Imaging and Preoperative Diagnosis
At a Glance
Ultrasound and MRI can suggest a uterine adenomyoma by showing changes in the uterine muscle, junctional zone, or lesion location, but these findings are not definitive. Histopathology from targeted or surgical tissue remains the diagnostic standard.
Before a diagnosis is confirmed by pathology, your medical team uses specialized imaging and visualization tools to “see” inside the uterus. While these tests are highly advanced, they are preoperative—meaning they provide strong clues but cannot give a 100% certain diagnosis without a tissue sample [1].
The FIGO PALM-COEIN Framework
To organize the many causes of abnormal bleeding, doctors use a system called PALM-COEIN [2].
- PALM covers structural causes you can see on an image: Polyps, Adenomyosis, Leiomyoma (fibroids), and Malignancy [3].
- The “A” category is dedicated to adenomyosis, but there is no specific category just for adenomyoma. Your bleeding cause may be classified under “A” or “L” depending on the radiologic and pathologic interpretation [4][3].
Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS)
A transvaginal ultrasound is usually the first step. Radiologists now use a standardized language called MUSA (Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment) to describe what they see [5].
Key features that may be noted include:
- Heterogeneous Myometrium: The muscle of the uterus looks “patchy” or uneven rather than smooth and uniform [6].
- Myometrial Cysts: Small, fluid-filled pockets within the uterine muscle [5].
- Fan-shaped Shadowing: Linear shadows that look like a handheld fan [5].
- Irregular Morphology: Unlike fibroids, which usually have very sharp borders, an adenomyoma may have ill-defined margins [1].
Note: These are primarily signs of adenomyosis or nonspecific myometrial change. They are suggestive features, not diagnostic markers that reliably distinguish an adenomyoma from a fibroid [1].
The Role of MRI
If an ultrasound is unclear, an MRI provides a high-resolution “map.” MRI is particularly good at looking at the junctional zone (JZ)—the border where the uterine lining meets the muscle [7].
- JZ Morphology: An MRI look for an irregular or thickened junctional zone. Doctors look for “fingerlike” projections or an irregular inner border [7].
- T2-Hyperintense Foci: These are bright spots on the MRI scan that represent tiny areas of bleeding or fluid (cysts) within the mass [8].
- Mapping for Surgery: MRI helps the surgeon see exactly where the mass is located—whether it is intramural (inside the wall) or submucosal (pushing into the cavity)—which dictates how it can be removed [9].
When Imaging and Biopsy Disagree: Hysteroscopy
Sometimes, a standard office biopsy (like a Pipelle sampling) comes back “normal” even though an ultrasound clearly shows a mass. This happens because a blind biopsy might only catch the healthy background lining and miss the mass itself [9].
In these cases, a hysteroscopy is an excellent tool for direct assessment of the uterine cavity [10].
- Direct Vision: A thin camera is inserted through the cervix, allowing the doctor to see the mass directly [9].
- Targeted Sampling: Instead of a blind sweep, the doctor can take a sample directly from the suspicious area.
- Identifying APAs: This is crucial for identifying Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma (APA) [9][11].
However, it is important to know that hysteroscopy cannot directly visualize an intramural lesion that is deep in the muscle. A normal hysteroscopy does not rule out a deep lesion, and whole-lesion removal is generally not possible through hysteroscopy when the lesion is deep. Histopathology—not hysteroscopic appearance—is the ultimate diagnostic standard [12].
Common questions in this guide
What can a transvaginal ultrasound show when adenomyoma is suspected?
Why might my doctor order an MRI for a uterine adenomyoma?
Can imaging alone confirm a diagnosis of uterine adenomyoma?
What does a negative Pipelle biopsy mean if imaging shows a uterine mass?
What is the difference between an intramural and submucosal adenomyoma?
How does the PALM-COEIN system classify bleeding related to adenomyoma?
Get notified when new evidence is published on adenomyoma of uterine corpus.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
References
References (12)
- 1
Imaging Diagnosis of Adenomyosis.
O'Shea A, Figueiredo G, Lee SI
Seminars in reproductive medicine 2020; (38(2-03)):119-128 doi:10.1055/s-0040-1719017.
PMID: 33197946 - 2
Contemporary evaluation of women and girls with abnormal uterine bleeding: FIGO Systems 1 and 2.
Jain V, Munro MG, Critchley HOD
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2023; (162 Suppl 2()):29-42 doi:10.1002/ijgo.14946.
PMID: 37538019 - 3
A Clinicopathological Correlation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics's PALM-COEIN Classification of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Indian Scenario.
Singh K, Agarwal C, Pujani M, et al.
Journal of mid-life health 2019; (10(3)):147-152 doi:10.4103/jmh.JMH_128_18.
PMID: 31579169 - 4
Comparison of classic terminology with the FIGO PALM-COEIN system for classification of the underlying causes of abnormal uterine bleeding.
Töz E, Sancı M, Özcan A, et al.
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 2016; (133(3)):325-8.
PMID: 26952349 - 5
Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure.
Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, et al.
Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2022; (60(1)):118-131 doi:10.1002/uog.24786.
PMID: 34587658 - 6
Accuracy of findings in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis on ultrasound.
Sam M, Raubenheimer M, Manolea F, et al.
Abdominal radiology (New York) 2020; (45(3)):842-850 doi:10.1007/s00261-019-02231-9.
PMID: 31552462 - 7
Diagnosing adenomyosis with MRI: a prospective study revisiting the junctional zone thickness cutoff of 12 mm as a diagnostic marker.
Tellum T, Matic GV, Dormagen JB, et al.
European radiology 2019; (29(12)):6971-6981 doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06308-3.
PMID: 31264010 - 8
MRI and Adenomyosis: What Can Radiologists Evaluate?
Celli V, Dolciami M, Ninkova R, et al.
International journal of environmental research and public health 2022; (19(10)) doi:10.3390/ijerph19105840.
PMID: 35627376 - 9
MRI and Transvaginal Ultrasound Findings of Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma: A Case Report.
Tan Y, Hu X, Song X, Zhang WJ
Chinese medical sciences journal = Chung-kuo i hsueh k'o hsueh tsa chih 2022; (37(1)):82-86 doi:10.24920/003911.
PMID: 35256047 - 10
Atypical polypoid adenomyoma follow-up and management: Systematic review of case reports and series and meta-analysis.
Biasioli A, Londero AP, Orsaria M, et al.
Medicine 2020; (99(26)):e20491 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000020491.
PMID: 32590732 - 11
A case of endometrial carcinoma progressed during pregnancy resulting in fetal death.
Ota E, Nomura H, Omatsu K, et al.
International cancer conference journal 2020; (9(3)):159-161 doi:10.1007/s13691-020-00417-3.
PMID: 32582523 - 12
Clinical analysis of 44 cases of atypical polypoid adenomyoma of the uterus.
Wang X, Guo Y
BMC women's health 2022; (22(1)):60 doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01643-y.
PMID: 35246106
This page is for informational purposes only and does not replace professional medical advice about uterine adenomyoma. Your gynecologist, radiologist, and pathologist can interpret your imaging and biopsy results and advise on next steps.