Prenatal Trisomy 18 Positive: Why Is Newborn Blood Negative?
At a Glance
A positive prenatal trisomy 18 result and a negative newborn blood test can occur because prenatal screening may reflect placental cells, or because low-level mosaic trisomy 18 is absent from blood. The test type and baby’s clinical findings guide further evaluation.
In this answer
5 sections
Conflicting genetic results are incredibly stressful. When a prenatal test suggests trisomy 18 but a newborn genetic blood test (such as a karyotype, FISH, or microarray—not the routine heel-prick metabolic screen) is negative, it does not automatically mean the baby is clear. Discordance can happen for several reasons: the prenatal result may have been a “false positive” (due to a vanishing twin, maternal chromosomal differences, or an abnormality confined only to the placenta), or the baby may have mosaic trisomy 18 with abnormal cells that are absent or undetectable in their blood [1][2][3]. To understand what the results mean for your baby, genetics specialists will review exactly which tests were performed.
1. What Kind of Prenatal Test Was Positive?
The explanation for the mismatch heavily depends on what was tested before birth.
- Screening tests (NIPT/cfDNA): Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing analyzes fragments of DNA floating in the mother’s blood, which mostly come from the placenta, not the baby [1][4]. NIPT is a screen, not a diagnosis. False positives can occur because of a “vanishing twin,” maternal chromosome variations, or confined placental mosaicism [2].
- Chorionic Villus Sampling (CVS): CVS tests a sample of the placenta. Because it tests the placenta, it can sometimes show an extra chromosome that is not present in the baby (confined placental mosaicism) [5].
- Amniocentesis: This tests cells floating in the amniotic fluid, which come directly from the fetus. If an amniocentesis showed trisomy 18, it is generally much more representative of the baby [6]. A negative newborn blood test after a positive amniocentesis is more concerning for true fetal mosaicism and requires careful review by a genetics team [3].
2. Confined Placental Mosaicism
If your positive prenatal result came from NIPT or CVS, an important possible explanation is confined placental mosaicism (CPM).
During early pregnancy, the cells that form the placenta separate from the cells that form the baby. In CPM, an error during cell division causes some or all of the placenta’s cells to have three copies of chromosome 18, while the baby’s cells develop typically [6][7]. Because NIPT and CVS test the placenta, they flag a high risk for trisomy 18 [1]. The newborn blood test might be negative because the extra chromosome was never in the baby’s body [8].
3. Low-Level or Tissue-Specific Mosaicism
If a baby has mosaic trisomy 18—meaning some cells have the extra chromosome and some do not—a newborn blood test can still be negative.
- Tissue-specific differences: Mosaicism does not spread evenly through the body. A baby might have the extra chromosome in their skin, internal organs, or cheek cells, but have completely typical chromosomes in their blood [9][10].
- Declining blood levels: Research shows that in some cases of mosaic trisomy 18, the percentage of abnormal cells in the blood can naturally decline over time, making them harder to detect [3].
4. The Limits of Newborn Blood Tests
A “negative” blood result only means the lab did not find the extra chromosome in the specific sample they analyzed. The testing method matters:
- Karyotyping: This traditional test looks at the chromosomes in a set number of cultured cells (often 20 to 50) [3]. If a baby only has trisomy 18 in 2% of their cells, karyotyping might miss it if those specific cells aren’t randomly selected for analysis [11]. Furthermore, growing (culturing) the cells in a lab can sometimes favor the growth of typical cells, masking the mosaicism [9].
- FISH and Microarray: Other tests like FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization, which can look at hundreds of uncultured cells) or chromosomal microarray (CMA) have different strengths, but neither is an absolute rule-out test for low-level mosaicism if the abnormal cells simply aren’t in the blood [12][13].
5. Next Steps and Further Evaluation
A normal physical examination and a single negative blood test do not completely rule out mosaic trisomy 18. Your genetics team will evaluate the baby’s newborn exam, prenatal growth patterns, and any congenital anomalies to help interpret the lab results [14][15].
If the clinical picture remains unclear, or if the prenatal test was an amniocentesis, specialists might consider testing another tissue, such as a cheek swab (buccal cells) or a small skin biopsy (fibroblasts) [16][11]. However, testing other tissues is highly individualized: no single test guarantees 100% certainty, and skin biopsies are invasive [10]. Your medical genetics team or genetic counselor will help you weigh whether further testing will change your baby’s medical care and follow-up.
Common questions in this guide
Can a positive prenatal trisomy 18 test be followed by a negative newborn blood test?
Why can NIPT or CVS be positive when the baby's blood test is negative?
Does a negative newborn karyotype rule out mosaic trisomy 18?
What if amniocentesis showed trisomy 18 but the newborn blood test was negative?
Could a cheek swab or skin test detect trisomy 18 missed in blood?
Is the newborn heel-prick screen the same as a genetic blood test for trisomy 18?
Related questions
Show more
Get notified when new evidence is published on Trisomy 18 syndrome.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
References
References (16)
- 1
Discrepancy between Non-invasive Prenatal Genetic Testing (NIPT) and Amniotic Chromosomal Test due to Placental Mosaicism: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Hayata K, Hiramatsu Y, Masuyama H, et al.
Acta medica Okayama 2017; (71(2)):181-185 doi:10.18926/AMO/54988.
PMID: 28420901 - 2
Retrospective details of false-positive and false-negative results in non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13.
Suzumori N, Sekizawa A, Takeda E, et al.
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2021; (256()):75-81 doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.050.
PMID: 33171421 - 3
Cytogenetic discrepancy between uncultured amniocytes and cultured amniocytes in mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable fetal outcome and maternal uniparental disomy 18.
Chen CP, Su JW, Chern SR, et al.
Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2022; (61(4)):684-689 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2022.05.005.
PMID: 35779922 - 4
Committee Opinion Summary No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy.
Obstetrics and gynecology 2015; (126(3)):691-692 doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000471171.86798.ac.
PMID: 26287784 - 5
Unexpected finding of uniparental disomy mosaicism in term placentas: Is it a common feature in trisomic placentas?
Van Opstal D, Diderich KEM, Joosten M, et al.
Prenatal diagnosis 2018; (38(12)):911-919 doi:10.1002/pd.5354.
PMID: 30187503 - 6
Confined placental mosaicism and its impact on confirmation of NIPT results.
Mardy A, Wapner RJ
American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics 2016; (172(2)):118-22 doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31505.
PMID: 27184347 - 7
Inherent mosaicism and extensive mutation of human placentas.
Coorens THH, Oliver TRW, Sanghvi R, et al.
Nature 2021; (592(7852)):80-85 doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03345-1.
PMID: 33692543 - 8
Predicting fetoplacental mosaicism during cfDNA-based NIPT.
Neofytou M
Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology 2020; (32(2)):152-158 doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000610.
PMID: 31977337 - 9
Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 18 and maternal uniparental disomy 18 by amniocentesis in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy in various tissues and a favorable fetal outcome.
Chen CP, Wu FT, Pan YT, et al.
Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2023; (62(4)):606-610 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2023.05.012.
PMID: 37407205 - 10
Variable degree of mosaicism for tetrasomy 18p in phenotypically discordant monozygotic twins-Diagnostic implications.
Rydzanicz M, Olszewski P, Kedra D, et al.
Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2021; (9(1)):e1526 doi:10.1002/mgg3.1526.
PMID: 33319479 - 11
Mosaic trisomy 18 at amniocentesis associated with a favorable fetal outcome in a pregnancy.
Chen CP, Hsu TY, Tsai CC, et al.
Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2022; (61(4)):690-694 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2022.05.006.
PMID: 35779923 - 12
Should prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis be offered for isolated fetal growth restriction? A French multicenter study.
Monier I, Receveur A, Houfflin-Debarge V, et al.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2021; (225(6)):676.e1-676.e15 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.035.
PMID: 34058167 - 13
Detection of an Underlying 22q11.2 Duplication in a Female Neonate With Trisomy 18.
Turbiville DE, Wu H, Dong J
Laboratory medicine 2017; (48(4)):372-375 doi:10.1093/labmed/lmx039.
PMID: 29036626 - 14
Neonate with 'rocker-bottom' feet: what to do when it is not Edwards syndrome.
Morrison PJ, Harris C, Mccarthy C, et al.
Archives of disease in childhood. Education and practice edition 2026; doi:10.1136/archdischild-2026-330753.
PMID: 42336615 - 15
Trisomy 18 presenting with complete bilateral radial aplasia: a rare case report.
Suboh MW, Atatre MH, Shwieki N, et al.
BMC pediatrics 2026; (26(1)).
PMID: 41963863 - 16
Mosaic Trisomy 12 Associated with Overgrowth Detected in Fibroblast Cell Lines.
Gasparini Y, Montenegro MM, Novo-Filho GM, et al.
Cytogenetic and genome research 2019; (157(3)):153-157 doi:10.1159/000498836.
PMID: 30933946
This page explains discordant prenatal and newborn trisomy 18 results for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your baby's medical genetics team should interpret the reports and recommend next steps.