Mapping the Disease: Diagnosis, Pathology, and Staging
At a Glance
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma is confirmed by examining a biopsy or LEEP sample. MRI, PET/CT, physical examination, and lymph-node findings show how far it has spread and determine the FIGO 2018 stage, which guides treatment.
Confirming a diagnosis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) involves more than just a single test. It is a process of gathering evidence from tissue samples, detailed imaging, and clinical exams to create a complete map of the disease. This “map” is your stage, and it helps your care team determine the most effective treatment path for you.
Confirming the Diagnosis
The first step is always a tissue sample to confirm the presence of cancer cells. This is usually done through a cervical biopsy or a LEEP (Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure), which uses a thin wire loop to remove a larger piece of tissue [1].
Once the tissue is under a microscope, a pathologist looks for specific markers to support the diagnosis of SCC and to distinguish it from “look-alike” cancers, such as endometrial cancer that has moved downward:
- p16: In HPV-associated cervical SCC, this marker usually shows a “block-like” or diffuse pattern [2].
- p40, p63, and CK5/6: These are markers that support the cells are indeed squamous cells [2][3].
- Margins: If you had a LEEP, the report will state if the edges (margins) are clear. “Negative margins” mean no cancer cells were found at the edge of the removed tissue—though this does not guarantee the rest of the cervix is completely clear of disease [4].
Diagnostic “Look-Alikes”
Occasionally, it can be difficult to tell if a cancer started in the cervix or the lining of the uterus (endometrium). Doctors use a combination of MRI scans to see where the bulk of the tumor is located and special stains like PAX8 or ER/PR (hormone receptors) to help identify the site of origin [3][5].
The Role of Imaging: Seeing the Full Picture
Under the current FIGO 2018 staging guidelines, imaging plays a vital role in determining your stage [6]. Imaging is highly individualized based on your stage, examination, and local practice; not everyone needs every scan.
- Pelvic MRI: This is the gold standard for looking at the “local” area. It helps doctors measure the exact size of the tumor and see if it has grown into nearby tissues like the parametrium (the tissue surrounding the uterus) or the vagina [7][8].
- FDG-PET/CT: This scan looks at the whole body. It uses a small amount of radioactive sugar to find active cancer cells. It is particularly good at spotting if cancer has spread to lymph nodes or distant organs, and is most often used when nodal disease is suspected [9][10]. Keep in mind that PET scans can sometimes show “false positives” if a lymph node is just inflamed from a common infection.
Understanding FIGO 2018 Staging
Cervical cancer staging is unique because it combines what the doctor sees during an exam with what the scans and pathology show. If your stage is based on imaging, you might see a small “r” (radiologic) next to it; if it is based on surgery, you will see a “p” (pathologic) [6][9].
Stage I: Confined to the Cervix
- Stage IA: The tumor is microscopic.
- Stage IB: The tumor is larger or deeper (sometimes microscopic if deep, but often visible to the naked eye), yet still confined to the cervix.
Stage IIIC: The Lymph Node Factor
A major change in recent years is how we handle lymph nodes. If cancer is found in the lymph nodes in the back of the abdomen (retroperitoneal nodes), the cancer is classified as Stage IIIC, regardless of how small the tumor on the cervix is [6][11].
- Stage IIIC1: Cancer is found in the pelvic lymph nodes [6].
- Stage IIIC2: Cancer is found in the para-aortic lymph nodes (higher up, near the large artery called the aorta) [6].
The Concept of “Stage Migration”
Because our imaging (like PET scans) has become so much better at finding tiny spots of cancer in lymph nodes, many patients who would have been called “Stage I” or “Stage II” in the past are now called Stage IIIC [12][13]. This is called stage migration.
Stage IIIC is an advanced, node-positive category. This generally changes your radiation fields and systemic treatment planning [14]. However, it is important to understand that your individual prognosis still varies substantially depending on the original size of the primary tumor, the number of nodes involved, and whether the nodes were confirmed by pathology or just seen on a scan [15][16].
Other Stages Briefly
- Stage II: Cancer has spread beyond the cervix to the upper vagina or parametrium, but not to the pelvic wall.
- Stage III (A/B): Cancer has spread to the lower third of the vagina or to the pelvic wall, or causes kidney blockage.
- Stage IV: Cancer has spread to the bladder/rectum (IVA) or distant organs like the lungs (IVB).
Common questions in this guide
How is cervical squamous cell carcinoma confirmed?
What does p16 mean on a cervical cancer pathology report?
Does a negative margin after LEEP mean the cancer is gone?
What do MRI and PET/CT show in cervical cancer staging?
What does stage IIIC mean for cervical squamous cell carcinoma?
What do the letters “r” and “p” mean beside my cervical cancer stage?
Could a cancer found in the cervix have started in the uterus?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Is my stage 'clinical' (based on exams), 'r' (based on imaging), or 'p' (based on pathology)?
- 2.What is the exact depth of invasion and size of my tumor, and does it affect my stage?
- 3.Were any lymph nodes seen on my imaging scans, and could they be inflammatory rather than cancerous?
- 4.My pathology report mentions p16—how does this support my diagnosis?
- 5.How does the actual size of the tumor on my cervix change my outlook if I have positive lymph nodes?
- 6.Was there any concern that this cancer might have started in the uterus instead of the cervix?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (16)
- 1
Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis.
Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al.
The Lancet. Global health 2020; (8(2)):e191-e203 doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6.
PMID: 31812369 - 2
An unusual pattern of endometrial involvement: superficial spreading squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Jiang X, Han Z, Chun Z, et al.
Frontiers in oncology 2024; (14()):1456297 doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1456297.
PMID: 39411132 - 3
Case report: Clinicopathological characteristic of two cases of primary endometrial squamous cell carcinoma and review of the literature.
Zhang HB, Lin LH, Lin QP, et al.
Frontiers in oncology 2024; (14()):1415816 doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1415816.
PMID: 39252944 - 4
Cervical Cancer Incidence in Young U.S. Females After Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Introduction.
Guo F, Cofie LE, Berenson AB
American journal of preventive medicine 2018; (55(2)):197-204 doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.013.
PMID: 29859731 - 5
Endometrial serous carcinoma with extensive squamous differentiation mimicking primary endometrial squamous cell carcinoma: Clinicopathological and molecular analysis of a case with literature review.
Santoro A, Travaglino A, Arciuolo D, et al.
Pathology, research and practice 2022; (240()):154209 doi:10.1016/j.prp.2022.154209.
PMID: 36423403 - 6
Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, et al.
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2019; (145(1)):129-135 doi:10.1002/ijgo.12749.
PMID: 30656645 - 7
Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Revised 2018 FIGO Staging in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Tsuyoshi H, Tsujikawa T, Yamada S, et al.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2021; (11(2)) doi:10.3390/diagnostics11020202.
PMID: 33573078 - 8
Imaging Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy in Assessment of Cervical Cancer.
Ghani MA, Liau J, Eskander R, et al.
Journal of computer assisted tomography 2022; (46(5)):707-715 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000001358.
PMID: 35995483 - 9
Multimodality Imaging of Uterine Cervical Malignancies.
Mansoori B, Khatri G, Rivera-Colón G, et al.
AJR. American journal of roentgenology 2020; (215(2)):292-304 doi:10.2214/AJR.19.21941.
PMID: 32551909 - 10
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI, CT, and [18F]FDG-PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastases in clinically early-stage cervical cancer - a nationwide Dutch cohort study.
Olthof EP, Bergink-Voorthuis BJ, Wenzel HHB, et al.
Insights into imaging 2024; (15(1)):36 doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01589-1.
PMID: 38332397 - 11
The variable impact of positive lymph nodes in cervical cancer: Implications of the new FIGO staging system.
McComas KN, Torgeson AM, Ager BJ, et al.
Gynecologic oncology 2020; (156(1)):85-92 doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.10.025.
PMID: 31744640 - 12
Stage migration and survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer at Stage IIIC according to the 2018 FIGO staging system: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han L, Chen Y, Zheng A, et al.
Frontiers in oncology 2024; (14()):1460543 doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1460543.
PMID: 39411135 - 13
FIGO 2018 staging criteria for cervical cancer: Impact on stage migration and survival.
Grigsby PW, Massad LS, Mutch DG, et al.
Gynecologic oncology 2020; (157(3)):639-643 doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.027.
PMID: 32248993 - 14
How should we stage and tailor treatment strategy in locally advanced cervical cancer? Imaging versus para-aortic surgical staging.
Martinez A, Angeles MA, Querleu D, et al.
International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society 2020; (30(9)):1434-1443 doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001351.
PMID: 32788263 - 15
A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
Liu X, Wang W, Hu K, et al.
Scientific reports 2020; (10(1)):362 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57202-3.
PMID: 31941966 - 16
Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
Kim J, Cho Y, Kim N, et al.
Gynecologic oncology 2021; (160(3)):735-741 doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.012.
PMID: 33358037
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your gynecologic oncology team should interpret your cervical cancer pathology, imaging, and stage in the context of your care.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.