Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 18 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Cardiology · Cardiac Erosion

What Is the Cardiac Erosion Risk After ASD/PFO Closure?

At a Glance

Cardiac erosion is an extremely rare complication of ASD or PFO closure, occurring in 0.1% to 0.3% of procedures. It happens if the device rubs against the heart wall. Your doctor will monitor you closely, but seek emergency care if you experience sudden chest pain or shortness of breath.

Cardiac erosion is a very rare but serious complication where the edges of an ASD or PFO closure device rub against and wear through the tissue of the heart wall or nearby blood vessels. While reading about it can be frightening, it is important to know that it is extremely rare, and most closure procedures happen safely without this issue [1][2]. Your care team is trained to carefully evaluate your heart’s anatomy before the procedure to minimize risks, and they will closely monitor you via echocardiograms in the days and months following your implantation [3][4].

What exactly is cardiac erosion?

When a doctor places a closure device to seal an Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) or Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO), the device sits against the wall separating the heart’s upper chambers. In very rare cases, the natural movement of the beating heart causes the edges of the device to repeatedly rub against the heart tissue [5][6]. Over time, this friction can wear away the tissue—a process called erosion. If the device wears through the wall, it can cause bleeding around the heart (a condition known clinically as hemopericardium or cardiac tamponade). This is a medical emergency that requires surgery to remove the device and repair the affected heart wall [6][7].

How rare is it?

Cardiac erosion is incredibly rare. The exact risk depends on the specific device used, but overall, it happens in a tiny fraction of patients—estimated at 1 to 3 out of every 1,000 procedures (0.1% to 0.3%) [1][2].

Because ASDs are typically larger than PFOs, they require larger closure devices. As a result, the vast majority of cardiac erosion cases have been associated with ASD closure devices rather than PFO devices [6][3]. While the risk with PFO closures is not zero, some types of PFO devices have no published reports of erosion at all [8][9].

Who is at a higher risk?

Research shows that cardiac erosion doesn’t happen randomly. It is most often linked to specific anatomical factors that your doctor will look for before deciding if a device is safe for you [10][6]. The primary risk factors include:

  • A “deficient aortic rim”: To sit securely without rubbing, the closure device needs enough surrounding heart tissue to grip. If there is very little tissue (usually less than 5 millimeters) between the hole in your heart and the aorta (the main artery leaving the heart), the device may rest directly against the aorta, increasing the risk of friction [6][10].
  • Oversized devices: Using a device that is too large for the hole or the surrounding anatomy can create excess pressure and friction against the heart walls [6][11].
  • Aortic root dilation: If the base of the aorta is wider than normal (dilated), it can sit closer to the device, increasing the chance of rubbing [6][12].

Your doctor will use imaging tools like a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to measure your rims and surrounding structures carefully before deciding if a transcatheter closure is right for you [3][4]. Importantly, having a deficient rim does not automatically mean you cannot have the procedure; doctors often adapt by using specific sizing techniques or alternative devices, or they may recommend surgical closure instead [6][13].

How is it monitored?

Your care team will monitor you closely to ensure the device is sitting safely. Most cases of cardiac erosion happen very early—often within the first 72 hours after the procedure [14][1]. Before you are sent home from the hospital, you will have an echocardiogram (ultrasound of the heart) to confirm the device is stable and not causing any fluid buildup around the heart (pericardial effusion) [3].

You will also have follow-up echocardiograms at regular intervals (typically at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year) [3][15]. While rare, erosion has been known to occur months or even years after the procedure, which is why attending your scheduled, long-term cardiology checkups is vital [1][16]. If your doctor suspects any issues during these checks, they can use advanced imaging like a 3D TEE or a Cardiac CT scan to get a highly detailed view of the device [4][17].

Symptoms to watch for

Because this complication can be dangerous, it is important to know the warning signs. You should seek emergency medical attention immediately if you experience:

  • Sudden, severe chest pain [7][18]
  • Unexplained shortness of breath (dyspnea) [18]
  • Fainting, severe dizziness, or signs of a dangerous drop in blood pressure (hemodynamic instability) [7][3]

Having this knowledge shouldn’t make you live in fear, but rather empower you to act quickly if something feels wrong.

Common questions in this guide

How common is cardiac erosion after ASD or PFO closure?
Cardiac erosion is extremely rare, occurring in an estimated 1 to 3 out of every 1,000 procedures. The vast majority of closure procedures are completed safely without this complication.
Which devices carry a higher risk for cardiac erosion?
The risk is primarily associated with larger closure devices used for Atrial Septal Defects (ASDs). While the risk with PFO devices is not zero, it is considerably lower because PFOs generally require smaller devices.
What does a deficient aortic rim mean for my procedure?
A deficient aortic rim means there is very little heart tissue between your heart defect and the aorta. This can increase the risk of the device rubbing against the aorta, so your doctor will carefully evaluate this to choose the safest closure method for you.
What are the warning signs of cardiac erosion?
Emergency warning signs include sudden and severe chest pain, unexplained shortness of breath, fainting, or severe dizziness. If you experience any of these symptoms after your procedure, you should seek immediate emergency medical attention.
How long after the procedure can cardiac erosion happen?
Most cases happen very early, often within the first 72 hours after the device is placed. However, erosion can rarely occur months or even years later, making long-term follow-up echocardiograms essential.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.What does my echocardiogram show about my aortic rim, and is there enough tissue to safely hold the device?
  2. 2.Which specific make and model of closure device do you recommend for my anatomy, and what is its track record regarding cardiac erosion?
  3. 3.How do you determine the correct size of the device to ensure it is not oversized for my defect?
  4. 4.What will my specific follow-up imaging schedule look like in the first year after the procedure to ensure the device is stable?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (18)
  1. 1

    Delayed cardiac tamponade caused by erosion 5 years after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect with Figulla Flex II: a case report.

    Sakumoto K, Araki Y, Noda M, et al.

    Journal of surgical case reports 2025; (2025(3)):rjaf104 doi:10.1093/jscr/rjaf104.

    PMID: 40062215
  2. 2

    Atrial Septal Erosion: Very Rare Complication of Percutaneous PFO Closure.

    Kozak K, Kula W, Drozd J, et al.

    JACC. Case reports 2026; (31(28)):108612 doi:10.1016/j.jaccas.2026.108612.

    PMID: 42460936
  3. 3

    Atrial Wall Perforation After Atrial Septal Defect Device Closure: A Case Report.

    Bekheet S, Abouzahr R, Ahmad Z, et al.

    Cureus 2025; (17(3)):e81411 doi:10.7759/cureus.81411.

    PMID: 40296984
  4. 4

    Three-dimensional echocardiographic demonstration of aortic wall erosion after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure.

    Mohamed AM, Türkmen I, Abdrabou MMM, Kemaloğlu Oz T

    Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU 2019; (47(6)):384-386 doi:10.1002/jcu.22699.

    PMID: 30729539
  5. 5

    Atrial Septal Defect Occluder-Induced Left Atrial Injury: A Paradoxical Source of Embolic Strokes.

    Hemmati P, Arghami A

    Annals of thoracic surgery short reports 2024; (2(3)):390-393 doi:10.1016/j.atssr.2024.01.015.

    PMID: 39790428
  6. 6

    Life-Threatening Aorto-Atrial Erosion Following Transcatheter Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect Closure: A Case-Based Review.

    Deaconu S, Deleanu D, Bistriceanu MIA, et al.

    Life (Basel, Switzerland) 2026; (16(5)) doi:10.3390/life16050824.

    PMID: 42195379
  7. 7

    A life-saving case of cardiopulmonary arrest with cardiac tamponade caused by erosion 6 years after percutaneous atrial septal defect closure: a case report.

    Kobayashi T, Watanabe T, Fu H, et al.

    Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 2021; (16(1)):137 doi:10.1186/s13019-021-01537-4.

    PMID: 34020682
  8. 8

    Two cases of pericardial tamponade due to nitinol wire fracture of a gore septal occluder.

    Kumar P, Orford JL, Tobis JM

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2020; (96(1)):219-224 doi:10.1002/ccd.28596.

    PMID: 31696617
  9. 9

    Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defect: A Review of Currently Used Devices.

    Shrivastava S, Shrivastava S, Allu SVV, Schmidt P

    Cureus 2023; (15(6)):e40132 doi:10.7759/cureus.40132.

    PMID: 37425612
  10. 10

    Relative Risk Factors for Cardiac Erosion Following Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defects: A Case-Control Study.

    McElhinney DB, Quartermain MD, Kenny D, et al.

    Circulation 2016; (133(18)):1738-46 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019987.

    PMID: 27002094
  11. 11

    [Very late erosion of the right atrium with Amplatzer(®) device].

    Zuñiga Luna M, Gallego Muñoz C, Vásquez Villegas S, et al.

    Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico 2016; (86(3)):271-5.

    PMID: 27177959
  12. 12

    Aortic dilation might be a risk factor for early cardiac perforation after interventional closure of patent foramen ovale: a case report.

    Andreescu A, Mihaila Baldea S, Udroiu C, et al.

    European heart journal. Case reports 2025; (9(5)):ytaf189 doi:10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf189.

    PMID: 40599604
  13. 13

    Perforation of the atrial wall and aortic sinus after closure of an atrial septal defect with an Atriasept occluder: a case report.

    Zhang ZQ, Ding JW

    Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 2021; (16(1)):53 doi:10.1186/s13019-021-01441-x.

    PMID: 33766059
  14. 14

    Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defects With the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder: A Prospective, Multicenter, Post-Approval Study.

    Turner DR, Owada CY, Sang CJ, et al.

    Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2017; (10(8)) doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004212.

    PMID: 28801537
  15. 15

    Temporal profile of right and left ventricular wall deformation analysis using 2D speckle tracking echocardiography following atrial septal defect closure.

    Ansari SA, Kapoor A, Katheria A, et al.

    AsiaIntervention 2025; (11(3)):190-198 doi:10.4244/AIJ-D-25-00027.

    PMID: 41049295
  16. 16

    Late erosion of Amplatzer Septal Occluder device 9 years after the implantation: a case report.

    Koumallos N, Aggeli C, Milas T, Tsioufis K

    Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2023; (37(2)) doi:10.1093/icvts/ivad132.

    PMID: 37589663
  17. 17

    Subclinical cardiac perforation caused by a Micra™ leadless pacemaker.

    Togashi I, Sato T, Hoshida K, Soejima K

    Journal of arrhythmia 2018; (34(3)):326-328 doi:10.1002/joa3.12052.

    PMID: 29951156
  18. 18

    Late tissue erosion after transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect.

    Mendirichaga R, Smairat RA, Sancassani R

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2017; (89(3)):502-504 doi:10.1002/ccd.26277.

    PMID: 26527464

This page is for informational purposes only and does not replace professional medical advice. If you experience sudden chest pain or shortness of breath after a heart procedure, seek emergency medical care immediately.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Interatrial communication.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.