Diagnostic Tests & Monitoring
At a Glance
Open-angle glaucoma is diagnosed and monitored with more than an eye-pressure check. Doctors combine a drainage-angle exam, OCT scans, visual field testing, optic nerve exams, and corneal measurements, comparing results over time to detect damage or progression.
Diagnosing and monitoring open-angle glaucoma (OAG) is a complex process that goes far beyond a simple eye pressure check. Because glaucoma is a “multimodal” disease—meaning it affects the structure of the eye and the function of your vision in different ways—your doctor must use a suite of tests to get a complete picture [1][2].
The Limitations of Eye Pressure
While measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) using a method called tonometry is a standard part of every exam, it is not enough to diagnose glaucoma on its own [3]. Some people have consistently high pressure but never develop nerve damage (ocular hypertension), while others have “normal” pressure but lose vision (normal-tension glaucoma) [1]. Furthermore, your eye pressure changes throughout the day, much like blood pressure, so a single reading is only a snapshot in time [4].
Essential Diagnostic Tests
To confirm a diagnosis and track changes, your care team will perform three primary types of assessments.
1. Gonioscopy: Looking at the Drain
Gonioscopy is the only way to confirm you have “open-angle” glaucoma rather than “angle-closure.” Your doctor uses a special mirrored lens to look directly at the eye’s drainage angle [2].
- Why it matters: It ensures the drain isn’t physically blocked by the iris. It also allows the doctor to see if “clogs” like pigment or flaky material (pseudoexfoliation) are present [5][6].
- What to expect: The doctor will numb your eye with drops and briefly place the lens against your eye.
2. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT): Mapping the Structure
OCT is a non-invasive imaging test that creates a highly detailed, 3D map of your optic nerve and retina [1].
- RNFL (Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer): This measures the thickness of the nerve fibers. Thinning in this layer can be an early sign of glaucoma [7][8].
- Macular GCIPL (Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer): This looks at the specialized cells in the center of your retina. It is especially helpful for detecting early damage and monitoring progression [9][10].
- Important Caveats: A single “abnormal” OCT scan does not automatically mean you have glaucoma. OCT measurements can be skewed by high myopia (nearsightedness), normal anatomical variations, or imaging artifacts. Your doctor looks for trends over multiple tests rather than relying on one scan.
3. Visual Field Testing: Measuring the Function
While OCT shows what the eye looks like structurally, a visual field test (perimetry) shows how it works functionally [11].
- The Test: You look into a bowl-shaped instrument and press a button every time you see a flash of light. This maps your peripheral and central vision.
- Structure vs. Function: It is common for an OCT to show structural damage while the visual field remains “normal.” This just means the damage hasn’t reached the point where it’s affecting your ability to see the lights yet. If your test results are unreliable because you were tired or distracted, your doctor will likely ask you to repeat it [12][8].
Understanding Your Anatomy
Two other measurements help your doctor assess your overall risk:
- Central Corneal Thickness (Pachymetry): The thickness of your cornea (the clear front window of the eye) can skew pressure readings [13]. A thin cornea might make your pressure seem lower than it actually is, while a thick cornea can make it seem higher [14]. However, there is no universally reliable mathematical formula to perfectly “correct” your pressure reading based on thickness. A thin cornea is also considered an independent risk marker for glaucoma progression [15].
- Corneal Hysteresis (CH): This measures the biomechanical properties of your cornea—essentially, how well it absorbs and dissipates energy. Low hysteresis is an adjunctive risk marker for progression, though this test is not available at every clinic [16][17].
The Optic Nerve Exam
During a dilated exam, your doctor will look directly at your optic nerve for specific warning signs:
- Cupping: The “cup” is the small indentation in the center of the nerve. Doctors measure the cup-to-disc ratio. While a large ratio can be a sign of glaucoma, it can also be a perfectly normal, physiological trait you were born with. The doctor looks for thinning or “notching” of the nerve tissue over time [1].
- Disc Hemorrhages: These are tiny “splinter” bleeds on the edge of the nerve. While they are a risk marker associated with glaucoma progression, they are not definitive proof of “active” disease by themselves [18].
Your Completeness Checklist
A comprehensive glaucoma evaluation is a combination of findings over time. Ensure your baseline exam and routine follow-ups include the following:
Baseline & Occasional Tests:
- [ ] Gonioscopy: To see if your drainage angle is open.
- [ ] Pachymetry: Measurement of your corneal thickness.
Routine Monitoring (Repeated Regularly):
- [ ] Tonometry: Accurate measurement of eye pressure.
- [ ] Dilated Nerve Exam: A physical look at your optic nerve.
- [ ] OCT Imaging: Structural scans to establish reliable trends.
- [ ] Visual Field Test: Functional mapping of your sight to detect subtle changes.
- [ ] Target IOP Discussion: Reviewing whether your specific eye pressure goal needs adjustment.
Common questions in this guide
Is eye pressure alone enough to diagnose open-angle glaucoma?
What does an OCT scan show in glaucoma?
What happens during a glaucoma visual field test?
Why is gonioscopy used when checking for open-angle glaucoma?
How can corneal thickness affect my glaucoma evaluation?
What does a large cup-to-disc ratio mean on an eye exam?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.During my exam, was my drainage angle open in all quadrants, and did you see any signs of pigment or flaky material?
- 2.How did my central corneal thickness affect the eye pressure reading you got today?
- 3.Do my OCT scans and visual field tests agree with each other, or is one showing more damage than the other?
- 4.Did you notice any disc hemorrhages or changes in my 'cup-to-disc' ratio since my last visit?
- 5.Based on the trend of my results over the last few visits, is my glaucoma currently stable or is it progressing?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
References
References (18)
- 1
Mean total macular volume measurement using optical coherence tomography in already diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients.
Ahmad HM, Tahir MY, Chaudhary MA, Khan R
Pakistan journal of medical sciences 2025; (41(3)):736-739 doi:10.12669/pjms.41.3.10102.
PMID: 40103876 - 2
Old and new in exploring the anterior chamber angle.
Raluca M, Mircea F, Andrei F, et al.
Romanian journal of ophthalmology 2015; (59(4)):208-216.
PMID: 29450309 - 3
Primary open-angle glaucoma.
Weinreb RN, Leung CK, Crowston JG, et al.
Nature reviews. Disease primers 2016; (2()):16067 doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.67.
PMID: 27654570 - 4
Corneal hysteresis and its relevance to glaucoma.
Deol M, Taylor DA, Radcliffe NM
Current opinion in ophthalmology 2015; (26(2)):96-102 doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000130.
PMID: 25611166 - 5
Intraobserver and interobserver agreement among anterior chamber angle evaluations using automated 360-degree gonio-photos.
Matsuo M, Mizoue S, Nitta K, et al.
PloS one 2021; (16(5)):e0251249 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251249.
PMID: 33956906 - 6
Surgical Management of Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma: A Review of Current Clinical Considerations and Surgical Outcomes.
Gillmann K, Meduri E, Niegowski LJ, Mermoud A
Journal of glaucoma 2021; (30(3)):e32-e39 doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001724.
PMID: 33137018 - 7
Diagnostic ability of macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in glaucoma suspects.
Xu X, Xiao H, Guo X, et al.
Medicine 2017; (96(51)):e9182 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000009182.
PMID: 29390457 - 8
Patterns of Progressive Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thinning in Glaucoma Detected by OCT.
Shin JW, Sung KR, Park SW
Ophthalmology 2018; (125(10)):1515-1525 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.052.
PMID: 29705057 - 9
Regional Vessel Density Reduction in the Macula and Optic Nerve Head of Patients With Pre-Perimetric Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.
Verticchio Vercellin A, Siesky B, Antman G, et al.
Journal of glaucoma 2023; (32(11)):930-941 doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002310.
PMID: 37725789 - 10
Optic Nerve Head Morphology is Associated with the Initial Location of Structural Progression in Early Open Angle Glaucoma.
Park YM, Park JW, Bae HW, et al.
Journal of glaucoma 2023; (32(11)):e145-e150 doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002274.
PMID: 37523646 - 11
Retrospective Analysis of Prognostic Value of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography for the Development of Glaucomatous Damage - One Year Follow-Up Retrospective Observational Cohort Analysis.
Bollinger O, Gugleta K, Schmetterer L, et al.
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2023; (240(4)):472-477 doi:10.1055/a-1997-9328.
PMID: 37164405 - 12
Integrating Macular Ganglion Cell Inner Plexiform Layer and Parapapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements to Detect Glaucoma Progression.
Hou HW, Lin C, Leung CK
Ophthalmology 2018; (125(6)):822-831 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.027.
PMID: 29433852 - 13
Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry.
Katsimpris JM, Theoulakis PE, Vasilopoulos K, et al.
Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2015; (232(4)):414-8 doi:10.1055/s-0035-1545792.
PMID: 25902089 - 14
Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer among Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure.
Singh P, Karmacharya S, Rizyal A
Journal of Nepal Health Research Council 2025; (23(1)):94-100 doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v23i01.5323.
PMID: 40776516 - 15
The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma.
Belovay GW, Goldberg I
Eye (London, England) 2018; (32(5)):915-923 doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0033-3.
PMID: 29445115 - 16
A Prospective Longitudinal Study to Investigate Corneal Hysteresis as a Risk Factor for Predicting Development of Glaucoma.
Susanna CN, Diniz-Filho A, Daga FB, et al.
American journal of ophthalmology 2018; (187()):148-152 doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.12.018.
PMID: 29305310 - 17
Corneal Hysteresis and Rates of Neuroretinal Rim Change in Glaucoma.
Jammal AA, Medeiros FA
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2022; (5(5)):483-489 doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2022.03.006.
PMID: 35331968 - 18
Corneal Biomechanics and Visual Field Progression in Eyes with Seemingly Well-Controlled Intraocular Pressure.
Susanna BN, Ogata NG, Jammal AA, et al.
Ophthalmology 2019; (126(12)):1640-1646 doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.023.
PMID: 31519385
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. An eye-care professional should interpret your test results and decide how to monitor your open-angle glaucoma.
Get notified when new evidence is published on open-angle glaucoma.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.