Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 13 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Hematology · Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

What Is Monocyte Repartitioning Flow Cytometry for CMML?

At a Glance

Monocyte repartitioning flow cytometry measures the balance of three monocyte types in blood. Having 94% or more classical monocytes supports CMML, but the result cannot diagnose or exclude CMML without bone marrow, genetic, and other tests.

Monocyte repartitioning flow cytometry is a specialized laboratory test that can help support a diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), but it cannot confirm the disease on its own [1]. The test typically uses a sample of peripheral blood—the blood drawn from your arm—and uses lasers to identify and count different types of monocytes (a type of white blood cell) based on specific protein markers [2].

While people without CMML have a natural mix of three different monocyte types, people with CMML often show a heavily skewed pattern where one specific type takes up a massive share of the population [3]. Though this flow cytometry test is a very useful tool, it is just one piece of the diagnostic puzzle and must be combined with a full bone marrow evaluation, genetic testing, and other blood tests to make a definitive diagnosis [1].

Understanding Monocyte Subsets

Monocytes are white blood cells that help your immune system fight infections and clean up damaged tissues. Your circulating monocytes are divided into three distinct groups, or “subsets.” Flow cytometry identifies these subsets by looking for the presence of specific proteins—specifically CD14 and CD16—on the surface of the cells [3][2].

Even in healthy blood, these three types are not present in equal amounts. Classical monocytes normally make up the largest share, with smaller populations of intermediate and nonclassical monocytes [3].

Monocyte Subset Protein Markers Normal Role Typical Change in CMML
Classical High CD14, No CD16 Usually the largest group Often increases to 94% or more of total monocytes
Intermediate High CD14, High CD16 Transitional state Typically decreases in percentage
Nonclassical Low CD14, High CD16 Patrols blood vessels Typically decreases in percentage

How the Test Supports a CMML Diagnosis

In CMML, the bone marrow produces abnormal monocytes, which changes the natural balance (repartitioning) of the three subsets in the blood [3].

Doctors look for a specific pattern: if classical monocytes make up 94% or more of your total monocytes in a peripheral blood sample, this strongly supports a CMML diagnosis [3][4]. This 94% threshold is a recognized supporting criterion for CMML when tested in peripheral blood [2]. Some specialized laboratories may also use an assay-specific cutoff showing a severe drop in the percentage of nonclassical monocytes as an additional adjunctive finding, though this depends on the exact laboratory method used [5][6].

Limitations of Flow Cytometry

While helpful, monocyte repartitioning is not universally definitive. A result at or above 94% does not confirm CMML on its own, and a result below 94% does not rule it out [2]. Several factors can skew the results:

  • Inflammation and Infection: Conditions like autoimmune diseases or active infections can increase your intermediate monocytes [5]. This can push your classical monocyte percentage below the 94% threshold, causing a false negative (the test looks non-CMML, even if you actually have CMML) [7][8].
  • Other Illnesses: Occasionally, severe infections or other types of cancer can cause reactive monocytosis that mimics the CMML pattern, leading to a false positive (the pattern looks like CMML, but is actually caused by another condition) [9][10].
  • Blood vs. Bone Marrow: The 94% threshold was validated primarily for peripheral blood [2]. Bone marrow has different monocyte distributions, and you cannot simply apply the 94% cutoff to a bone marrow flow cytometry report unless the laboratory has validated its own specific marrow reference range [9].
  • Sample Quality and Laboratory Expertise: The way the sample is handled and the strict computational rules the laboratory uses to define and count the cells (gating strategy) can significantly change the reported percentages [11].
  • Previous Treatments: Certain therapies can alter your monocyte proportions, meaning the test is most accurate on blood drawn before starting treatment [3]. However, you should never stop or delay prescribed treatments just to get this test; your care team will decide the best timing.

Why It Doesn’t Replace the Full Work-Up

Because of these limitations, monocyte flow cytometry is only a supporting test [1]. Your hematologist will interpret the result in the context of your complete clinical picture.

To definitively diagnose CMML, your care team must verify that your monocyte count meets strict criteria: a sustained elevation for at least three months, with an absolute monocyte count of at least 0.5×1090.5 \times 10^9/L, and monocytes making up at least 10% of your total white blood cells [1].

They must also perform a bone marrow aspirate and core biopsy to look for dysplasia (abnormal development in the blood-forming cells) and confirm that immature leukemia cells (blasts) make up less than 20% of the cells [1][12]. Genetic and molecular testing is used to identify acquired mutations (clonality), though a mutation alone does not prove CMML since mutations can occur naturally with age [1]. Finally, they must rule out other specific myeloid neoplasms and reactive causes of high monocytes [13].

Common questions in this guide

What does monocyte repartitioning flow cytometry measure in CMML?
This blood test measures the proportions of classical, intermediate, and nonclassical monocytes using surface markers called CD14 and CD16. A high proportion of classical monocytes can support a CMML diagnosis, but the test is only one part of the evaluation.
Does having 94% or more classical monocytes confirm CMML?
No. Having at least 94% classical monocytes in peripheral blood strongly supports CMML, but it cannot confirm the disease by itself, and a result below 94% does not rule CMML out. Doctors also use blood-count patterns, bone marrow findings, genetic testing, and other evaluations.
What can affect the accuracy of CMML monocyte flow cytometry?
Infections, inflammation, autoimmune conditions, other cancers, sample handling, and the laboratory's cell-counting method can change monocyte percentages. Previous treatment can also affect the result, so your care team decides when testing is appropriate and whether the findings are reliable.
Can the 94% monocyte cutoff be used on a bone marrow sample?
The 94% threshold was mainly validated for peripheral blood, not bone marrow. Bone marrow has different monocyte patterns, so a laboratory should use its own validated reference range before applying a cutoff to a marrow result.
What other tests are needed to diagnose CMML?
Doctors look for monocytosis lasting at least three months, an absolute monocyte count of at least 0.5 × 10^9/L, and monocytes making up at least 10% of white blood cells. A bone marrow aspirate and biopsy, genetic or molecular testing, and evaluation for other blood disorders or reactive causes are also needed.

Get notified when new evidence is published on chronic monocytic leukemia.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (13)
  1. 1

    Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management.

    Patnaik MM, Tefferi A

    American journal of hematology 2024; (99(6)):1142-1165 doi:10.1002/ajh.27271.

    PMID: 38450850
  2. 2

    Technical, gating and interpretation recommendations for the partitioning of circulating monocyte subsets assessed by flow cytometry.

    Tarfi S, Kern W, Goulas E, et al.

    Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry 2024; (106(3)):203-215 doi:10.1002/cyto.b.22176.

    PMID: 38656036
  3. 3

    Characteristic repartition of monocyte subsets as a diagnostic signature of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

    Selimoglu-Buet D, Wagner-Ballon O, Saada V, et al.

    Blood 2015; (125(23)):3618-26 doi:10.1182/blood-2015-01-620781.

    PMID: 25852055
  4. 4

    ELN iMDS flow working group validation of the monocyte assay for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia diagnosis by flow cytometry.

    Wagner-Ballon O, Bettelheim P, Lauf J, et al.

    Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry 2023; (104(1)):66-76 doi:10.1002/cyto.b.22054.

    PMID: 34967500
  5. 5

    Incorporating flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of CMML. Are we ready for prime?

    Solary E, Wagner-Ballon O, Selimoglu-Buet D

    Best practice & research. Clinical haematology 2020; (33(2)):101134 doi:10.1016/j.beha.2019.101134.

    PMID: 32460985
  6. 6

    Real world implementation of flow cytometric monocyte subset partitioning for distinguishing chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia from other causes of monocytosis.

    Barge L, Gooch M, Hendle M, Simleit E

    Pathology 2023; (55(6)):827-834 doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2023.05.006.

    PMID: 37541805
  7. 7

    [Analysis of peripheral blood monocyte subsets in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: a single-center study].

    Wang L, Li MM, Bai JJ, et al.

    Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi 2025; (46(10)):952-957 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20250126-00045.

    PMID: 41339049
  8. 8

    Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia without increased classical monocyte subsets exhibits a distinct genetic profile, including frequent CBL mutations.

    Yan M, Younes IE, Song J, Zhang L

    American journal of clinical pathology 2026; (165(5)) doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqag045.

    PMID: 42154859
  9. 9

    Evaluation by Flow Cytometry of Mature Monocyte Subpopulations for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.

    Picot T, Aanei CM, Flandrin Gresta P, et al.

    Frontiers in oncology 2018; (8()):109 doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00109.

    PMID: 29707521
  10. 10

    Monocyte subsets to differentiate chronic myelomonocytic leukemia from reactive monocytosis.

    Hwang SM, Ahn H, Jeon S, et al.

    Journal of clinical laboratory analysis 2021; (35(1)):e23576 doi:10.1002/jcla.23576.

    PMID: 32931067
  11. 11

    Optimization of monocyte gating to quantify monocyte subsets for the diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

    Jurado R, Huguet M, Xicoy B, et al.

    Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry 2023; (104(4)):319-330 doi:10.1002/cyto.b.22106.

    PMID: 36448679
  12. 12

    How I investigate chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

    Sangiorgio VFI, Arber DA, Orazi A

    International journal of laboratory hematology 2020; (42(2)):101-108 doi:10.1111/ijlh.13145.

    PMID: 31841277
  13. 13

    The 2016 WHO versus 2008 WHO Criteria for the Diagnosis of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.

    Moon Y, Kim MH, Kim HR, et al.

    Annals of laboratory medicine 2018; (38(5)):481-483 doi:10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.481.

    PMID: 29797820

This page explains monocyte subset flow cytometry in CMML for informational purposes and does not diagnose CMML or replace medical advice. Your hematologist should interpret your result alongside your blood counts, bone marrow findings, genetic tests, and overall health.