Subtypes and the Diagnostic Work-up
At a Glance
CMML is classified by white blood cell count into myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative disease and by blast levels into CMML-1 or CMML-2. Diagnosis combines blood and marrow findings with chromosome, mutation, and rule-out testing.
When you look at a diagnostic work-up for CMML, you are looking at a complex biological puzzle. Doctors use two main “labels” to describe your specific version of the disease. These labels help predict how the disease might behave and which treatments may be most effective.
The Two Ways to Classify CMML
Your diagnosis is classified along two different axes: how the cells act (Phenotype) and how many immature cells are present (Blast Percentage).
1. Classification by Phenotype: MD-CMML vs. MP-CMML
This classification is based on your total white blood cell (WBC) count. The cutoff used by both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) is 13 x 10⁹/L [1][2].
- Myelodysplastic (MD-CMML): Your WBC count is less than 13 x 10⁹/L. This subtype often focuses on “ineffective” blood production, where the main challenge is low blood counts (cytopenias) like anemia [1].
- Myeloproliferative (MP-CMML): Your WBC count is 13 x 10⁹/L or higher. This subtype is characterized by the overproduction of cells. It often carries a more aggressive course, a higher risk of the disease changing into acute leukemia, and physical symptoms like an enlarged spleen (splenomegaly) [1][3].
2. Classification by Blasts: CMML-1 vs. CMML-2
This group is defined by the number of “blasts” in your blood and bone marrow. Blasts are immature, “baby” cells that haven’t yet grown into functional white blood cells. In CMML, doctors also count promonocytes—a specific type of immature monocyte—as “blast equivalents” [4][5].
| Classification | Blasts in Blood | Blasts in Bone Marrow |
|---|---|---|
| CMML-1 | Less than 5% | Less than 10% |
| CMML-2 | 5% to 19% | 10% to 19% |
If the blast count reaches 20% or higher in either the blood or the marrow, the disease is generally considered to have transformed into Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) [6]. However, the final classification depends on complete genetic and morphological findings, as some genetically defined AMLs may use different criteria.
Your Diagnostic Work-up “Completeness Checklist”
A comprehensive work-up for CMML should include several key pieces of information (which may appear across multiple reports) to ensure an accurate diagnosis and risk assessment.
- Absolute Monocyte Count: Must be ≥0.5 x 10⁹/L and make up ≥10% of your total white blood cells [1].
- Blast & Promonocyte Percentage: The report should state the percentage in both the blood and the marrow [4].
- Cytogenetics (Karyotype): A look at the structure of your chromosomes. About 30% of patients have abnormalities like Trisomy 8 or Loss of Y [7].
- Molecular Panel (NGS): This uses Next-Generation Sequencing to find specific mutations. Over 90% of patients have mutations in genes like TET2, SRSF2, or ASXL1 [8][9].
- Bone Marrow Morphology: A description of how the cells look under a microscope, checking for “dysplasia” (abnormal shapes) [10].
How Doctors Rule Out “Mimics”
Monocytosis (high monocytes) can be caused by many things other than cancer. Your doctor must distinguish CMML from:
- Reactive Monocytosis: High monocytes caused by a temporary infection or inflammation [11].
- Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML): A different blood cancer defined by a specific genetic swap called BCR::ABL1. A “negative” test for this gene is required [12].
- Other Neoplasms: Doctors will also rule out rearrangements involving PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1, or PCM1::JAK2, and differentiate CMML from diseases like Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) by looking at cell shapes and fibrosis in the marrow [13].
The Role of Genetic Mutations
The mutations found in your NGS panel (such as ASXL1 or RAS-pathway mutations like NRAS) are not just for diagnosis; they are factored into validated prognostic models [14][3]. However, it is important to know that a single mutation alone does not determine your future. The effect of any mutation depends on the specific variant (e.g., a “truncating” ASXL1 mutation vs. another type), co-occurring mutations (such as TET2 without ASXL1, which some models treat favorably [15]), your blood counts, and your overall health. These findings are used together by your doctor to guide treatment decisions.
Common questions in this guide
What is the difference between MD-CMML and MP-CMML?
How are CMML-1 and CMML-2 determined?
What tests are included in a complete CMML diagnostic work-up?
Can one mutation determine my CMML prognosis?
Why is BCR::ABL1 testing important when CMML is suspected?
Questions For You
Answer a question to get research tailored to you. Your answers are private.
Get notified when new evidence is published on chronic monocytic leukemia.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Does my diagnostic work-up explicitly include promonocytes in the total blast percentage?
- 2.Was my classification as CMML-1 or CMML-2 based on my blood count, my bone marrow, or both?
- 3.How were other mimicking conditions ruled out in my case—was a BCR::ABL1 test performed?
- 4.Based on my complete molecular profile, what is my predicted risk level for the disease progressing?
- 5.Can you explain what 'clonal hematopoiesis' means in the context of my specific mutations?
References
References (15)
- 1
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management.
Patnaik MM, Tefferi A
American journal of hematology 2024; (99(6)):1142-1165 doi:10.1002/ajh.27271.
PMID: 38450850 - 2
How I treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Solary E, Itzykson R
Blood 2017; (130(2)):126-136 doi:10.1182/blood-2017-04-736421.
PMID: 28572287 - 3
Landscape and clinicopathologic features of RAS pathway mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Montalban-Bravo G, Loghavi S, Li Z, et al.
Blood advances 2025; (9(19)):5105-5117 doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016529.
PMID: 40644618 - 4
How I diagnose and treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Patnaik MM
Haematologica 2022; (107(7)):1503-1517 doi:10.3324/haematol.2021.279500.
PMID: 35236051 - 5
Proposed diagnostic criteria for classical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), CMML variants and pre-CMML conditions.
Valent P, Orazi A, Savona MR, et al.
Haematologica 2019; (104(10)):1935-1949 doi:10.3324/haematol.2019.222059.
PMID: 31048353 - 6
Validation of the 2017 revision of the WHO chronic myelomonocytic leukemia categories.
Loghavi S, Sui D, Wei P, et al.
Blood advances 2018; (2(15)):1807-1816 doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2018019224.
PMID: 30054307 - 7
Cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Patnaik MM, Tefferi A
Blood cancer journal 2016; (6()):e393 doi:10.1038/bcj.2016.5.
PMID: 26849014 - 8
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management.
Patnaik MM, Tefferi A
American journal of hematology 2018; (93(6)):824-840 doi:10.1002/ajh.25104.
PMID: 29878489 - 9
[How I diagnose and treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia].
Xiao ZJ
Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi 2026; (47(2)):117-122 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20251217-00597.
PMID: 41839624 - 10
CSF3R-mutant chronic myelomonocytic leukemia is a distinct clinically subset with abysmal prognosis: a case report and systematic review of the literature.
Guastafierro V, Ubezio M, Manes N, et al.
Leukemia & lymphoma 2023; (64(9)):1566-1573 doi:10.1080/10428194.2023.2227750.
PMID: 37395413 - 11
Evaluation by Flow Cytometry of Mature Monocyte Subpopulations for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia.
Picot T, Aanei CM, Flandrin Gresta P, et al.
Frontiers in oncology 2018; (8()):109 doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00109.
PMID: 29707521 - 12
Update on CML-Like Disorders.
Cross NCP
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia 2020; (20 Suppl 1()):S101-S102 doi:10.1016/S2152-2650(20)30477-8.
PMID: 32862848 - 13
Utility of JAK2 V617F allelic burden in distinguishing chronic myelomonocytic Leukemia from Primary myelofibrosis with monocytosis.
Hu Z, Ramos CEB, Medeiros LJ, et al.
Human pathology 2019; (85()):290-298 doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2018.10.026.
PMID: 30447300 - 14
Clinical, molecular, and prognostic correlates of number, type, and functional localization of TET2 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)-a study of 1084 patients.
Coltro G, Mangaonkar AA, Lasho TL, et al.
Leukemia 2020; (34(5)):1407-1421 doi:10.1038/s41375-019-0690-7.
PMID: 31836856 - 15
Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in younger patients: molecular and cytogenetic predictors of survival and treatment outcome.
Patnaik MM, Wassie EA, Padron E, et al.
Blood cancer journal 2015; (5()):e270 doi:10.1038/bcj.2014.90.
PMID: 25555161
This page explains CMML subtypes and diagnostic testing for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your hematologist and pathologist should interpret your results and risk assessment in the context of your overall health.