the body into early menopause, significantly impacting a patient’s quality of life. Newer evidence shows RAD51C and RAD51D can also elevate breast cancer risk, depending heavily on your family history [18].

Why Multi-Gene Panels Are the Standard of Care

If you had genetic testing more than a decade ago (prior to 2014), you were likely only tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2. You should speak with a genetic counselor to see if you qualify for updated testing. Today, a single blood or saliva test can read a panel of many genes at once [19]. Multi-gene panels are the new standard for several reasons:

  • Finding More Answers: Testing multiple genes at once identifies significantly more people with hereditary cancer risks than BRCA-only testing [20][21]. This means families get more accurate explanations for their cancer history.
  • Tailored Screening: Knowing exactly which gene is altered changes how your medical team manages your health [22]. For example, if you have an ATM mutation, your doctor might recommend starting breast MRIs earlier [23][24], whereas a BRIP1 mutation shifts the focus primarily toward ovarian screening and prevention [17].
  • Cost and Efficiency: It is much more efficient and cost-effective to test for all relevant genes at once rather than testing them one by one [25].

The Catch: Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS)

The main drawback of casting a wider net with multi-gene panels is a higher chance of finding a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) [26][27]. A VUS means the laboratory found a change in your DNA, but there isn’t enough medical evidence yet to know if it increases your cancer risk or is just a harmless biological quirk.

It is crucial to know that a VUS is not a diagnosis. Standard medical guidelines recommend that a VUS should not be used to make decisions about preventive surgeries (like a mastectomy) [27][28]. In most cases, a VUS is eventually reclassified as harmless as researchers learn more [29].

Who tracks a VUS? It is generally the patient’s responsibility to check in with their genetic counselor or doctor every year or two to see if the laboratory has reclassified the variant. Discussing this communication plan with your care team upfront can relieve significant anxiety.

Common questions in this guide

What is a multi-gene panel for cancer risk?
A multi-gene panel is a single blood or saliva test that checks dozens of genes simultaneously for cancer-causing mutations, rather than just testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. It provides a more comprehensive look at your hereditary cancer risk.
What are the high-penetrance genes for breast cancer besides BRCA?
High-penetrance genes like PALB2, CDH1, PTEN, and TP53 significantly increase your lifetime risk for breast cancer. Mutations in these genes may also elevate the risk for other unexpected cancers, such as ovarian, pancreatic, or stomach cancer.
What is a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)?
A VUS means the genetic test found a change in your DNA, but there is not enough evidence to know if it increases your cancer risk or is just a harmless biological quirk. Most VUS results are eventually reclassified as harmless.
Should I have preventive surgery if I have a VUS?
Because a VUS is not a diagnosis and the risk is unclear, standard medical guidelines state it should not be used to make decisions about preventive surgeries like a mastectomy. You should track the VUS with your care team to see if it gets reclassified.
How do ATM and CHEK2 gene mutations affect my cancer risk?
Moderate-penetrance genes like ATM and CHEK2 generally double or triple your average cancer risk. While they may prompt your doctor to change your screening schedule, such as starting breast MRIs earlier, they are not as severe as high-penetrance genes.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Given my personal and family history of cancer, which specific multi-gene panel is most appropriate for me?
  2. 2.If my test returns a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS), what is the clinic's process for tracking it, and is it my responsibility to call you yearly to check for updates?
  3. 3.If I test positive for a moderate-penetrance gene like ATM or CHEK2, how exactly will that change the timeline and frequency of my current screening schedule?
  4. 4.Since multi-gene panels test for risks beyond breast and ovarian cancer, can you refer me to a genetic counselor to discuss how I might handle unexpected findings before I take the test?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (29)
  1. 1

    A dominant RAD51C pathogenic splicing variant predisposes to breast and ovarian cancer in the Newfoundland population due to founder effect.

    Dawson LM, Smith KN, Werdyani S, et al.

    Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2020; (8(2)):e1070 doi:10.1002/mgg3.1070.

    PMID: 31782267
  2. 2

    Mutational analysis of RAD51C and RAD51D genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families from Murcia (southeastern Spain).

    Sánchez-Bermúdez AI, Sarabia-Meseguer MD, García-Aliaga Á, et al.

    European journal of medical genetics 2018; (61(6)):355-361 doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.01.015.

    PMID: 29409816
  3. 3

    Clinical Validity of Next-Generation Sequencing Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Detecting Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.

    Yoo J, Lee GD, Kim JH, et al.

    Annals of laboratory medicine 2020; (40(2)):148-154 doi:10.3343/alm.2020.40.2.148.

    PMID: 31650731
  4. 4

    Clinical Actionability of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment.

    Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, et al.

    JAMA oncology 2015; (1(7)):943-51 doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2690.

    PMID: 26270727
  5. 5

    Understanding genetic variations associated with familial breast cancer.

    Pal M, Das D, Pandey M

    World journal of surgical oncology 2024; (22(1)):271 doi:10.1186/s12957-024-03553-9.

    PMID: 39390525
  6. 6

    Germline Genetic Testing for Women With Breast Cancer: Shifting the Paradigm From Whom to Test to Whom NOT to Test.

    Tung N, Desai N

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021; (39(31)):3415-3418 doi:10.1200/JCO.21.01761.

    PMID: 34491781
  7. 7

    Comparison of Patient Susceptibility Genes Across Breast Cancer: Implications for Prognosis and Therapeutic Outcomes.

    Peleg Hasson S, Menes T, Sonnenblick A

    Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine 2020; (13()):227-238 doi:10.2147/PGPM.S233485.

    PMID: 32801835
  8. 8

    Cancer Risks Associated With Germline PALB2 Pathogenic Variants: An International Study of 524 Families.

    Yang X, Leslie G, Doroszuk A, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020; (38(7)):674-685 doi:10.1200/JCO.19.01907.

    PMID: 31841383
  9. 9

    Germline CDH1 Variants and Lifetime Cancer Risk.

    Ryan CE, Fasaye GA, Gallanis AF, et al.

    JAMA 2024; (332(9)):722-729 doi:10.1001/jama.2024.10852.

    PMID: 38873722
  10. 10

    Variants in members of the cadherin-catenin complex, CDH1 and CTNND1, cause blepharocheilodontic syndrome.

    Kievit A, Tessadori F, Douben H, et al.

    European journal of human genetics : EJHG 2018; (26(2)):210-219 doi:10.1038/s41431-017-0010-5.

    PMID: 29348693
  11. 11

    Short and long-term outcomes of prophylactic total gastrectomy in 54 consecutive individuals with germline pathogenic mutations in the CDH1 gene.

    Stillman MD, Kusche N, Toledano S, et al.

    Journal of surgical oncology 2022; (126(8)):1413-1422 doi:10.1002/jso.27084.

    PMID: 36063148
  12. 12

    Managing patients at genetic risk of breast cancer.

    Pederson HJ, Padia SA, May M, Grobmyer S

    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine 2016; (83(3)):199-206 doi:10.3949/ccjm.83a.14057.

    PMID: 26974991
  13. 13

    Systemic Treatment Strategies for Patients with Hereditary Breast Cancer Syndromes.

    Parkes A, Arun BK, Litton JK

    The oncologist 2017; (22(6)):655-666 doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0430.

    PMID: 28469042
  14. 14

    Hereditary breast cancer beyond BRCA: clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes.

    Dejaegher K, Nevelsteen I, Han S, et al.

    Familial cancer 2025; (24(2)):54 doi:10.1007/s10689-025-00478-4.

    PMID: 40504267
  15. 15

    Lessons Learned in Practice with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: LFS-Related Breast Cancer Treatment Strategy and Establishment of a Surveillance System.

    Sasaki R, Horimoto Y, Saeki H, et al.

    Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal 2022; (68(4)):405-412 doi:10.14789/jmj.JMJ22-0012-CR.

    PMID: 39021431
  16. 16

    Germline Mutations in the BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN Genes in Women With Ovarian Cancer.

    Ramus SJ, Song H, Dicks E, et al.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2015; (107(11)).

    PMID: 26315354
  17. 17

    Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) in a BRIP-1 mutation carrier: the first case report.

    Grandi G, Caroli M, Alboni C, et al.

    Familial cancer 2020; (19(4)):291-295 doi:10.1007/s10689-020-00179-0.

    PMID: 32328861
  18. 18

    Ovarian and Breast Cancer Risks Associated With Pathogenic Variants in RAD51C and RAD51D.

    Yang X, Song H, Leslie G, et al.

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2020; (112(12)):1242-1250 doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa030.

    PMID: 32107557
  19. 19

    Expanding the Genomic Landscape of HBOC and Cancer Risk Among Mutation Carriers.

    Vietri MT, Della Pepa C, Caliendo G, et al.

    International journal of molecular sciences 2025; (26(13)) doi:10.3390/ijms26135928.

    PMID: 40649708
  20. 20

    Spectrum of germline pathogenic variants using a targeted next generation sequencing panel and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with suspected hereditary breast cancer at an academic medical centre in Pakistan.

    Akbar F, Siddiqui Z, Waheed MT, et al.

    Hereditary cancer in clinical practice 2022; (20(1)):24 doi:10.1186/s13053-022-00232-2.

    PMID: 35710434
  21. 21

    Impact of deleterious variants in other genes beyond BRCA1/2 detected in breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients by NGS-based multi-gene panel testing: looking over the hedge.

    Bono M, Fanale D, Incorvaia L, et al.

    ESMO open 2021; (6(4)):100235 doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100235.

    PMID: 34371384
  22. 22

    Principles of molecular testing for hereditary cancer.

    Mighton C, Lerner-Ellis JP

    Genes, chromosomes & cancer 2022; (61(6)):356-381 doi:10.1002/gcc.23048.

    PMID: 35436018
  23. 23

    Hereditary Breast Cancer: BRCA Mutations and Beyond.

    Patel MM, Adrada BE

    Radiologic clinics of North America 2024; (62(4)):627-642 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.014.

    PMID: 38777539
  24. 24

    Local treatment in patients with hereditary breast cancer: decision-making process in low-, moderate-, high-penetrance pathogenic germline mutation carriers.

    Sibilio A, Curcio A, Toesca A, et al.

    Current opinion in oncology 2022; (34(6)):614-622 doi:10.1097/CCO.0000000000000872.

    PMID: 36170166
  25. 25

    Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program.

    Jones JC, Golafshar MA, Coston TW, et al.

    Cureus 2023; (15(4)):e37428 doi:10.7759/cureus.37428.

    PMID: 37181954
  26. 26

    Occurrence of variants of unknown clinical significance in genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome: a literature review and analytical observational retrospective cohort study.

    Adam F, Fluri M, Scherz A, Rabaglio M

    BMC medical genomics 2023; (16(1)):7 doi:10.1186/s12920-023-01437-7.

    PMID: 36647026
  27. 27

    The influence of BRCA variants of unknown significance on cancer risk management decision-making.

    Chern JY, Lee SS, Frey MK, et al.

    Journal of gynecologic oncology 2019; (30(4)):e60 doi:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e60.

    PMID: 31074248
  28. 28

    Using patient-reported outcomes from the PROCLAIM trial to assess the impact of universal germline genetic testing for prostate cancer patients.

    Shore ND, Pieczonka CM, Heron S, et al.

    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 2026; (29(2)):346-352 doi:10.1038/s41391-025-01013-3.

    PMID: 40983675
  29. 29

    A Modern Dilemma: How Experts Grapple with Ambiguous Genetic Test Results.

    Scherr CL, Ross Arguedas AA, Getachew-Smith H, et al.

    Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 2020; (40(5)):655-668 doi:10.1177/0272989X20935864.

    PMID: 32734842

This page is for informational purposes only and does not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a genetic counselor or oncologist regarding genetic testing and personalized cancer risk management.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.