The Road to Diagnosis: Decoding Your Medical Reports
At a Glance
A definitive GERD diagnosis often requires specialized tests like an endoscopy or 96-hour wireless pH monitoring. Your endoscopy report uses specific grading systems—like the LA Classification for erosions and the Hill Grade for hernias—to measure severity and guide your treatment options.
When lifestyle changes and medication trials aren’t enough, doctors turn to specialized tests to “prove” the presence of GERD and rule out other conditions. Understanding the terminology in your medical reports can help you feel more confident in your diagnostic journey.
The Diagnostic Path
The journey usually begins with a trial of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs). If your symptoms do not resolve, or if you have “alarm symptoms” (like difficulty swallowing), your doctor will recommend an Endoscopy (EGD) [1].
If the endoscopy is inconclusive—meaning your esophagus looks healthy but you still feel sick—the next step is often objective reflux testing, such as 96-hour wireless pH monitoring (Bravo). This involves a small capsule temporarily attached to your esophagus that measures acid levels for four days, capturing a broader picture of your symptoms than older 24-hour tests [2][3].
Important note for patients: This test is typically performed “off-medication.” You will usually need to stop your acid-blocking drugs for several days before and during the test to get an accurate baseline, so be mentally and physically prepared for a temporary flare-up of your symptoms.
Decoding Your Endoscopy Report
During an endoscopy, the doctor looks for specific physical markers. If your report contains these terms, here is what they mean:
1. LA Classification (Erosive Esophagitis)
This system grades the severity of “breaks” or erosions in the esophageal lining caused by acid.
- Grade A: Small erosions (less than 5mm).
- Grade B: At least one erosion longer than 5mm. While the 2022 ACG guidelines recognize Grade B as strong evidence of GERD, the globally adopted Lyon Consensus (2023) considers it “borderline.” This means you may still need additional pH testing to definitively prove GERD before considering surgery [2].
- Grades C & D: Large erosions that merge together or cover significant portions of the esophagus. These are universally recognized as definitive signs of severe reflux [4][5].
2. Hill Flap-Valve Grade (The Hernia Check)
The Hill Grade (I-IV) assesses the mechanical integrity of the “flap-valve” at the entrance to your stomach.
- Grades I and II: Considered normal mechanical function [6].
- Grades III and IV: Indicate the valve is loose or shifted, often signifying a hiatal hernia and a higher risk of persistent reflux [7].
3. Prague Classification (Barrett’s Esophagus)
If your doctor suspects Barrett’s esophagus (a change in the lining of the esophagus), they use the Prague system to measure it [8]:
- C (Circumferential): The height of the “ring” of changed tissue.
- M (Maximum): The total length of the longest “tongue” of changed tissue.
Advanced Testing: Manometry and FLIP
If your doctor needs to see how your esophagus moves rather than just how it looks, they may use:
- High-Resolution Manometry (HRM): A thin tube that measures the pressure and coordination of your esophageal muscles as you swallow. It is the “gold standard” for diagnosing movement (motility) disorders [9][10].
- FLIP (Functional Lumen Imaging Probe): Often done while you are sedated, this uses a balloon to measure how stretchy or stiff your esophagus and its valves are. It helps find blockages or muscle issues that manometry might miss [11][12].
Your Endoscopy “Completeness Checklist”
When you receive your report, ensure it addresses these four key areas:
Common questions in this guide
What does an LA Grade B mean on my endoscopy report?
What is the Hill flap-valve grade on an endoscopy?
Do I need to stop taking acid-blocking medication before a Bravo pH test?
How is Barrett's esophagus measured during an endoscopy?
What is high-resolution manometry used for in GERD?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Does my endoscopy report show LA Grade B or higher? If so, does that confirm my GERD diagnosis according to current guidelines?
- 2.What was my Hill flap-valve grade? Is it a Grade III or IV, which would suggest a significant mechanical failure of the sphincter?
- 3.If Barrett's esophagus was found, what are my specific Prague 'C' and 'M' measurements?
- 4.If we do the 96-hour wireless pH monitoring, should I be off my acid-suppressing medication to get the most accurate baseline?
- 5.Do my symptoms warrant a manometry or FLIP test to check for motility issues like achalasia?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (13)
- 1
AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Personalized Approach to the Evaluation and Management of GERD: Expert Review.
Yadlapati R, Gyawali CP, Pandolfino JE,
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 2022; (20(5)):984-994.e1 doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.025.
PMID: 35123084 - 2
[Modern Diagnostic Strategies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Focus on Lyon Consensus 2.0].
Lee TH
The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi 2026; (86(3)):193-198 doi:10.4166/kjg.2026.038.
PMID: 42494146 - 3
Prolonged acid reflux monitoring using acid exposure time and DeMeester score: two days are not enough.
Lee ME, Ghosh G, Rooney K, et al.
Surgical endoscopy 2024; (38(5)):2515-2521 doi:10.1007/s00464-024-10733-x.
PMID: 38467859 - 4
[Use of Los Angeles Classification in Erosive Esophagitis: analysis of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement].
de Los Rios AA, Olmos JI, Sanguinetti JM, et al.
Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana 2025; (55(4)):350-357 doi:10.52787/agl.v55i4.559.
PMID: 41800372 - 5
Endoscopic classification of reflux esophagitis.
Hoshihara Y, Iwakiri K
Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine 2016; (74(8)):1262-1267.
PMID: 30562426 - 6
Esophagogastric Junction Morphology on Hill's Classification Predicts Gastroesophageal Reflux with Good Accuracy and Consistency.
Osman A, Albashir MM, Nandipati K, et al.
Digestive diseases and sciences 2021; (66(1)):151-159 doi:10.1007/s10620-020-06146-0.
PMID: 32078088 - 7
Value of endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Wang W, Liu Q, Luo L, et al.
Surgical endoscopy 2024; (38(9)):4956-4964 doi:10.1007/s00464-024-10839-2.
PMID: 38977497 - 8
Clinical characteristics and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Vietnamese patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Quach DT, Pham QTT, Tran TLT, et al.
JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2021; (5(5)):580-584 doi:10.1002/jgh3.12536.
PMID: 34013058 - 9
Validation of criteria for the definition of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations using high-resolution manometry.
Roman S, Holloway R, Keller J, et al.
Neurogastroenterology and motility 2017; (29(2)) doi:10.1111/nmo.12920.
PMID: 27477826 - 10
Clinical usefulness of esophageal high resolution manometry and adjunctive tests: An update.
Gyawali CP, Penagini R
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver 2021; (53(11)):1373-1380 doi:10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.007.
PMID: 33994122 - 11
When Manometry and Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Disagree: The Current Limitations of the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 and Probable Extended Indications of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe.
Jung KW, Pandolfino JE
Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility 2025; (31(3)):304-312 doi:10.5056/jnm25054.
PMID: 40254534 - 12
Identifying hiatal hernia with impedance planimetry during esophageal distension testing.
Carlson DA, Kahrilas PJ, Simlote A, et al.
Neurogastroenterology and motility 2023; (35(2)):e14470 doi:10.1111/nmo.14470.
PMID: 36168153 - 13
Advances in diagnostic techniques for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review of emerging noninvasive methods.
Al Abdulqader AK
European journal of medical research 2025; (30(1)):924 doi:10.1186/s40001-025-02989-3.
PMID: 41034999
This page explains GERD diagnostic testing and endoscopy terminology for informational purposes only. Always consult your gastroenterologist to interpret your specific test results.
Get notified when new evidence is published on gastroesophageal reflux disease.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.