Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 15 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Medical Genetics

Diagnostic Tests & Avoiding Misdiagnoses

At a Glance

Chronic visceral ASMD is usually confirmed with acid sphingomyelinase activity testing plus SMPD1 genetic testing. Lyso-SM can support the diagnosis, while parallel testing helps distinguish ASMD from Gaucher disease and Niemann-Pick type C when results are unclear.

Diagnosing a rare condition like Chronic Visceral ASMD can be a complex process, often requiring a “detective work” approach by specialists. Because its symptoms—like an enlarged spleen and low platelets—overlap with more common conditions, it is frequently misdiagnosed [1]. Getting to the right answer requires a combination of enzyme testing, genetic analysis, and specialized biomarkers interpreted by an expert.

The Diagnostic Pathway

Confirming ASMD generally involves a two-step approach [2]:

  1. Enzyme Activity Testing: Measuring the activity of the acid sphingomyelinase (ASM) enzyme using a validated assay on a dried blood spot, white blood cells (leukocytes), or skin cells (fibroblasts) [3]. In people with ASMD, this activity is significantly reduced. It must be interpreted alongside the laboratory’s specific reference range [2].
  2. Genetic Testing: Sequencing the SMPD1 gene to identify pathogenic variants (mutations) [4]. To have ASMD, a person must have two disease-causing variants—one inherited from each parent. A geneticist must also determine if these variants are “in trans” (on opposite copies of the gene) [5].

A Critical Warning: The “False-Normal” Result

One of the biggest challenges in diagnosing ASMD is that some common laboratory tests can occasionally miss the disease. Some labs use synthetic substrates (artificial chemicals) to measure enzyme activity [6].

(Note for your clinician: In certain genetic types of ASMD—specifically those involving variants like Q294K, C92W, or P184L—the enzyme may appear to work “normally” when tested with these artificial substances, leading to a false-normal result [7][6].)

If your symptoms strongly suggest ASMD but your enzyme test comes back normal, it is vital to follow up with genetic testing or biomarker measurement [7][8]. Furthermore, genetic testing sometimes reveals “variants of uncertain significance” (VUS), where it is not immediately clear if the variant causes disease. A genetic counselor is essential for interpreting these nuances and organizing testing for siblings or other relatives.

The Role of Plasma Biomarkers

Recently, doctors have begun using specialized blood markers to help confirm a diagnosis and monitor disease burden, especially when enzyme results are borderline [3].

  • Lyso-SM (lysosphingomyelin): This is a breakdown product of the fat that builds up in ASMD. It is highly elevated in patients with ASMD and is an established biomarker for the disease [9][10].
  • Lyso-SM-509: Another marker that can be elevated. However, examining the Lyso-SM-509 to Lyso-SM ratio is chiefly used to help distinguish Niemann-Pick Type C (NPC) from ASMD [11].

Biomarkers are supportive tools and do not replace formal enzyme and genetic testing.

Avoiding Common Misdiagnoses

ASMD is often mistaken for other “storage” diseases because they share similar features like an enlarged spleen (splenomegaly) [12].

Gaucher Disease

Gaucher disease is the most common misdiagnosis for ASMD [13]. Both cause an enlarged spleen and low platelets. To tell them apart, doctors should perform “parallel testing,” measuring both ASM and the enzyme for Gaucher (glucocerebrosidase) at the same time [13]. Key clues that strongly support ASMD rather than Gaucher include the presence of interstitial lung disease and very low HDL cholesterol [12][14].

Niemann-Pick Type C (NPC)

Despite the similar names, ASMD and NPC are caused by different biological problems. While ASMD is an enzyme deficiency, NPC is a problem with how cholesterol moves within cells [11]. Doctors can distinguish them using the Lyso-SM-509/Lyso-SM ratio and molecular testing. Additionally, NPC often involves progressive neurological symptoms, like difficulty looking up and down, which are not typical in Chronic Visceral ASMD [15].

Common questions in this guide

What tests are used to confirm chronic visceral ASMD?
Doctors usually start by measuring acid sphingomyelinase activity in a dried blood spot, white blood cells, or skin cells. They typically use SMPD1 sequencing to look for two disease-causing variants, with one inherited from each parent.
Can an enzyme test for ASMD be falsely normal?
Yes. Some assays use synthetic substrates and can show near-normal activity for certain SMPD1 variants, so a normal result does not always rule out ASMD when symptoms fit. Ask about genetic testing, biomarkers, or an alternative enzyme assay if suspicion remains high.
How can Lyso-SM testing help diagnose ASMD?
Lyso-SM is a blood marker made from the fat that accumulates in ASMD and is often highly elevated. It can support diagnosis and help monitor disease burden, but it does not replace enzyme activity and genetic testing. Lyso-SM-509 and its ratio to Lyso-SM can help distinguish ASMD from Niemann-Pick type C.
How do doctors tell ASMD apart from Gaucher disease?
ASMD and Gaucher disease can both cause an enlarged spleen and low platelets. Doctors can measure acid sphingomyelinase and glucocerebrosidase activity in parallel; interstitial lung disease and very low HDL cholesterol may favor ASMD.
How is ASMD distinguished from Niemann-Pick type C?
ASMD results from low acid sphingomyelinase activity, whereas Niemann-Pick type C involves abnormal movement of cholesterol inside cells. The Lyso-SM-509-to-Lyso-SM ratio and molecular testing can help distinguish them, while progressive difficulty moving the eyes up and down is more typical of Niemann-Pick type C than chronic visceral ASMD.
What does a variant of uncertain significance in SMPD1 mean?
A variant of uncertain significance is a gene change whose effect is not yet clear, so it cannot by itself confirm or exclude ASMD. A genetic counselor or medical geneticist can interpret it alongside enzyme results, other clinical findings, and family testing.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Was my (or my child's) ASM activity tested using a natural or a synthetic substrate, and could the results be a 'false-normal'?
  2. 2.Can we measure the plasma Lyso-SM level to help confirm the diagnosis or track disease burden?
  3. 3.Have we ruled out Gaucher disease and Niemann-Pick Type C by checking glucocerebrosidase activity and NPC-specific biomarkers?
  4. 4.Does the genetic report show two pathogenic variants in the SMPD1 gene, and what do we know about these specific variants?
  5. 5.Can we meet with a genetic counselor to help interpret these results and discuss testing for family members?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (15)
  1. 1

    Lysosomal Storage Disorders.

    Cefalo J, Crestani B, Guyard A, et al.

    Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine 2026; (47(4)):434-445 doi:10.1055/a-2715-6812.

    PMID: 41043473
  2. 2

    Expert opinion on patient journey, diagnosis and clinical monitoring in acid sphingomyelinase deficiency in Turkey: a pediatric metabolic disease specialist's perspective.

    Arslan N, Coker M, Gokcay GF, et al.

    Frontiers in pediatrics 2023; (11()):1113422 doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1113422.

    PMID: 37435168
  3. 3

    Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency: Laboratory diagnosis, genetic and epidemiologic aspects of a 50-year French cohort.

    Froissart R, Pettazzoni M, Pagan C, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2025; (145(1)):109081 doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2025.109081.

    PMID: 40106870
  4. 4

    Case report: The spectrum of SMPD1 pathogenic variants in Hungary.

    Molnar MJ, Szlepak T, Csürke I, et al.

    Frontiers in genetics 2023; (14()):1158108 doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1158108.

    PMID: 37347058
  5. 5

    Functional characterization of novel variants in SMPD1 in Indian patients with acid sphingomyelinase deficiency.

    Deshpande D, Gupta SK, Sarma AS, et al.

    Human mutation 2021; (42(10)):1336-1350 doi:10.1002/humu.24263.

    PMID: 34273913
  6. 6

    Improved sensitivity of an acid sphingomyelinase activity assay using a C6:0 sphingomyelin substrate.

    Chuang WL, Pacheco J, Cooper S, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism reports 2015; (3()):55-7 doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2015.04.001.

    PMID: 26937397
  7. 7

    Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency: The clinical spectrum of 2 patients who carry the Q294K mutation and diagnostic challenges.

    Blümlein U, Mengel E, Amraoui Y

    Molecular genetics and metabolism reports 2022; (32()):100900 doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2022.100900.

    PMID: 36046391
  8. 8

    Quantification of lysosphingomyelin and lysosphingomyelin-509 for the screening of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency.

    Kubaski F, Burlina A, Pereira D, et al.

    Orphanet journal of rare diseases 2022; (17(1)):407 doi:10.1186/s13023-022-02560-x.

    PMID: 36348386
  9. 9

    The impact of biomarkers analysis in the diagnosis of Niemann-Pick C disease and acid sphingomyelinase deficiency.

    Deodato F, Boenzi S, Taurisano R, et al.

    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 2018; (486()):387-394 doi:10.1016/j.cca.2018.08.039.

    PMID: 30153451
  10. 10

    Quantitation of plasmatic lysosphingomyelin and lysosphingomyelin-509 for differential screening of Niemann-Pick A/B and C diseases.

    Kuchar L, Sikora J, Gulinello ME, et al.

    Analytical biochemistry 2017; (525()):73-77 doi:10.1016/j.ab.2017.02.019.

    PMID: 28259515
  11. 11

    Rapid screening for lipid storage disorders using biochemical markers. Expert center data and review of the literature.

    Voorink-Moret M, Goorden SMI, van Kuilenburg ABP, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2018; (123(2)):76-84 doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.12.431.

    PMID: 29290526
  12. 12

    Similarities and differences between Gaucher disease and acid sphingomyelinase deficiency: An algorithm to support the diagnosis.

    Cappellini MD, Motta I, Barbato A, et al.

    European journal of internal medicine 2023; (108()):81-84 doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2022.11.028.

    PMID: 36443133
  13. 13

    Importance to include differential diagnostics for acid sphingomyelinase deficiency (ASMD) in patients suspected to have to Gaucher disease.

    Oliva P, Schwarz M, Mechtler TP, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2023; (139(1)):107563 doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2023.107563.

    PMID: 37086570
  14. 14

    Interstitial lung disease in lysosomal storage disorders.

    Borie R, Crestani B, Guyard A, Lidove O

    European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society 2021; (30(160)) doi:10.1183/16000617.0363-2020.

    PMID: 33927007
  15. 15

    Diagnostic tests for Niemann-Pick disease type C (NP-C): A critical review.

    Vanier MT, Gissen P, Bauer P, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2016; (118(4)):244-54.

    PMID: 27339554

This page explains chronic visceral ASMD diagnostic tests and possible misdiagnoses for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Ask a qualified clinician or genetic counselor to interpret your specific results.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Chronic visceral acid sphingomyelinase deficiency.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.