Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 21 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Cardiology

Why Do EF and Stroke Volume Matter in Aortic Stenosis?

At a Glance

In aortic stenosis, a normal ejection fraction does not always mean the heart is pumping normally. Stroke volume, stroke volume index, global longitudinal strain, valve area, and pressure gradient must be interpreted together to detect low flow and confirm how severe the valve narrowing is.

When you look at your echocardiogram report for aortic valve stenosis (AS), two important numbers are ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV). Ejection fraction measures the percentage of blood pumped out of your heart’s main chamber with each beat, while stroke volume measures the actual amount of blood delivered forward. Together with other measurements like valve area and pressure gradient, they help your doctor understand whether your heart muscle is straining and whether there is enough blood flow to accurately measure the severity of your stenosis [1][2].

The Limits of Ejection Fraction

Many patients are reassured to see an ejection fraction in the “normal” range. While laboratories vary, a normal EF is often 55% to 70%, and AS guidelines frequently use 50% or higher to define “preserved” EF [3]. However, in aortic valve stenosis, a preserved EF does not necessarily mean your heart is coping perfectly [4].

As your heart works harder to push blood through a narrowed valve, the heart muscle thickens—a process called left ventricular remodeling [5]. This thickened muscle takes up more space, making the inside chamber (cavity) smaller [6]. Because ejection fraction is just a percentage of how much the cavity empties, a thickened heart can squeeze out a normal percentage of a much smaller actual volume of blood [1].

To detect early signs of muscle strain before the EF drops, doctors look at global longitudinal strain (GLS). GLS measures the lengthwise deformation (shortening) of the heart muscle during a beat. It is reported as a negative percentage, meaning a “less negative” number (like -14% compared to -20%) indicates worse function [7]. Impaired GLS can reveal subtle heart muscle strain even when your ejection fraction is preserved [7][8]. It is an important risk marker that prompts closer monitoring by your specialist, though it is not a standalone reason for a valve replacement [9].

Why Stroke Volume and “Low Flow” Matter

Stroke volume is the actual volume of blood (in milliliters) pumped forward with each heartbeat. Doctors often look at the stroke volume index (SVi), which adjusts this number for your body size [2]. If your SVi is 35 mL/m² or lower, clinicians commonly consider this a “low flow” state in the context of AS [2][10].

Low flow is a critical finding because it complicates how valve severity is measured. Standard tests measure how fast blood travels through the aortic valve and the pressure difference (mean gradient) across it. If your heart is pumping a lower volume of blood with each beat, it won’t generate a high pressure gradient [11]. This can make a severely narrowed valve look only “moderate” based on the pressure, a situation known as pseudo-severe stenosis [12][13].

You can have a low stroke volume even with a preserved ejection fraction, a condition known as paradoxical low-flow aortic stenosis [14][2].

Resolving Conflicting Measurements

Sometimes your report might show a small calculated aortic valve area (suggesting severe stenosis) but a low mean gradient (suggesting moderate stenosis). While reduced stroke volume is one possible explanation, these conflicting numbers can also be caused by measurement errors (like an inaccurately measured outflow tract), high blood pressure during the test, or irregular heart rhythms [15][16][17].

To clarify whether the stenosis is truly severe, your specialist may need to review the imaging quality or order additional tests:

  • Dobutamine Stress Echocardiogram: Used selectively for patients with a low ejection fraction and low flow, this test uses medication to temporarily increase the heart’s pumping force. If flow increases adequately, it helps reveal the true severity of the narrowed valve [18].
  • CT Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring: A specialized CT scan can measure calcium buildup on the valve. While it doesn’t independently confirm severity in every case, a high score (using specific thresholds for men and women) strongly supports the likelihood of true severe stenosis, independent of blood flow measurements [19][13].

Understanding Your Echocardiogram Numbers

Here is a framework for how clinicians look at these numbers together (note that normal ranges can vary by laboratory, and your doctor will interpret these in context with your symptoms):

Report Term What It Measures Why It Matters in Aortic Stenosis
Ejection Fraction (EF) The percentage of blood emptied from the cavity per beat. Often 50-70% is considered preserved. A preserved EF doesn’t mean the heart isn’t straining.
Stroke Volume Index (SVi) The actual volume of blood pumped forward, adjusted for body size. ≤35 mL/m² suggests a low-flow state, which can make the valve pressure gradient look falsely reassuring.
Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) The lengthwise shortening of the heart muscle. Reported as a negative percentage. A “less negative” number indicates subtle muscle strain.
Mean Gradient The average pressure difference across the aortic valve. A low gradient (<40 mmHg) can occur even in severe stenosis if your stroke volume is low.

Treatment and Next Steps

Finding out you have low flow, impaired GLS, or conflicting measurements does not mean you need an immediate valve replacement. Treatment decisions are highly individualized and depend on confirmed severe stenosis, your symptoms, overall heart function, and procedural risks [2][20]. These numbers simply help your care team build a complete picture of your heart health to determine the safest timeline for monitoring or intervening [21].

🚨 When to Seek Immediate Care:
Echocardiogram numbers only tell part of the story. Do not wait for your next scan if you develop symptoms. If you experience new or worsening exertional symptoms (like fatigue or shortness of breath), contact your care team promptly. If you experience exertional chest pain, fainting (syncope), or severe shortness of breath at rest, seek emergency medical care immediately [20].

Common questions in this guide

Can I have serious aortic stenosis if my ejection fraction is normal?
Yes. In aortic stenosis, a thickened heart muscle can create a smaller chamber that empties a normal percentage but still pumps a reduced amount of blood. A preserved EF therefore does not rule out low flow or early heart muscle strain, so it must be interpreted with other measurements and symptoms.
What does a low stroke volume index mean in aortic stenosis?
Stroke volume index (SVi) estimates the amount of blood pumped forward with each beat after adjusting for body size. An SVi of 35 mL/m² or less is commonly considered low flow in aortic stenosis. Low flow can produce a lower pressure gradient and make a severely narrowed valve appear less severe.
What does global longitudinal strain show on an echocardiogram?
Global longitudinal strain (GLS) measures how much the heart muscle shortens lengthwise during a heartbeat and is reported as a negative percentage. A less negative value, such as -14% compared with -20%, suggests worse muscle function. Abnormal GLS can reveal strain despite a preserved EF, but it is not by itself a reason for valve replacement.
Why can my aortic valve area and pressure gradient suggest different levels of severity?
Low blood flow can lower the pressure gradient even when the valve opening is severely narrowed. Differences can also result from an inaccurately measured outflow tract, high blood pressure during the test, or an irregular rhythm. A specialist may review the images and repeat or supplement testing.
What tests can clarify whether my aortic stenosis is truly severe?
A dobutamine stress echocardiogram may be used selectively when low EF and low flow make severity uncertain; it temporarily increases the heart’s pumping force to assess the flow response. CT aortic valve calcium scoring can provide additional evidence of severe narrowing when blood-flow measurements are discordant. The appropriate test depends on your full clinical picture.
Do low flow or abnormal GLS mean I need a valve replacement now?
No. Treatment decisions depend on confirmed stenosis severity, symptoms, heart function, and the risks of a procedure, so an abnormal number alone does not establish the need or timing of valve replacement. Your care team may recommend monitoring, additional testing, or intervention based on the complete picture.
When should symptoms with aortic stenosis prompt urgent care?
New or worsening fatigue or shortness of breath with activity should be reported promptly to your care team. Exertional chest pain, fainting, or severe shortness of breath at rest require emergency medical care rather than waiting for a routine appointment.

Get notified when new evidence is published on aortic valve stenosis.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (21)
  1. 1

    Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Echocardiography: The Case for Routinely Adding Global Longitudinal Strain to Ejection Fraction.

    Potter E, Marwick TH

    JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 2018; (11(2 Pt 1)):260-274 doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.11.017.

    PMID: 29413646
  2. 2

    Impact of Stress Echocardiography on Aortic Valve Stenosis Management.

    Synetos A, Vlasopoulou K, Drakopoulou M, et al.

    Journal of clinical medicine 2024; (13(12)) doi:10.3390/jcm13123495.

    PMID: 38930024
  3. 3

    Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Solving the Conundrum Using Multi-Modality Imaging.

    Messika-Zeitoun D, Oh JK, Topilsky Y, et al.

    Progress in cardiovascular diseases 2018; (61(5-6)):416-422 doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2018.11.006.

    PMID: 30445161
  4. 4

    Shifting from Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction to Strain Imaging in Aortic Stenosis.

    Anastasiou V, Daios S, Bazmpani MA, et al.

    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2023; (13(10)) doi:10.3390/diagnostics13101756.

    PMID: 37238238
  5. 5

    Aortic valve replacement and mortality in asymptomatic individuals with severe aortic stenosis and left ventricular hypertrophy.

    Wasfy JH, Etiwy M, Zhao Y, et al.

    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2025; (67(9)) doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezaf211.

    PMID: 40889283
  6. 6

    Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as a syndrome of reduced effective stroke volume.

    Sapalo AT

    American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2026; (331(1)):H327-H331 doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00294.2026.

    PMID: 42318834
  7. 7

    Association of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Natural Course and Prognostic Value.

    Vollema EM, Sugimoto T, Shen M, et al.

    JAMA cardiology 2018; (3(9)):839-847 doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.2288.

    PMID: 30140889
  8. 8

    Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Aortic Valve Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

    Liao H, Yang S, Yu S, et al.

    Cardiology 2024; (149(3)):277-285 doi:10.1159/000536331.

    PMID: 38301616
  9. 9

    Role of advanced left ventricular imaging in adults with aortic stenosis.

    Calin A, Mateescu AD, Popescu AC, et al.

    Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2020; (106(13)):962-969 doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315211.

    PMID: 32179586
  10. 10

    Impact of low stroke volume on mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

    Rusinaru D, Bohbot Y, Ringle A, et al.

    European heart journal 2018; (39(21)):1992-1999 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehy123.

    PMID: 29547988
  11. 11

    Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states.

    Abbas AE, Pibarot P

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2019; (93(5)):1002-1023 doi:10.1002/ccd.28146.

    PMID: 30790429
  12. 12

    Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

    Clavel MA, Magne J, Pibarot P

    European heart journal 2016; (37(34)):2645-57 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw096.

    PMID: 27190103
  13. 13

    How Do We Reconcile Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid Imaging in Assessing Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity?

    Delgado V, Clavel MA, Hahn RT, et al.

    JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 2019; (12(2)):267-282 doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.027.

    PMID: 30732722
  14. 14

    Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain: An Imaging Marker Associated with Outcomes in Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.

    Tran N, Dahan S, Kang J, et al.

    Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 2026; (39(1)):71-79 doi:10.1016/j.echo.2025.09.012.

    PMID: 41005715
  15. 15

    Estimation of Stroke Volume and Aortic Valve Area in Patients with Aortic Stenosis: A Comparison of Echocardiography versus Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

    Guzzetti E, Capoulade R, Tastet L, et al.

    Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 2020; (33(8)):953-963.e5 doi:10.1016/j.echo.2020.03.020.

    PMID: 32580897
  16. 16

    Prospective assessment of the frequency of low gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: Critical impact of aortic flow misalignment and pressure recovery phenomenon.

    Ringle A, Castel AL, Le Goffic C, et al.

    Archives of cardiovascular diseases 2018; (111(8-9)):518-527 doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2017.11.004.

    PMID: 29439881
  17. 17

    The spectrum of low-output low-gradient aortic stenosis with normal ejection fraction.

    Pislaru SV, Pellikka PA

    Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2016; (102(9)):665-71 doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307893.

    PMID: 26822426
  18. 18

    The clinical significance of the incorporation of tissue Doppler imaging into low-dose Dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis prior to Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

    Saeed S, Kellermair J, Herstad J, Bleie Ø

    BMC cardiovascular disorders 2020; (20(1)):416 doi:10.1186/s12872-020-01700-0.

    PMID: 32928125
  19. 19

    Diagnostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification Levels in the Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

    Adrichem R, Hokken TW, Bouwmeester S, et al.

    JACC. Cardiovascular imaging 2024; (17(8)):847-860 doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.03.014.

    PMID: 38795109
  20. 20

    Risk stratification of severe aortic stenosis according to new guidelines: long term outcomes.

    Colli A, Bizzotto E, Besola L, et al.

    Journal of thoracic disease 2018; (10(10)):5833-5841 doi:10.21037/jtd.2018.09.152.

    PMID: 30505491
  21. 21

    Moderate gradient severe aortic stenosis: diagnosis, prognosis and therapy.

    Rizzello V

    European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology 2021; (23(Suppl E)):E133-E137 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/suab108.

    PMID: 34650372

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. A cardiologist should interpret your echocardiogram, symptoms, and treatment options with you.