Deciphering Your Pathology and Risk Scores
At a Glance
Myelofibrosis pathology shows how much scarring is in the bone marrow and how many immature cells, called blasts, are present. Risk scores combine these findings with symptoms, blood counts, genetics, and disease history to guide monitoring, treatment, and transplant discussions.
Your pathology report and risk scores are the tools your care team uses to move from a general diagnosis to a personalized treatment plan. These documents can be dense with technical language, but they essentially answer two main questions: “What does the bone marrow look like right now?” and “How is the disease likely to behave in the future?” [1][2]
Grading the Scar Tissue (Fibrosis)
When a pathologist looks at your bone marrow biopsy, they use a scale from MF-0 to MF-3 to grade the amount of reticulin (fiber) and collagen buildup [3]. This grading, combined with cellularity and megakaryocyte appearance, helps distinguish between the two main stages of primary myelofibrosis:
- MF-0 or MF-1 (Prefibrotic/Early PMF): The bone marrow shows minimal or no scarring. In this stage, the diagnosis is based more on the unusual shape and “clustering” of certain blood-forming cells [3][4].
- MF-2 or MF-3 (Overt PMF): These grades indicate significant, visible scarring. This stage is more likely to be associated with an enlarged spleen and lower blood counts [3][5].
Tracking “Blasts” and Disease Phases
Your blood and marrow reports will list a percentage of blasts, which are immature blood-forming cells [6]. In healthy marrow, blasts are rare. In myelofibrosis, the number of blasts helps define the “phase” of the disease:
- Chronic Phase: Most patients are diagnosed here. Blasts are low (typically below 10%) [6].
- Accelerated Phase: Blasts make up 10% to 19% of the blood or marrow. This indicates the disease is becoming more active [6][7].
- Blast Phase: Blasts reach 20% or higher. This is treated similarly to acute leukemia [6][5].
Even if your blasts are below 10%, a rise above 3% to 5% is often viewed as a prognostic warning used in some models rather than a universal phase-defining threshold, and your doctor will watch it closely [7][5].
Risk Scoring: Predicting the Future
Because myelofibrosis affects everyone differently, doctors use scoring systems to group patients into risk categories (Low, Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, or High) [8]. These scores help determine if you should “watch and wait” or consider intensive treatments like a stem cell transplant [9].
| Score Name | Who It Is For | Key Factors Included |
|---|---|---|
| DIPSS / DIPSS-plus | Primary Myelofibrosis | Age, hemoglobin, WBC count, circulating blasts, and symptoms. (DIPSS-plus adds platelets, transfusions, and cytogenetics). |
| MIPSS70 / MIPSS70-plus | Primary Myelofibrosis | Clinical factors combined with genetic mutations (like ASXL1 or EZH2). (MIPSS70-plus adds cytogenetics). |
| MYSEC-PM | Secondary Myelofibrosis | Age, blood counts, CALR mutation status, and constitutional symptoms. |
Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) Scores
- DIPSS and DIPSS-plus: These are clinical scores [8][10].
- MIPSS70 and MIPSS70-plus: These “molecular” scores are more modern. They combine clinical factors with your genetic mutation data, specifically looking for “high-molecular-risk” mutations which can make the disease more aggressive [11][5].
Secondary Myelofibrosis Score
- MYSEC-PM: This is the preferred score if your MF developed from Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia [12]. It weights factors differently to give a more accurate picture for secondary MF [12][13].
What Your Risk Category Means for You
These categories are population tools, not an individual deadline, but a guide for your doctor’s strategy:
- Low / Intermediate-1: If you have no symptoms, your doctor may recommend “watchful waiting” or simple symptom management [14]. Watchful waiting is an active management strategy, but does not mean you have an exact individual timeline; symptoms, trajectory, and patient goals affect the plan [10][15].
- Intermediate-2 / High: These categories suggest a more aggressive disease. For patients who are physically fit, this is often the point where an allogeneic stem cell transplant—the only potential cure—is discussed seriously [9][16].
If different scoring systems give you different risk levels, don’t panic. Your doctor will look at the “big picture” of your pathology, genetics, and how you feel to make the final recommendation [17].
Common questions in this guide
What does an MF-0 to MF-3 fibrosis grade tell me?
How does the blast percentage affect myelofibrosis staging?
What do ASXL1 and EZH2 results mean in myelofibrosis?
Which risk score is used for primary or secondary myelofibrosis?
Does my myelofibrosis risk category predict exactly how long I will live?
When should a stem cell transplant be discussed for myelofibrosis?
How is primary myelofibrosis different from secondary myelofibrosis?
Questions For You
Answer a question to get research tailored to you. Your answers are private.
Get notified when new evidence is published on myelofibrosis.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.What is my current reticulin fibrosis grade (MF-0 to MF-3), and how does that match with my other biopsy findings?
- 2.Which specific risk model—DIPSS, MIPSS70, or MYSEC-PM—was used to determine my risk category?
- 3.What is my current 'blast' percentage, and has there been a trend in this number over my last few blood tests?
- 4.Do I have any 'high-molecular-risk' mutations, like ASXL1 or EZH2, that were factored into my risk score?
- 5.Based on my risk score, should we be discussing a referral to a transplant specialist now, or are we in an 'observation' phase?
References
References (17)
- 1
The international consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukemias: myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Orazi A, et al.
American journal of hematology 2023; (98(1)):166-179 doi:10.1002/ajh.26751.
PMID: 36200127 - 2
A Review of the Pathological and Molecular Diagnosis of Primary Myelofibrosis.
Shao R, Ryder C, Wang L, et al.
Cancers 2025; (18(1)) doi:10.3390/cancers18010050.
PMID: 41514563 - 3
Diagnosis and management of prefibrotic myelofibrosis.
Rumi E, Sant'Antonio E, Boveri E, et al.
Expert review of hematology 2018; (11(7)):537-545 doi:10.1080/17474086.2018.1484280.
PMID: 29862872 - 4
How I Diagnose Primary Myelofibrosis.
Prakash S, Orazi A
American journal of clinical pathology 2022; (157(4)):518-530 doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqac016.
PMID: 35238345 - 5
Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Shahin OA, Chifotides HT, Bose P, et al.
Acta haematologica 2021; (144(5)):484-499 doi:10.1159/000512929.
PMID: 33882481 - 6
Treating accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: progress and challenges.
Ajufo HO, Waksal JA, Mascarenhas JO, Rampal RK
Therapeutic advances in hematology 2023; (14()):20406207231177282 doi:10.1177/20406207231177282.
PMID: 37564898 - 7
Accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Saliba AN, Gangat N
Best practice & research. Clinical haematology 2022; (35(2)):101379 doi:10.1016/j.beha.2022.101379.
PMID: 36333070 - 8
Primary myelofibrosis: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.
Tefferi A
American journal of hematology 2016; (91(12)):1262-1271 doi:10.1002/ajh.24592.
PMID: 27870387 - 9
Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group.
Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al.
The Lancet. Haematology 2024; (11(1)):e62-e74 doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00305-8.
PMID: 38061384 - 10
Prognosis of Primary Myelofibrosis in the Genomic Era.
Bose P, Verstovsek S
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia 2016; (16 Suppl()):S105-13.
PMID: 27521306 - 11
MIPSS70: Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis.
Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al.
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018; (36(4)):310-318 doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886.
PMID: 29226763 - 12
A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.
Passamonti F, Giorgino T, Mora B, et al.
Leukemia 2017; (31(12)):2726-2731 doi:10.1038/leu.2017.169.
PMID: 28561069 - 13
Towards a Personalized Definition of Prognosis in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.
Mora B, Passamonti F
Current hematologic malignancy reports 2022; (17(5)):127-139 doi:10.1007/s11899-022-00672-6.
PMID: 36048275 - 14
Primary myelofibrosis: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management.
Tefferi A
American journal of hematology 2018; (93(12)):1551-1560 doi:10.1002/ajh.25230.
PMID: 30039550 - 15
GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis.
Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al.
Leukemia 2018; (32(7)):1631-1642 doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0107-z.
PMID: 29654267 - 16
Myelofibrosis: Timing of Transplantation and Management of Splenomegaly.
Kröger N, Rathje K, Gagelmann N
Advances in experimental medicine and biology 2025; (1475()):167-175 doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84988-6_9.
PMID: 40488829 - 17
Prognostic risk models for transplant decision-making in myelofibrosis.
Hernández-Boluda JC, Pereira A, Correa JG, et al.
Annals of hematology 2018; (97(5)):813-820 doi:10.1007/s00277-018-3240-x.
PMID: 29396714
This page explains myelofibrosis pathology findings and risk scores for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your hematology team should interpret your results and discuss monitoring or treatment options with you.