What Is the Turner Syndrome NIPT False Positive Rate?
At a Glance
The false positive rate for Turner syndrome (Monosomy X) on NIPT is very high, ranging from 65% to 80%. Because NIPT analyzes placental DNA, factors like confined placental mosaicism can trigger a false alarm. A high-risk screening result should always be confirmed with a diagnostic test like amniocentesis.
In this answer
4 sections
If your Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) screening came back “high risk” for Turner syndrome (Monosomy X), it does not mean your baby definitely has the condition. In fact, the false positive rate for Turner syndrome on NIPT is very high [1]. Studies show that the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for Monosomy X is only about 20% to 35% [2][3][4]. This means that if you receive a high-risk result, there is a 65% to 80% chance that the result is a false positive and your baby does not have Turner syndrome [5]. Because of this, NIPT is considered a screening tool, not a diagnostic test, and a high-risk result should always be confirmed with additional testing before any medical decisions are made [6][7].
Screening vs. Diagnostic Testing
To understand why NIPT can be inaccurate, it helps to know how the test works. NIPT—also called cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing—analyzes small fragments of DNA floating in your bloodstream. During pregnancy, most of this DNA comes from you, but a small percentage comes from the placenta (which usually shares the same genetics as the baby).
Because NIPT looks at placental DNA rather than directly testing the baby’s DNA, it is only a screening test [2][8]. It flags a potential risk but cannot provide a definitive diagnosis [9]. Diagnostic tests, such as amniocentesis, are required to know for sure if the baby has Turner syndrome [7].
Why Are False Positives So Common?
There are two primary biological reasons why an NIPT might incorrectly flag a high risk for Turner syndrome:
- Confined Placental Mosaicism (CPM): Because NIPT tests DNA from the placenta, it can detect chromosomal differences that exist only in the placenta and not in the baby [10][11]. It is possible for the placenta to have some cells missing an X chromosome (Monosomy X) while the baby’s cells are completely typical (46,XX or 46,XY) [12][13].
- Maternal Mosaicism: As women age, it is common and generally harmless for some of their own cells to lose an X chromosome. Because NIPT analyzes both maternal and placental DNA, the test might detect this missing X chromosome in the mother’s blood and mistakenly attribute it to the baby [14][15][16].
Next Steps: Confirming the Diagnosis
If you receive a high-risk NIPT result, your healthcare provider will likely refer you to a genetic counselor. Genetic counselors are specifically trained to calculate your individualized PPV based on your age and the specific testing brand used. They will also discuss options for diagnostic testing [4].
There are two main prenatal diagnostic tests:
- Amniocentesis: Usually performed between 15 and 20 weeks of pregnancy, this test analyzes cells shed by the baby into the amniotic fluid. Amniocentesis is considered the “gold standard” for confirming NIPT results for Turner syndrome [9]. Because it tests the baby’s actual cells rather than placental cells, it bypasses the issue of confined placental mosaicism [17][18]. For this reason, many genetic counselors and professional guidelines explicitly recommend amniocentesis over CVS for confirming suspected sex chromosome variations like Turner syndrome.
- Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS): Usually performed between 10 and 13 weeks, this test analyzes tissue from the placenta. While it can be done earlier in the pregnancy, CVS may not always resolve a false positive caused by confined placental mosaicism because it tests the very same placental tissue that the NIPT screened [19][20].
Waiting for an amniocentesis between 15 and 20 weeks can be an agonizing “limbo” period. It is completely normal to feel terrified and anxious during this wait. Working closely with your care team and focusing on the reassuring statistics can help you navigate this difficult time.
The Role of Ultrasound
Your doctor will likely recommend a detailed ultrasound to look for physical signs associated with Turner syndrome [21][22].
- Early Ultrasounds: Scans around 12 weeks can spot markers like a cystic hygroma (fluid buildup at the back of the baby’s neck) [21].
- Anatomy Scans and Echocardiograms: Detecting specific structural heart defects common in Turner syndrome, such as a bicuspid aortic valve or coarctation of the aorta, usually requires a detailed anatomy scan or a specialized fetal echocardiogram later in pregnancy, typically around 18 to 22 weeks [22][23].
If an ultrasound is completely normal, the likelihood that the NIPT result is a false positive increases significantly [24]. However, a normal ultrasound does not completely rule out Turner syndrome. Many individuals with Turner syndrome have no structural ultrasound anomalies at all and only present with shorter stature or premature ovarian insufficiency later in life. Conversely, if ultrasound markers are present, the chance that the baby truly has Turner syndrome is higher. Even with ultrasound findings, an amniocentesis or postnatal testing (after the baby is born) is still required for a definitive diagnosis [9].
Common questions in this guide
Why is the false positive rate for Turner syndrome so high on NIPT?
What is the actual chance my baby has Turner syndrome if my NIPT is high risk?
Should I get an amniocentesis or CVS to confirm a Turner syndrome NIPT result?
Can a normal ultrasound prove my NIPT result is a false positive?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.What was the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) specific to my test results and age?
- 2.Because of the high chance of a false positive, do you recommend amniocentesis over CVS for diagnostic confirmation?
- 3.Does my early ultrasound show any physical markers, like a cystic hygroma, that might increase the likelihood of Turner syndrome?
- 4.Should I be referred for a specialized fetal echocardiogram later in pregnancy to check for heart anomalies?
- 5.Could my own genetic makeup (maternal mosaicism) be influencing these test results, and do you recommend any testing for me?
- 6.Can you refer me to a genetic counselor to help interpret these results and navigate the next steps?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (24)
- 1
Clinical evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing for sex chromosome aneuploidies in 9,176 Korean pregnant women: a single-center retrospective study.
Kim H, Park JE, Kang KM, et al.
BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2024; (24(1)):93 doi:10.1186/s12884-024-06275-8.
PMID: 38297236 - 2
The accuracy of prenatal cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bussolaro S, Raymond YC, Acreman ML, et al.
American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM 2023; (5(3)):100844 doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100844.
PMID: 36572107 - 3
Clinical Application of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies in Central China.
Zhao G, Dai P, Wang C, et al.
Frontiers in medicine 2021; (8()):672211 doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.672211.
PMID: 35155454 - 4
An assessment of the analytical performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in detecting sex chromosome aneuploidies: 34,717-patient sample in a single prenatal diagnosis Centre in China.
Luo Y, Hu H, Zhang R, et al.
The journal of gene medicine 2021; (23(9)):e3362 doi:10.1002/jgm.3362.
PMID: 33973298 - 5
Efficiency of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies.
Shi Y, Li X, Ju D, et al.
Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 2021; (86(4)):379-387 doi:10.1159/000518002.
PMID: 34384080 - 6
Confined placental mosaicism and its impact on confirmation of NIPT results.
Mardy A, Wapner RJ
American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics 2016; (172(2)):118-22 doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31505.
PMID: 27184347 - 7
Cell-free DNA screening positive for monosomy X: clinical evaluation and management of suspected maternal or fetal Turner syndrome.
Dowlut-McElroy T, Davis S, Howell S, et al.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2022; (227(6)):862-870 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.004.
PMID: 35841934 - 8
Positive predictive value estimates for noninvasive prenatal testing from data of a prenatal diagnosis laboratory and literature review.
Liu S, Yang F, Chang Q, et al.
Molecular cytogenetics 2022; (15(1)):29 doi:10.1186/s13039-022-00607-z.
PMID: 35794576 - 9
Next-generation sequencing: a follow-up of 36,913 singleton pregnancies with noninvasive prenatal testing in central China.
Lu W, Huang T, Wang XR, et al.
Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2020; (37(12)):3143-3150 doi:10.1007/s10815-020-01977-2.
PMID: 33094428 - 10
Discordant non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) - a systematic review.
Hartwig TS, Ambye L, Sørensen S, Jørgensen FS
Prenatal diagnosis 2017; (37(6)):527-539 doi:10.1002/pd.5049.
PMID: 28382695 - 11
Unexpected finding of uniparental disomy mosaicism in term placentas: Is it a common feature in trisomic placentas?
Van Opstal D, Diderich KEM, Joosten M, et al.
Prenatal diagnosis 2018; (38(12)):911-919 doi:10.1002/pd.5354.
PMID: 30187503 - 12
Placental, maternal, fetal, and technical origins of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results.
Raymond Y, Fernando S, Menezes M, et al.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2024; (230(4)):381-389 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1240.
PMID: 38008147 - 13
Confined placental mosaicism for 22q11.2 deletion as the etiology for discordant positive NIPT results.
Bunnell M, Zhang C, Lee C, et al.
Prenatal diagnosis 2017; (37(4)):416-419 doi:10.1002/pd.5022.
PMID: 28198030 - 14
Contribution of maternal mosaicism to false-positive chromosome X loss associated with noninvasive prenatal testing.
Wan J, Li R, Li F, et al.
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians 2022; (35(25)):9647-9653 doi:10.1080/14767058.2022.2050362.
PMID: 35282756 - 15
Case Report: A prenatal case with sex discordance between non-invasive prenatal testing and fetal genetic testings due to maternal rare chromosome karyotype.
Zhong G, Wu J, Zhong Z, et al.
Frontiers in genetics 2025; (16()):1546579 doi:10.3389/fgene.2025.1546579.
PMID: 40395556 - 16
Relationships among maternal monosomy X mosaicism, maternal trisomy, and discordant sex chromosome aneuploidies.
Tang X, Du Y, Chen M, et al.
Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 2024; (554()):117770 doi:10.1016/j.cca.2024.117770.
PMID: 38199578 - 17
Confined placental mosaicism of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a case report.
Winerdal M, Westenius E, Granfors M, et al.
Molecular cytogenetics 2020; (13(1)):51 doi:10.1186/s13039-020-00520-3.
PMID: 33334361 - 18
Discordant structural chromosomal aberrations in chorionic villi and amniotic fluid leading to a formation of an isochromosome 21: a case report.
Westenius E, Pettersson M, Björck E
Molecular cytogenetics 2021; (14(1)):30 doi:10.1186/s13039-021-00549-y.
PMID: 34127035 - 19
Confined placental mosaicism is a diagnostic pitfall in dystrophinopathies: a clinical report.
Sabbagh Q, Larrieux M, Schneider A, et al.
European journal of human genetics : EJHG 2026; (34(1)):161-164 doi:10.1038/s41431-024-01665-0.
PMID: 39014012 - 20
Limited additional value of karyotyping cultured amniotic fluid cell colonies in addition to microarray on uncultured cells for confirmation of abnormal non-invasive prenatal testing results.
Donze SH, Srebniak MI, Diderich KEM, et al.
Prenatal diagnosis 2024; (44(4)):401-408 doi:10.1002/pd.6499.
PMID: 38141050 - 21
A case report of Turner syndrome associated with fetal nuchal cystic hygroma and bilateral syndactyly of the hands and feet.
Chen HY, Zheng JQ, Zhang HP
Italian journal of pediatrics 2019; (45(1)):85 doi:10.1186/s13052-019-0680-4.
PMID: 31319890 - 22
The Impact of Karyotype on Congenital Heart Diseases in Turner Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Álvarez-Nava F, Crenshaw ML, Bedei I, et al.
American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics 2025; (199(2)):93-106 doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.32146.
PMID: 40557696 - 23
Cardiovascular Disease and Inpatient Complications in Turner Syndrome: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Alzahrani T
Texas Heart Institute journal 2024; (51(1)) doi:10.14503/THIJ-23-8245.
PMID: 38748548 - 24
Improved positive predictive value of non-invasive prenatal testing through integration with second-trimester ultrasound soft markers for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study.
Fu D, Wu Q, Ju Y, et al.
Frontiers in endocrinology 2026; (17()):1831332 doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1831332.
PMID: 42290850
This page provides educational information about NIPT screening for Turner syndrome. Always consult your obstetrician or a genetic counselor to discuss your specific prenatal test results and diagnostic options.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Turner syndrome.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.