Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 15 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Cardiothoracic Surgery

When the Heart Needs a Machine: Mechanical Support Options

At a Glance

When the right heart fails after surgery and medications are insufficient, doctors may use mechanical circulatory support (MCS) like RVADs or VA-ECMO. These machines temporarily take over pumping blood, acting as a bridge to recovery while the heart muscle rests and heals.

When medications, inhaled therapies, and careful fluid management (detailed in The Step-by-Step Plan to Strengthen the Right Heart) are not enough to keep the blood flowing, the right heart is said to be in refractory failure [1]. In these critical moments, the medical team may recommend Mechanical Circulatory Support (MCS). These are external or internal pumps that take over the physical work of the heart, allowing the right ventricle to rest and, hopefully, heal [2][3].

The Two Main Types of Support

There are two primary ways doctors can mechanically support the right heart. The choice depends on whether the lungs also need help and how much total support the body requires.

  • RVADs (Right Ventricular Assist Devices): These are specialized pumps like the Impella RP or ProtekDuo [4][5].

    • How they work: These devices use a thin tube (cannula) to pull blood out of the right heart and pump it directly into the pulmonary artery (the pipe to the lungs). This effectively “jumps” the blood over the failing right ventricle [6].
    • The Focus: These are generally used for isolated right heart failure where the left heart and lungs are still doing their jobs relatively well [4].
  • VA-ECMO (Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation): This is the most complete form of life support.

    • How it works: Blood is taken out of the body, run through an artificial lung (oxygenator) to add oxygen and remove carbon dioxide, and then pumped back into the body [7].
    • The Focus: This is used when both the heart and the lungs are failing, or when the entire circulatory system is in deep shock [8].

The Concept of “Bridge to Recovery”

In the setting of heart surgery, these devices are most often used as a bridge to recovery. This means the doctors believe the heart muscle is not permanently dead, but is “stunned” or “exhausted” from the surgery [3].

  • Healing Time: By letting the machine do the heavy lifting for a few days or weeks, the swelling in the heart can go down, and the muscle fibers can regain their strength [4].
  • The Goal: The ultimate goal is to slowly “wean” the machine—turning down its speed over several days—to see if the patient’s own heart can take back the workload [9].

Understanding the Risks

While these machines are life-saving, they are also highly invasive and carry significant risks that the team must manage 24/7.

  • Bleeding: Because the blood is being pushed through plastic tubes at high speeds, patients must often take blood thinners to prevent clots. This significantly increases the risk of bleeding [4][5].
  • Infection: Every tube entering the body is a potential “doorway” for bacteria. Infectious complications are a major concern in the ICU [10][11].
  • Blood Trauma (Hemolysis): The spinning blades of the pumps can sometimes “bruise” or break red blood cells as they pass through [12].
  • Limb Issues: In VA-ECMO, the large tubes in the leg can sometimes block blood flow to the foot (limb ischemia). The team monitors the pulses in the feet constantly to prevent this [13].

Making the Decision

Deciding to move to mechanical support is a heavy moment for any family. However, research suggests that early initiation—starting the support before other organs like the kidneys and liver begin to fail—is often associated with better chances of a successful recovery [14][15]. These devices are not a sign that the team has “given up,” but rather that they are using every tool available to give the heart the best chance to mend.

For information on what the long-term outlook holds once the patient starts coming off the machine, read The Long Road: Prognosis and the Path to Healing.

Common questions in this guide

Why would a doctor choose an RVAD instead of VA-ECMO?
An RVAD (like the Impella or ProtekDuo) is typically used for isolated right heart failure when the left heart and lungs are still functioning well. VA-ECMO is a more complete form of life support used when both the heart and lungs are failing, or the entire circulatory system is in shock.
What does it mean to use mechanical support as a "bridge to recovery"?
This means doctors believe the heart muscle is temporarily stunned or exhausted from surgery, not permanently damaged. The machine takes over the heart's workload for days or weeks, allowing swelling to decrease and muscle fibers to heal so the heart can eventually work on its own.
What are the main risks of being on a mechanical circulatory support device?
Because these devices use external tubes and rapid pumps, patients face increased risks of bleeding from required blood thinners, infections at tube insertion sites, and damage to red blood cells. The intensive care team monitors the patient continuously to manage these serious risks.
How do doctors know when it is time to remove the heart support machine?
The medical team will perform "weaning trials" where they slowly decrease the machine's pumping speed over several days. This allows them to carefully observe if the patient's own right ventricle has recovered enough strength to take back the workload safely.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.What specific markers (like blood pressure or organ function) show that the medications are no longer enough and it is time for mechanical support?
  2. 2.Why would the team choose an RVAD (like Impella or ProtekDuo) over VA-ECMO for my loved one?
  3. 3.How often will the team perform 'weaning trials' to see if the right heart is starting to recover its strength?
  4. 4.What is our plan for managing the high risk of bleeding while the patient is on this device?
  5. 5.If the right heart does not recover with this device, what are the next possible steps (the 'Plan B')?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (15)
  1. 1

    Right ventricular failure: Current strategies and future development.

    Monteagudo-Vela M, Tindale A, Monguió-Santín E, et al.

    Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine 2023; (10()):998382 doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.998382.

    PMID: 37187786
  2. 2

    ECMO and Right Ventricular Failure: Review of the Literature.

    Grant C, Richards JB, Frakes M, et al.

    Journal of intensive care medicine 2021; (36(3)):352-360 doi:10.1177/0885066619900503.

    PMID: 31964208
  3. 3

    Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

    Riebandt J, Haberl T, Wiedemann D, et al.

    European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2018; (53(3)):590-595 doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx349.

    PMID: 29045747
  4. 4

    Use of Impella RP Flex in Post-Heart Transplant Patients with RV Primary Graft Dysfunction.

    Dumitru I, DeWolf J, Sevillano M, et al.

    Biomedicines 2025; (13(6)) doi:10.3390/biomedicines13061335.

    PMID: 40564056
  5. 5

    Utilization and Outcomes of Temporary Percutaneous Right Ventricular Assist Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.

    John KJ, Hernandez-Montfort J, Kanwar MK, et al.

    ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) 2025; (71(5)):379-386 doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002348.

    PMID: 40310015
  6. 6

    Hemodynamic improvement with Impella RP in acute massive pulmonary embolism: a narrative review of cardiovascular outcomes and pulmonary catheter pressure assessment.

    Pandey A, Parajuli S, Khanal P, et al.

    Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) 2025; (87(7)):4303-4309 doi:10.1097/MS9.0000000000003431.

    PMID: 40851987
  7. 7

    Mechanical Circulatory Support for Right Ventricular Failure.

    DeFilippis EM, Topkara VK, Kirtane AJ, et al.

    Cardiac failure review 2022; (8()):e14 doi:10.15420/cfr.2021.11.

    PMID: 35516793
  8. 8

    The Roles of Venopulmonary Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

    Hockstein MA, Fan E

    Critical care medicine 2024; (52(2)):297-306 doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006094.

    PMID: 37909826
  9. 9

    Bridge to durable left ventricular assist device for refractory cardiogenic shock.

    Yoshioka D, Takayama H, Garan AR, et al.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2017; (153(4)):752-762.e5 doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.085.

    PMID: 27988030
  10. 10

    Infection epidemiology, preventive measures and principles of best practices involving the skin and dressing of patients with a ventricular assist device: A scoping review.

    Brandão SMG, Urasaki MBM, Yamada BFA, et al.

    Intensive & critical care nursing 2025; (86()):103840 doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103840.

    PMID: 39306939
  11. 11

    Ventricular Assist Device Infections.

    Aslam S

    Cardiology clinics 2018; (36(4)):507-517 doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2018.06.005.

    PMID: 30297068
  12. 12

    Blood trauma potential of the HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device in pediatric patients.

    Granegger M, Thamsen B, Schlöglhofer T, et al.

    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2020; (159(4)):1519-1527.e1 doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.084.

    PMID: 31444074
  13. 13

    ECMO, VAD, Impella, and IABP: Primer on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.

    Kruse J, Ranade M

    Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology 2025; (28(2)):101042 doi:10.1016/j.tvir.2025.101042.

    PMID: 40634051
  14. 14

    Strategies for Mechanical Right Ventricular Support During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant.

    Beller JP, Mehaffey JH, Wegermann ZK, et al.

    The Annals of thoracic surgery 2022; (114(2)):484-491 doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.10.032.

    PMID: 34843696
  15. 15

    Revisiting Acute Decompensated Right Ventricle Failure in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

    Masih R, Paudyal V, Basnet YM, et al.

    The open respiratory medicine journal 2025; (19()):e18743064359315 doi:10.2174/0118743064359315250210080743.

    PMID: 40322493

This page provides educational information about mechanical support options for right heart failure in the intensive care unit. It does not replace professional medical advice from your critical care team or cardiothoracic surgeon.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Postcardiotomy right ventricular failure.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.