Getting the Right Diagnosis and Understanding the Pathology
At a Glance
A diagnosis of DNAJC21-related Shwachman-Diamond syndrome generally requires disease-causing variants in both copies of DNAJC21, supported by bone marrow findings and other tests. A negative older panel may miss DNAJC21, and a variant of uncertain significance alone does not confirm the diagnosis.
Because DNAJC21-related SDS is so rare, getting to a definitive diagnosis often feels like a journey through several layers of testing. Understanding the “pathology”—the specific changes in the cells and genes—is the key to moving from a suspected diagnosis to a confirmed one. This process involves looking at the blueprint of DNA and the actual “factory floor” of the bone marrow [1][2].
The Genetic Blueprint
To have DNAJC21-related SDS, a patient typically must have biallelic mutations. This means both copies of the DNAJC21 gene (one inherited from each parent) are not working correctly [3].
- In Trans: Doctors look for mutations “in trans,” meaning one was inherited from the mother and one from the father [1].
- The Limits of Panels: Many standard “bone marrow failure panels” created just a few years ago did not include the DNAJC21 gene [4]. If an older panel was negative, a Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) or Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) might be needed to find these specific variants [4][5]. However, even WES/WGS can miss structural variants or deep intronic variants.
- VUS and RNA: Sometimes, a genetic test finds a “variant of uncertain significance” (VUS). A VUS does not automatically establish a diagnosis. Doctors may use RNA sequencing to see if the mutation causes the cell to “skip” important parts of the gene (like exon 7 skipping), integrating this functional evidence to confirm pathogenicity [1][6].
Demystifying the Bone Marrow Report
A bone marrow biopsy is a “snapshot” of how the body is producing blood cells. The report can be full of complex terms [2][7]:
- Hypocellularity (Hypoplastic Marrow): There are fewer blood-forming cells than expected. The marrow may look “empty” or replaced by fat cells [3][8].
- Pancytopenia: A term for low counts in all three major blood cell types: red cells, white cells, and platelets [3].
- Defective Megakaryopoiesis: Problems making megakaryocytes, the large cells that produce platelets. In some DNAJC21 cases, these cells may be few in number or abnormally shaped [9][10].
- Dysplasia: This means the cells look “weird” or malformed. While some dysplasia can occur in inherited marrow failure without necessarily meaning leukemia, an experienced hematopathologist must interpret it [11].
- Blast Percentage: Immature “blast” cells below 5% are typical of a non-acute-leukemia marrow. However, a normal blast percentage does not entirely rule out MDS; it must be interpreted with cytogenetics, counts, and cellular morphology [12].
Somatic Mutations: Clonal Evolution
Beyond the inherited (germline) mutations, bone marrow cells can pick up new mutations over time. These are called somatic mutations or clones.
In the more common SBDS-related SDS, mutations like EIF6 or del(20q) are heavily studied, but their meaning in DNAJC21 disease is not fully established.
- EIF6 / del(20q): In classic SDS, these are sometimes considered adaptive or “rescue” events [13][14]. However, they still require expert monitoring, as a single clone never rules out cancer risk entirely.
- TP53: These mutations disable the cell’s “safety checks.” The appearance of biallelic TP53 alterations is a concerning sign of a higher risk for MDS or AML and requires very close monitoring [15][16]. It is important to know that TP53 is concerning, but not an automatic leukemia diagnosis or an immediate transplant indication on its own. Do not infer cancer risk from raw genetic files; these require expert interpretation.
A Conditional Diagnostic Checklist
To ensure a complete diagnostic picture, your specialist team may consider the following conditional items based on symptoms, age, and previous results. (Not every patient requires every test):
- [ ] Biallelic DNAJC21 Variants: Pathogenic mutations confirmed “in trans” via parental testing [1].
- [ ] Marrow Cellularity & Lineage: Assessment of red, white, and platelet-producing cells [2].
- [ ] Blast Percentage: Checked to ensure immature cells are within expected ranges [12].
- [ ] Cytogenetics (Karyotype/FISH): Checking for chromosome changes [17].
- [ ] Somatic Myeloid Panel (NGS): Checking for acquired clones like TP53 or EIF6 [15].
- [ ] Differential Rule-Outs: “Chromosome breakage” test (Fanconi Anemia) or “telomere length” test (Dyskeratosis Congenita) [2][8].
Common questions in this guide
What genetic findings support a diagnosis of DNAJC21-related Shwachman-Diamond syndrome?
Can a negative bone marrow failure panel miss DNAJC21-related SDS?
What does a hypocellular bone marrow report mean?
What do pancytopenia and abnormal megakaryocytes mean in the marrow report?
Can RNA sequencing help explain a DNAJC21 variant of uncertain significance?
Do TP53 or EIF6 mutations mean that leukemia is present?
Does a blast count below 5% rule out myelodysplastic syndrome?
Get notified when new evidence is published on DNAJC21-related Shwachman Diamond syndrome.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
References
References (17)
- 1
Case Report: Novel Biallelic Variants in DNAJC21 Causing an Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Spectrum Phenotype: An Odyssey to Diagnosis.
Chirita-Emandi A, Petrescu CA, Zimbru CG, et al.
Frontiers in genetics 2022; (13()):870233 doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.870233.
PMID: 35464845 - 2
Genetic variant profile in a cohort of inherited bone marrow failure patients from North india.
Viswanathan GK, Dass J, Chauhan R, et al.
Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 2026; (42(5)):1873-1880 doi:10.1007/s12288-025-02243-0.
PMID: 42712617 - 3
DNAJC21 Mutations Link a Cancer-Prone Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome to Corruption in 60S Ribosome Subunit Maturation.
Tummala H, Walne AJ, Williams M, et al.
American journal of human genetics 2016; (99(1)):115-24.
PMID: 27346687 - 4
A Rare Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome Disclosed by Reanalysis of the Exome Data of a Patient Evaluated for Cytopenia and Dysmorphic Features.
Durmaz D, Aslanger AD, Yavas Abali Z, et al.
Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology 2024; (46(3)):e214-e219 doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000002839.
PMID: 38408162 - 5
A Well-Curated Cost-Effective Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Identifies a Diverse Landscape of Pathogenic and Novel Germline Variants in a Bone Marrow Failure Cohort in a Resource-Constraint Setting.
Pallavelangini S, Senguttuvan G, Bhatia P, et al.
The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 2023; (25(10)):748-757 doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.06.009.
PMID: 37474001 - 6
Clinical and genetic spectrum of SBDS and DNAJC21 gene variants in bone marrow failure cases: Atypical and cryptic presentations.
Palla S, Bhatia P, Raina S, et al.
Blood cells, molecules & diseases 2025; (113-114()):102924 doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2025.102924.
PMID: 40209608 - 7
Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes and germline predisposition to myeloid neoplasia: A practical approach for the pathologist.
Li J, Bledsoe JR
Seminars in diagnostic pathology 2023; (40(6)):429-442 doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2023.06.006.
PMID: 37507252 - 8
Refining the phenotype associated with biallelic DNAJC21 mutations.
D'Amours G, Lopes F, Gauthier J, et al.
Clinical genetics 2018; (94(2)):252-258 doi:10.1111/cge.13370.
PMID: 29700810 - 9
DNAJC21-related thrombocytopenia in a young adult female.
Aslan D, Akgun-Dogan O, Ay B, et al.
American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics 2023; (193(2)):193-197 doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.32043.
PMID: 37186482 - 10
Schwachman Diamond-Like Syndrome Due to a Novel Variant of DNAJC21 Gene: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Maaloul I, Hachicha J, Achich Y, et al.
Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology 2026; doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000003309.
PMID: 42925145 - 11
Clinical features and outcomes of patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.
Myers KC, Furutani E, Weller E, et al.
The Lancet. Haematology 2020; (7(3)):e238-e246 doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30206-6.
PMID: 31879230 - 12
Predisposition to myeloid malignancies in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome: biological insights and clinical advances.
Reilly CR, Shimamura A
Blood 2023; (141(13)):1513-1523 doi:10.1182/blood.2022017739.
PMID: 36542827 - 13
Distinct genetic pathways define pre-malignant versus compensatory clonal hematopoiesis in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome.
Kennedy AL, Myers KC, Bowman J, et al.
Nature communications 2021; (12(1)):1334 doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21588-4.
PMID: 33637765 - 14
Somatic genetic rescue of a germline ribosome assembly defect.
Tan S, Kermasson L, Hilcenko C, et al.
Nature communications 2021; (12(1)):5044 doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24999-5.
PMID: 34413298 - 15
Convergent somatic evolution commences in utero in a germline ribosomopathy.
Machado HE, Øbro NF, Williams N, et al.
Nature communications 2023; (14(1)):5092 doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40896-5.
PMID: 37608017 - 16
Clonal hematopoiesis in the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.
Tsai FD, Lindsley RC
Blood 2020; (136(14)):1615-1622 doi:10.1182/blood.2019000990.
PMID: 32736377 - 17
Novel recurrent chromosome anomalies in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome.
Valli R, De Paoli E, Nacci L, et al.
Pediatric blood & cancer 2017; (64(8)) doi:10.1002/pbc.26454.
PMID: 28130858
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your hematology, hematopathology, and genetics team should interpret your DNAJC21 results and bone marrow report.