Decoding Your Genetic Test: Understanding the Microarray Report
At a Glance
To understand a 1q21.1 microdeletion report, check the missing-DNA coordinates, reference map version, deletion size, lab label, and parental results. A genetics professional should interpret the deletion’s region and inheritance because the gene list alone cannot predict outcome.
A genetic test report can look like a wall of technical jargon, but it is the most important document in your medical folder. To diagnose 1q21.1 microdeletion, doctors use a test called a Chromosomal Microarray (CMA) or a SNP array [1][2]. This test scans your child’s chromosomes for missing or extra pieces of DNA, known as copy number variants (CNVs) [3].
When a CMA finds a “pathogenic” CNV, it means the lab has found a missing piece of DNA that is established to cause health or developmental challenges [4].
The Anatomy of Your Result
Every report should contain a specific string of numbers and letters—this is the “address” of the missing DNA. To understand your report, look for these key components:
1. The Coordinates and Genome Build
The report will list a range of numbers representing where the deletion starts and ends. It must also state which “version” of the human genome map it used, typically GRCh37 (hg19) or GRCh38 (hg38) [5][6].
- Why this matters: The same deletion will have different coordinate numbers depending on which map version the lab used. Without the version, the numbers are like an address without a zip code.
2. Distal vs. Proximal: Which Region is Missing?
The 1q21.1 area is broadly divided into two main neighborhoods, though the exact breakpoints can vary. Your geneticist will use the laboratory’s coordinates and formal ISCN nomenclature to determine your specific deletion:
- Distal Deletion: Often described as falling between breakpoints BP3 and BP4, this is the most common form, frequently linked to developmental delays, microcephaly, and psychiatric risks [7][8].
- Proximal Deletion: Often described as falling between BP2 and BP3 (or BP1-BP2 depending on the lab’s naming conventions), this region contains the RBM8A gene [9][10]. A deletion here is evaluated for its association with TAR syndrome, though the deletion alone does not cause the syndrome [11].
- Class II / Larger Deletions: Some people have a large deletion that spans both regions or involves atypical (non-recurrent) breakpoints [9]. A genetics professional must interpret the interval rather than relying on breakpoint labels alone.
3. The Gene List
A report may list specific genes located within the missing piece, though not all labs format their reports this way. Genes that have been studied as possible contributors to the syndrome’s features include:
- GJA5 and CHD1L: Often missing in distal deletions; these have been studied as possible contributors to heart development and brain growth [12][13].
- RBM8A: The primary gene involved in the proximal TAR-associated region [10].
- PRKAB2: A gene in the distal region studied for its role in neurological health [14].
Caution: While gene content can help classify a CNV, it cannot predict a person’s developmental or medical outcome. Do not use the gene list as a rigid prognosis [15].
Questions to Ask Your Genetics Team
If you are reading your report, look for these items and ask your clinician to clarify them:
- Classification: Is it labeled Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic? If it is listed as a VUS (Variant of Uncertain Significance), this means there is not enough evidence to say it causes health issues, and a VUS generally should not drive major medical decisions by itself.
- Size: Is the size listed in Mb (Megabases) or kb (kilobases)?
- Coordinates & Build: What are the exact coordinates, and is it hg19 or hg38?
- Inheritance: The report will only show if it is inherited after parental testing has been performed [7].
Why Parental Testing is the Next Step
Once a deletion is found in a child, doctors almost always recommend testing both biological parents. This is not to assign “blame,” but to provide vital context [16].
- If a parent has the same deletion, it helps explain inheritance and informs the risk for future pregnancies (generally a 50% transmission chance per pregnancy) [7][8].
- If neither parent has the deletion in the tested sample, it is usually called de novo (meaning “new”). The recurrence risk is usually very low, but not zero.
If your report is difficult to read or missing context, direct your questions to the ordering clinician or a genetic counselor to help interpret it safely.
Common questions in this guide
What does a 1q21.1 microdeletion on a microarray report mean?
How do I know whether the deletion is distal or proximal?
What do hg19 and hg38 mean on a 1q21.1 report?
Can the genes listed on the report predict my child’s outcome?
Why is parental testing recommended after a 1q21.1 deletion is found?
What does a VUS mean on a genetic microarray report?
Does a proximal 1q21.1 deletion mean my child has TAR syndrome?
One line in your results can change your plan.
Once a deletion is found in a child, doctors almost always recommend testing both biological parents. We check your results against the latest research to help you prepare for what’s next.
Get notified when new evidence is published on 1q21.1 microdeletion syndrome.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
References
References (16)
- 1
[Analysis of clinical characteristics and molecular genetics in eighteen patients with 1q21.1 microdeletion syndrome].
Luo X, Niu H, Zhou F, et al.
Zhonghua yi xue yi chuan xue za zhi = Zhonghua yixue yichuanxue zazhi = Chinese journal of medical genetics 2024; (41(4)):480-485 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20230311-00125.
PMID: 38565516 - 2
Prenatal ultrasound phenotype of fetuses with recurrent 1q21.1 deletion and duplication syndrome.
Wang F, Peng H, Lou G, et al.
Frontiers in pediatrics 2024; (12()):1504122 doi:10.3389/fped.2024.1504122.
PMID: 39840309 - 3
Should prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis be offered for isolated fetal growth restriction? A French multicenter study.
Monier I, Receveur A, Houfflin-Debarge V, et al.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2021; (225(6)):676.e1-676.e15 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.035.
PMID: 34058167 - 4
ClassifyCNV: a tool for clinical annotation of copy-number variants.
Gurbich TA, Ilinsky VV
Scientific reports 2020; (10(1)):20375 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76425-3.
PMID: 33230148 - 5
The Diagnostic Utility of Prenatal Microarray in High-Risk Pregnancies: A Single-Center Experience in Enhancing Reproductive Care and Risk Stratification.
Bakır A, Alay MT, Tekbaş UC, et al.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2025; (15(17)) doi:10.3390/diagnostics15172129.
PMID: 40941617 - 6
Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen).
Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, et al.
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 2020; (22(2)):245-257 doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8.
PMID: 31690835 - 7
Prenatal diagnosis of the recurrent 1q21.1 microdeletions in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies and review of the literature.
Liu L, Lei T, Guo F, et al.
Frontiers in genetics 2024; (15()):1448341 doi:10.3389/fgene.2024.1448341.
PMID: 39268082 - 8
Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of 1q21.1 copy number variants: A report of 34 new individuals and literature review.
Bourgois A, Bizaoui V, Colson C, et al.
American journal of medical genetics. Part A 2024; (194(3)):e63457 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.63457.
PMID: 37881147 - 9
Discordance of cardiovascular abnormalities in a monozygotic twin pair carrying a class II 1q21.1 microdeletion.
Shi SS, Lin SB, Cai DL, et al.
Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2020; (59(1)):123-126 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2019.11.019.
PMID: 32039779 - 10
1q21.1 deletion and a rare functional polymorphism in siblings with thrombocytopenia-absent radius-like phenotypes.
Brodie SA, Rodriguez-Aulet JP, Giri N, et al.
Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies 2019; (5(6)) doi:10.1101/mcs.a004564.
PMID: 31836590 - 11
Thrombocytopenia-Absent Radius Syndrome: Descriptions of Three New Cases and a Novel Splicing Variant in RBM8A That Expands the Spectrum of Null Alleles.
Monteiro C, Gonçalves A, Oliveira J, et al.
International journal of molecular sciences 2022; (23(17)) doi:10.3390/ijms23179621.
PMID: 36077017 - 12
Detection of a familial 1q21.1 microdeletion and concomitant CHD1L mutation in a fetus with oligohydramnios and bilateral renal dysplasia on prenatal ultrasound.
Chen CP, Huang JP, Chen YY, et al.
Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2019; (58(6)):859-863 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.031.
PMID: 31759543 - 13
Disrupted transcriptional networks regulated by CHD1L during neurodevelopment underlie the mirrored neuroanatomical and growth phenotypes of the 1q21.1 copy number variant.
Lemée MV, Loviglio MN, Ye T, et al.
Nucleic acids research 2025; (53(18)) doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf934.
PMID: 40987614 - 14
A review on the relationship between the distal 1q21.1 microdeletion and schizophrenia.
Guo X, Guo J, Liu X, Hu T
Frontiers in genetics 2025; (16()):1612654 doi:10.3389/fgene.2025.1612654.
PMID: 40792073 - 15
Phenotypic spectrum of 1q21.1 copy number variants in 42 children: genotype-phenotype correlations and clinical implications.
Mutlucan Köseoğlu G, Ceylan AC, Çavdarlı B, et al.
European journal of pediatrics 2026; (185(11)).
PMID: 42862371 - 16
Prenatal diagnosis of 1q21.1 microdeletions and microduplications: a retrospective case series.
Liu Z, Yi S, Li M, Liu N
Molecular cytogenetics 2025; (18(1)):23 doi:10.1186/s13039-025-00731-6.
PMID: 41029435
This page explains how to read a 1q21.1 microdeletion microarray report for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. A clinical geneticist or genetic counselor should interpret your exact coordinates, classification, and parental-testing results.