Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 11 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Immunology

Reading Your Immunology and Genetic Reports for AGM10

At a Glance

In AGM10, reports commonly show nearly absent B cells, very low antibody levels before replacement therapy, and a SPI1 variant. Diagnosis depends on interpreting these results together, especially whether the variant is pathogenic or remains uncertain.

Navigating immunology and genetic reports can feel like reading a foreign language. However, for Agammaglobulinemia Type 10 (AGM10), these reports contain the specific “fingerprints” of the disease that help your doctor distinguish it from other immune conditions.

The Immunology Report: Tracking Your “Soldier” Cells

When you look at your immunology lab results, you are primarily looking for two things: the absolute count of your immune cells and the pre-treatment level of immunoglobulins (antibodies) circulating in your blood. (Note: Reference intervals are age- and laboratory-specific; interpret these with your immunologist rather than using one value as a diagnosis.)

1. B-Cell Lymphopenia

The hallmark of AGM10 is the near-total absence of B cells [1]. In your report, look for markers labeled CD19+ or CD20+. These are the unique “ID tags” that flow cytometry (a specialized laser-based blood test) uses to count B cells [2][3].

  • What to expect: In many reported AGM10 cases, the absolute B-cell count is close to zero (e.g., 1 cell per microliter), or the percentage of B cells is less than 0.1% of your total lymphocytes [2][1].

2. Dendritic Cell Deficiency

Unlike many other antibody deficiencies, AGM10 often affects dendritic cells, the “scouts” of the immune system [4]. Your report may list subsets like cDC1, cDC2, or pDCs [5]. In AGM10, these counts are typically lower than normal [6][4]. Note that dendritic-cell testing is a highly specialized assay and is not necessarily part of routine clinical monitoring everywhere.

3. Hypogammaglobulinemia

This term simply means low levels of antibodies in the blood. Your report should list three main types:

  • IgG: Usually profoundly low prior to treatment (e.g., below 4.0 g/L in an untreated teenager/adult, though this varies by age) [2]. Note that once you start Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy (IgRT), your measured IgG will reflect the donor antibodies infused into your body, not what your body produces.
  • IgA and IgM: Often undetectable or extremely low [2][1].

The Genetic Report: Decoding the SPI1 Mutation

The genetic report is the “source code” for your diagnosis. It will describe a change in your SPI1 gene, which is responsible for making the PU.1 protein.

Understanding Variant Classifications

Laboratories use a standard system to rank how “sure” they are that a genetic change is causing a disease:

  • Pathogenic / Likely Pathogenic: The lab is confident that this specific mutation breaks the PU.1 protein and is the cause of your symptoms [7].
  • Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS): This means the lab found a change in your SPI1 gene, but they don’t have enough scientific data yet to prove it causes disease [8]. Many AGM10 cases start as a VUS because the disease is so rare [2].

Why a VUS Requires More Work

A VUS should not be used alone to formally diagnose AGM10, guide irreversible treatment, or make predictive decisions in relatives. If your report says “VUS,” your doctor may need “tie-breaker” evidence:

  • Segregation Testing: Testing your parents. If a parent has the same mutation but is perfectly healthy, it might be a harmless variant—though in AGM10, some healthy people can still carry the gene due to “incomplete penetrance.” Thus, a healthy parent does not automatically prove it harmless, nor does it prove it is disease-causing [4][6].
  • Functional Studies: Specialized labs can check if your cells actually make the PU.1 protein, though these may be unavailable or inconclusive [1][6].
    Review by a clinical geneticist or genetic counselor is highly recommended.

Report Completeness Checklist

Ensure your medical records include these specific items for a thorough AGM10 evaluation:

  1. Quantitative Immunoglobulins: Absolute levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM (ideally drawn before treatment starts) [9].
  2. Lymphocyte Subsets: Absolute counts for T cells (CD3+), B cells (CD19+), and NK cells (CD16/56+) [9][10].
  3. Dendritic Cell Panel: Specifically looking for myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cell counts (ask if this will change your management) [6][5].
  4. Genetic Detail: The specific “address” of the mutation (e.g., SPI1 c.130G>T) and whether it was “de novo” (a new mutation) or inherited [11][2].

If any of these pieces are missing, your immunology team may need to order more specific testing to get the full picture of how AGM10 is affecting your body.

Common questions in this guide

What can a very low B-cell count mean on an AGM10 report?
A near-zero count of CD19-positive or CD20-positive B cells indicates a severe B-cell deficiency, which is a characteristic finding in AGM10. The result should be compared with the laboratory’s age-specific range and interpreted alongside antibody levels, clinical findings, and genetic results by an immunologist.
How should I interpret IgG, IgA, and IgM results in AGM10?
Before immunoglobulin replacement therapy, AGM10 often causes profoundly low IgG and very low or undetectable IgA and IgM. After treatment begins, the measured IgG reflects donor antibodies from the therapy, so it may not show how much antibody your body naturally makes.
What does a pathogenic SPI1 variant mean for an AGM10 diagnosis?
A pathogenic or likely pathogenic SPI1 variant provides genetic evidence that the change affects PU.1, a protein involved in the immune system, and can support an AGM10 diagnosis. Your clinician should interpret the result with your immune-cell counts, antibody levels, and clinical history.
Can a VUS in SPI1 confirm AGM10?
No. A variant of uncertain significance means the laboratory does not yet have enough evidence to show whether the SPI1 change causes disease, so it should not alone establish the diagnosis, direct irreversible treatment, or guide predictive decisions for relatives. A clinical geneticist or genetic counselor may discuss family testing and, when available, functional studies.
What tests should be included when reviewing AGM10 reports?
A thorough review may include quantitative IgG, IgA, and IgM levels obtained before replacement therapy, absolute T-, B-, and NK-cell counts, and a specialized dendritic-cell panel when clinically useful. The genetic report should identify the exact SPI1 variant and state whether it was inherited or arose de novo.
Does a healthy parent with the same SPI1 variant rule out AGM10?
No. A healthy parent carrying the same SPI1 change does not automatically prove that the change is harmless because incomplete penetrance can occur in AGM10. Family results are only one part of the evaluation and should be reviewed with a genetics professional.

Get notified when new evidence is published on agammaglobulinemia 10, autosomal dominant.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (11)
  1. 1

    Constrained chromatin accessibility in PU.1-mutated agammaglobulinemia patients.

    Le Coz C, Nguyen DN, Su C, et al.

    The Journal of experimental medicine 2021; (218(7)) doi:10.1084/jem.20201750.

    PMID: 33951726
  2. 2

    A novel SPI1 variant (c.566T > C (p.Ile189Thr)) possibly associated with autosomal dominant agammaglobulinemia in a Chinese girl.

    Wu P, Zhao J, Yu Z, et al.

    BMC pediatrics 2026; (26(1)).

    PMID: 41772502
  3. 3

    Effect of chemoradiotherapy on the dynamics of circulating lymphocyte subsets in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

    Yi L, Gu Y, Guo L, et al.

    Frontiers in oncology 2025; (15()):1521836 doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1521836.

    PMID: 40012553
  4. 4

    One hundred thirty-four germ line PU.1 variants and the agammaglobulinemic patients carrying them.

    Knox AVC, Cominsky LY, Sun D, et al.

    Blood 2025; (145(22)):2549-2560 doi:10.1182/blood.2024026683.

    PMID: 39854693
  5. 5

    Unsupervised High-Dimensional Analysis Aligns Dendritic Cells across Tissues and Species.

    Guilliams M, Dutertre CA, Scott CL, et al.

    Immunity 2016; (45(3)):669-684 doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.08.015.

    PMID: 27637149
  6. 6

    Novel heterozygous SPI1c.538C>T p.(Leu180Phe) variant causes PU.1 haploinsufficiency leading to agammaglobulinemia.

    Daddali R, Kettunen K, Turunen T, et al.

    Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) 2025; (277()):110503 doi:10.1016/j.clim.2025.110503.

    PMID: 40294836
  7. 7

    Fitting a naturally scaled point system to the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines.

    Tavtigian SV, Harrison SM, Boucher KM, Biesecker LG

    Human mutation 2020; (41(10)):1734-1737 doi:10.1002/humu.24088.

    PMID: 32720330
  8. 8

    Perspective: Application of the American College of Medical Genetics Variant Interpretation Criteria to Common Variable Immunodeficiency Disorders.

    Ameratunga R, Allan C, Lehnert K, Woon ST

    Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology 2021; (61(2)):226-235 doi:10.1007/s12016-020-08828-z.

    PMID: 33818703
  9. 9

    Memory B Cells and Antibody Responses to Vaccines in Infected Children (MARVIC) With Recurrent Infections: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.

    Jamaluddin J, Mohamad SM, Zainal Abidin MA, et al.

    JMIR research protocols 2026; (15()):e101835 doi:10.2196/101835.

    PMID: 42867869
  10. 10

    Comparison of the composition of lymphocyte subpopulations in non-relapse and relapse patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck before, during radiochemotherapy and in the follow-up period: a multicenter prospective study of the German Cancer Consortium Radiation Oncology Group (DKTK-ROG).

    Niu M, Combs SE, Linge A, et al.

    Radiation oncology (London, England) 2021; (16(1)):141 doi:10.1186/s13014-021-01868-5.

    PMID: 34332614
  11. 11

    Case Report: A novel de novo SPI1 mutation identified in a Chinese patient with agammaglobulinemia.

    Peng Q, Deng M, Zeng X, et al.

    Frontiers in immunology 2025; (16()):1716208 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1716208.

    PMID: 41394874

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your immunologist, clinical geneticist, or genetic counselor should interpret your AGM10 reports and guide care.