How Common Is IgA Nephropathy by Age, Sex, and Ethnicity?
At a Glance
IgA nephropathy is diagnosed in about 25 to 63 people per 100,000 in Western countries, but rates vary widely worldwide. It is reported more often in East Asian populations and in men in many Western countries, while screening, biopsy practices, and access to care strongly affect who is diagnosed.
In this answer
4 sections
IgA nephropathy is one of the most common primary glomerular diseases worldwide [1]. This means it is a disease that begins directly in the kidneys (primary) and specifically affects the glomeruli, which are the tiny filtering units inside the kidneys. In general, studies suggest that between 25 and 63 out of every 100,000 people have been diagnosed with the condition in Western countries [1][2]. It is most frequently diagnosed in adults in their 30s and 40s, though it can occur in childhood or older age [3][4]. In many Western countries, men are diagnosed two to three times more often than women [4]. However, these numbers vary widely across the globe—it is reported much more frequently in East Asian countries and less often in some populations, such as people of African ancestry [5][6]. This variation isn’t just about biology; it is heavily influenced by how different countries screen for and diagnose the disease [7].
Understanding the Numbers
The exact number of people who have IgA nephropathy is hard to pin down. Definitive confirmation usually requires a kidney biopsy—a procedure where a small piece of kidney tissue is removed with a needle and examined under a microscope [8]. A nephrologist evaluates your specific case, including your urine tests and kidney function, and arranges the procedure if it is safe and appropriate. Because many people have mild forms of the disease that cause no obvious symptoms, they may never be tested or biopsied, meaning the true number of people with the condition is likely higher than reported [9].
When researchers look at how many people are diagnosed with the disease (prevalence) or how many new cases are found each year (incidence), the estimates vary significantly depending on where and how the data was collected:
| Region | Estimated Prevalence (per 100,000) | Estimated Annual Incidence (per 100,000) | Data Source & Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe | ~25 to 26 | ~1 | Combined data from national biopsy registries across 10 countries; prevalence is modeled from incidence [1][10]. |
| United States | ~54 to 63 | ~2 | Estimates based on a combination of health insurance claims and pathology records [2][11]. |
| Japan | ~83 | Not provided in survey | Nationwide hospital department survey; uses a different counting method than registry studies [12]. |
These estimates are heavily shaped by local healthcare practices rather than representing a perfect apples-to-apples comparison of true disease risk [13].
Why Does Frequency Vary by Location and Ethnicity?
You may read that IgA nephropathy is most commonly reported in people of East Asian descent, less common in White people (or people of European ancestry), and reported least often in people of African descent [6][5]. While this pattern exists in the data, anyone of any ancestry can develop IgA nephropathy. The reported differences are driven by a mix of both biological and healthcare system factors.
Biological Factors
Research shows that genetic susceptibility plays a role [7]. The genetic markers associated with the risk of developing IgA nephropathy are found most frequently in East Asian populations, moderately in European populations, and least often in African populations [14][15]. However, your ancestry does not determine whether you will get the disease or how your individual condition will behave.
Healthcare System Factors
Differences in healthcare practices are one of the biggest reasons why disease rates vary globally [7].
- Urine Screening Programs: In countries like Japan, routine urine screening for school children and workers is standard [16]. This practice catches many early, mild cases that might go unnoticed in countries without such programs [6]. (The existence of population screening in some countries is not, by itself, a recommendation for everyone to seek it out).
- Biopsy Practices: Because a diagnosis requires a biopsy, countries with different thresholds for when to perform one will report different rates of the disease [6]. In Europe, one analysis found a strong association between a country’s overall kidney biopsy rate and its reported incidence of IgA nephropathy [13].
- Access to Care: Diagnosing the disease requires access to primary care and specialist referral [17]. In areas with limited access to specialized care, or in regions where biopsies are performed less frequently, the disease is likely underdiagnosed [18][19].
Age and Sex Differences
Typical Age at Diagnosis
IgA nephropathy can develop at any age, but it is most frequently diagnosed in early to middle adulthood [3]. In various medical registries, the average age at the time of biopsy is often between 34 and 46 years old [3][20]. The age at which someone is diagnosed is strongly influenced by how they are tested; children may be diagnosed earlier in places with routine pediatric urine checks, while adults may only be identified later when elevated blood pressure (which is often asymptomatic) is noticed or when visible blood appears in the urine (macroscopic hematuria) [4]. Being diagnosed outside of this typical age window is not unusual and does not make your diagnosis any less valid.
Why Are Men Diagnosed More Often?
In the United States and Europe, men are diagnosed with IgA nephropathy two to three times more often than women [4][20]. However, this is not a universal rule. In Japan, where broad screening catches cases regardless of symptoms, the disease is found at nearly equal rates in men and women [12].
This suggests that some of the “male predominance” seen in Western countries might actually reflect differences in how men and women interact with the healthcare system, how severe their symptoms become before seeking care, or different thresholds for doctors recommending a biopsy, rather than a strictly biological difference [21][7].
What This Means for You
Epidemiology—the study of how often diseases occur in different groups—helps scientists understand the big picture, but population statistics do not determine your individual journey.
For your own outlook, your care team will track specific clinical factors, including:
- The amount of protein in your urine (proteinuria) [22].
- Your kidney filtering function (eGFR), and how it changes over time [23].
- Your blood pressure [24].
- Relevant findings from your kidney biopsy, such as the Oxford MEST-C score, which grades the amount of inflammation and scarring in the kidney tissue [25].
Your prognosis is based on these specific, measurable aspects of your health—not your demographic group alone.
Common questions in this guide
How common is IgA nephropathy in Western countries?
Is IgA nephropathy more common in some ethnic groups?
At what age is IgA nephropathy usually diagnosed?
Are men more likely than women to be diagnosed with IgA nephropathy?
Why do reported IgA nephropathy rates differ between countries?
Does my ethnicity, age, or sex determine my prognosis with IgA nephropathy?
Related questions
Show more
Get notified when new evidence is published on Immunoglobulin A nephropathy.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
References
References (25)
- 1
The incidence and prevalence of IgA nephropathy in Europe.
Willey CJ, Coppo R, Schaefer F, et al.
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2023; (38(10)):2340-2349 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad082.
PMID: 37156519 - 2
The incidence and prevalence of immunoglobulin A nephropathy in the United States.
DeCongelio M, Ali SN, Furegato M, et al.
Clinical nephrology 2025; (103(1)):19-25 doi:10.5414/CN111489.
PMID: 39559835 - 3
External Validation of International Risk-Prediction Models of IgA Nephropathy in an Asian-Caucasian Cohort.
Zhang Y, Guo L, Wang Z, et al.
Kidney international reports 2020; (5(10)):1753-1763 doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2020.07.036.
PMID: 33102968 - 4
Clinical validation of immunoglobulin A nephropathy diagnosis in Swedish biopsy registers.
Jarrick S, Lundberg S, Welander A, et al.
Clinical epidemiology 2017; (9()):67-73 doi:10.2147/CLEP.S118730.
PMID: 28203107 - 5
Ethnicity and IgA nephropathy: worldwide differences in epidemiology, timing of diagnosis, clinical manifestations, management and prognosis.
Lee M, Suzuki H, Nihei Y, et al.
Clinical kidney journal 2023; (16(Suppl 2)):ii1-ii8 doi:10.1093/ckj/sfad199.
PMID: 38053973 - 6
Epidemiology of IgA Nephropathy: A Global Perspective.
Schena FP, Nistor I
Seminars in nephrology 2018; (38(5)):435-442 doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.05.013.
PMID: 30177015 - 7
IgA Nephropathy: Epidemiology and Disease Risk Across the World.
Ghaddar M, Canney M, Barbour SJ
Seminars in nephrology 2024; (44(5)):151564 doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2025.151564.
PMID: 40082162 - 8
Current Understanding of Complement Proteins as Therapeutic Targets for the Treatment of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy.
Rajasekaran A, Green TJ, Renfrow MB, et al.
Drugs 2023; (83(16)):1475-1499 doi:10.1007/s40265-023-01940-2.
PMID: 37747686 - 9
Update on immunoglobulin A nephropathy, Part I: Pathophysiology.
Salvadori M, Rosso G
World journal of nephrology 2015; (4(4)):455-67 doi:10.5527/wjn.v4.i4.455.
PMID: 26380197 - 10
IgA nephropathy occurrence, treatment, and prognosis in the last two decades in Denmark.
Ystrøm IK, Jensen SK, Andersen IT, et al.
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2026; (41(8)):1496-1507 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfag021.
PMID: 41649428 - 11
Incidence of Adult Primary Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy among a Racially/Ethnically Diverse Population in the United States.
Sim JJ, Chen Q, Cannizzaro N, et al.
American journal of nephrology 2025; (56(2)):172-177 doi:10.1159/000541869.
PMID: 39496243 - 12
The prevalence of IgA nephropathy in Japan: results from a nationwide survey.
Matsuzaki K, Aoki R, Nakatani S, et al.
Clinical and experimental nephrology 2026; doi:10.1007/s10157-026-02948-0.
PMID: 42801414 - 13
The prevalence of immunoglobulin A nephropathy in the European Union and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: an estimation approach utilizing the kidney biopsy frequency.
Buisker J, Behr S, Kubesch NJ, et al.
Clinical kidney journal 2025; (18(4)):sfaf068 doi:10.1093/ckj/sfaf068.
PMID: 40236511 - 14
New Insights into the Pathogenesis of IgA Nephropathy.
Novak J, Rizk D, Takahashi K, et al.
Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 2015; (1(1)):8-18 doi:10.1159/000382134.
PMID: 26568951 - 15
GWAS-Based Discoveries in IgA Nephropathy, Membranous Nephropathy, and Steroid-Sensitive Nephrotic Syndrome.
Sanchez-Rodriguez E, Southard CT, Kiryluk K
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 2021; (16(3)):458-466 doi:10.2215/CJN.14031119.
PMID: 32680915 - 16
An update on pathology of IgA nephropathy.
Soares MF
Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia 2016; (38(4)):435-440 doi:10.5935/0101-2800.20160069.
PMID: 28001190 - 17
Characteristics of children with IgA nephropathy.
Zhou N, Wang H, Wang XY, et al.
Pediatric research 2023; (93(3)):715-719 doi:10.1038/s41390-022-02080-1.
PMID: 35681087 - 18
Epidemiology of Histologically Proven Glomerulonephritis in Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Okpechi IG, Ameh OI, Bello AK, et al.
PloS one 2016; (11(3)):e0152203 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152203.
PMID: 27011216 - 19
The Origin and Activities of IgA1-Containing Immune Complexes in IgA Nephropathy.
Knoppova B, Reily C, Maillard N, et al.
Frontiers in immunology 2016; (7()):117 doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00117.
PMID: 27148252 - 20
Validation of IgA nephropathy diagnosis in the Swedish Renal Registry.
Rehnberg J, Segelmark M, Ludvigsson JF, Emilsson L
BMC nephrology 2024; (25(1)):78 doi:10.1186/s12882-024-03512-2.
PMID: 38438966 - 21
Distribution of kidney diseases in Joinville, Santa Catarina: analysis of a kidney biopsy data bank between 2008 and 2019.
Lima HDN, Deboni LM, Calice-Silva V, et al.
Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia 2022; (44(3)):358-367 doi:10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2021-0165.
PMID: 35080235 - 22
The Association between Low-Grade Proteinuria and Adverse Kidney Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Yamaguchi Y, Kosugi T, Sasaki T, et al.
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 2026; (21(4)):615-625 doi:10.2215/CJN.0000000952.
PMID: 41385286 - 23
Three-Year Clinical Outcomes of the First South Asian Prospective Longitudinal Observational IgA Nephropathy Cohort.
Alexander S, Varughese S, Franklin R, et al.
Kidney international reports 2022; (7(2)):305-318 doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.11.012.
PMID: 35155869 - 24
Intensive blood pressure control and the progression of IgA nephropathy: a cohort study using marginal structural models.
Tang C, Chen P, Si FL, et al.
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2023; (39(1)):55-63 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad139.
PMID: 37391382 - 25
Evaluating a New International Risk-Prediction Tool in IgA Nephropathy.
Barbour SJ, Coppo R, Zhang H, et al.
JAMA internal medicine 2019; (179(7)):942-952 doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0600.
PMID: 30980653
This page explains how often IgA nephropathy is reported in different populations for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your nephrologist should interpret your kidney tests and biopsy findings in the context of your individual health.