Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 20 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Nephrology · IgA Nephropathy

What Do MEST-C Biopsy Scores Mean in IgA Nephropathy?

At a Glance

MEST-C is a five-part kidney biopsy profile—not a single score or disease stage—that describes tissue changes in IgA nephropathy. Its thresholds help show active injury and chronic scarring, but doctors must interpret it with eGFR, urine protein, and biopsy quality.

When you are diagnosed with IgA nephropathy, your kidney biopsy report may include a MEST-C score (sometimes called the Oxford Classification) [1]. This scoring system grades five specific types of tissue changes found in your kidney filters (glomeruli) and surrounding structures [1]. It provides your care team with a standardized way to describe the tissue damage. While some of these lesions reflect more active injury and others reflect chronic scarring, the score cannot determine reversibility or guarantee a response to specific treatments by itself [2][3].

Importantly, the MEST-C score is not a single total number that you add up (like a grade out of 10), nor is it a disease stage. Instead, it is a profile of five separate categories. For example, a report might read M0 E1 S1 T0 C0, which provides a descriptive snapshot of your kidney tissue.

Decoding the MEST-C Thresholds

Each letter in the MEST-C acronym represents a different type of structural change. The numbers (0, 1, or 2) indicate the presence or extent of that specific change [4][5].

M: Mesangial Hypercellularity

The mesangium is the central stalk that supports your kidney’s filtering capillaries. Mesangial hypercellularity means there are too many cells crowding this supporting area [6]. This extra cell growth is associated with a faster decline in kidney function in long-term studies [3].

  • M0: Half or less (≤0.5) of the glomeruli have this extra cell crowding [4].
  • M1: More than half (>0.5) of the glomeruli show this extra cell crowding [4].

E: Endocapillary Hypercellularity

Endocapillary hypercellularity occurs when extra cells build up inside the capillary loops (the tiny blood vessels in the filters), narrowing the spaces where blood normally flows [7]. This finding may prompt discussions about active disease, but it does not independently dictate therapy [5][7].

  • E0: Absent (no extra cells inside the capillary loops) [5].
  • E1: Present (extra cells are narrowing the capillary loops in at least some glomeruli) [5].

S: Segmental Sclerosis or Adhesion

Segmental sclerosis refers to localized scarring that affects only a part (segment) of a kidney filter, while an adhesion is an abnormal attachment of the filter to its surrounding capsule [8]. These findings are grouped together because both indicate areas of permanent damage rather than active inflammation [3].

  • S0: Absent (neither segmental scarring nor adhesions are seen) [5].
  • S1: Present (segmental scarring or an adhesion is present in at least one glomerulus) [5].

T: Tubular Atrophy and Interstitial Fibrosis

This measures damage to the kidney tubules (which help balance your body’s fluids) and the surrounding structural tissue. Tubular atrophy refers to the shrinking of these tubes, and interstitial fibrosis is the chronic scarring that replaces healthy tissue [9]. The T score is consistently one of the strongest predictors of long-term kidney survival [9][3]. It is measured as a percentage of the cortical tissue (the outer layer of the kidney).

  • T0: 25% or less (≤25%) of the cortical tissue is affected by scarring or atrophy [10].
  • T1: More than 25% up to 50% (>25% to ≤50%) of the tissue is affected [4][10].
  • T2: More than 50% (>50%) of the tissue is scarred or atrophied, indicating significant chronic damage [4].

C: Cellular or Fibrocellular Crescents

Crescents are moon-shaped collections of cells that form in the space surrounding the kidney filters following glomerular injury [11]. They can be cellular (mostly active inflammatory cells) or fibrocellular (a mix of cells and fibrous scar tissue) [11]. They were added to the original MEST score in 2016 [11][1].

  • C0: No crescents present [11].
  • C1: Crescents are found in less than 25% of the glomeruli [11].
  • C2: Crescents are found in 25% or more of the glomeruli [11].

While higher crescent scores (C1 or C2) are associated with a higher risk of poor kidney outcomes in studies, they do not by themselves diagnose an emergency or dictate specific treatments [2][11].

The Impact of Biopsy Specimen Quality

The accuracy of your MEST-C score depends heavily on the quality and size of the biopsy sample [12]. Pathologists generally state that the tissue sample should contain a minimum of 8 glomeruli to apply the Oxford Classification [12][1]. However, having 8 glomeruli does not guarantee perfect reliability; even an adequate sample can miss localized, focal damage [12].

Interpreting kidney biopsies also requires human judgment. Studies show that when multiple pathologists look at the same biopsy, they sometimes disagree on the scoring—particularly for the M, E, and C categories—especially if the damage affects only a small percentage of the tissue [13].

Not a Standalone Prescription

While scores like T1/T2, S1, and C1/C2 are associated with a higher risk of kidney function decline, the MEST-C score is never used in a vacuum [4][14]. Your doctor will combine these microscopic findings with your clinical signs, such as how much protein is in your urine (proteinuria) and how well your kidneys are filtering waste (estimated glomerular filtration rate, or eGFR) [15][16].

Optimized supportive care—such as strict blood pressure control and medications that protect the kidneys—is the foundation of treatment for everyone with IgA nephropathy [17][18]. A specific MEST-C profile does not automatically mean you will benefit from immunosuppressive medications (drugs that calm the immune system, like steroids) [19][20]. Treatment decisions always require a full view of your clinical risk profile, not just your biopsy report [18].

Common questions in this guide

Is the MEST-C score a single number or a kidney disease stage?
No. MEST-C is a five-part profile, not a total score out of 10 or a disease stage. The letters describe mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary hypercellularity, segmental sclerosis or adhesion, tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis, and crescents.
What do the 0, 1, and 2 values mean in a MEST-C report?
The numbers show whether a specific biopsy finding is absent, present, or more extensive. M and E use 0 or 1, S uses 0 or 1, T ranges from 0 to 2 based on the percentage of kidney cortex affected, and C ranges from 0 to 2 based on the percentage of glomeruli with crescents.
What do M0 or M1, E0 or E1, and S0 or S1 mean?
M0 means half or fewer glomeruli have excess mesangial cells, while M1 means more than half do. E0 means no extra cells are narrowing the capillary loops and E1 means this finding is present; S0 means no segmental scar or adhesion is seen, and S1 means one is present in at least one glomerulus.
How are the T and C thresholds defined?
T0 means 25% or less of the kidney cortex has tubular atrophy or scarring, T1 means more than 25% up to 50%, and T2 means more than 50%. C0 means no crescents, C1 means crescents in fewer than 25% of glomeruli, and C2 means crescents in 25% or more.
Does a higher MEST-C result mean my kidneys will get worse?
Some findings, especially T1 or T2, S1, and C1 or C2, are linked with a higher risk of kidney function decline in studies. The profile cannot predict your individual outcome by itself, so clinicians also consider eGFR, urine protein, biopsy quality, and other clinical information.
How does the biopsy sample affect my MEST-C result?
Pathologists generally look for at least eight glomeruli to apply the Oxford Classification, but even that amount may miss damage limited to a small area. Different pathologists may also score M, E, and C differently, especially when changes are subtle.
Does my MEST-C profile determine whether I need steroids?
No. A MEST-C profile does not automatically call for immune-suppressing medicines such as steroids. Treatment is based on your overall risk and usually starts with supportive care, including blood pressure control and medicines that protect kidney function.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Immunoglobulin A nephropathy.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (20)
  1. 1

    Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy 2016: an update from the IgA Nephropathy Classification Working Group.

    Trimarchi H, Barratt J, Cattran DC, et al.

    Kidney international 2017; (91(5)):1014-1021 doi:10.1016/j.kint.2017.02.003.

    PMID: 28341274
  2. 2

    Validation study of Oxford Classification of IgA Nephropathy: the significance of extracapillary hypercellularity and mesangial IgG immunostaining.

    Ştefan G, Ismail G, Stancu S, et al.

    Pathology international 2016; (66(8)):453-9 doi:10.1111/pin.12442.

    PMID: 27439692
  3. 3

    Is there long-term value of pathology scoring in immunoglobulin A nephropathy? A validation study of the Oxford Classification for IgA Nephropathy (VALIGA) update.

    Coppo R, D'Arrigo G, Tripepi G, et al.

    Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2020; (35(6)):1002-1009 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy302.

    PMID: 30418652
  4. 4

    The Association of the Oxford Classification Score with Longitudinal Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline in Patients with Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Mixed-Method Study.

    Xu R, Li Z, Cao T, et al.

    International journal of general medicine 2021; (14()):2655-2663 doi:10.2147/IJGM.S313333.

    PMID: 34177274
  5. 5

    [The value of T1 mapping in the non-invasive assessment of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy].

    Li CB, Chen P, Zhou SP, et al.

    Zhonghua nei ke za zhi 2025; (64(10)):954-962 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20250523-00302.

    PMID: 41083389
  6. 6

    The role of the mesangium in glomerular function.

    Boi R, Ebefors K, Nyström J

    Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) 2023; (239(2)):e14045 doi:10.1111/apha.14045.

    PMID: 37658606
  7. 7

    Relationship between renal CD68+ infiltrates and the Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy.

    Soares MF, Genitsch V, Chakera A, et al.

    Histopathology 2019; (74(4)):629-637 doi:10.1111/his.13768.

    PMID: 30303541
  8. 8

    Aberrant Blood Vessel Formation Connecting the Glomerular Capillary Tuft and the Interstitium Is a Characteristic Feature of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis-like IgA Nephropathy.

    Lim BJ, Kim MJ, Hong SW, Jeong HJ

    Journal of pathology and translational medicine 2016; (50(3)):211-6 doi:10.4132/jptm.2016.02.01.

    PMID: 27068024
  9. 9

    IgA nephropathy: an update.

    Soares MF, Roberts IS

    Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension 2017; (26(3)):165-171 doi:10.1097/MNH.0000000000000312.

    PMID: 28221174
  10. 10

    The correlation analysis between the Oxford classification of Chinese IgA nephropathy children and renal outcome - a retrospective cohort study.

    Wu H, Xia Z, Gao C, et al.

    BMC nephrology 2020; (21(1)):247 doi:10.1186/s12882-020-01913-7.

    PMID: 32611399
  11. 11

    A Multicenter Study of the Predictive Value of Crescents in IgA Nephropathy.

    Haas M, Verhave JC, Liu ZH, et al.

    Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN 2017; (28(2)):691-701 doi:10.1681/ASN.2016040433.

    PMID: 27612994
  12. 12

    Histological classification of Japanese IgA nephropathy with a small number of glomeruli using Bayes' theorem.

    Nakata T, Tanigawa M, Fukuda A, Shibata H

    Scientific reports 2023; (13(1)):18663 doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45734-8.

    PMID: 37907505
  13. 13

    Reproducibility of the Oxford classification of immunoglobulin A nephropathy, impact of biopsy scoring on treatment allocation and clinical relevance of disagreements: evidence from the VALidation of IGA study cohort.

    Bellur SS, Roberts ISD, Troyanov S, et al.

    Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association 2019; (34(10)):1681-1690 doi:10.1093/ndt/gfy337.

    PMID: 30561721
  14. 14

    Clinical Significance of Crescent Formation in IgA Nephropathy - a Multicenter Validation Study.

    Park S, Baek CH, Park SK, et al.

    Kidney & blood pressure research 2019; (44(1)):22-32 doi:10.1159/000497808.

    PMID: 30808840
  15. 15

    The MEST score provides earlier risk prediction in lgA nephropathy.

    Barbour SJ, Espino-Hernandez G, Reich HN, et al.

    Kidney international 2016; (89(1)):167-75.

    PMID: 26759049
  16. 16

    The epidemiology and evolution of IgA nephropathy over two decades: A single centre experience.

    Storrar J, Chinnadurai R, Sinha S, Kalra PA

    PloS one 2022; (17(9)):e0268421 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268421.

    PMID: 36048745
  17. 17

    An update on predicting renal progression in IgA nephropathy.

    Barbour S, Reich H

    Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension 2018; (27(3)):214-220 doi:10.1097/MNH.0000000000000405.

    PMID: 29432215
  18. 18

    IgA Nephropathy: Mechanisms, Risk Stratification, and Precision Therapy.

    Alobaidi S

    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) 2026; (16(9)) doi:10.3390/diagnostics16091259.

    PMID: 42121963
  19. 19

    Guiding immunotherapy based on the oxford classification activity score in IgA nephropathy.

    Nong J, Tang Y, Yang J, et al.

    Frontiers in endocrinology 2026; (17()):1873181 doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1873181.

    PMID: 42416908
  20. 20

    Clinical usefulness of the Oxford classification in determining immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy.

    Yoon CY, Chang TI, Kang EW, et al.

    Annals of medicine 2017; (49(3)):217-229 doi:10.1080/07853890.2016.1252058.

    PMID: 27764976

This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. A nephrologist and pathologist should interpret your MEST-C profile alongside your eGFR, urine protein, biopsy quality, and overall clinical picture.