What Does the Qp:Qs Ratio Mean on an Echocardiogram?
At a Glance
A Qp:Qs ratio measures the balance of blood flowing to your lungs versus your body. A normal ratio is 1:1, but a ratio of 1.5 or higher indicates a significant left-to-right heart shunt, often requiring a procedure to close the hole and prevent long-term heart damage.
In this answer
3 sections
If you are looking at your echocardiogram report and see a Qp:Qs ratio, you are looking at a measurement of how much extra blood is flowing through the hole in your heart. In short, a Qp:Qs ratio greater than 1.5:1 indicates a “clinically significant” shunt [1]. This means your lungs are receiving at least 50% more blood than the rest of your body, and your doctor will often evaluate you for a procedure to close the hole to protect your heart long-term [2][3].
Breaking Down the Hemodynamics Simply
To understand this ratio, it helps to know what the letters stand for:
- Qp (Pulmonary Blood Flow): The total volume of blood pumped to your lungs to pick up oxygen [4].
- Qs (Systemic Blood Flow): The total volume of blood pumped to the rest of your body to deliver that oxygen [5][6].
In a healthy heart with no structural holes, the amount of blood pumped to the lungs is exactly the same as the amount of blood pumped to the body. This means the normal Qp:Qs ratio is 1:1.
However, if you have an interatrial communication like an Atrial Septal Defect (ASD), oxygen-rich blood can leak across the wall separating the heart’s upper chambers. Because the blood pressure on the left side of the heart is naturally higher than on the right, this extra blood is pushed back over to the right side and sent back through the lungs again [7][8]. Doctors call this a left-to-right shunt.
Why Does a Ratio Over 1.5:1 Matter?
When your echo report notes a Qp:Qs ratio of 1.5 (often written as 1.5:1), it means there is 1.5 times as much blood going to your lungs as there is going to your body [1]. For context, significant shunts often range from 1.5 up to 3.0 or higher [9].
Cardiologists use 1.5:1 as a standard dividing line. If your ratio is lower than 1.5, the leak is relatively small and your heart can usually handle the extra work without issue. However, if the ratio is 1.5 or higher, the shunt is considered “hemodynamically significant” [1][2].
A significant shunt means your right heart is working overtime. Many patients with a ratio of 1.5 to 2.0 feel completely fine and have no noticeable symptoms [10]. But over many years, this chronic extra workload can cause:
- Right heart enlargement (volume overload): The right chambers of your heart stretch and enlarge to accommodate the extra blood volume [11][12].
- Pulmonary hypertension: The extra blood flow increases the pressure inside your lung arteries, which can permanently damage the blood vessels over decades [13].
- Heart failure and arrhythmias: If left untreated for a long time, the right side of the heart can weaken, and irregular heartbeats can develop [12][14].
What Are the Next Steps?
While reading about heart failure is scary, discovering a high Qp:Qs ratio is typically not an immediate emergency. Procedures to treat it are usually scheduled electively.
Because a Qp:Qs ratio > 1.5:1 carries long-term risks, guidelines generally recommend that eligible patients undergo a procedure to close the hole [15]. Today, many defects can be safely fixed with a minimally invasive catheter procedure (using a tiny patch delivered through a vein in the leg), though some anatomies still require surgical closure [3][16]. Note that in rare cases where a patient has already developed severe, irreversible pulmonary hypertension, closure may no longer be recommended, which is why a thorough evaluation is necessary [17].
It is also important to know that estimating this ratio with an echocardiogram is sometimes mathematically imperfect [18]. If your number is borderline or if your doctor needs a clearer picture of your heart’s anatomy, they might order a Cardiac MRI or a right heart catheterization. These are highly accurate ways to measure your exact Qp:Qs ratio before finalizing a treatment plan [19][20]. While waiting for these appointments, you can generally continue your normal activities, but you should ask your doctor about any restrictions on heavy lifting or intense exercise.
Common questions in this guide
What is a normal Qp:Qs ratio?
What does a Qp:Qs ratio of 1.5 mean?
What happens if a high Qp:Qs ratio is left untreated?
Will I need open-heart surgery if my Qp:Qs ratio is high?
Why might my doctor order a Cardiac MRI for my Qp:Qs ratio?
Questions to Ask Your Doctor
Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.
- 1.Is my right heart showing signs of enlargement (volume overload) due to this extra blood flow?
- 2.Based on my anatomy, am I a candidate for a minimally invasive catheter closure, or would I need surgery?
- 3.Do you recommend a secondary imaging test like a Cardiac MRI to confirm my exact Qp:Qs ratio?
- 4.What level of physical activity or exercise is safe for me while we wait for a treatment plan?
- 5.What are the long-term risks of waiting versus proceeding with closure of this defect now?
Questions For You
Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.
Related questions
References
References (20)
- 1
Cor Triatriatum Dexter With a Sinus Venosus Atrial Septal Defect in a 50-Year-Old Woman: A Case Report.
Kazma H, Fakih M, Raad A, et al.
Cureus 2024; (16(2)):e53477 doi:10.7759/cureus.53477.
PMID: 38439997 - 2
The correlation between serum level of brain natriuretic peptide and amount of left to right shunt.
Jamei Khosroshahi A, Molaei A, Samadi M, Eskandartash E
Journal of cardiovascular and thoracic research 2019; (11(1)):68-71 doi:10.15171/jcvtr.2019.11.
PMID: 31024675 - 3
Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect protects from pulmonary edema: septal occluder device gradually reduces LR shunt.
Murakami T, Nakazawa G, Horinouchi H, et al.
Heart and vessels 2017; (32(1)):101-104 doi:10.1007/s00380-016-0863-5.
PMID: 27314266 - 4
Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect in adults: time-course of atrial and ventricular remodeling and effects on exercise capacity.
Stephensen SS, Ostenfeld E, Kutty S, et al.
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 2019; (35(11)):2077-2084 doi:10.1007/s10554-019-01647-0.
PMID: 31203534 - 5
Estimation of intracardiac shunts in young children with a novel indicator dilution technology.
Sigurdsson TS, Lindberg L
Scientific reports 2020; (10(1)):1337 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58347-2.
PMID: 31992787 - 6
Traumatic ventricular septal rupture associated with rapid progression of heart failure despite low Qp/Qs ratio: a case report.
Murakawa K, Yoshida S, Okada T, et al.
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 2016; (11(1)):57 doi:10.1186/s13019-016-0457-4.
PMID: 27068402 - 7
Partial anomalous pulmonary venous return: A case series with management approach.
El-Kersh K, Homsy E, Daniels CJ, Smith JS
Respiratory medicine case reports 2019; (27()):100833 doi:10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.100833.
PMID: 31008046 - 8
Anatomy vs. shunt fraction: haemodynamic consequences in atrial septal defects and partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection-a comprehensive CMR study.
Jacquemyn X, Van De Bruaene A, Budts W, et al.
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging 2025; (26(3)):569-578 doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaf001.
PMID: 39761532 - 9
Predictors of Atrial Septal Defect Occluder Dislodgement.
Lee WC, Fang CY, Huang CF, et al.
International heart journal 2015; (56(4)):428-31 doi:10.1536/ihj.15-065.
PMID: 26118595 - 10
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review.
Ruopp NF, Cockrill BA
JAMA 2022; (327(14)):1379-1391 doi:10.1001/jama.2022.4402.
PMID: 35412560 - 11
The Prevalence of and Predisposing Factors for Late Atrial Arrhythmias after Transcatheter Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defects in Children.
Abu-Tair T, Martin C, Wiethoff CM, Kampmann C
Journal of clinical medicine 2023; (12(11)) doi:10.3390/jcm12113717.
PMID: 37297912 - 12
Right Ventricular Pump Efficiency in Secundum-Type Atrial Septal Defect.
Lai WT, Yu HP, Lin CC, et al.
Acta Cardiologica Sinica 2022; (38(1)):47-55 doi:10.6515/ACS.202201_38(1).20210721A.
PMID: 35068883 - 13
How many versus how much: comprehensive haemodynamic evaluation of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection by cardiac MRI.
Seller N, Yoo SJ, Grant B, Grosse-Wortmann L
European radiology 2018; (28(11)):4598-4606 doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5428-9.
PMID: 29721685 - 14
An Unusual Presentation of Eisenmenger Syndrome in a Middle-Aged Woman Without Known Cardiac History.
Rainey HN, LePera AW
Cureus 2023; (15(2)):e34668 doi:10.7759/cureus.34668.
PMID: 36909123 - 15
Device closure of atrial septal defect with severe pulmonary hypertension in adults: Patient selection with early and intermediate term results.
Dalvi B, Jain S, Pinto R
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions 2019; (93(2)):309-315 doi:10.1002/ccd.27853.
PMID: 30346095 - 16
Practical Therapeutic Management of Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Closure.
Tanaka S, Imamura T, Narang N, et al.
Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) 2022; (61(1)):15-22 doi:10.2169/internalmedicine.5944-20.
PMID: 33583888 - 17
Outcome of congenital heart disease with left-to-right shunts and pulmonary arterial hypertension undergoing operability assessment by acute vasodilator testing: The AIIMS operability score.
Kadiyani L, Saxena A, Ramakrishnan S, et al.
Annals of pediatric cardiology 2026; (19(1)):6-13 doi:10.4103/apc.apc_329_25.
PMID: 42112055 - 18
Correlation of transthoracic echocardiography-derived pulmonary to systemic flow ratio with hemodynamically estimated left to right shunt in atrial septal defects.
Faherty E, Rajagopal H, Lee S, et al.
Annals of pediatric cardiology 2022; (15(1)):20-26 doi:10.4103/apc.apc_139_21.
PMID: 35847407 - 19
Accuracy of Shunt Volume Measured by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients With an Atrial Septal Defect and a Dilated Right Ventricle.
Yanagi Y, Amano M, Tamai Y, et al.
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography 2024; (37(8)):797-805 doi:10.1016/j.echo.2024.04.016.
PMID: 38754748 - 20
Editorial for "Evaluation of Cardiac Shunts With 4D Flow Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Intra- and Interobserver Variability".
Westenberg JJM, Roest AAW, Lamb HJ
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2020; (52(4)):1064-1065 doi:10.1002/jmri.27175.
PMID: 32363692
This page explains echocardiogram terminology for educational purposes. Your cardiologist is the best source for interpreting your specific Qp:Qs ratio and determining the right treatment plan for your heart.
Get notified when new evidence is published on Interatrial communication.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.