Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 17 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Hematology

Deciphering Your Pathology and Risk Scores

At a Glance

Myelofibrosis pathology shows how much scarring is in the bone marrow and how many immature cells, called blasts, are present. Risk scores combine these findings with symptoms, blood counts, genetics, and disease history to guide monitoring, treatment, and transplant discussions.

Your pathology report and risk scores are the tools your care team uses to move from a general diagnosis to a personalized treatment plan. These documents can be dense with technical language, but they essentially answer two main questions: “What does the bone marrow look like right now?” and “How is the disease likely to behave in the future?” [1][2]

Grading the Scar Tissue (Fibrosis)

When a pathologist looks at your bone marrow biopsy, they use a scale from MF-0 to MF-3 to grade the amount of reticulin (fiber) and collagen buildup [3]. This grading, combined with cellularity and megakaryocyte appearance, helps distinguish between the two main stages of primary myelofibrosis:

  • MF-0 or MF-1 (Prefibrotic/Early PMF): The bone marrow shows minimal or no scarring. In this stage, the diagnosis is based more on the unusual shape and “clustering” of certain blood-forming cells [3][4].
  • MF-2 or MF-3 (Overt PMF): These grades indicate significant, visible scarring. This stage is more likely to be associated with an enlarged spleen and lower blood counts [3][5].

Tracking “Blasts” and Disease Phases

Your blood and marrow reports will list a percentage of blasts, which are immature blood-forming cells [6]. In healthy marrow, blasts are rare. In myelofibrosis, the number of blasts helps define the “phase” of the disease:

  • Chronic Phase: Most patients are diagnosed here. Blasts are low (typically below 10%) [6].
  • Accelerated Phase: Blasts make up 10% to 19% of the blood or marrow. This indicates the disease is becoming more active [6][7].
  • Blast Phase: Blasts reach 20% or higher. This is treated similarly to acute leukemia [6][5].

Even if your blasts are below 10%, a rise above 3% to 5% is often viewed as a prognostic warning used in some models rather than a universal phase-defining threshold, and your doctor will watch it closely [7][5].

Risk Scoring: Predicting the Future

Because myelofibrosis affects everyone differently, doctors use scoring systems to group patients into risk categories (Low, Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, or High) [8]. These scores help determine if you should “watch and wait” or consider intensive treatments like a stem cell transplant [9].

Score Name Who It Is For Key Factors Included
DIPSS / DIPSS-plus Primary Myelofibrosis Age, hemoglobin, WBC count, circulating blasts, and symptoms. (DIPSS-plus adds platelets, transfusions, and cytogenetics).
MIPSS70 / MIPSS70-plus Primary Myelofibrosis Clinical factors combined with genetic mutations (like ASXL1 or EZH2). (MIPSS70-plus adds cytogenetics).
MYSEC-PM Secondary Myelofibrosis Age, blood counts, CALR mutation status, and constitutional symptoms.

Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) Scores

  • DIPSS and DIPSS-plus: These are clinical scores [8][10].
  • MIPSS70 and MIPSS70-plus: These “molecular” scores are more modern. They combine clinical factors with your genetic mutation data, specifically looking for “high-molecular-risk” mutations which can make the disease more aggressive [11][5].

Secondary Myelofibrosis Score

  • MYSEC-PM: This is the preferred score if your MF developed from Polycythemia Vera or Essential Thrombocythemia [12]. It weights factors differently to give a more accurate picture for secondary MF [12][13].

What Your Risk Category Means for You

These categories are population tools, not an individual deadline, but a guide for your doctor’s strategy:

  • Low / Intermediate-1: If you have no symptoms, your doctor may recommend “watchful waiting” or simple symptom management [14]. Watchful waiting is an active management strategy, but does not mean you have an exact individual timeline; symptoms, trajectory, and patient goals affect the plan [10][15].
  • Intermediate-2 / High: These categories suggest a more aggressive disease. For patients who are physically fit, this is often the point where an allogeneic stem cell transplant—the only potential cure—is discussed seriously [9][16].

If different scoring systems give you different risk levels, don’t panic. Your doctor will look at the “big picture” of your pathology, genetics, and how you feel to make the final recommendation [17].

Common questions in this guide

What does an MF-0 to MF-3 fibrosis grade tell me?
The grade estimates how much reticulin and collagen scar tissue is present in a bone marrow biopsy. MF-0 or MF-1 means little or no scarring, while MF-2 or MF-3 means more substantial scarring. The grade is interpreted together with the appearance and cellularity of the marrow and other findings.
How does the blast percentage affect myelofibrosis staging?
Blasts are immature blood-forming cells measured in the blood or bone marrow. Less than 10% is typical of chronic phase, 10% to 19% suggests accelerated phase, and 20% or more indicates blast phase, which is treated similarly to acute leukemia. A rise above 3% to 5% can be a warning in some risk models even when it does not define a disease phase.
What do ASXL1 and EZH2 results mean in myelofibrosis?
ASXL1 and EZH2 are examples of high-molecular-risk mutations that can be associated with more aggressive myelofibrosis. They may be included in molecular risk scores such as MIPSS70. A mutation result is only one part of the assessment and does not determine treatment by itself.
Which risk score is used for primary or secondary myelofibrosis?
DIPSS and DIPSS-plus, along with MIPSS70 and MIPSS70-plus, are used for primary myelofibrosis. MYSEC-PM is preferred when myelofibrosis develops after polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia. Your clinician chooses the model based on the disease type and the clinical, genetic, and laboratory information available.
Does my myelofibrosis risk category predict exactly how long I will live?
No. Risk categories are based on groups of patients and help estimate disease behavior, but they do not provide an exact individual timeline. Doctors also consider symptoms, disease changes over time, genetic findings, overall health, and personal goals.
When should a stem cell transplant be discussed for myelofibrosis?
For a medically fit person with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis, an allogeneic stem cell transplant is often discussed seriously because it is the only potential cure. The decision depends on overall health, donor options, disease features, expected benefits, and transplant risks. A transplant specialist can help assess whether referral is appropriate.
How is primary myelofibrosis different from secondary myelofibrosis?
Primary myelofibrosis develops as myelofibrosis itself, while secondary myelofibrosis develops after an earlier condition such as polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia. This distinction matters because different risk models may be used. MYSEC-PM is designed for secondary myelofibrosis.

Questions For You

Answer a question to get research tailored to you. Your answers are private.

Get notified when new evidence is published on myelofibrosis.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.What is my current reticulin fibrosis grade (MF-0 to MF-3), and how does that match with my other biopsy findings?
  2. 2.Which specific risk model—DIPSS, MIPSS70, or MYSEC-PM—was used to determine my risk category?
  3. 3.What is my current 'blast' percentage, and has there been a trend in this number over my last few blood tests?
  4. 4.Do I have any 'high-molecular-risk' mutations, like ASXL1 or EZH2, that were factored into my risk score?
  5. 5.Based on my risk score, should we be discussing a referral to a transplant specialist now, or are we in an 'observation' phase?

References

References (17)
  1. 1

    The international consensus classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute Leukemias: myeloproliferative neoplasms.

    Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Orazi A, et al.

    American journal of hematology 2023; (98(1)):166-179 doi:10.1002/ajh.26751.

    PMID: 36200127
  2. 2

    A Review of the Pathological and Molecular Diagnosis of Primary Myelofibrosis.

    Shao R, Ryder C, Wang L, et al.

    Cancers 2025; (18(1)) doi:10.3390/cancers18010050.

    PMID: 41514563
  3. 3

    Diagnosis and management of prefibrotic myelofibrosis.

    Rumi E, Sant'Antonio E, Boveri E, et al.

    Expert review of hematology 2018; (11(7)):537-545 doi:10.1080/17474086.2018.1484280.

    PMID: 29862872
  4. 4

    How I Diagnose Primary Myelofibrosis.

    Prakash S, Orazi A

    American journal of clinical pathology 2022; (157(4)):518-530 doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqac016.

    PMID: 35238345
  5. 5

    Accelerated Phase of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

    Shahin OA, Chifotides HT, Bose P, et al.

    Acta haematologica 2021; (144(5)):484-499 doi:10.1159/000512929.

    PMID: 33882481
  6. 6

    Treating accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms: progress and challenges.

    Ajufo HO, Waksal JA, Mascarenhas JO, Rampal RK

    Therapeutic advances in hematology 2023; (14()):20406207231177282 doi:10.1177/20406207231177282.

    PMID: 37564898
  7. 7

    Accelerated and blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms.

    Saliba AN, Gangat N

    Best practice & research. Clinical haematology 2022; (35(2)):101379 doi:10.1016/j.beha.2022.101379.

    PMID: 36333070
  8. 8

    Primary myelofibrosis: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

    Tefferi A

    American journal of hematology 2016; (91(12)):1262-1271 doi:10.1002/ajh.24592.

    PMID: 27870387
  9. 9

    Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group.

    Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al.

    The Lancet. Haematology 2024; (11(1)):e62-e74 doi:10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00305-8.

    PMID: 38061384
  10. 10

    Prognosis of Primary Myelofibrosis in the Genomic Era.

    Bose P, Verstovsek S

    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia 2016; (16 Suppl()):S105-13.

    PMID: 27521306
  11. 11

    MIPSS70: Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis.

    Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al.

    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018; (36(4)):310-318 doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886.

    PMID: 29226763
  12. 12

    A clinical-molecular prognostic model to predict survival in patients with post polycythemia vera and post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

    Passamonti F, Giorgino T, Mora B, et al.

    Leukemia 2017; (31(12)):2726-2731 doi:10.1038/leu.2017.169.

    PMID: 28561069
  13. 13

    Towards a Personalized Definition of Prognosis in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

    Mora B, Passamonti F

    Current hematologic malignancy reports 2022; (17(5)):127-139 doi:10.1007/s11899-022-00672-6.

    PMID: 36048275
  14. 14

    Primary myelofibrosis: 2019 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management.

    Tefferi A

    American journal of hematology 2018; (93(12)):1551-1560 doi:10.1002/ajh.25230.

    PMID: 30039550
  15. 15

    GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis.

    Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al.

    Leukemia 2018; (32(7)):1631-1642 doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0107-z.

    PMID: 29654267
  16. 16

    Myelofibrosis: Timing of Transplantation and Management of Splenomegaly.

    Kröger N, Rathje K, Gagelmann N

    Advances in experimental medicine and biology 2025; (1475()):167-175 doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84988-6_9.

    PMID: 40488829
  17. 17

    Prognostic risk models for transplant decision-making in myelofibrosis.

    Hernández-Boluda JC, Pereira A, Correa JG, et al.

    Annals of hematology 2018; (97(5)):813-820 doi:10.1007/s00277-018-3240-x.

    PMID: 29396714

This page explains myelofibrosis pathology findings and risk scores for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your hematology team should interpret your results and discuss monitoring or treatment options with you.