Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 88 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated

Research & Literature

Explore the leading researchers and institutions driving advances in this area, and dive into the full body of literature that informs this resource.

Explore the Literature Visualize citation networks across 88 referenced papers

Top Authors

Alastair Mark Thompson
Baylor College of Medicine
E. Shelley Hwang
Duke University
Jelle Wesseling
Leiden University Medical Center
Marc D. Ryser
Duke University
Lars J. Grimm
Duke University
Monica Morrow
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Esther H. Lips
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Ann H. Partridge
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Terry Hyslop
Thomas Jefferson University
Thomas Lynch
Duke University

Top Institutions

Ranked by publications Top 10 institutions

References

References (88)
  1. 1

    Treatment selection for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast using the University of Southern California/Van Nuys (USC/VNPI) prognostic index.

    Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD

    The breast journal 2015; (21(2)):127-32 doi:10.1111/tbj.12368.

    PMID: 25600630
  2. 2

    Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ - The LORD study.

    Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L, et al.

    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 2015; (51(12)):1497-510.

    PMID: 26025767
  3. 3

    Predictors and patterns of fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors.

    McGinty HL, Small BJ, Laronga C, Jacobsen PB

    Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 2016; (35(1)):1-9 doi:10.1037/hea0000238.

    PMID: 26030308
  4. 4

    A population-based validation study of the DCIS Score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone.

    Rakovitch E, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W, et al.

    Breast cancer research and treatment 2015; (152(2)):389-98 doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3464-6.

    PMID: 26119102
  5. 5

    Histopathological grading of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: validation of a web-based survey through intra-observer reproducibility analysis.

    Schuh F, Biazús JV, Resetkova E, et al.

    Diagnostic pathology 2015; (10()):93 doi:10.1186/s13000-015-0320-2.

    PMID: 26159429
  6. 6

    Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

    Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V, et al.

    JAMA oncology 2015; (1(7)):888-96 doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2510.

    PMID: 26291673
  7. 7

    Her2 and Ki67 Biomarkers Predict Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

    Davis JE, Nemesure B, Mehmood S, et al.

    Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM 2016; (24(1)):20-5 doi:10.1097/PAI.0000000000000223.

    PMID: 26317313
  8. 8

    Myoepithelial cell differentiation markers in ductal carcinoma in situ progression.

    Russell TD, Jindal S, Agunbiade S, et al.

    The American journal of pathology 2015; (185(11)):3076-89.

    PMID: 26343330
  9. 9

    Anastrozole versus tamoxifen for the prevention of locoregional and contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ (IBIS-II DCIS): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

    Forbes JF, Sestak I, Howell A, et al.

    Lancet (London, England) 2016; (387(10021)):866-73.

    PMID: 26686313
  10. 10

    Anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

    Margolese RG, Cecchini RS, Julian TB, et al.

    Lancet (London, England) 2016; (387(10021)):849-56.

    PMID: 26686957
  11. 11

    Patient-reported outcomes with anastrozole versus tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

    Ganz PA, Cecchini RS, Julian TB, et al.

    Lancet (London, England) 2016; (387(10021)):857-65.

    PMID: 26686960
  12. 12

    Is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Indicated at Completion Mastectomy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

    Pilewskie M, Karsten M, Radosa J, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2016; (23(7)):2229-34 doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5145-z.

    PMID: 26960927
  13. 13

    The relationship between illness representations, risk perception and fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors.

    Freeman-Gibb LA, Janz NK, Katapodi MC, et al.

    Psycho-oncology 2017; (26(9)):1270-1277 doi:10.1002/pon.4143.

    PMID: 27146965
  14. 14

    Do LORIS Trial Eligibility Criteria Identify a Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patient Population at Low Risk of Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

    Pilewskie M, Stempel M, Rosenfeld H, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2016; (23(11)):3487-3493 doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5268-2.

    PMID: 27172775
  15. 15

    Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

    Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2016; (23(12)):3801-3810 doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5449-z.

    PMID: 27527714
  16. 16

    The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.

    Marinovich ML, Azizi L, Macaskill P, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2016; (23(12)):3811-3821 doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5446-2.

    PMID: 27527715
  17. 17

    Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

    Lyman GH, Somerfield MR, Bosserman LD, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017; (35(5)):561-564 doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.71.0947.

    PMID: 27937089
  18. 18

    Adjuvant therapy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: The Pandora's box.

    Lazzeroni M, Dunn BK, Pruneri G, et al.

    Cancer treatment reviews 2017; (55()):1-9 doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.01.010.

    PMID: 28262606
  19. 19

    Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Margins <2 mm: Contemporary Outcomes With Breast Conservation.

    Tadros AB, Smith BD, Shen Y, et al.

    Annals of surgery 2019; (269(1)):150-157 doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002439.

    PMID: 28742682
  20. 20

    Surgical Upstaging Rates for Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Proven DCIS: Implications for Active Surveillance Trials.

    Grimm LJ, Ryser MD, Partridge AH, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2017; (24(12)):3534-3540 doi:10.1245/s10434-017-6018-9.

    PMID: 28795370
  21. 21

    Adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation following lumpectomy in ductal carcinoma in-situ: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    Garg PK, Jakhetiya A, Pandey R, et al.

    The breast journal 2018; (24(3)):233-239 doi:10.1111/tbj.12889.

    PMID: 28833776
  22. 22

    Patient-reported outcomes of catheter-based accelerated partial breast brachytherapy and whole breast irradiation, a single institution experience.

    Jethwa KR, Kahila MM, Mara KC, et al.

    Breast cancer research and treatment 2018; (169(1)):189-196 doi:10.1007/s10549-018-4665-6.

    PMID: 29349713
  23. 23

    Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

    Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al.

    Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN 2018; (16(3)):310-320 doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0012.

    PMID: 29523670
  24. 24

    Thioredoxin-interacting protein is an independent risk stratifier for breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

    Miligy IM, Gorringe KL, Toss MS, et al.

    Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc 2018; (31(12)):1807-1815 doi:10.1038/s41379-018-0086-7.

    PMID: 29955142
  25. 25

    Meta-analysis of the cumulative risk of endometrial malignancy and systematic review of endometrial surveillance in extended tamoxifen therapy.

    Fleming CA, Heneghan HM, O'Brien D, et al.

    The British journal of surgery 2018; (105(9)):1098-1106 doi:10.1002/bjs.10899.

    PMID: 29974455
  26. 26

    Ductal carcinoma in situ current trends, controversies, and review of literature.

    Hong YK, McMasters KM, Egger ME, Ajkay N

    American journal of surgery 2018; (216(5)):998-1003 doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.013.

    PMID: 30244816
  27. 27

    Local Relapse After Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Mastectomy for Extensive Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ≥4 cm.

    Hamilton SN, Nichol A, Wai E, et al.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 2019; (103(2)):381-388 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.09.022.

    PMID: 30253237
  28. 28

    Endocrine Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast with Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and Radiotherapy (RT): a Meta-Analysis.

    Yan Y, Zhang L, Tan L, et al.

    Pathology oncology research : POR 2020; (26(1)):521-531 doi:10.1007/s12253-018-0553-y.

    PMID: 30499075
  29. 29

    The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

    Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, et al.

    BMJ open 2019; (9(3)):e026797 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026797.

    PMID: 30862637
  30. 30

    Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen to Prevent Local and Contralateral Recurrence in Breast Intraepithelial Neoplasia.

    DeCensi A, Puntoni M, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019; (37(19)):1629-1637 doi:10.1200/JCO.18.01779.

    PMID: 30973790
  31. 31

    Predictors of an Invasive Breast Cancer Recurrence after DCIS: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

    Visser LL, Groen EJ, van Leeuwen FE, et al.

    Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2019; (28(5)):835-845 doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0976.

    PMID: 31023696
  32. 32

    Ductal carcinoma in situ: to treat or not to treat, that is the question.

    van Seijen M, Lips EH, Thompson AM, et al.

    British journal of cancer 2019; (121(4)):285-292 doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0478-6.

    PMID: 31285590
  33. 33

    Comparison of Local Recurrence Risk Estimates After Breast-Conserving Surgery for DCIS: DCIS Nomogram Versus Refined Oncotype DX Breast DCIS Score.

    Van Zee KJ, Zabor EC, Di Donato R, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2019; (26(10)):3282-3288 doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07537-y.

    PMID: 31342373
  34. 34

    [Ductal carcinoma in situ in 2019: Diagnosis, treatment, prognosis].

    Cutuli B

    Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983) 2019; (48(10)):1112-1122 doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2019.08.018.

    PMID: 31653542
  35. 35

    External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): a randomised controlled trial.

    Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Berrang TS, et al.

    Lancet (London, England) 2019; (394(10215)):2165-2172 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32515-2.

    PMID: 31813635
  36. 36

    Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Update.

    Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, et al.

    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 2020; (144(5)):545-563 doi:10.5858/arpa.2019-0904-SA.

    PMID: 31928354
  37. 37

    Efficacy of radiation boost after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer with focally positive, tumor-exposed margins.

    Suzuki R, Yoshida M, Oguchi M, et al.

    Journal of radiation research 2020; (61(3)):440-446 doi:10.1093/jrr/rraa005.

    PMID: 32163143
  38. 38

    Analysis of Surgical Trends for Axillary Lymph Node Management in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using the NSQIP Database: Are We Following National Guidelines?

    Pyfer BJ, Jonczyk M, Jean J, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2020; (27(9)):3448-3455 doi:10.1245/s10434-020-08374-0.

    PMID: 32232706
  39. 39

    Do Eligibility Criteria for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Active Surveillance Trials Identify Patients at Low Risk for Upgrade to Invasive Carcinoma?

    Oseni TO, Smith BL, Lehman CD, et al.

    Annals of surgical oncology 2020; (27(11)):4459-4465 doi:10.1245/s10434-020-08576-6.

    PMID: 32418079
  40. 40

    Is There Any Association Between Mammographic Features of Microcalcifications and Breast Cancer Subtypes in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ?

    Avdan Aslan A, Gültekin S, Esendağli Yilmaz G, Kurukahvecioğlu O

    Academic radiology 2021; (28(7)):963-968 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.032.

    PMID: 32620528
  41. 41

    An Integrative Review on Factors Contributing to Fear of Cancer Recurrence Among Young Adult Breast Cancer Survivors.

    Gormley M, Ghazal L, Fu MR, et al.

    Cancer nursing 2022; (45(1)):E10-E26 doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000858.

    PMID: 32657897
  42. 42

    Tamoxifen and Endometrial Cancer: A Janus-Headed Drug.

    Emons G, Mustea A, Tempfer C

    Cancers 2020; (12(9)) doi:10.3390/cancers12092535.

    PMID: 32906618
  43. 43

    Hypofractionated Versus Standard Fractionated Radiotherapy in Patients With Early Breast Cancer or Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in a Randomized Phase III Trial: The DBCG HYPO Trial.

    Offersen BV, Alsner J, Nielsen HM, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020; (38(31)):3615-3625 doi:10.1200/JCO.20.01363.

    PMID: 32910709
  44. 44

    Pathological features of 11,337 patients with primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and subsequent events: results from the UK Sloane Project.

    Shaaban AM, Hilton B, Clements K, et al.

    British journal of cancer 2021; (124(5)):1009-1017 doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01152-5.

    PMID: 33199800
  45. 45

    Clinical outcomes of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ in Hong Kong: 10-year territory-wide cancer registry study.

    Co M, Ngan RKC, Mang OWK, et al.

    Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi 2020; (26(6)):486-491 doi:10.12809/hkmj198203.

    PMID: 33277445
  46. 46

    Symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): Upstaging risk and predictors.

    Venkatesh SL, Oseni TO, Bahl M

    Clinical imaging 2021; (73()):101-107 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.11.050.

    PMID: 33360004
  47. 47

    Comparison of Radiation With or Without Concurrent Trastuzumab for HER2-Positive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Resected by Lumpectomy: A Phase III Clinical Trial.

    Cobleigh MA, Anderson SJ, Siziopikou KP, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021; (39(21)):2367-2374 doi:10.1200/JCO.20.02824.

    PMID: 33739848
  48. 48

    Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological and mammographic findings.

    Zhang M, Lin Q, Su XH, et al.

    Clinical radiology 2021; (76(10)):787.e1-787.e7 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2021.04.011.

    PMID: 34052010
  49. 49

    Therapeutic Options for the Management of Aromatase Inhibitor- Associated Bone Loss.

    Gaudio A, Xourafa A, Rapisarda R, Castellino P

    Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets 2022; (22(3)):259-273 doi:10.2174/1871530321666210809153152.

    PMID: 34370654
  50. 50

    Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Radiation Following Surgical Excision for Good-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Long-Term Report From NRG Oncology/RTOG 9804.

    McCormick B, Winter KA, Woodward W, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021; (39(32)):3574-3582 doi:10.1200/JCO.21.01083.

    PMID: 34406870
  51. 51

    Long-term risk of subsequent ipsilateral lesions after surgery with or without radiotherapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

    van Seijen M, Lips EH, Fu L, et al.

    British journal of cancer 2021; (125(10)):1443-1449 doi:10.1038/s41416-021-01496-6.

    PMID: 34408284
  52. 52

    Assessment of the usefulness of prognostic Van Nuys Prognostic Index in the treatment in ductal carcinoma in situ in 15-year observation.

    Kunkiel M, Niwińska A

    Scientific reports 2021; (11(1)):22645 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02126-0.

    PMID: 34811426
  53. 53

    Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review.

    Grimm LJ, Rahbar H, Abdelmalak M, et al.

    Radiology 2022; (302(2)):246-255 doi:10.1148/radiol.211839.

    PMID: 34931856
  54. 54

    Systemic Treatment of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.

    Crimini E, Corti C, Repetto M, et al.

    Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990) 2021; (116(5 Suppl)):S97-S104.

    PMID: 34967317
  55. 55

    A Model to Predict Upstaging to Invasive Carcinoma in Patients Preoperatively Diagnosed with Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.

    Nicosia L, Bozzini AC, Penco S, et al.

    Cancers 2022; (14(2)) doi:10.3390/cancers14020370.

    PMID: 35053533
  56. 56

    The effect of psychological interventions on fear of cancer recurrence in breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lyu MM, Siah RC, Lam ASL, Cheng KKF

    Journal of advanced nursing 2022; (78(10)):3069-3082 doi:10.1111/jan.15321.

    PMID: 35696315
  57. 57

    Radiation doses and fractionation schedules in non-low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ in the breast (BIG 3-07/TROG 07.01): a randomised, factorial, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.

    Chua BH, Link EK, Kunkler IH, et al.

    Lancet (London, England) 2022; (400(10350)):431-440 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01246-6.

    PMID: 35934006
  58. 58

    MiRNA expression deregulation correlates with the Oncotype DX® DCIS score.

    Loudig O, Mitchell MI, Ben-Dov IZ, et al.

    Breast cancer research : BCR 2022; (24(1)):62 doi:10.1186/s13058-022-01558-4.

    PMID: 36096802
  59. 59

    Precise application of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world data.

    Chiu CW, Chang LC, Su CM, et al.

    Surgical oncology 2022; (45()):101880 doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2022.101880.

    PMID: 36332555
  60. 60

    The clinical significance of HER2 expression in DCIS.

    Akrida I, Mulita F

    Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) 2022; (40(1)):16 doi:10.1007/s12032-022-01876-9.

    PMID: 36352293
  61. 61

    Surveillance Imaging after Primary Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

    Byng D, Thomas SM, Rushing CN, et al.

    Radiology 2023; (307(1)):e221210 doi:10.1148/radiol.221210.

    PMID: 36625746
  62. 62

    Aromatase Inhibitor Musculoskeletal Syndrome and Bone Loss: a Review of the Current Literature.

    Christensen Holz S

    Current oncology reports 2023; (25(7)):825-831 doi:10.1007/s11912-023-01413-5.

    PMID: 37052869
  63. 63

    De-escalation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

    Abdulla HA, Khalaf Y

    Cureus 2023; (15(4)):e37383 doi:10.7759/cureus.37383.

    PMID: 37182081
  64. 64

    Isogenic Mammary Models of Intraductal Carcinoma Reveal Progression to Invasiveness in the Absence of a Non-Obligatory In Situ Stage.

    Bernhardt SM, Mitchell E, Stamnes S, et al.

    Cancers 2023; (15(8)) doi:10.3390/cancers15082257.

    PMID: 37190184
  65. 65

    Can Molecular Biomarkers Help Reduce the Overtreatment of DCIS?

    Hahn E, Rodin D, Sutradhar R, et al.

    Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) 2023; (30(6)):5795-5806 doi:10.3390/curroncol30060433.

    PMID: 37366916
  66. 66

    Recruiting women with ductal carcinoma in situ to a randomised controlled trial: lessons from the LORIS study.

    Wheelwright S, Matthews L, Jenkins V, et al.

    Trials 2023; (24(1)):670 doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07703-4.

    PMID: 37838682
  67. 67

    Association of DCIS size and margin status with risk of developing breast cancer post-treatment: multinational, pooled cohort study.

    Schmitz RSJM, van den Belt-Dusebout AW, Clements K, et al.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2023; (383()):e076022 doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-076022.

    PMID: 37903527
  68. 68

    Selective omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ: identifying eligible candidates.

    Bae SJ, Kook Y, Jang JS, et al.

    Breast cancer research : BCR 2024; (26(1)):65 doi:10.1186/s13058-024-01816-7.

    PMID: 38609935
  69. 69

    Mammography of suspicious calcifications among ductal carcinoma in situ and benign breast disease.

    Lohitvisate W, Kaeorat C, Kwankua A

    SA journal of radiology 2024; (28(1)):2852 doi:10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2852.

    PMID: 38840823
  70. 70

    Comparison of locoregional recurrence risk among nipple-sparing mastectomy, skin-sparing mastectomy, and simple mastectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a single-center study.

    Nashimoto M, Asano Y, Matsui H, et al.

    Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) 2024; (31(6)):1010-1017 doi:10.1007/s12282-024-01613-2.

    PMID: 39017823
  71. 71

    Radiology for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Updates on Invasive Cancer Progression and Active Monitoring.

    Grimm LJ

    Korean journal of radiology 2024; (25(8)):698-705 doi:10.3348/kjr.2024.0117.

    PMID: 39028009
  72. 72

    Proportion of Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ That Qualify for Observation Criteria Set Forth by Clinical Trials.

    McAdams CD, Clevenger N, Nicholson K, et al.

    Journal of surgical oncology 2025; (131(2)):115-123 doi:10.1002/jso.27858.

    PMID: 39295556
  73. 73

    A Nomogram Using Imaging Features to Predict Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

    Choi BH, Kang S, Cho N, Kim SY

    Korean journal of radiology 2024; (25(10)):876-886 doi:10.3348/kjr.2024.0268.

    PMID: 39344545
  74. 74

    Spectrum of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) Lesions of the Breast: From Morphology to Molecular Characteristics.

    Sathvik G, V P, Joseph LD, Challa CB

    Cureus 2024; (16(9)):e69929 doi:10.7759/cureus.69929.

    PMID: 39439618
  75. 75

    Active Monitoring With or Without Endocrine Therapy for Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: The COMET Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Lynch T, et al.

    JAMA 2025; (333(11)):972-980 doi:10.1001/jama.2024.26698.

    PMID: 39665585
  76. 76

    The natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ: development, validation, and estimated outcomes of the SimDCIS model.

    Poelhekken K, Dorrius MD, Dibden A, et al.

    Breast cancer research and treatment 2025; (211(1)):223-231 doi:10.1007/s10549-025-07639-0.

    PMID: 40021589
  77. 77

    Comparative Analyses of Van Nuys Prognostic Index and NCCN Guidelines in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment in a Brazilian Hospital.

    Antonini M, Barros Vasconcelos R, Mattar A, et al.

    Life (Basel, Switzerland) 2025; (15(3)) doi:10.3390/life15030432.

    PMID: 40141777
  78. 78

    Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.

    Park KU, Somerfield MR, Anne N, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2025; (43(14)):1720-1741 doi:10.1200/JCO-25-00099.

    PMID: 40209128
  79. 79

    Oncotype DX Breast DCIS Score® Test: Impact on Radiotherapy Recommendations and Patient Decisional Anxiety.

    Muktar S, Kirby A, Locke I, et al.

    Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2025; (42()):103839 doi:10.1016/j.clon.2025.103839.

    PMID: 40311271
  80. 80

    ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS).

    , Kuzmiak CM, Sharpe RE, et al.

    Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 2025; (22(5S)):S274-S299 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.027.

    PMID: 40409882
  81. 81

    The effects of adjuvant endocrine therapy on long-term outcomes from ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Chen Q, Campbell I, Elwood M, et al.

    Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2025; (82()):104521 doi:10.1016/j.breast.2025.104521.

    PMID: 40540939
  82. 82

    Prediction of upstaging in DCIS: the dominant role of pathological over imaging risk factors.

    Choi S, Park B, Lee EG, et al.

    Breast cancer research and treatment 2025; (213(3)):325-334 doi:10.1007/s10549-025-07768-6.

    PMID: 40748441
  83. 83

    Advancements in Detection and Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

    Tucunduva TCM, Zanetta VC, Chala LF, et al.

    Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 2025; (45(9)):e240174 doi:10.1148/rg.240174.

    PMID: 40773373
  84. 84

    Multimodal Imaging of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Single-Center Study of 75 Cases.

    Urraro F, Giordano N, Patanè V, et al.

    Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) 2025; (13(4)) doi:10.3390/medsci13040245.

    PMID: 41283246
  85. 85

    Preliminary Outcomes of a Culturally Adapted Fear of Recurrence Therapy (FORT) for Turkish Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Eyrenci A, Ertuna L, Bahçivan O

    Psycho-oncology 2025; (34(12)):e70345 doi:10.1002/pon.70345.

    PMID: 41318944
  86. 86

    American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria Report on Radiation in the Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) of the Breast.

    Harris E, Daroui P, Gonzalez V, et al.

    Clinical breast cancer 2026; (26(2)):105-112 doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2025.12.007.

    PMID: 41621199
  87. 87

    Calcification and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict upgrade of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on core needle biopsy.

    Marabi M, Li Y, Aphivatanasiri C, et al.

    Histopathology 2026; (89(1)):122-135 doi:10.1111/his.70143.

    PMID: 41905345
  88. 88

    Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Invasion Risk Scoring in Tru-Cut Biopsies of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ; Predictive Role of Estrogen Receptor and HER2 Expression.

    Uzun E, Bulut K

    Turk patoloji dergisi 2026; (42(3)):174-182 doi:10.5146/tjpath.2026.14901.

    PMID: 42117201