What Genes Besides BRCA Cause Breast & Ovarian Cancer?
At a Glance
While BRCA genes are the most well-known, mutations in other genes like PALB2, ATM, CHEK2, CDH1, and PTEN also increase the risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Multi-gene panel testing is now the standard way to identify these broader cancer risks.
In this answer
3 sections
For many years, the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were the primary focus when evaluating a person’s genetic risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. However, we now know that changes (mutations) in several other genes can also significantly increase your risk for these and other cancers [1][2]. Because of this, modern genetic testing has moved away from looking only at BRCA1 and BRCA2. Today, multi-gene panels—tests that look at dozens of cancer-risk genes simultaneously—are the standard of care [3][4].
Discovering a genetic mutation can be overwhelming, especially when modern panels test for risks beyond just breast or ovarian cancer. This is why it is highly recommended to work closely with a genetic counselor who can help you prepare for these possibilities before you even take the test.
High vs. Moderate Penetrance Genes
Genes linked to cancer risk are often described by their penetrance, which simply means how likely it is that a person with a mutation in that gene will actually develop cancer during their lifetime [5].
High-Penetrance Genes
Mutations in these genes carry a very high lifetime risk for cancer. For context, these mutations can increase your breast cancer risk to more than four times that of the general population [6][7].
- PALB2: Similar to BRCA mutations, changes in PALB2 carry a high risk for breast cancer, as well as an increased risk for ovarian and pancreatic cancers [8].
- CDH1: This gene is strongly associated with a specific type of breast cancer called lobular breast cancer, carrying a lifetime breast cancer risk of around 37% [9][10]. It is also linked to hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. Because the stomach cancer risk is so severe, discussions around this gene often involve preventive stomach removal [11].
- PTEN: Mutations here cause PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (including Cowden syndrome), which significantly increases the risk for breast, thyroid, and uterine cancers [12][13]. A hamartoma is a type of non-cancerous growth.
- TP53: Associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, mutations in this gene dramatically increase the risk for breast cancer (often at a very young age), as well as sarcomas (cancers of the bone or muscle), brain tumors, and other cancers [14]. Finding out you have a massive risk for unexpected cancers like brain tumors can be frightening, which is why a genetic counselor’s guidance is vital. People with this mutation must also be cautious with radiation therapy due to an impaired ability to repair DNA [15].
Moderate-Penetrance Genes
These genes increase your cancer risk, but not as severely as high-penetrance genes. They generally double or triple the average risk [5].
- ATM and CHEK2: Both are linked to an increased risk of breast cancer (often estrogen-receptor positive) [14].
- RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1: These genes are primarily known for increasing the risk of ovarian cancer [1][16]. For instance, a mutation in BRIP1 is often considered a reason to discuss preventive removal of the ovaries and fallopian tubes between ages 45 and 50 [17]. While preventing cancer is the goal, it is important to acknowledge that this surgery forces the body into early menopause, significantly impacting a patient’s quality of life. Newer evidence shows RAD51C and RAD51D can also elevate breast cancer risk, depending heavily on your family history [18].
Why Multi-Gene Panels Are the Standard of Care
If you had genetic testing more than a decade ago (prior to 2014), you were likely only tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2. You should speak with a genetic counselor to see if you qualify for updated testing. Today, a single blood or saliva test can read a panel of many genes at once [19]. Multi-gene panels are the new standard for several reasons:
- Finding More Answers: Testing multiple genes at once identifies significantly more people with hereditary cancer risks than BRCA-only testing [20][21]. This means families get more accurate explanations for their cancer history.
- Tailored Screening: Knowing exactly which gene is altered changes how your medical team manages your health [22]. For example, if you have an ATM mutation, your doctor might recommend starting breast MRIs earlier [23][24], whereas a BRIP1 mutation shifts the focus primarily toward ovarian screening and prevention [17].
- Cost and Efficiency: It is much more efficient and cost-effective to test for all relevant genes at once rather than testing them one by one [25].
The Catch: Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS)
The main drawback of casting a wider net with multi-gene panels is a higher chance of finding a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) [26][27]. A VUS means the laboratory found a change in your DNA, but there isn’t enough medical evidence yet to know if it increases your cancer risk or is just a harmless biological quirk.
It is crucial to know that a VUS is not a diagnosis. Standard medical guidelines recommend that a VUS should not be used to make decisions about preventive surgeries (like a mastectomy) [27][28]. In most cases, a VUS is eventually reclassified as harmless as researchers learn more [29].
Who tracks a VUS? It is generally the patient’s responsibility to check in with their genetic counselor or doctor every year or two to see if the laboratory has reclassified the variant. Discussing this communication plan with your care team upfront can relieve significant anxiety.
Common questions in this guide
What is a multi-gene panel for cancer risk?
What are the high-penetrance genes for breast cancer besides BRCA?
What is a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS)?
Should I have preventive surgery if I have a VUS?
How do ATM and CHEK2 gene mutations affect my cancer risk?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Given my personal and family history of cancer, which specific multi-gene panel is most appropriate for me?
- 2.If my test returns a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS), what is the clinic's process for tracking it, and is it my responsibility to call you yearly to check for updates?
- 3.If I test positive for a moderate-penetrance gene like ATM or CHEK2, how exactly will that change the timeline and frequency of my current screening schedule?
- 4.Since multi-gene panels test for risks beyond breast and ovarian cancer, can you refer me to a genetic counselor to discuss how I might handle unexpected findings before I take the test?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (29)
- 1
A dominant RAD51C pathogenic splicing variant predisposes to breast and ovarian cancer in the Newfoundland population due to founder effect.
Dawson LM, Smith KN, Werdyani S, et al.
Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2020; (8(2)):e1070 doi:10.1002/mgg3.1070.
PMID: 31782267 - 2
Mutational analysis of RAD51C and RAD51D genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families from Murcia (southeastern Spain).
Sánchez-Bermúdez AI, Sarabia-Meseguer MD, García-Aliaga Á, et al.
European journal of medical genetics 2018; (61(6)):355-361 doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.01.015.
PMID: 29409816 - 3
Clinical Validity of Next-Generation Sequencing Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Detecting Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.
Yoo J, Lee GD, Kim JH, et al.
Annals of laboratory medicine 2020; (40(2)):148-154 doi:10.3343/alm.2020.40.2.148.
PMID: 31650731 - 4
Clinical Actionability of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment.
Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, et al.
JAMA oncology 2015; (1(7)):943-51 doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2690.
PMID: 26270727 - 5
Understanding genetic variations associated with familial breast cancer.
Pal M, Das D, Pandey M
World journal of surgical oncology 2024; (22(1)):271 doi:10.1186/s12957-024-03553-9.
PMID: 39390525 - 6
Germline Genetic Testing for Women With Breast Cancer: Shifting the Paradigm From Whom to Test to Whom NOT to Test.
Tung N, Desai N
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021; (39(31)):3415-3418 doi:10.1200/JCO.21.01761.
PMID: 34491781 - 7
Comparison of Patient Susceptibility Genes Across Breast Cancer: Implications for Prognosis and Therapeutic Outcomes.
Peleg Hasson S, Menes T, Sonnenblick A
Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine 2020; (13()):227-238 doi:10.2147/PGPM.S233485.
PMID: 32801835 - 8
Cancer Risks Associated With Germline PALB2 Pathogenic Variants: An International Study of 524 Families.
Yang X, Leslie G, Doroszuk A, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020; (38(7)):674-685 doi:10.1200/JCO.19.01907.
PMID: 31841383 - 9
Germline CDH1 Variants and Lifetime Cancer Risk.
Ryan CE, Fasaye GA, Gallanis AF, et al.
JAMA 2024; (332(9)):722-729 doi:10.1001/jama.2024.10852.
PMID: 38873722 - 10
Variants in members of the cadherin-catenin complex, CDH1 and CTNND1, cause blepharocheilodontic syndrome.
Kievit A, Tessadori F, Douben H, et al.
European journal of human genetics : EJHG 2018; (26(2)):210-219 doi:10.1038/s41431-017-0010-5.
PMID: 29348693 - 11
Short and long-term outcomes of prophylactic total gastrectomy in 54 consecutive individuals with germline pathogenic mutations in the CDH1 gene.
Stillman MD, Kusche N, Toledano S, et al.
Journal of surgical oncology 2022; (126(8)):1413-1422 doi:10.1002/jso.27084.
PMID: 36063148 - 12
Managing patients at genetic risk of breast cancer.
Pederson HJ, Padia SA, May M, Grobmyer S
Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine 2016; (83(3)):199-206 doi:10.3949/ccjm.83a.14057.
PMID: 26974991 - 13
Systemic Treatment Strategies for Patients with Hereditary Breast Cancer Syndromes.
Parkes A, Arun BK, Litton JK
The oncologist 2017; (22(6)):655-666 doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0430.
PMID: 28469042 - 14
Hereditary breast cancer beyond BRCA: clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes.
Dejaegher K, Nevelsteen I, Han S, et al.
Familial cancer 2025; (24(2)):54 doi:10.1007/s10689-025-00478-4.
PMID: 40504267 - 15
Lessons Learned in Practice with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: LFS-Related Breast Cancer Treatment Strategy and Establishment of a Surveillance System.
Sasaki R, Horimoto Y, Saeki H, et al.
Juntendo Iji zasshi = Juntendo medical journal 2022; (68(4)):405-412 doi:10.14789/jmj.JMJ22-0012-CR.
PMID: 39021431 - 16
Germline Mutations in the BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN Genes in Women With Ovarian Cancer.
Ramus SJ, Song H, Dicks E, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2015; (107(11)).
PMID: 26315354 - 17
Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) in a BRIP-1 mutation carrier: the first case report.
Grandi G, Caroli M, Alboni C, et al.
Familial cancer 2020; (19(4)):291-295 doi:10.1007/s10689-020-00179-0.
PMID: 32328861 - 18
Ovarian and Breast Cancer Risks Associated With Pathogenic Variants in RAD51C and RAD51D.
Yang X, Song H, Leslie G, et al.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2020; (112(12)):1242-1250 doi:10.1093/jnci/djaa030.
PMID: 32107557 - 19
Expanding the Genomic Landscape of HBOC and Cancer Risk Among Mutation Carriers.
Vietri MT, Della Pepa C, Caliendo G, et al.
International journal of molecular sciences 2025; (26(13)) doi:10.3390/ijms26135928.
PMID: 40649708 - 20
Spectrum of germline pathogenic variants using a targeted next generation sequencing panel and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with suspected hereditary breast cancer at an academic medical centre in Pakistan.
Akbar F, Siddiqui Z, Waheed MT, et al.
Hereditary cancer in clinical practice 2022; (20(1)):24 doi:10.1186/s13053-022-00232-2.
PMID: 35710434 - 21
Impact of deleterious variants in other genes beyond BRCA1/2 detected in breast/ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients by NGS-based multi-gene panel testing: looking over the hedge.
Bono M, Fanale D, Incorvaia L, et al.
ESMO open 2021; (6(4)):100235 doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100235.
PMID: 34371384 - 22
Principles of molecular testing for hereditary cancer.
Mighton C, Lerner-Ellis JP
Genes, chromosomes & cancer 2022; (61(6)):356-381 doi:10.1002/gcc.23048.
PMID: 35436018 - 23
Hereditary Breast Cancer: BRCA Mutations and Beyond.
Patel MM, Adrada BE
Radiologic clinics of North America 2024; (62(4)):627-642 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2023.12.014.
PMID: 38777539 - 24
Local treatment in patients with hereditary breast cancer: decision-making process in low-, moderate-, high-penetrance pathogenic germline mutation carriers.
Sibilio A, Curcio A, Toesca A, et al.
Current opinion in oncology 2022; (34(6)):614-622 doi:10.1097/CCO.0000000000000872.
PMID: 36170166 - 25
Universal Genetic Testing vs. Guideline-Directed Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes Among Traditionally Underrepresented Patients in a Community Oncology Program.
Jones JC, Golafshar MA, Coston TW, et al.
Cureus 2023; (15(4)):e37428 doi:10.7759/cureus.37428.
PMID: 37181954 - 26
Occurrence of variants of unknown clinical significance in genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome: a literature review and analytical observational retrospective cohort study.
Adam F, Fluri M, Scherz A, Rabaglio M
BMC medical genomics 2023; (16(1)):7 doi:10.1186/s12920-023-01437-7.
PMID: 36647026 - 27
The influence of BRCA variants of unknown significance on cancer risk management decision-making.
Chern JY, Lee SS, Frey MK, et al.
Journal of gynecologic oncology 2019; (30(4)):e60 doi:10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e60.
PMID: 31074248 - 28
Using patient-reported outcomes from the PROCLAIM trial to assess the impact of universal germline genetic testing for prostate cancer patients.
Shore ND, Pieczonka CM, Heron S, et al.
Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 2026; (29(2)):346-352 doi:10.1038/s41391-025-01013-3.
PMID: 40983675 - 29
A Modern Dilemma: How Experts Grapple with Ambiguous Genetic Test Results.
Scherr CL, Ross Arguedas AA, Getachew-Smith H, et al.
Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 2020; (40(5)):655-668 doi:10.1177/0272989X20935864.
PMID: 32734842
This page is for informational purposes only and does not replace professional medical advice. Always consult a genetic counselor or oncologist regarding genetic testing and personalized cancer risk management.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.