Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Medical Genetics

The Genetics of Smith-Magenis Syndrome

At a Glance

Smith-Magenis syndrome usually results from losing one working copy of RAI1, either through a 17p11.2 deletion or a pathogenic RAI1 variant. Genetic testing distinguishes these changes and checks whether FLCN was also deleted, which can affect kidney surveillance.

Understanding the genetics of Smith-Magenis Syndrome (SMS) is like looking at a blueprint to see why a building was constructed a certain way. At its core, SMS is caused by having only one working copy of a specific gene called RAI1 (Retinoic Acid Induced 1) instead of the usual two [1][2]. This is known as haploinsufficiency—where a single “dose” of the gene is not enough for the body to function correctly [3].

The Role of the RAI1 Gene

The RAI1 gene produces a protein that lives in the cell’s nucleus and tells other genes how and when to work [3]. It is especially active in the brain, where it helps with neuronal communication, regulating the body’s internal clock (circadian rhythms), and metabolism [4][5][6]. When there isn’t enough RAI1 protein, these systems don’t run smoothly.

Two Genetic Subtypes

There are two main ways the RAI1 gene can be affected. While these subtypes show group-level trends in research cohorts, they do not strictly predict your individual child’s future. There is substantial overlap between the groups, and your child’s own developmental assessment should always guide their care [7].

1. 17p11.2 Deletion (Approx. 90% of cases)

In this version, a small piece of chromosome 17 is missing entirely [1]. This missing piece always includes the RAI1 gene, but it usually takes several “neighbor” genes with it [2].

  • Cognition and Behavior: Group-level data suggests children with deletions tend to have a higher burden of intellectual disability compared to those with variants [8]. They may also show more “externalizing” behaviors, such as physical aggression or impulsivity [7].
  • Physical Features: Deletion-related SMS is more likely to include multisystem physical findings, such as scoliosis, hearing loss, and heart or kidney concerns [9][10].

2. RAI1 Pathogenic Variant (Approx. 10% of cases)

In these cases, the chromosome is intact, but there is a “spelling error” (a pathogenic variant) within the RAI1 gene itself that stops it from working properly [11]. Note that a “variant of uncertain significance” (VUS) does not confirm an SMS diagnosis; it must be classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic based on the clinical picture.

  • Cognition and Behavior: On average, children in this group often have slightly higher cognitive scores [8]. Their behavioral patterns may be more “internalizing,” meaning they might experience more anxiety, social withdrawal, or depressed mood [7][8].
  • Weight: Some evidence suggests that early-onset obesity may be more frequent in the variant group [2][12].

The Importance of the FLCN Gene

When a child has a 17p11.2 deletion, it is critical to check the genetic report to see if a neighboring gene called FLCN was also lost. The FLCN gene helps protect the body against certain types of tumors [13].

If the FLCN gene is deleted, it can cause a condition similar to Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome [14]. While rare, this increases the risk for non-cancerous skin bumps and a specific type of kidney cancer later in life. Because of this, medical experts recommend that individuals with a deletion involving FLCN receive specialist genetic and urologic counseling [13]. A BHD-oriented surveillance plan typically involves lifelong kidney imaging (often repeated MRIs, as ultrasounds can miss small lesions) starting in adulthood [15]. Do not attempt to arrange this imaging on your own—always work with a specialist to determine the appropriate modality and interval.

Confirming the Subtype: Testing Methods

Testing strategy depends on the patient’s phenotype. A genetics team may use:

  • Chromosomal Microarray (CMA) or Deletion/Duplication Analysis: Often used first to scan the chromosomes and find missing pieces (deletions) [16].
  • Gene Sequencing (Multigene panels or Exome/Genome testing): If a microarray is normal but SMS is suspected, sequencing looks for pathogenic variants within the RAI1 gene itself [17][18].

Your Genetic Report Checklist

When you review your child’s lab results with a geneticist, ensure you can answer these specific questions:

  1. Is it a deletion or a pathogenic variant? [1].
  2. What are the exact coordinates? (e.g., “chr17:16,000,000-19,000,000”) [7].
  3. Is the FLCN gene included in the deletion? (This determines if specialist BHD-tumor surveillance is needed later in life) [13].
  4. Have parents been tested? (To confirm recurrence risks).

Common questions in this guide

What genetic change causes Smith-Magenis syndrome?
Smith-Magenis syndrome occurs when the body has only one working copy of the RAI1 gene. This usually happens because a small part of chromosome 17, called 17p11.2, is deleted; less often, a harmful RAI1 change affects an otherwise intact chromosome.
Does a deletion or an RAI1 variant predict how my child will develop?
Research shows average differences between the two genetic groups, but they overlap substantially. Children with deletions may have more intellectual disability, behavioral challenges, and physical findings, while some children with RAI1 variants have higher average cognitive scores or more anxiety-related behaviors; these patterns do not predict an individual child’s future. Developmental assessments should guide care.
Can a variant of uncertain significance confirm Smith-Magenis syndrome?
No. A variant of uncertain significance, or VUS, does not establish the diagnosis because its meaning is not known. The RAI1 change generally needs to be classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and interpreted together with the child’s clinical findings.
Why should I check whether FLCN is included in a deletion?
If a 17p11.2 deletion also removes FLCN, it can cause a Birt-Hogg-Dubé-like condition. This may raise the later risk of certain noncancerous skin growths and kidney cancer, so a genetics or urology specialist can discuss age-appropriate surveillance, often including kidney imaging in adulthood. Families should not arrange this imaging without specialist guidance.
Which genetic tests can identify the Smith-Magenis subtype?
A chromosomal microarray or deletion/duplication test can look for the missing section of chromosome 17. If that testing is normal but Smith-Magenis syndrome is still suspected, gene sequencing through a multigene panel, exome, or genome test can look for a harmful RAI1 variant. The genetics team chooses testing based on the child’s clinical findings.
What should I look for on my child’s Smith-Magenis genetic report?
Ask whether the result is a 17p11.2 deletion or a pathogenic RAI1 variant, and note the exact chromosome coordinates. For a deletion, check whether FLCN and other potentially important genes are included. The genetics team can also explain whether parental testing is needed to clarify recurrence risk.

Questions For You

Answer a question to get research tailored to you. Your answers are private.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Smith-Magenis syndrome.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Does my child have a 17p11.2 deletion or a pathogenic RAI1 variant?
  2. 2.Based on the genetic report, is the FLCN gene included in the deleted section?
  3. 3.If the FLCN gene is missing, can you refer us to a specialist for Birt-Hogg-Dubé-oriented surveillance?
  4. 4.Were any other genes of concern identified in the deleted region of chromosome 17?
  5. 5.When should we schedule parental genetic testing to determine if this was a 'de novo' event?

References

References (18)
  1. 1

    Production and characterization of CSSI003 (2961) human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) carrying a novel puntiform mutation in RAI1 gene, Causative of Smith-Magenis syndrome.

    Altieri F, Turco EM, Vinci E, et al.

    Stem cell research 2018; (28()):153-156 doi:10.1016/j.scr.2018.02.016.

    PMID: 29494847
  2. 2

    RAI1 gene mutations: mechanisms of Smith-Magenis syndrome.

    Falco M, Amabile S, Acquaviva F

    The application of clinical genetics 2017; (10()):85-94 doi:10.2147/TACG.S128455.

    PMID: 29138588
  3. 3

    Molecular and Neural Functions of Rai1, the Causal Gene for Smith-Magenis Syndrome.

    Huang WH, Guenthner CJ, Xu J, et al.

    Neuron 2016; (92(2)):392-406 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.019.

    PMID: 27693255
  4. 4

    Retinoic Acid Induced 1 and Smith-Magenis Syndrome: From Genetics to Biology and Possible Therapeutic Strategies.

    Covarelli J, Vinciarelli E, Mirarchi A, et al.

    International journal of molecular sciences 2025; (26(14)) doi:10.3390/ijms26146667.

    PMID: 40724914
  5. 5

    Smith-Magenis syndrome and its circadian influence on development, behavior, and obesity - own experience.

    Chen L, Mullegama SV, Alaimo JT, Elsea SH

    Developmental period medicine 2015; (19(2)):149-56.

    PMID: 26384114
  6. 6

    Smith-Magenis syndrome protein RAI1 regulates body weight homeostasis through hypothalamic BDNF-producing neurons and neurotrophin downstream signalling.

    Javed S, Chang YT, Cho Y, et al.

    eLife 2023; (12()).

    PMID: 37956053
  7. 7

    Distinct Neuropsychiatric Profiles Associated With 17p11.2 Deletions and RAI1 Variants in Smith-Magenis Syndrome.

    Blanc A, Nemos C, Bonnet C, et al.

    American journal of medical genetics. Part A 2026; (200(10)):2320-2330 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.70205.

    PMID: 42178606
  8. 8

    Intellectual and Behavioral Phenotypes of Smith-Magenis Syndrome: Comparisons between Individuals with a 17p11.2 Deletion and Pathogenic RAI1 Variant.

    Linders CC, van Eeghen AM, Zinkstok JR, et al.

    Genes 2023; (14(8)) doi:10.3390/genes14081514.

    PMID: 37628566
  9. 9

    Smith-Magenis syndrome: Clinical and behavioral characteristics in a large retrospective cohort.

    Rive Le Gouard N, Jacquinet A, Ruaud L, et al.

    Clinical genetics 2021; (99(4)):519-528 doi:10.1111/cge.13906.

    PMID: 33368193
  10. 10

    Smith Magenis syndrome: First case of congenital heart defect in a patient with Rai1 mutation.

    Onesimo R, Delogu AB, Blandino R, et al.

    American journal of medical genetics. Part A 2022; (188(7)):2184-2186 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.62740.

    PMID: 35373511
  11. 11

    Deletion of RAI1 noncoding exons 1-2 causes Smith-Magenis syndrome.

    Hamiel U, Kurolap A, Gadot CC, et al.

    Journal of genetics 2025; (104()).

    PMID: 40386916
  12. 12

    Clarifying main nutritional aspects and resting energy expenditure in children with Smith-Magenis syndrome.

    Proli F, Sforza E, Faragalli A, et al.

    European journal of pediatrics 2024; (183(10)):4563-4571 doi:10.1007/s00431-024-05715-z.

    PMID: 39162735
  13. 13

    A diagnosis of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome in individuals with Smith-Magenis syndrome: Recommendation for cancer screening.

    Vocke CD, Fleming LR, Piskorski AM, et al.

    American journal of medical genetics. Part A 2023; (191(2)):490-497 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.63049.

    PMID: 36513625
  14. 14

    Bilateral renal tumors in an adult man with Smith-Magenis syndrome: The role of the FLCN gene.

    Dardour L, Verleyen P, Lesage K, et al.

    European journal of medical genetics 2016; (59(10)):499-501.

    PMID: 27633572
  15. 15

    [Expert consensus on the diagnosis and management of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome].

    , , ,

    Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases 2023; (46(9)):897-908 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20230705-00362.

    PMID: 37670643
  16. 16

    Prenatal diagnosis of Smith-Magenis syndrome in two fetuses with increased nuchal translucency, mild lateral ventriculomegaly, and congenital heart defects.

    Lei TY, Li R, Fu F, et al.

    Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2016; (55(6)):886-890 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2015.07.007.

    PMID: 28040141
  17. 17

    Delayed diagnosis in a house of correction: Smith-Magenis syndrome due to a de novo nonsense RAI1 variant.

    Yeetong P, Vilboux T, Ciccone C, et al.

    American journal of medical genetics. Part A 2016; (170(9)):2383-8 doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.37602.

    PMID: 27311559
  18. 18

    First-trimester cystic hygroma and neurodevelopmental disorders: The association to remember.

    Pan M, Liu YN, Xu LL, Li DZ

    Taiwanese journal of obstetrics & gynecology 2020; (59(6)):960-962 doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2020.09.029.

    PMID: 33218422

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. A clinical geneticist or genetic counselor should interpret your child’s report and recommend any FLCN-related surveillance.