Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 16 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Cardiology · Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Advanced Tools: When Medications Are Not Enough

At a Glance

Advanced treatment for systolic heart failure that remains difficult to control may include an implanted defibrillator (ICD) for dangerous rhythms, CRT to coordinate pumping, or evaluation for a mechanical heart pump (LVAD) or heart transplant.

For many people with Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), medications (GDMT) are the primary defense. However, when medications alone are not enough to restore heart function or protect against dangerous heart rhythms, specialized devices and advanced therapies can provide a critical safety net.

The ICD: A Safety Net for Your Heart

An Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) is a small device placed under the skin that monitors your heartbeat. If it detects a life-threatening, rapid heart rhythm, it can deliver an electric shock to restore a normal rhythm and prevent sudden cardiac death [1].

Primary and Secondary Prevention

For primary prevention, if your Ejection Fraction (EF) remains 35% or lower after optimization, you may be evaluated for an ICD. However, doctors almost always wait at least 3 to 6 months after you start your optimized heart medications before placing one [1][2].

  • Why wait? Many patients see their EF improve significantly once they are on the “Four Pillars” of treatment. In some cases, the heart recovers enough (above 35%) that a new ICD might not be recommended [3]. However, if you already have one and your EF improves, the device is usually not removed.
  • The Exception: For secondary prevention—if you have already survived a cardiac arrest or have a specific history of dangerous heart rhythms—your doctor will recommend an ICD much sooner [1]. The decision also depends on symptoms, heart failure cause, and expected survival.

CRT: Helping the Heart Beat in Sync

Sometimes the electrical signals in a weakened heart don’t travel properly, causing the left and right sides of the heart to beat out of sync. This is often seen on an ECG as a wide QRS or a Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB) [4].

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) uses three wires to time the heart’s contractions so the chambers pump together effectively. CRT can be a pacemaker (CRT-P) or combined with a defibrillator (CRT-D).

  • Who it helps: It is most effective for symptomatic patients with an EF of 35% or lower who have a very wide QRS measurement (usually 150 milliseconds or more) and typical LBBB [4][5]. Non-LBBB patterns or atrial fibrillation require different specialist considerations.
  • The Benefit: By making the heart more efficient, CRT can improve symptoms, increase your ability to exercise, and even help the heart shrink back toward a more normal size [6]. Risks of these devices include infection, lead issues, or inappropriate shocks for defibrillators.

When to Seek Advanced Care

For most patients, GDMT and devices are enough to manage the disease. However, if heart failure continues to progress, it may be time to consult an Advanced Heart Failure Specialist. Early referral is key because advanced treatments are more successful when they are started before other organs, like the kidneys or liver, begin to fail [7][8].

You should consider a referral if you experience:

  • Recurrent Hospitalizations: Escalating diuretic needs or more than one hospital stay for heart failure in a year [9].
  • Medication Intolerance: Being unable to take heart medications because your blood pressure or kidney function is persistently worsening [9][10].
  • Low-Output Symptoms: Frequent shortness of breath or fatigue that prevents you from performing basic daily activities despite being on all your medications [11].

Advanced Options: LVAD and Transplant

In the most advanced stages of HFrEF, two main surgical options exist:

  1. LVAD (Left Ventricular Assist Device): A mechanical pump that is surgically implanted to help the heart’s main pumping chamber move blood to the rest of the body. It can be used as a “bridge” while waiting for a transplant or as a long-term treatment [12][13]. Risks include stroke, pump thrombosis (blood clots), and driveline infections.
  2. Heart Transplant: Replacing the failing heart with a healthy donor heart. This remains the most effective long-term treatment for end-stage heart failure, though donor hearts are limited [14]. It carries rejection and immunosuppression risks.

Both options are major surgeries with significant risks and they require a lifelong commitment to intensive medical follow-up [15][16]. Palliative or supportive care can also be involved to help you weigh these risks and align treatment with your goals.

Common questions in this guide

What does an ICD do, and when might someone with HFrEF need one?
An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) continuously monitors the heart and can deliver a shock for a life-threatening fast rhythm. For primary prevention, clinicians often consider it when the ejection fraction remains 35% or lower after about 3 to 6 months of optimized heart failure treatment; after cardiac arrest or certain dangerous rhythms, it may be recommended sooner. The decision also depends on symptoms, the cause of heart failure, and overall expected survival.
Who may benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) uses leads to help the heart's lower chambers contract together. It is most useful for people who remain symptomatic, have an ejection fraction of 35% or lower, and have a very wide QRS, especially typical left bundle branch block with a QRS around 150 milliseconds or more. A specialist must individualize decisions for non-left-bundle patterns or atrial fibrillation.
If my ejection fraction improves, will I still need an ICD?
If a new ICD is being considered, the care team often waits 3 to 6 months after optimized medication so the ejection fraction has time to improve; if it rises above 35%, an ICD may no longer be recommended for primary prevention. An ICD that is already implanted is usually not removed just because the ejection fraction improves. Your history of dangerous rhythms and overall risk still matter.
When should I see an advanced heart failure specialist?
Ask about an advanced heart failure referral if you have repeated hospital stays, need increasing doses of diuretics, cannot tolerate heart medicines because of low blood pressure or worsening kidney function, or remain too breathless or fatigued to do daily activities. Early referral allows the team to assess advanced options before other organs, such as the kidneys or liver, begin to fail.
What are LVADs and heart transplants used for?
An LVAD is a surgically implanted mechanical pump that helps the heart's main pumping chamber move blood through the body; it may support you while waiting for a transplant or serve as long-term treatment. A heart transplant replaces the failing heart with a donor heart and can be the most effective long-term treatment for selected people with end-stage heart failure, but donor hearts are limited. Both require major surgery and lifelong medical follow-up.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Is my current ejection fraction (EF) low enough to qualify for an ICD, and how long should we wait to see if it improves on my current medications?
  2. 2.Does my ECG show a 'Left Bundle Branch Block' (LBBB) or a wide QRS, and would I benefit from a biventricular pacemaker (CRT)?
  3. 3.If my EF stays below 35% but I feel better, do I still need an ICD to protect against sudden cardiac arrest?
  4. 4.At what point should I be referred to an advanced heart failure specialist for a consultation?
  5. 5.If my blood pressure is too low to increase my heart medications, is that a sign that I need more advanced treatment options like an LVAD?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (16)
  1. 1

    Prevention of sudden death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: do we still need an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention?

    Abdelhamid M, Rosano G, Metra M, et al.

    European journal of heart failure 2022; (24(9)):1460-1466 doi:10.1002/ejhf.2594.

    PMID: 35753058
  2. 2

    The Optimal Timing of Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Referral in the Rapidly Changing Medical Landscape.

    Wong JA, Roberts JD, Healey JS

    The Canadian journal of cardiology 2021; (37(4)):644-654 doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.01.024.

    PMID: 33549824
  3. 3

    Therapy duration and improvement of ventricular function in de novo heart failure: the Heart Failure Optimization study.

    Veltmann C, Duncker D, Doering M, et al.

    European heart journal 2024; (45(30)):2771-2781 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae334.

    PMID: 38864173
  4. 4

    Multidisciplinary approach to long-standing left bundle branch block with dyssynchrony and aortic stenosis: case report.

    Maigrot JA, Weiss AJ, Wazni O, Starling RC

    European heart journal. Case reports 2024; (8(4)):ytae127 doi:10.1093/ehjcr/ytae127.

    PMID: 38567275
  5. 5

    Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

    Friedman DJ, Al-Khatib SM, Dalgaard F, et al.

    Circulation 2023; (147(10)):812-823 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062124.

    PMID: 36700426
  6. 6

    The Benefit of Atrioventricular Junction Ablation for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Waranugraha Y, Rizal A, Setiawan D, Aziz IJ

    Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal 2021; (21(2)):101-111 doi:10.1016/j.ipej.2020.12.005.

    PMID: 33548449
  7. 7

    Left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: patient selection and outcomes.

    Gustafsson F, Rogers JG

    European journal of heart failure 2017; (19(5)):595-602 doi:10.1002/ejhf.779.

    PMID: 28198133
  8. 8

    Mechanical circulatory support for end-stage heart failure.

    Combes A

    Metabolism: clinical and experimental 2017; (69S()):S30-S35 doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.009.

    PMID: 28153356
  9. 9

    Patient Selection for Destination LVAD Therapy: Predicting Success in the Short and Long Term.

    Michaels A, Cowger J

    Current heart failure reports 2019; (16(5)):140-149 doi:10.1007/s11897-019-00434-1.

    PMID: 31240639
  10. 10

    Survival and Readmission Burden in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Managed With Ventricular Assist Device Versus Continued Medical Therapy.

    Alexis JD, Wood K, Gosev I, et al.

    ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) 2025; (71(8)):628-636 doi:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002382.

    PMID: 40028781
  11. 11

    Advanced Heart Failure: Prevalence, Natural History, and Prognosis.

    Chaudhry SP, Stewart GC

    Heart failure clinics 2016; (12(3)):323-33.

    PMID: 27371510
  12. 12

    Advanced (stage D) heart failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines Committee.

    Fang JC, Ewald GA, Allen LA, et al.

    Journal of cardiac failure 2015; (21(6)):519-34.

    PMID: 25953697
  13. 13

    Advanced heart failure: a position statement of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Crespo-Leiro MG, Metra M, Lund LH, et al.

    European journal of heart failure 2018; (20(11)):1505-1535 doi:10.1002/ejhf.1236.

    PMID: 29806100
  14. 14

    Treatment of Advanced Heart Failure-Focus on Transplantation and Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support: What Does the Future Hold?

    Guidetti F, Arrigo M, Frank M, et al.

    Heart failure clinics 2021; (17(4)):697-708 doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2021.05.013.

    PMID: 34511216
  15. 15

    Left ventricular assist device implantation and clinical outcomes in the Netherlands.

    Damman K, Caliskan K, Birim O, et al.

    Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation 2023; (31(5)):189-195 doi:10.1007/s12471-023-01760-9.

    PMID: 36723773
  16. 16

    Who is the Candidate? The Heart Transplant Evaluation Process.

    Kittleson MM

    Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal 2025; (21(3)):13-24 doi:10.14797/mdcvj.1512.

    PMID: 40384741

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your heart failure team should determine whether a device, LVAD, transplant, or supportive care is appropriate for your situation.

Get notified when new evidence is published on systolic heart failure.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.