Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 17 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Hematology · DNAJC21-related Shwachman-Diamond syndrome

Getting the Right Diagnosis and Understanding the Pathology

At a Glance

A diagnosis of DNAJC21-related Shwachman-Diamond syndrome generally requires disease-causing variants in both copies of DNAJC21, supported by bone marrow findings and other tests. A negative older panel may miss DNAJC21, and a variant of uncertain significance alone does not confirm the diagnosis.

Because DNAJC21-related SDS is so rare, getting to a definitive diagnosis often feels like a journey through several layers of testing. Understanding the “pathology”—the specific changes in the cells and genes—is the key to moving from a suspected diagnosis to a confirmed one. This process involves looking at the blueprint of DNA and the actual “factory floor” of the bone marrow [1][2].

The Genetic Blueprint

To have DNAJC21-related SDS, a patient typically must have biallelic mutations. This means both copies of the DNAJC21 gene (one inherited from each parent) are not working correctly [3].

  • In Trans: Doctors look for mutations “in trans,” meaning one was inherited from the mother and one from the father [1].
  • The Limits of Panels: Many standard “bone marrow failure panels” created just a few years ago did not include the DNAJC21 gene [4]. If an older panel was negative, a Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) or Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) might be needed to find these specific variants [4][5]. However, even WES/WGS can miss structural variants or deep intronic variants.
  • VUS and RNA: Sometimes, a genetic test finds a “variant of uncertain significance” (VUS). A VUS does not automatically establish a diagnosis. Doctors may use RNA sequencing to see if the mutation causes the cell to “skip” important parts of the gene (like exon 7 skipping), integrating this functional evidence to confirm pathogenicity [1][6].

Demystifying the Bone Marrow Report

A bone marrow biopsy is a “snapshot” of how the body is producing blood cells. The report can be full of complex terms [2][7]:

  • Hypocellularity (Hypoplastic Marrow): There are fewer blood-forming cells than expected. The marrow may look “empty” or replaced by fat cells [3][8].
  • Pancytopenia: A term for low counts in all three major blood cell types: red cells, white cells, and platelets [3].
  • Defective Megakaryopoiesis: Problems making megakaryocytes, the large cells that produce platelets. In some DNAJC21 cases, these cells may be few in number or abnormally shaped [9][10].
  • Dysplasia: This means the cells look “weird” or malformed. While some dysplasia can occur in inherited marrow failure without necessarily meaning leukemia, an experienced hematopathologist must interpret it [11].
  • Blast Percentage: Immature “blast” cells below 5% are typical of a non-acute-leukemia marrow. However, a normal blast percentage does not entirely rule out MDS; it must be interpreted with cytogenetics, counts, and cellular morphology [12].

Somatic Mutations: Clonal Evolution

Beyond the inherited (germline) mutations, bone marrow cells can pick up new mutations over time. These are called somatic mutations or clones.

In the more common SBDS-related SDS, mutations like EIF6 or del(20q) are heavily studied, but their meaning in DNAJC21 disease is not fully established.

  • EIF6 / del(20q): In classic SDS, these are sometimes considered adaptive or “rescue” events [13][14]. However, they still require expert monitoring, as a single clone never rules out cancer risk entirely.
  • TP53: These mutations disable the cell’s “safety checks.” The appearance of biallelic TP53 alterations is a concerning sign of a higher risk for MDS or AML and requires very close monitoring [15][16]. It is important to know that TP53 is concerning, but not an automatic leukemia diagnosis or an immediate transplant indication on its own. Do not infer cancer risk from raw genetic files; these require expert interpretation.

A Conditional Diagnostic Checklist

To ensure a complete diagnostic picture, your specialist team may consider the following conditional items based on symptoms, age, and previous results. (Not every patient requires every test):

  • [ ] Biallelic DNAJC21 Variants: Pathogenic mutations confirmed “in trans” via parental testing [1].
  • [ ] Marrow Cellularity & Lineage: Assessment of red, white, and platelet-producing cells [2].
  • [ ] Blast Percentage: Checked to ensure immature cells are within expected ranges [12].
  • [ ] Cytogenetics (Karyotype/FISH): Checking for chromosome changes [17].
  • [ ] Somatic Myeloid Panel (NGS): Checking for acquired clones like TP53 or EIF6 [15].
  • [ ] Differential Rule-Outs: “Chromosome breakage” test (Fanconi Anemia) or “telomere length” test (Dyskeratosis Congenita) [2][8].

Common questions in this guide

What genetic findings support a diagnosis of DNAJC21-related Shwachman-Diamond syndrome?
The diagnosis usually requires disease-causing changes in both copies of the DNAJC21 gene, with one copy inherited from each parent. Testing the parents can show whether the variants are “in trans.” A variant of uncertain significance alone does not confirm the diagnosis.
Can a negative bone marrow failure panel miss DNAJC21-related SDS?
Yes. Older panels may not have included DNAJC21, so a negative result may lead the team to consider whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing or reanalysis of prior data. Even these tests can miss some structural or deep intronic variants.
What does a hypocellular bone marrow report mean?
Hypocellular, or hypoplastic, marrow has fewer blood-forming cells than expected and may contain more fat. This can occur with low blood counts, but the finding must be interpreted with the marrow appearance, genetic results, and other tests.
What do pancytopenia and abnormal megakaryocytes mean in the marrow report?
Pancytopenia means that red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets are all low. Megakaryocytes are the large marrow cells that make platelets; in DNAJC21-related disease they may be reduced or unusually shaped. A hematopathologist should interpret these findings in context.
Can RNA sequencing help explain a DNAJC21 variant of uncertain significance?
It can provide functional evidence about how a variant affects the gene, including whether it causes abnormal skipping of an exon such as exon 7. This evidence may help doctors decide whether the variant is disease-causing, but RNA results are interpreted with the rest of the genetic and clinical information.
Do TP53 or EIF6 mutations mean that leukemia is present?
No. These are acquired changes in some marrow cells, and their meaning depends on the gene, pattern, amount, and clinical context. Biallelic TP53 changes are concerning for a higher risk of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia, but they do not by themselves prove leukemia or automatically require a transplant; EIF6 and del(20q) findings are not fully established in DNAJC21-related disease.
Does a blast count below 5% rule out myelodysplastic syndrome?
No. A blast percentage below 5% is typical of a marrow without acute leukemia, but it does not completely rule out myelodysplastic syndrome. Doctors interpret blasts alongside chromosome testing, blood counts, and cell appearance.

Get notified when new evidence is published on DNAJC21-related Shwachman Diamond syndrome.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (17)
  1. 1

    Case Report: Novel Biallelic Variants in DNAJC21 Causing an Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Spectrum Phenotype: An Odyssey to Diagnosis.

    Chirita-Emandi A, Petrescu CA, Zimbru CG, et al.

    Frontiers in genetics 2022; (13()):870233 doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.870233.

    PMID: 35464845
  2. 2

    Genetic variant profile in a cohort of inherited bone marrow failure patients from North india.

    Viswanathan GK, Dass J, Chauhan R, et al.

    Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 2026; (42(5)):1873-1880 doi:10.1007/s12288-025-02243-0.

    PMID: 42712617
  3. 3

    DNAJC21 Mutations Link a Cancer-Prone Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome to Corruption in 60S Ribosome Subunit Maturation.

    Tummala H, Walne AJ, Williams M, et al.

    American journal of human genetics 2016; (99(1)):115-24.

    PMID: 27346687
  4. 4

    A Rare Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome Disclosed by Reanalysis of the Exome Data of a Patient Evaluated for Cytopenia and Dysmorphic Features.

    Durmaz D, Aslanger AD, Yavas Abali Z, et al.

    Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology 2024; (46(3)):e214-e219 doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000002839.

    PMID: 38408162
  5. 5

    A Well-Curated Cost-Effective Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Identifies a Diverse Landscape of Pathogenic and Novel Germline Variants in a Bone Marrow Failure Cohort in a Resource-Constraint Setting.

    Pallavelangini S, Senguttuvan G, Bhatia P, et al.

    The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 2023; (25(10)):748-757 doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.06.009.

    PMID: 37474001
  6. 6

    Clinical and genetic spectrum of SBDS and DNAJC21 gene variants in bone marrow failure cases: Atypical and cryptic presentations.

    Palla S, Bhatia P, Raina S, et al.

    Blood cells, molecules & diseases 2025; (113-114()):102924 doi:10.1016/j.bcmd.2025.102924.

    PMID: 40209608
  7. 7

    Inherited bone marrow failure syndromes and germline predisposition to myeloid neoplasia: A practical approach for the pathologist.

    Li J, Bledsoe JR

    Seminars in diagnostic pathology 2023; (40(6)):429-442 doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2023.06.006.

    PMID: 37507252
  8. 8

    Refining the phenotype associated with biallelic DNAJC21 mutations.

    D'Amours G, Lopes F, Gauthier J, et al.

    Clinical genetics 2018; (94(2)):252-258 doi:10.1111/cge.13370.

    PMID: 29700810
  9. 9

    DNAJC21-related thrombocytopenia in a young adult female.

    Aslan D, Akgun-Dogan O, Ay B, et al.

    American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics 2023; (193(2)):193-197 doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.32043.

    PMID: 37186482
  10. 10

    Schwachman Diamond-Like Syndrome Due to a Novel Variant of DNAJC21 Gene: A Case Report and Literature Review.

    Maaloul I, Hachicha J, Achich Y, et al.

    Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology 2026; doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000003309.

    PMID: 42925145
  11. 11

    Clinical features and outcomes of patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome and myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.

    Myers KC, Furutani E, Weller E, et al.

    The Lancet. Haematology 2020; (7(3)):e238-e246 doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30206-6.

    PMID: 31879230
  12. 12

    Predisposition to myeloid malignancies in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome: biological insights and clinical advances.

    Reilly CR, Shimamura A

    Blood 2023; (141(13)):1513-1523 doi:10.1182/blood.2022017739.

    PMID: 36542827
  13. 13

    Distinct genetic pathways define pre-malignant versus compensatory clonal hematopoiesis in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome.

    Kennedy AL, Myers KC, Bowman J, et al.

    Nature communications 2021; (12(1)):1334 doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21588-4.

    PMID: 33637765
  14. 14

    Somatic genetic rescue of a germline ribosome assembly defect.

    Tan S, Kermasson L, Hilcenko C, et al.

    Nature communications 2021; (12(1)):5044 doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24999-5.

    PMID: 34413298
  15. 15

    Convergent somatic evolution commences in utero in a germline ribosomopathy.

    Machado HE, Øbro NF, Williams N, et al.

    Nature communications 2023; (14(1)):5092 doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40896-5.

    PMID: 37608017
  16. 16

    Clonal hematopoiesis in the inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.

    Tsai FD, Lindsley RC

    Blood 2020; (136(14)):1615-1622 doi:10.1182/blood.2019000990.

    PMID: 32736377
  17. 17

    Novel recurrent chromosome anomalies in Shwachman-Diamond syndrome.

    Valli R, De Paoli E, Nacci L, et al.

    Pediatric blood & cancer 2017; (64(8)) doi:10.1002/pbc.26454.

    PMID: 28130858

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your hematology, hematopathology, and genetics team should interpret your DNAJC21 results and bone marrow report.