Staging and Risk: Predicting Your Tumor's Behavior
At a Glance
For adrenal cancer, ENSAT stage shows how far the tumor has spread, while Ki-67, surgical margins, cortisol production, and selected genetic findings help estimate recurrence risk. These factors guide follow-up and treatment discussions but cannot predict one person’s outcome.
Staging and risk stratification are the tools your doctors use to determine how aggressive your cancer is and how likely it is to return after treatment. It is important to remember that these statistics describe groups of people and cannot predict your exact individual outcome.
Staging Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC)
The most common way to stage ACC is the ENSAT system (European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors). This system groups patients into four stages based on where the cancer is located [1][2]:
- Stage I: The tumor is 5 centimeters (about 2 inches) or smaller and is contained entirely within the adrenal gland [1].
- Stage II: The tumor is larger than 5 centimeters but is still contained within the adrenal gland [1].
- Stage III: The cancer has begun to spread to nearby tissues, such as the fat around the kidney, or into nearby lymph nodes or major blood vessels [1][2].
- Stage IV: The cancer has spread (metastasized) to distant parts of the body, such as the lungs, liver, or bones [2].
While staging describes where the cancer is, risk stratification looks at the biology of the tumor to predict how it might behave in the future.
The Ki-67 Index: Your Tumor’s “Speedometer”
In localized ACC (Stages I–III), the Ki-67 index is considered a vital predictor of whether the cancer will return [3][4]. This percentage tells your doctors how many cells are actively dividing.
- Low Risk (Ki-67 < 10%): These tumors generally grow more slowly and have a better long-term outlook [3].
- Intermediate Risk (Ki-67 10–19%): These tumors have a moderate growth rate [3].
- High Risk (Ki-67 ≥ 20%): These tumors are dividing rapidly and require intensive monitoring [3][5].
Resection Margins: Was it All Removed?
After surgery, a pathologist examines the edges of the removed tissue to see if any cancer cells were left behind. This is called the resection margin [6].
- R0 (Complete Resection): No cancer cells are visible at the margins under a microscope. This offers the best chance of a cure [6][7].
- R1 (Microscopic Residual): The surgeon removed everything they could see, but the pathologist found cancer cells at the very edge of the tissue under a microscope [6][7].
- R2 (Macroscopic Residual): Some tumor tissue was intentionally or unintentionally left behind [6].
Having an R1 or R2 margin significantly increases the risk that the cancer will come back. This finding often prompts your multidisciplinary team to discuss additional treatments like mitotane, radiation, or closer surveillance [8][4]. Adjuvant treatment is a highly individualized decision, not an automatic rule.
Hormones and Molecular Profiles in ACC
Two other factors can help fine-tune your risk assessment:
- Hormone Production: Tumors that secrete excess cortisol are associated with higher-risk disease and a greater chance of complications [9][10].
- Molecular Profiling: Scientists can look at the “genetic signature” of a tumor, including its DNA methylation [11][12]. Certain methylation patterns (like the “CIMP-high” profile) are linked to a higher risk of the cancer spreading [13]. While promising, this is primarily a research classification and does not currently dictate routine treatment decisions for most patients.
Staging and Risk in PPGL
Risk assessment for Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma (PPGL) is different. While the AJCC has staging systems for some specific PPGL sites, there is no single universally adopted system comparable to ENSAT.
Instead, clinicians combine multiple factors to assess risk. All PPGLs have the potential to spread (metastasize), but not all of them will. Metastatic PPGL is generally defined by spread to tissues where chromaffin cells do not normally exist (like bones or the liver) [14]. Risk is assessed by looking at the size of the tumor, its location (tumors outside the adrenal gland are often higher risk), its biochemical phenotype, and whether you carry a specific genetic mutation, such as SDHB [15][16].
Common questions in this guide
How is adrenocortical carcinoma staged?
What does my Ki-67 result mean?
What do R0, R1, and R2 mean after adrenal cancer surgery?
Can cortisol production change adrenal cancer risk?
How do doctors assess risk in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma?
Can my stage or risk score predict exactly what will happen?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.What is my ENSAT stage, and does it involve any nearby organs or lymph nodes?
- 2.What was my Ki-67 index? Based on that number, do you consider me at low, intermediate, or high risk for recurrence?
- 3.Was my surgery an R0 resection? If not, how does the presence of microscopic residual cells change my follow-up plan?
- 4.Does my tumor's hormone production, especially cortisol, impact how we should monitor for recurrence?
- 5.If I have a PPGL, what specific risk factors (like size, location, or genetics) are we using to determine my follow-up plan?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (16)
- 1
[Are there still indications for open adrenalectomy?]
Holzer K, Bartsch DK
Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) 2022; (93(9)):856-860 doi:10.1007/s00104-022-01678-9.
PMID: 35788865 - 2
Prognostic factors in stage III-IV adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC): an European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumor (ENSAT) study.
Libé R, Borget I, Ronchi CL, et al.
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 2015; (26(10)):2119-25 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv329.
PMID: 26392430 - 3
Major prognostic role of Ki67 in localized adrenocortical carcinoma after complete resection.
Beuschlein F, Weigel J, Saeger W, et al.
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2015; (100(3)):841-9 doi:10.1210/jc.2014-3182.
PMID: 25559399 - 4
European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of adrenocortical carcinoma in adults, in collaboration with the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors
Fassnacht M, Dekkers OM, Else T, et al.
European journal of endocrinology 2018; (179(4)):G1-G46 doi:10.1530/EJE-18-0608.
PMID: 30299884 - 5
Hormonal functional status and prognostic stratification in adrenocortical carcinoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Guerrero-Pérez F, Tarruella Planas M, Weilg Espejo C, et al.
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico 2026; doi:10.1007/s12094-026-04409-2.
PMID: 42207431 - 6
ENDOCRINE TUMOURS: Our experience with the management of patients with non-metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma.
Terzolo M, Fassnacht M
European journal of endocrinology 2022; (187(3)):R27-R40 doi:10.1530/EJE-22-0260.
PMID: 35695575 - 7
Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Impact of Surgical Margin Status on Long-Term Outcomes.
Margonis GA, Kim Y, Prescott JD, et al.
Annals of surgical oncology 2016; (23(1)):134-41 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4803-x.
PMID: 26286195 - 8
Survival impact of treatment utilization and margin status after resection of adrenocortical carcinoma.
Memeh K, Abou Azar S, Afolaranmi O, Vaghaiwalla TM
American journal of surgery 2025; (239()):115999 doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115999.
PMID: 39427460 - 9
Influence of hormonal functional status on survival in adrenocortical carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vanbrabant T, Fassnacht M, Assie G, Dekkers OM
European journal of endocrinology 2018; (179(6)):429-436.
PMID: 30325179 - 10
The impact of adrenocortical carcinoma hormone secreting status as a predictor of poor survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nastos C, Papaconstantinou D, Paspala A, et al.
Langenbeck's archives of surgery 2024; (409(1)):316 doi:10.1007/s00423-024-03507-5.
PMID: 39432022 - 11
Value of Molecular Classification for Prognostic Assessment of Adrenocortical Carcinoma.
Assié G, Jouinot A, Fassnacht M, et al.
JAMA oncology 2019; (5(10)):1440-1447 doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1558.
PMID: 31294750 - 12
DNA Methylation Is an Independent Prognostic Marker of Survival in Adrenocortical Cancer.
Jouinot A, Assie G, Libe R, et al.
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2017; (102(3)):923-932 doi:10.1210/jc.2016-3205.
PMID: 27967600 - 13
Targeted Assessment of G0S2 Methylation Identifies a Rapidly Recurrent, Routinely Fatal Molecular Subtype of Adrenocortical Carcinoma.
Mohan DR, Lerario AM, Else T, et al.
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2019; (25(11)):3276-3288 doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2693.
PMID: 30770352 - 14
Risk Stratification on Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma from Laboratory and Clinical Medicine.
Kimura N, Takekoshi K, Naruse M
Journal of clinical medicine 2018; (7(9)) doi:10.3390/jcm7090242.
PMID: 30150569 - 15
Genotype-phenotype correlations in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis.
Crona J, Lamarca A, Ghosal S, et al.
Endocrine-related cancer 2019; (26(5)):539-550.
PMID: 30893643 - 16
A clinical prediction model to estimate the metastatic potential of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: ASES score.
Cho YY, Kwak MK, Lee SE, et al.
Surgery 2018; (164(3)):511-517 doi:10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.001.
PMID: 29929757
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your oncology team should interpret your adrenal cancer results and recommend follow-up for your specific situation.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Adrenal gland cancer.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.