Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Neurology · COQ8A-Related Ataxia

Genetics and the Challenges of Diagnostic Testing

At a Glance

COQ8A-related ataxia is diagnosed mainly through genetic testing, but a negative or incomplete result does not always exclude it. Whole exome sequencing can miss repeat expansions and large deletions, and normal CoQ10 levels in skin cells may differ from muscle results.

Finding the cause of a rare ataxia often involves a complex puzzle of genetic and biochemical tests. For COQ8A-related ataxia (also known as ARCA2), the diagnostic journey is frequently complicated by the fact that traditional tests can sometimes return conflicting or even normal results in patients who truly have the condition [1][2].

The Genetic Blueprint: Autosomal Recessive Inheritance

This condition is an autosomal recessive disorder. This means a patient must have two non-working copies of the COQ8A (or ADCK3) gene—one inherited from each parent—to develop the disease [3].

  • The “In Trans” Rule: If two different heterozygous variants are identified, doctors must confirm that the two mutations are “in trans,” meaning they sit on opposite copies of the gene [4]. Geneticists often test the parents (segregation testing) to prove this [5]. (Note: This is not needed to establish trans configuration for a truly homozygous pathogenic variant). A variant of uncertain significance (VUS) should not be treated as diagnostic on its own.
  • Genotype-Phenotype Correlations: Research suggests that the type of mutation might influence the symptoms probabilistically. One large study of 59 patients found that missense variants (where one “letter” of DNA is swapped) were more likely to cause multisystem symptoms—affecting the brain, heart, and muscles—compared to loss-of-function variants (where the gene is essentially “switched off”), which often resulted in symptoms more focused on the brain [2].

Genetic Risk and Family Planning

Because this condition is autosomal recessive, when both parents are carriers, there is a 25% chance in each pregnancy of the child being affected. There is a 50% chance the child will be a carrier (unaffected), and a 25% chance they will not carry the mutation. A genetic counselor can help explain these probabilities and discuss testing for other family members.

Why Biochemical Testing Can Be Misleading

Historically, doctors looked for a Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) deficiency in the blood or skin cells to diagnose this condition. However, modern research has shown that these levels can be “discordant”—meaning they look different depending on which tissue is tested [6][7].

  • Normal vs. Low Levels: It is possible for a patient to have a severe CoQ10 deficiency in their skeletal muscle while having completely normal levels in their skin fibroblasts (skin cells grown in a lab) [1].
  • The Energy Demand Factor: Tissues with high energy needs, like muscle and brain cells, “feel” the CoQ10 shortage first [8]. Skin cells, which have lower energy demands, may be able to maintain normal CoQ10 levels as a possible explanation for these differences [9].
  • A normal fibroblast result does not rule out disease, but a muscle biopsy is invasive and is not automatically the next step when molecular testing is diagnostic. When testing muscle, labs use different methods to “normalize” or adjust the results (often comparing CoQ10 to protein levels or an enzyme called citrate synthase). Using only one method can sometimes miss a deficiency that the other method would catch [10].

Diagnostic Look-Alikes

Because ataxia is a broad symptom, COQ8A-related ataxia can easily be mistaken for other conditions that look nearly identical in the early stages:

  • POLG-Related Disorders: These mitochondrial conditions also involve ataxia and seizures but are caused by a different gene (POLG) [11].
  • Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA): The most common inherited ataxia. It often involves coordination loss and heart issues, similar to COQ8A [12].
  • Vitamin E Deficiency: This rare but treatable condition can mimic the symptoms of genetic ataxias and must be ruled out with a simple blood test [13].

The Limitations of Modern Genetic Testing

Most families now receive a diagnosis through Whole Exome Sequencing (WES), which reads the protein-coding parts of all 20,000 genes. While powerful, WES has two major blind spots:

  1. Repeat Expansions: Conditions like Friedreich ataxia and many Spinocerebellar Ataxias (SCAs) are caused by “stutters” in the DNA called repeat expansions. WES often cannot “see” these stutters accurately [14][15]. If a WES report is negative, a doctor should still order targeted repeat-expansion testing for FRDA [16].
  2. Large Deletions: Sometimes, a whole chunk of a gene is missing rather than just one letter. Standard sequencing might miss this, requiring a specialized test called deletion/duplication analysis (or MLPA) to find the “hidden” second mutation [5][17].

For these reasons, a phenotype- and laboratory-dependent testing strategy is used, often involving a combination of comprehensive Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) and specialized tests to rule out repeat expansions and large-scale genetic deletions [18][3].

Common questions in this guide

What does finding two COQ8A variants mean?
Two pathogenic or likely pathogenic COQ8A variants can support a diagnosis of COQ8A-related ataxia. If the variants are different, testing may be needed to confirm they are on opposite copies of the gene, called being “in trans.” A variant of uncertain significance alone should not be used to diagnose the condition.
Can normal CoQ10 levels in a skin biopsy rule out COQ8A ataxia?
No. A person can have low CoQ10 in skeletal muscle while levels in skin fibroblasts are normal, so a normal skin-cell result does not rule out disease. Muscle biopsy is invasive and is not automatically needed when genetic testing is diagnostic.
What can whole exome sequencing miss in inherited ataxia?
Whole exome sequencing may miss repeat expansions, such as those causing Friedreich ataxia and some spinocerebellar ataxias. It can also miss large deletions or duplications in a gene. Targeted repeat-expansion or deletion/duplication testing may be needed when results are negative or only identify one COQ8A variant.
What are the chances if both parents carry a COQ8A mutation?
For each pregnancy, two carrier parents have a 25% chance of having an affected child, a 50% chance of having a carrier child without the condition, and a 25% chance of having a child who does not inherit either mutation. A genetic counselor can explain these probabilities and discuss testing for relatives.
Why can muscle CoQ10 results depend on the laboratory method?
Laboratories may normalize muscle CoQ10 to protein or citrate synthase. Using one method can identify a deficiency that another method might miss, so the method used matters when interpreting the result.
What should be checked if only one COQ8A variant is found?
Because COQ8A-related ataxia is recessive, finding only one variant may mean a second change was not detected. Ask whether deletion/duplication analysis, such as MLPA, was performed and whether the variant is clearly disease-causing; a variant of uncertain significance alone is not diagnostic.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Autosomal recessive ataxia due to ubiquinone deficiency.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (18)
  1. 1

    Cerebellar ataxia and severe muscle CoQ10 deficiency in a patient with a novel mutation in ADCK3.

    Barca E, Musumeci O, Montagnese F, et al.

    Clinical genetics 2016; (90(2)):156-60 doi:10.1111/cge.12742.

    PMID: 26818466
  2. 2

    Clinico-Genetic, Imaging and Molecular Delineation of COQ8A-Ataxia: A Multicenter Study of 59 Patients.

    Traschütz A, Schirinzi T, Laugwitz L, et al.

    Annals of neurology 2020; (88(2)):251-263 doi:10.1002/ana.25751.

    PMID: 32337771
  3. 3

    Molecular diagnosis of coenzyme Q10 deficiency: an update.

    Yubero D, Montero R, Santos-Ocaña C, et al.

    Expert review of molecular diagnostics 2018; (18(6)):491-498 doi:10.1080/14737159.2018.1478290.

    PMID: 29781757
  4. 4

    Case Report: Myoclonic and tremulous movements associated with COQ8A-related coenzyme Q10 deficiency type 4.

    Wang D, Zhang G, Fang X, et al.

    Frontiers in genetics 2025; (16()):1682085 doi:10.3389/fgene.2025.1682085.

    PMID: 41568333
  5. 5

    Early-onset coenzyme Q10 deficiency associated with ataxia and respiratory chain dysfunction due to novel pathogenic COQ8A variants, including a large intragenic deletion.

    Cotta A, Alston CL, Baptista-Junior S, et al.

    JIMD reports 2020; (54(1)):45-53 doi:10.1002/jmd2.12107.

    PMID: 32685350
  6. 6

    Biochemical Assessment of Coenzyme Q10 Deficiency.

    Rodríguez-Aguilera JC, Cortés AB, Fernández-Ayala DJ, Navas P

    Journal of clinical medicine 2017; (6(3)) doi:10.3390/jcm6030027.

    PMID: 28273876
  7. 7

    Whole-Exome Sequencing Study of Fibroblasts Derived From Patients With Cerebellar Ataxia Referred to Investigate CoQ10 Deficiency.

    Monfrini E, Pesini A, Biella F, et al.

    Neurology. Genetics 2023; (9(2)):e200058 doi:10.1212/NXG.0000000000200058.

    PMID: 37090936
  8. 8

    Genetic Rescue of Mitochondrial and Skeletal Muscle Impairment in an Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Model of Coenzyme Q10 Deficiency.

    Romero-Moya D, Santos-Ocaña C, Castaño J, et al.

    Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2017; (35(7)):1687-1703 doi:10.1002/stem.2634.

    PMID: 28472853
  9. 9

    Mitochondrial Dysfunctions in Human Primary Coenzyme Q10 Deficiencies.

    Fontaine F, Pénicaud R, Allouche S

    Biomolecules 2026; (16(2)) doi:10.3390/biom16020302.

    PMID: 41750371
  10. 10

    The dilemma of diagnosing coenzyme Q10 deficiency in muscle.

    Louw R, Smuts I, Wilsenach KL, et al.

    Molecular genetics and metabolism 2018; (125(1-2)):38-43 doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.02.015.

    PMID: 29530532
  11. 11

    A Scoping Review of POLG-Related Cerebellar Ataxia: Insights and Clinical Perspectives.

    Kalampokini S, Keramidiotis I, Ravanidis S, et al.

    Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) 2025; (15()):55 doi:10.5334/tohm.1027.

    PMID: 41245005
  12. 12

    Early-Onset Friedreich's Ataxia With Oculomotor Apraxia.

    Saghazadeh A, Hafizi S, Hosseini F, et al.

    Acta medica Iranica 2017; (55(2)):128-130.

    PMID: 28282710
  13. 13

    A first description of ataxia with vitamin E deficiency associated with MT-TG gene mutation.

    Maalej M, Kammoun F, Kharrat M, et al.

    Acta neurologica Belgica 2021; (121(6)):1733-1740 doi:10.1007/s13760-020-01490-4.

    PMID: 32979145
  14. 14

    Analysis of Short Tandem Repeat Expansions in a Cohort of 12,496 Exomes from Patients with Neurological Diseases Reveals Variable Genotyping Rate Dependent on Exome Capture Kits.

    Rocca C, Murphy D, Clarkson C, et al.

    Genes 2025; (16(2)) doi:10.3390/genes16020169.

    PMID: 40004498
  15. 15

    Sequencing through hyperexpanded Friedreich's ataxia-GAA repeats by nanopore technology: implications in genotype-phenotype correlation.

    Uppili B, Sharma P, Ahmad I, et al.

    Brain communications 2023; (5(2)):fcad020 doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad020.

    PMID: 37006329
  16. 16

    Molecular genetic testing for hereditary ataxia: What every neurologist should know.

    Wallace SE, Bird TD

    Neurology. Clinical practice 2018; (8(1)):27-32 doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000421.

    PMID: 29517052
  17. 17

    Diagnostic yield and limitations of whole-genome sequencing for hereditary cerebellar ataxia.

    Yau WY, Sullivan R, O'Connor E, et al.

    Brain communications 2025; (7(3)):fcaf188 doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf188.

    PMID: 40488180
  18. 18

    An Update on the Adult-Onset Hereditary Cerebellar Ataxias: Novel Genetic Causes and New Diagnostic Approaches.

    Rudaks LI, Yeow D, Ng K, et al.

    Cerebellum (London, England) 2024; (23(5)):2152-2168 doi:10.1007/s12311-024-01703-z.

    PMID: 38760634

This page explains COQ8A-related ataxia testing for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. A genetics professional should interpret your family’s results and recommend next steps for your specific situation.