Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 13 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Oncology

Why Is There No Routine Screening for Ovarian Cancer?

At a Glance

Routine screening for ovarian cancer is not recommended for average-risk women. Tests like CA-125 and ultrasounds produce high rates of false positives, leading to unnecessary surgeries without saving lives. Women with persistent symptoms or a strong family history should consult a doctor.

It is incredibly frustrating that we do not have a routine screening test for ovarian cancer like we do for breast or cervical cancer. The short answer is that large, rigorous studies have proven that screening women at average risk does not save lives, but it does cause significant harm [1][2][3]. The tests currently available—specifically the CA-125 blood test and transvaginal ultrasound—generate too many false alarms in healthy women [4]. These false positives lead women to undergo unnecessary and risky surgeries to remove their ovaries, without ultimately preventing ovarian cancer deaths in the population [5][1].

What the Major Clinical Trials Showed

For years, doctors hoped that checking CA-125 levels and performing regular ultrasounds could catch ovarian cancer early enough to make a difference. To test this, researchers conducted two massive clinical trials:

  • The UKCTOCS Trial: This UK study tracked over 200,000 women for more than 16 years [1]. While the screening did find some cancers earlier, it did not significantly reduce the number of women who died from the disease [1].
  • The PLCO Trial: A similar massive study in the United States, called the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial, also found no difference in ovarian cancer mortality between women who were screened and those who received usual care [2].

Because of these findings, major medical organizations, including the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), strongly recommend against routine ovarian cancer screening for women at average risk, concluding that the harms far outweigh the benefits [6][7].

The Problem of False Positives

A false positive happens when a test suggests you might have cancer, but you actually do not. Both CA-125 and transvaginal ultrasounds are highly prone to false positives in average-risk women [3].

  • CA-125 is a protein found in the blood. While ovarian cancer can cause it to rise, many common, non-cancerous conditions—like endometriosis, fibroids, or even a normal menstrual cycle—can also cause high CA-125 levels [8][4]. Because it lacks specificity, relying on it as a standalone screening test in the healthy population is ineffective [4][9]. (Note: While CA-125 is not a good screening tool for healthy women, it is a highly effective and standard test for monitoring women who have already been diagnosed with ovarian cancer.)
  • Transvaginal ultrasounds are good at spotting masses or cysts on the ovaries, but they cannot tell whether a mass is harmless (benign) or cancerous (malignant).

Because these tests raise so many false alarms, many women end up needing surgery just to find out for sure what the tests found.

Unnecessary Surgeries and Hidden Harms

When a screening test comes back abnormal, the only way to definitively diagnose or rule out ovarian cancer is to perform surgery to remove the ovary (an oophorectomy) and examine the tissue under a microscope.

Because of the high rate of false positives, routine screening causes many healthy women to undergo major surgery for harmless cysts [3][10]. These unnecessary surgeries carry real risks, including:

  • Blood loss and infections [5]
  • Bowel or organ injuries [11]
  • Long-term complications from sudden surgical menopause [5]

The trials showed that a significant number of women suffered major complications from surgeries triggered by false positive screening tests [10].

Exceptions for High-Risk Women

It is important to note that these guidelines apply to women at average risk. If you have a strong family history (such as having a mother, sister, or daughter diagnosed with ovarian cancer or early-onset breast cancer), or if you carry a known genetic mutation like BRCA1, BRCA2, or Lynch syndrome, the rules are different [12].

For women at elevated risk, doctors often recommend intensified surveillance, genetic counseling, or risk-reducing surgeries (like removing the ovaries and fallopian tubes) [12][13].

What to Do Instead of Screening

If you are concerned about your risk, the best approach is to talk to your doctor about your family history. More importantly, pay attention to persistent changes in your body. Warning signs of ovarian cancer are often vague but include:

  • Persistent bloating
  • Pelvic or abdominal pain
  • Difficulty eating or feeling full quickly
  • Urinary urgency or frequency

If you experience these symptoms consistently for more than a few weeks, you should not ask for a “routine screening.” Instead, tell your doctor about your symptoms and ask for a diagnostic evaluation. This shifts the context from checking a healthy person to investigating a specific medical problem, which is exactly what these tests are designed to do.

Common questions in this guide

Why isn't there a routine screening test for ovarian cancer?
Large studies have shown that screening average-risk women does not prevent ovarian cancer deaths. The available tests produce too many false alarms that can lead to unnecessary and risky surgeries without actually saving lives.
Can a CA-125 blood test be used to screen for ovarian cancer?
CA-125 is not recommended as a routine screening test for healthy women because common conditions like endometriosis or fibroids can also cause elevated levels. However, it is an effective tool for monitoring women who have already been diagnosed with ovarian cancer.
What should I do if I have a family history of ovarian cancer?
If you have a strong family history or a genetic mutation like BRCA1 or BRCA2, you are considered high risk. Doctors often recommend intensified surveillance, genetic counseling, or risk-reducing surgeries for women in this category.
What are the early warning signs of ovarian cancer?
Warning signs are often vague but include persistent bloating, pelvic or abdominal pain, feeling full quickly, and urinary urgency. If you experience these symptoms consistently for more than a few weeks, ask your doctor for a diagnostic evaluation rather than a screening.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Given my personal and family history, am I considered at average or high risk for ovarian cancer?
  2. 2.If I am having pelvic surgery for another reason, should we discuss removing my fallopian tubes to lower my risk?
  3. 3.Since I have a family history, should I meet with a genetic counselor to understand my risk better?
  4. 4.I have been experiencing persistent bloating and pelvic pain; what diagnostic tests should we run to investigate these specific symptoms?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (13)
  1. 1

    Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial.

    Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, et al.

    Lancet (London, England) 2021; (397(10290)):2182-2193 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5.

    PMID: 33991479
  2. 2

    Screening for Ovarian Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

    Henderson JT, Webber EM, Sawaya GF

    JAMA 2018; (319(6)):595-606 doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21421.

    PMID: 29450530
  3. 3

    Extended mortality results for ovarian cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median 15years follow-up.

    Pinsky PF, Yu K, Kramer BS, et al.

    Gynecologic oncology 2016; (143(2)):270-275 doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.08.334.

    PMID: 27615399
  4. 4

    Bayesian and deep-learning models applied to the early detection of ovarian cancer using multiple longitudinal biomarkers.

    Abrego L, Zaikin A, Marino IP, et al.

    Cancer medicine 2024; (13(7)):e7163 doi:10.1002/cam4.7163.

    PMID: 38597129
  5. 5

    Assessing the rates of false-positive ovarian cancer screenings and surgical interventions associated with screening tools: a systematic review.

    Silverwood SM, Backer G, Galloway A, et al.

    BMJ oncology 2024; (3(1)):e000404 doi:10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000404.

    PMID: 39886168
  6. 6

    Screening for Ovarian Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    , Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al.

    JAMA 2018; (319(6)):588-594 doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21926.

    PMID: 29450531
  7. 7

    Impact of a decision aid about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management on women's knowledge and intentions: a randomised online experimental survey study.

    Meisel SF, Freeman M, Waller J, et al.

    BMC public health 2017; (17(1)):882 doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4889-0.

    PMID: 29145813
  8. 8

    Evaluation of Serum Cancer Antigen (CA)-125 Levels as a Biomarker for Ovarian Lesions: Correlation With Histopathological Diagnosis and Clinical Outcomes.

    Patil NJ, Mane A, Hulwan AB, et al.

    Cureus 2024; (16(7)):e65342 doi:10.7759/cureus.65342.

    PMID: 39184596
  9. 9

    Chronic Medical Conditions and CA125 Levels among Women without Ovarian Cancer.

    Akinwunmi BO, Babic A, Vitonis AF, et al.

    Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2018; (27(12)):1483-1490 doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0203.

    PMID: 30237250
  10. 10

    Complications from Surgeries Related to Ovarian Cancer Screening.

    Baldwin LA, Pavlik EJ, Ueland E, et al.

    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2017; (7(1)) doi:10.3390/diagnostics7010016.

    PMID: 28282907
  11. 11

    Ovarian cancer: screening and future directions.

    Gupta KK, Gupta VK, Naumann RW

    International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society 2019; (29(1)):195-200 doi:10.1136/ijgc-2018-000016.

    PMID: 30640704
  12. 12

    A feasibility study of breast cancer genetic risk assessment in a federally qualified health center.

    Hoskins KF, Tejeda S, Vijayasiri G, et al.

    Cancer 2018; (124(18)):3733-3741 doi:10.1002/cncr.31635.

    PMID: 30320429
  13. 13

    Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer.

    Sideris M, Menon U, Manchanda R

    The Medical journal of Australia 2024; (220(5)):264-274 doi:10.5694/mja2.52227.

    PMID: 38353066

This page provides information on ovarian cancer screening guidelines for educational purposes only. Always consult your gynecologist or oncologist about your personal risk factors and any symptoms you are experiencing.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Ovarian Cancer.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.