Skip to content
How It Works
Explore
Resources Ask a Question
Who It's For
Patients
Decode results, prep for appointments, weigh options.
Caregivers & advocates
Carry the research load for someone you love.
Providers & clinicians
Resources for patients in your practice.
Log In Ask a Question
PubMed This is a summary of 25 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Neurology · Atypical Rett Syndrome

What Is Atypical Rett Syndrome vs Classic Rett?

At a Glance

Atypical Rett syndrome involves developmental regression similar to classic Rett, but children exhibit fewer core symptoms. An atypical diagnosis requires only two of the four core features, plus five supportive criteria. Variants like Zappella often result in milder symptoms and retained speech.

When a child is diagnosed with atypical Rett syndrome, it means they exhibit many of the hallmark signs of Rett syndrome but do not meet all the strict clinical criteria required for a “classic” diagnosis [1][2]. While classic Rett syndrome typically follows a highly specific pattern—a period of normal early development followed by a clear loss of skills—an atypical diagnosis means your child’s symptoms may have appeared at a different time, progressed differently, or are simply missing some of the core features [1][3].

Classic vs. Atypical Criteria

To diagnose classic Rett syndrome, doctors look for a clear period of regression (loss of previously acquired skills) followed by a stabilization or recovery phase [1][4]. During or after this regression, a child must display all four “core” features:

  • Partial or complete loss of purposeful hand skills
  • Partial or complete loss of spoken language
  • Walking (gait) abnormalities
  • Repetitive hand movements (stereotypies), such as wringing, squeezing, or clapping [5][6].

A child with atypical Rett syndrome will have experienced a regression followed by stabilization, but will only meet at least two of the four core criteria [6][4]. To confirm an atypical diagnosis, doctors also require the presence of at least five out of eleven “supportive” criteria [7][8]. These are other common signs associated with Rett syndrome, such as sleep disturbances, abnormal muscle tone, scoliosis, growth delays, peripheral vasomotor disturbances (cold or blue hands and feet), and screaming spells [7][9].

The Zappella Variant (Preserved Speech)

The most common true variant of atypical Rett syndrome is the Zappella variant, also known as the preserved speech variant [10]. Children with this form generally have a milder clinical course than those with classic Rett syndrome [11][12].

  • Communication: They often regain or retain the ability to speak in single words or short phrases [10].
  • Mobility and Symptoms: They tend to have better motor skills and walking ability, and epilepsy is much less common compared to classic Rett [10][11].

Like classic Rett syndrome, the Zappella variant is most often caused by mutations in the MECP2 gene [13][14].

Reclassification: CDKL5 and FOXG1

In the past, the medical community recognized two other main types of atypical Rett syndrome: the Hanefeld variant (early-onset seizure variant) and the Congenital variant [2][15]. As broad genetic testing panels have become more common, doctors now understand that these are actually separate, distinct genetic disorders [16][17].

  • CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder (formerly Hanefeld / early-onset seizure variant): Originally thought of as a Rett variant because it causes similar developmental delays and repetitive hand movements (stereotypies), this disorder is caused by mutations in the CDKL5 gene rather than MECP2 [18][19]. A defining difference is the onset of epilepsy; children with CDKL5 deficiency typically develop hard-to-control seizures in the first two months of life, well before the typical age of developmental regression seen in classic Rett [20][21].
  • FOXG1 Syndrome (formerly Congenital variant): Previously considered a variant because of overlapping features like severe developmental impairment and small head size (microcephaly), this condition is caused by a mutation in the FOXG1 gene [16][14]. Unlike classic Rett, where a child develops normally for roughly 6 to 18 months before losing skills, infants with FOXG1 syndrome typically show developmental abnormalities and low muscle tone (hypotonia) from birth, without a distinct period of normal development followed by regression [22][23].

What This Means for Your Child

Understanding whether your child has classic Rett syndrome, a true atypical variant like Zappella, or a related disorder like CDKL5 or FOXG1 is crucial because it changes their medical roadmap [16][18]. The specific genetic cause and variant type provide important clues to your specialists (such as your pediatric neurologist and geneticist) about which symptom management therapies to prioritize, what seizure risks to monitor for, and what your child’s long-term developmental outlook might be [24][13]. Because a proper diagnosis relies heavily on comprehensive genetic testing panels today, discussing these results with a genetic counselor can also help you understand whether the mutation was spontaneous (de novo) and what it means for your family’s future [17][25].

Common questions in this guide

What is the difference between classic and atypical Rett syndrome?
Classic Rett syndrome requires a child to exhibit four specific core features following a period of developmental regression. Atypical Rett syndrome is diagnosed when a child experiences regression but only has two of the core features, along with at least five supportive clinical signs.
What is the Zappella variant of Rett syndrome?
The Zappella variant, also known as the preserved speech variant, is a milder form of atypical Rett syndrome. Children with this variant often regain or keep their ability to speak in single words or short phrases and generally have better mobility.
Why are CDKL5 and FOXG1 no longer considered atypical Rett syndrome?
As genetic testing improved, doctors discovered that CDKL5 and FOXG1 are caused by mutations in entirely different genes than the one responsible for most Rett cases. Because their symptom timelines and genetic causes are distinct, they are now classified as separate disorders.
Does my child need genetic testing if they have symptoms of atypical Rett?
Yes, comprehensive genetic testing is crucial for an accurate diagnosis. Identifying the exact genetic mutation helps specialists determine the most effective therapies, monitor for specific risks like early-onset epilepsy, and guide your child's medical roadmap.
What are the supportive symptoms used to diagnose atypical Rett syndrome?
Doctors look for a list of eleven supportive criteria to confirm an atypical diagnosis. Common examples include sleep disturbances, abnormal muscle tone, scoliosis, growth delays, cold or blue hands and feet, and unexpected screaming spells.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Based on my child's symptoms and genetic testing, do they meet the strict criteria for classic Rett, the Zappella variant, or a related but distinct disorder like CDKL5 or FOXG1?
  2. 2.Which of the 11 supportive clinical criteria for atypical Rett does my child currently exhibit, and which ones should we be actively monitoring for?
  3. 3.What does my child's specific genetic mutation (and variant diagnosis) tell us about their likelihood of developing early-onset epilepsy or retaining mobility?
  4. 4.Based on this specific diagnosis, what targeted therapies (physical, occupational, or speech) should we prioritize in our care plan right now?
  5. 5.Should we meet with a genetic counselor to discuss whether this mutation was spontaneous (de novo) and what it means for our family?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

Related questions

Can Children Regain Skills After Rett Regression?Can Boys Get Rett Syndrome? Causes & GeneticsHow Eye Tracking and AAC Help Rett Syndrome CommunicateHow to Coordinate Rett Syndrome Care With Local DoctorsRett Syndrome: How to Transition to Adult Medical CareIs Rett Syndrome Hereditary? What Parents Need to KnowQuestions to Ask Your New Doctor About Rett SyndromeHow to Treat Constipation & Reflux in Rett SyndromeWhat are the Early Signs of Rett Syndrome Stage 1?What Are DAYBUE Side Effects & How to Manage DiarrheaWhat Causes Swallowing Issues in Rett Syndrome Adults?What Does VUS Mean on a Rett Syndrome Genetic Test?Why Do Rett Syndrome Patients Need EKGs for Long QT?What is the Status of Rett Syndrome Gene Therapy Trials?Why Do Rett Syndrome Children Hold Breath & Wring Hands?Why Is Rett Syndrome Mistaken for Autism or CP?

References

References (25)
  1. 1

    Rett-like Phenotypes in HNRNPH2-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder.

    Gonzalez JN, Goldman S, Carter MT, Bain JM

    Genes 2023; (14(6)) doi:10.3390/genes14061154.

    PMID: 37372334
  2. 2

    FOXG1 Mutation is a Low-Incidence Genetic Cause in Atypical Rett Syndrome.

    Byun CK, Lee JS, Lim BC, et al.

    Child neurology open 2015; (2(1)):2329048X14568151 doi:10.1177/2329048X14568151.

    PMID: 28503589
  3. 3

    Towards a better diagnosis and treatment of Rett syndrome: a model synaptic disorder.

    Banerjee A, Miller MT, Li K, et al.

    Brain : a journal of neurology 2019; (142(2)):239-248 doi:10.1093/brain/awy323.

    PMID: 30649225
  4. 4

    Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature.

    Neul JL, Kaufmann WE, Glaze DG, et al.

    Annals of neurology 2010; (68(6)):944-50 doi:10.1002/ana.22124.

    PMID: 21154482
  5. 5

    Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Petriti U, Dudman DC, Scosyrev E, Lopez-Leon S

    Systematic reviews 2023; (12(1)):5 doi:10.1186/s13643-023-02169-6.

    PMID: 36642718
  6. 6

    Breathing disturbances in Rett syndrome.

    Ramirez JM, Karlen-Amarante M, Wang JJ, et al.

    Handbook of clinical neurology 2022; (189()):139-151 doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-91532-8.00018-5.

    PMID: 36031301
  7. 7

    An Atypical Rett Syndrome Phenotype Due to a Novel Missense Mutation in CACNA1A.

    Epperson MV, Haws ME, Standridge SM, Gilbert DL

    Journal of child neurology 2018; (33(4)):286-289 doi:10.1177/0883073818754987.

    PMID: 29366381
  8. 8

    Clinical and biological progress over 50 years in Rett syndrome.

    Leonard H, Cobb S, Downs J

    Nature reviews. Neurology 2017; (13(1)):37-51 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.186.

    PMID: 27934853
  9. 9

    Multidisciplinary Management of Rett Syndrome: Twenty Years' Experience.

    Vilvarajan S, McDonald M, Douglas L, et al.

    Genes 2023; (14(8)) doi:10.3390/genes14081607.

    PMID: 37628658
  10. 10

    Rett syndrome: a wide clinical and autonomic picture.

    Pini G, Bigoni S, Congiu L, et al.

    Orphanet journal of rare diseases 2016; (11(1)):132 doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0499-7.

    PMID: 27682832
  11. 11

    Bilingualism in the preserved speech variant of Rett syndrome: A longitudinal case study.

    Day RH, Cooper S, Sanoudaki E

    Clinical linguistics & phonetics 2026; (40(3)):207-226 doi:10.1080/02699206.2025.2508260.

    PMID: 40458919
  12. 12

    Comparing social reciprocity in preserved speech variant and typical Rett syndrome during the early years of life.

    Townend GS, Bartl-Pokorny KD, Sigafoos J, et al.

    Research in developmental disabilities 2015; (43-44()):80-6.

    PMID: 26159884
  13. 13

    Epilepsy and genetic in Rett syndrome: A review.

    Operto FF, Mazza R, Pastorino GMG, et al.

    Brain and behavior 2019; (9(5)):e01250 doi:10.1002/brb3.1250.

    PMID: 30929312
  14. 14

    Longitudinal course of epilepsy in Rett syndrome and related disorders.

    Tarquinio DC, Hou W, Berg A, et al.

    Brain : a journal of neurology 2017; (140(2)):306-318 doi:10.1093/brain/aww302.

    PMID: 28007990
  15. 15

    The array of clinical phenotypes of males with mutations in Methyl-CpG binding protein 2.

    Neul JL, Benke TA, Marsh ED, et al.

    American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics 2019; (180(1)):55-67 doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.32707.

    PMID: 30536762
  16. 16

    Comparison of Core Features in Four Developmental Encephalopathies in the Rett Natural History Study.

    Cutri-French C, Armstrong D, Saby J, et al.

    Annals of neurology 2020; (88(2)):396-406 doi:10.1002/ana.25797.

    PMID: 32472944
  17. 17

    Current developments in the genetics of Rett and Rett-like syndrome.

    Ehrhart F, Sangani NB, Curfs LMG

    Current opinion in psychiatry 2018; (31(2)):103-108 doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000389.

    PMID: 29206688
  18. 18

    Phenotypic manifestations between male and female children with CDKL5 mutations.

    Liang JS, Huang H, Wang JS, Lu JF

    Brain & development 2019; (41(9)):783-789 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2019.05.003.

    PMID: 31122804
  19. 19

    Novel CDKL5 Mutations in Czech Patients with Phenotypes of Atypical Rett Syndrome and Early-Onset Epileptic Encephalopathy.

    Záhoráková D, Langová M, Brožová K, et al.

    Folia biologica 2016; (62(2)):67-74 doi:10.14712/fb2016062020067.

    PMID: 27187038
  20. 20

    Clinical evolution and epilepsy outcome in three patients with CDKL5-related developmental encephalopathy.

    Bernardo P, Ferretti A, Terrone G, et al.

    Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape 2019; (21(3)):271-277 doi:10.1684/epd.2019.1071.

    PMID: 31225800
  21. 21

    CDKL5-associated developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: A long-term, longitudinal electroclinical study of 22 cases.

    Darra F, Monchelato M, Loos M, et al.

    Epilepsy research 2023; (190()):107098 doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107098.

    PMID: 36739728
  22. 22

    Partial monosomy14q involving FOXG1 and NOVA1 in an infant with microcephaly, seizures and severe developmental delay.

    Fryssira H, Tsoutsou E, Psoni S, et al.

    Molecular cytogenetics 2016; (9()):55 doi:10.1186/s13039-016-0269-1.

    PMID: 27486480
  23. 23

    Behavioral Phenotypes of Foxg1 Heterozygous Mice.

    Younger S, Boutros S, Cargnin F, et al.

    Frontiers in pharmacology 2022; (13()):927296 doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.927296.

    PMID: 35754477
  24. 24

    Analysis of X-inactivation status in a Rett syndrome natural history study cohort.

    Fang X, Butler KM, Abidi F, et al.

    Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2022; (10(5)):e1917 doi:10.1002/mgg3.1917.

    PMID: 35318820
  25. 25

    Molecular Testing of MECP2 Gene in Rett Syndrome Phenotypes in Indian Girls.

    Lallar M, Rai A, Srivastava P, et al.

    Indian pediatrics 2018; (55(6)):474-477.

    PMID: 29428920

This page provides educational information about atypical and classic Rett syndrome criteria. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice or formal genetic counseling for your child.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Rett syndrome.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.