Skip to content
How It Works
Explore
Ask a Question Resources Pricing
Who It's For
Patients
Decode results, prep for appointments, weigh options.
Caregivers & advocates
Carry the research load for someone you love.
Providers & clinicians
Resources for patients in your practice.
Log In Ask a Question
PubMed This is a summary of 23 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Urology

Procedures and Surgery: Finding the Right Path

At a Glance

The best BPH procedure depends on prostate size and shape, including a median lobe, plus your priorities. UroLift and Rezūm usually recover faster and better preserve ejaculation, while TURP and HoLEP generally provide stronger, more durable flow improvement.

When lifestyle changes and medications no longer provide enough relief, several procedural and surgical options can help. These treatments generally fall into two categories: Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies (MISTs), which focus on a faster recovery and preserving sexual function, and Definitive Surgeries, which focus on maximizing urinary flow and providing the most durable, long-term results [1][2].

The “best” choice often depends on the size and shape of your prostate, particularly whether you have a median lobe (a part of the prostate that grows upward into the bladder like a “ball-valve”) [3][4].

Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies (MISTs)

MISTs are often performed in an office or outpatient setting, sometimes under local anesthesia [5]. Their primary goal is to open the urinary channel without removing large amounts of tissue.

UroLift (Prostatic Urethral Lift)

UroLift uses small, permanent implants to “curtain back” the prostate tissue that is squeezing the urethra [1].

  • Pros: Rapid recovery, often allowing a return to normal activity within days. It is known for preserving both erections and ejaculation [6][7]. Expect temporary dysuria, urgency, and pelvic discomfort for days to weeks.
  • Cons: It is typically used for prostates under 80 mL and has specific approaches for some median lobes, but candidacy depends on anatomy [3]. About 13.6% of men may need a repeat procedure within 5 years [8].

Rezūm (Water Vapor Therapy)

Rezūm uses the thermal energy from sterile water vapor (steam) to destroy the excess prostate tissue [4]. Over several weeks, the body naturally absorbs the treated tissue, opening the channel [9].

  • Pros: It can effectively treat the median lobe and preserves sexual function for most men [4][10].
  • Cons: You will likely need a catheter for a few days while the initial swelling goes down, and expect weeks of temporary dysuria and urgency [11]. Full results take about 3 months to develop [4].

Definitive Surgeries

These procedures physically remove the obstructive prostate tissue. They offer the most significant improvements in urinary flow but come with longer recovery times and a higher risk of sexual side effects.

TURP (Transurethral Resection of the Prostate)

Often considered a historical standard, TURP involves using an electric loop to “scoop out” the inner part of the prostate [12].

  • Trade-offs: It provides excellent, long-lasting relief for prostates up to 80 mL [12]. However, it carries a 50–70% risk of retrograde ejaculation (where semen enters the bladder during climax) [13]. It can carry risks of strictures, bleeding, and temporary incontinence.

HoLEP (Holmium Laser Enucleation)

HoLEP uses a laser to peel away the entire obstructive part of the prostate, much like removing the fruit from the inside of an orange peel [14].

  • Pros: It is effective across a broad range of prostate sizes and has a very low retreatment rate (about 1.4% over 9 years) [15][16]. It also has a lower risk of bleeding than TURP, making it safer for men on blood thinners [17]. Never stop or start blood thinners without consulting your doctors.
  • Cons: It is a more complex surgery that requires a surgeon with specialized training [18]. Retrograde ejaculation is common, occurring in about 75% of cases [19].

Aquablation

Aquablation is a newer, robotic procedure that uses a high-pressure water jet to remove prostate tissue [20].

  • Trade-offs: It offers symptom relief similar to TURP but may be better at preserving ejaculation in some men (about 73% retain normal ejaculation in some studies) [20][21]. It requires general anesthesia and a hospital stay [22].

Summary of Key Differences

Feature MISTs (UroLift/Rezūm) Definitive Surgery (TURP/HoLEP)
Recovery Faster (days) Slower (weeks)
Anesthesia Local or Sedation General or Spinal
Ejaculation Usually Preserved [6] Often Lost [13]
Flow Improvement Moderate [1] Significant [14]
Retreatment Risk Higher (approx. 10–15%) [23] Lower (approx. 1–5%) [23]
Best For Mild-Moderate symptoms Large prostates / Severe blockage

Choosing between these options is a balance of priorities. If your main goal is to avoid any change in sexual function and you don’t mind the possibility of a second procedure years later, a MIST may be ideal. If you want a more durable approach with the strongest possible urine stream, a definitive surgery like HoLEP or TURP is usually the preferred path [1][23].

Post-Procedure Warning Signs

Regardless of which procedure you choose, you should seek urgent medical attention if you experience:

  • Fever or chills (signs of infection).
  • Heavy bleeding or large blood clots in your urine.
  • Severe or worsening pain.
  • The sudden inability to urinate.

Common questions in this guide

How do I choose between a minimally invasive BPH procedure and surgery?
The choice depends on your prostate size and shape, including whether you have a median lobe, as well as your priorities. UroLift or Rezūm may offer faster recovery and better preservation of ejaculation, while TURP or HoLEP usually provide stronger, more durable improvement in urine flow but involve more recovery and sexual side effects.
Can UroLift or Rezūm treat a BPH median lobe?
Rezūm can treat a median lobe, while UroLift has specific approaches for some median-lobe anatomies. Your urologist must assess the prostate’s shape and size to determine whether either procedure is appropriate for you.
What is the difference between TURP and HoLEP for BPH?
TURP uses an electric loop to remove obstructive prostate tissue and provides long-lasting relief, particularly for prostates up to about 80 mL. HoLEP uses a laser to peel away the obstructive tissue, works across a broader range of prostate sizes, and has a low retreatment rate, but requires specialized training.
Will BPH procedures change ejaculation?
UroLift and Rezūm are designed to preserve sexual function for many men, although individual results vary. Retrograde ejaculation is common after tissue-removing procedures such as TURP and HoLEP, while Aquablation may preserve normal ejaculation in some men.
How long is recovery after BPH surgery, and will I need a catheter?
Recovery is usually faster after minimally invasive procedures than after tissue-removing surgery, but the timeline depends on the procedure and your health. Rezūm commonly requires a catheter for a few days and may take about three months to reach full results; UroLift often allows normal activity within days, while surgeries generally require weeks of recovery.
What warning signs require urgent care after a BPH procedure?
Seek urgent medical attention for fever or chills, heavy bleeding or large clots in the urine, severe or worsening pain, or a sudden inability to urinate. These symptoms can signal infection, bleeding, or urinary blockage and should not be ignored.
Which BPH procedure may be safer if I take blood thinners?
HoLEP has a lower bleeding risk than TURP in the information discussed here, but the safest approach depends on your health and medications. Never stop or start a blood thinner without instructions from the doctor who prescribed it and your urologist.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Does the specific shape of my prostate, such as a 'median lobe,' make me a better candidate for one procedure over another?
  2. 2.Based on my prostate volume, am I a candidate for MISTs (like Rezūm or UroLift), or would a surgery like TURP or HoLEP provide a more reliable outcome?
  3. 3.What is your personal experience and retreatment rate for the procedure you are recommending?
  4. 4.If we choose a tissue-removing surgery, what is the likelihood I will experience ejaculatory changes, and are there techniques that might preserve it?
  5. 5.If I am taking blood thinners, which procedure offers the lowest risk, and how will we manage my medications around the time of surgery?
  6. 6.How long will I realistically need to have a catheter in place, and what is the typical recovery timeline for this specific procedure?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (23)
  1. 1

    The role of novel minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    Madersbacher S, Roehrborn CG, Oelke M

    BJU international 2020; (126(3)):317-326 doi:10.1111/bju.15154.

    PMID: 32599656
  2. 2

    Minimally Invasive Treatments for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

    Cornu JN, Zantek P, Burtt G, et al.

    European urology 2023; (83(6)):534-547 doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.028.

    PMID: 36964042
  3. 3

    Evaluation of Peri-Operative Outcomes after Prostatic Urethral Lift with Emphasis on Urodynamic Changes, Symptom Improvement and Sexual Function.

    Lombardo R, Santarelli V, Turchi B, et al.

    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2024; (14(19)) doi:10.3390/diagnostics14192110.

    PMID: 39410516
  4. 4

    Minimally Invasive Prostate Convective Water Vapor Energy Ablation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

    McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC, et al.

    The Journal of urology 2016; (195(5)):1529-1538 doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.181.

    PMID: 26614889
  5. 5

    Surgical treatment options for benign prostatic obstruction: beyond prostate volume.

    Deyirmendjian C, Elterman D, Chughtai B, et al.

    Current opinion in urology 2022; (32(1)):102-108 doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000937.

    PMID: 34669611
  6. 6

    Three year results of the prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study.

    Roehrborn CG, Rukstalis DB, Barkin J, et al.

    The Canadian journal of urology 2015; (22(3)):7772-82.

    PMID: 26068624
  7. 7

    Prostatic urethral lift vs transurethral resection of the prostate: 2-year results of the BPH6 prospective, multicentre, randomized study.

    Gratzke C, Barber N, Speakman MJ, et al.

    BJU international 2017; (119(5)):767-775 doi:10.1111/bju.13714.

    PMID: 27862831
  8. 8

    Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate After Failed UroLift: Surgical Considerations for the Management of Nonabsorbable Implants.

    Parikh KA, Dora CD

    Urology 2019; (132()):212 doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.06.027.

    PMID: 31271781
  9. 9

    Final 5-Year Outcomes of the Multicenter Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of a Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

    McVary KT, Gittelman MC, Goldberg KA, et al.

    The Journal of urology 2021; (206(3)):715-724 doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001778.

    PMID: 33872051
  10. 10

    Modified water vapor thermal therapy for large-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    Lu Q, Zhu G, Liu J, et al.

    BMC urology 2026; (26(1)).

    PMID: 41652420
  11. 11

    Transurethral water vapour thermal therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia under local anaesthesia alone: initial experience in Chinese patients.

    Lo KL, Mok A, Ko ICH, et al.

    Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi 2024; (30(3)):227-232 doi:10.12809/hkmj2210330.

    PMID: 38725395
  12. 12

    Mechanical and Ablative Minimally Invasive Techniques for Male LUTS due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review according to BPH-6 Evaluation.

    Cantiello F, Fimognari D, Di Mauro M, et al.

    Urologia internationalis 2021; (105(9-10)):858-868 doi:10.1159/000514438.

    PMID: 33849045
  13. 13

    Ejaculations and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Impossible Compromise? A Comprehensive Review.

    Couteau N, Duquesne I, Frédéric P, et al.

    Journal of clinical medicine 2021; (10(24)) doi:10.3390/jcm10245788.

    PMID: 34945084
  14. 14

    Is Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate a Good Surgical Alternative in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management? A Review Article.

    Abedi A, Razzaghi MR, Rahavian A, et al.

    Journal of lasers in medical sciences 2020; (11(2)):197-203 doi:10.34172/jlms.2020.33.

    PMID: 32273963
  15. 15

    18 Years of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience.

    Ibrahim A, Alharbi M, Elhilali MM, et al.

    The Journal of urology 2019; (202(4)):795-800 doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000280.

    PMID: 31009288
  16. 16

    Holmium Laser Enucleation, Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy, or Open Prostatectomy: The Role of the Prostate Volume in terms of Operation Time.

    Gunseren KO, Akdemir S, Çiçek MC, et al.

    Urologia internationalis 2021; (105(3-4)):285-290 doi:10.1159/000511637.

    PMID: 33227804
  17. 17

    Superiority of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate over Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in a Matched-Pair Analysis of Bleeding Complications Under Various Antithrombotic Regimens.

    Westhofen T, Schott M, Keller P, et al.

    Journal of endourology 2021; (35(3)):328-334 doi:10.1089/end.2020.0321.

    PMID: 32940051
  18. 18

    Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

    Robert G, Cornu JN, Fourmarier M, et al.

    BJU international 2016; (117(3)):495-9 doi:10.1111/bju.13124.

    PMID: 25781490
  19. 19

    Retrograde ejaculation after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)-Impact on sexual function and evaluation of patient bother using validated questionnaires.

    Gild P, Dahlem R, Pompe RS, et al.

    Andrology 2020; (8(6)):1779-1786 doi:10.1111/andr.12887.

    PMID: 32780944
  20. 20

    Randomized Controlled Trial of Aquablation versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-year Outcomes.

    Gilling PJ, Barber N, Bidair M, et al.

    Urology 2019; (125()):169-173 doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.002.

    PMID: 30552937
  21. 21

    Aquablation of the prostate: single-center results of a non-selected, consecutive patient cohort.

    Bach T, Giannakis I, Bachmann A, et al.

    World journal of urology 2019; (37(7)):1369-1375 doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2509-y.

    PMID: 30288598
  22. 22

    Aquablation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in medium-to-large-sized prostates (ATHLETE): protocol of a prospective randomised trial.

    Müllhaupt G, Güsewell S, Schmid HP, et al.

    BMJ open 2021; (11(5)):e046973 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046973.

    PMID: 33941632
  23. 23

    Five-year Retreatment and Medication Restart Rates Following Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Treatments: A Nationwide Real-world Analysis Using Epic Cosmos.

    Carletti F, Tamborino F, Turcan A, et al.

    European urology focus 2026; (12(3)):383-392 doi:10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.003.

    PMID: 41558957

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your urologist can help you choose the safest BPH procedure based on your prostate anatomy, symptoms, medications, and priorities.

Get notified when new evidence is published on benign prostatic hyperplasia.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.