Staging and Understanding Your Risk Score
At a Glance
The ACTG TIS system stages Kaposi sarcoma based on Tumor extent, Immune status, and Systemic illness. Doctors assign a Good (0) or Poor (1) score in each category to predict how the disease will behave and to help plan the most effective treatment for you.
Staging is the process doctors use to describe the extent of a cancer and how much it has spread. For Kaposi sarcoma (KS), the most widely used framework is the ACTG TIS system, developed by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group [1]. While originally designed for HIV-associated KS, it provides a vital map for understanding how the disease is behaving in your body.
The TIS Framework: Breaking Down the Scores
The system evaluates three specific areas: Tumor, Immune system, and Systemic illness. For each category, you are assigned a score of 0 (Good Risk) or 1 (Poor Risk) [1][1].
T: Tumor Extent
This measures where the KS is and how it is affecting your physical structure.
- T0 (Good Risk): The KS is limited to the skin or lymph nodes. If there are spots in the mouth, they are only on the roof (palate). There is no significant swelling or open sores [1][2].
- T1 (Poor Risk): This indicates more advanced disease. It includes:
- Edema: Significant swelling caused by the tumor blocking lymph fluid [2].
- Ulceration: Lesions that have broken open or become sores [1].
- Extensive Oral KS: Lesions appearing on the tongue, gums, or throat [3].
- Visceral Involvement: KS found in internal organs like the lungs or digestive tract [4][5].
I: Immune Status
This looks at the health of your immune system, specifically your CD4 count (a type of white blood cell).
- I0 (Good Risk): A CD4 count of 200 cells/mm³ or higher [1].
- I1 (Poor Risk): A CD4 count below 200 cells/mm³ [1].
- Note: In the era of highly effective modern HIV medications, the “I” score has become much less important in predicting survival than it used to be. Many people with low counts recover rapidly once starting treatment [1][6].
S: Systemic Illness
This assesses your overall health and whether you have symptoms that affect your whole body.
- S0 (Good Risk): You feel generally well, have no “B symptoms” (which are unexplained fevers, drenching night sweats, or losing more than 10% of your body weight without trying), and have not had other major opportunistic infections [1][7].
- S1 (Poor Risk): You have “B symptoms,” a history of other serious infections, or a “poor performance status,” meaning you are often too weak to perform typical daily activities, need significant assistance, or are bedridden [1][7].
Risk Stratification: What the Scores Predict
Doctors use these scores to predict how the disease might progress and to tailor the intensity of your treatment.
- Short-term Outcomes (0–4 months): The S (Systemic) score is the strongest predictor of health in the months immediately following diagnosis. An S1 score often signals a need for more urgent, supportive care to stabilize your overall health [1].
- Long-term Outcomes (4–24 months): The T (Tumor) score is the most accurate predictor of long-term survival. Patients with T1 disease generally require more intensive systemic treatments, such as chemotherapy, to manage the higher tumor burden [1][8].
Limitations for Other KS Subtypes
The ACTG TIS system was built specifically for HIV-associated KS. If you have Classic, Endemic, or Iatrogenic KS, your staging might look different [9].
- Classic KS: Staging is often simpler, focusing only on whether the disease is localized to the skin or has spread to internal organs [9].
- Iatrogenic KS: The most important “stage” factor is often the type and amount of immunosuppressive medication you are taking, rather than your CD4 count [10][11].
- Endemic KS: In children, staging focuses heavily on lymph node involvement, which is more common in this subtype [4].
| Category | Good Risk (0) | Poor Risk (1) |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor (T) | Skin/nodes only; flat oral lesions | Edema, ulceration, visceral, or deep oral lesions [1] |
| Immune (I) | CD4 count ≥ 200 | CD4 count < 200 [1] |
| Systemic (S) | No B-symptoms; good health | Fevers, weight loss, or prior serious infections [1] |
Common questions in this guide
What does a T1 (Poor Risk) tumor score mean for Kaposi sarcoma?
How important is my CD4 count for my Kaposi sarcoma stage?
What are B symptoms in Kaposi sarcoma?
Does the ACTG TIS staging system apply to all types of Kaposi sarcoma?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Based on the ACTG system, am I classified as T0 or T1, and what specific findings led to that score?
- 2.Does my 'S' score (Systemic Illness) indicate that I am at a higher risk for short-term complications?
- 3.Since the 'I' (Immune) score is less predictive today, how much weight are you giving to my CD4 count when planning my treatment?
- 4.If I have Classic or Iatrogenic KS, how does your staging approach differ from the ACTG system used for HIV-related cases?
- 5.Are there signs of 'T1' disease, such as internal involvement or swelling, that I should be monitoring for at home?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (11)
- 1
Evaluation of a Predictive Staging Model for HIV-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma in Uganda.
Okuku F, Krantz EM, Kafeero J, et al.
Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2017; (74(5)):548-554 doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000001286.
PMID: 28107226 - 2
A Pilot Study of Liposomal Doxorubicin Combined with Bevacizumab followed by Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Kaposi Sarcoma.
Ramaswami R, Uldrick TS, Polizzotto MN, et al.
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2019; (25(14)):4238-4247 doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3528.
PMID: 30979736 - 3
Beyond T Staging in the "Treat-All" Era: Severity and Heterogeneity of Kaposi Sarcoma in East Africa.
Freeman EE, Semeere A, McMahon DE, et al.
Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 2021; (87(5)):1119-1127 doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000002699.
PMID: 33871409 - 4
Endemic Kaposi's Sarcoma.
Zeinaty PE, Lebbé C, Delyon J
Cancers 2023; (15(3)) doi:10.3390/cancers15030872.
PMID: 36765830 - 5
A comparative study of classic and HIV-viremic and aviremic AIDS Kaposi sarcoma.
Séverin D, Bessaoud F, Meftah N, et al.
AIDS (London, England) 2021; (35(3)):399-405 doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000002744.
PMID: 33181532 - 6
Modern Approach to Manage Patients With Kaposi Sarcoma.
Bettuzzi T, Lebbe C, Grolleau C
Journal of medical virology 2025; (97(3)):e70294 doi:10.1002/jmv.70294.
PMID: 40119751 - 7
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis syndrome (HLH) in HIV-associated Kaposi sarcoma patients: The first case series from a single center in Türkiye.
Orta Z, Benli A, Çağatay AA, et al.
International journal of STD & AIDS 2025; (36(13)):946-950 doi:10.1177/09564624251355834.
PMID: 40696960 - 8
Clinical Significance of Elevated KSHV Viral Load in HIV-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma Patients in South Africa.
Tibenderana RM, Blumenthal MJ, Bukajumbe E, et al.
Viruses 2024; (16(2)) doi:10.3390/v16020189.
PMID: 38399965 - 9
Kaposi Sarcoma Updates.
Etemad SA, Dewan AK
Dermatologic clinics 2019; (37(4)):505-517 doi:10.1016/j.det.2019.05.008.
PMID: 31466590 - 10
Iatrogenic Kaposi Sarcoma Revealed by Acral Nodules With Silent Pulmonary Involvement in Two Patients Treated for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases.
Zemmez Y, Zegmout A, Toufgua Z, et al.
Cureus 2025; (17(12)):e99633 doi:10.7759/cureus.99633.
PMID: 41555982 - 11
Management of Kaposi sarcoma after solid organ transplantation: A European retrospective study.
Delyon J, Rabate C, Euvrard S, et al.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2019; (81(2)):448-455 doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.028.
PMID: 30902727
This page explains Kaposi sarcoma staging and the ACTG TIS system for educational purposes. Your oncologist or infectious disease specialist is the best source for interpreting your specific risk score and treatment needs.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Kaposi sarcoma.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.