Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 17 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

How Do BCR::ABL1 Transcripts Affect CML Monitoring?

At a Glance

Your BCR::ABL1 transcript determines whether standardized International Scale PCR can monitor CML accurately. Common e13a2 and e14a2 usually use standard testing, while rare e1a2, e6a2, and e19a2 require a transcript-specific assay and individualized response tracking.

The specific type of BCR::ABL1 transcript you have—such as the common e13a2 and e14a2, or the rarer e1a2, e6a2, and e19a2—directly determines how your molecular tests must be designed and monitored [1]. Standard tests are built for the common transcripts, meaning patients with rare transcripts need customized testing to avoid false-negative results [2]. An “undetectable” result on an assay not designed for your specific transcript could give a false sense of security, so it is critical that your care team uses the right test [3].

Understanding Common vs. Rare Transcripts

In Philadelphia-chromosome positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), pieces of the BCR and ABL1 genes break and fuse together. The exact spot where they join can vary. This creates different versions of the fusion gene called transcripts. For example, the name “e13a2” (also known as b2a2) simply means that exon 13 of the BCR gene fused to exon 2 of the ABL1 gene.

Your exact transcript is identified at diagnosis. This is commonly done by identifying the Philadelphia chromosome through cytogenetics or FISH, followed by multiplex RT-PCR, and sometimes sequencing the gene to map out the exact fusion junction [3][2].

  • The Common Transcripts (e13a2 and e14a2, or b2a2 and b3a2): The vast majority of people with CML have these forms. Standard PCR tests are specifically designed to look for them [1].
  • The Rare (Atypical) Transcripts (e1a2, e6a2, e19a2): A small percentage of people have atypical junctions. Because routine screening tests are not designed to catch them, these rare transcripts can be missed [2].

How Your Transcript Affects Your Testing

Your transcript type dictates how your laboratory tracks your disease burden over time using RT-qPCR (quantitative polymerase chain reaction), a test that measures the amount of leukemia RNA in your blood.

Testing for Common Transcripts

If you have e13a2 or e14a2, your PCR results can generally be reported on the International Scale (IS), provided your testing is done by a suitably standardized laboratory [4]. The International Scale standardizes results across different laboratories so your doctor can apply standard clinical milestones [5].

For example, a Major Molecular Response (MMR) on the International Scale is defined as a BCR::ABL1 level of 0.1% or less [6]. Achieving these milestones guides your targeted therapy, usually involving a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Typically, testing occurs every 3 months initially, then every 3-6 months once milestones are met.

The test relies on comparing your leukemia cells to a reference or control gene (like ABL1 or GUSB) [7]. The control gene ensures the sample quality is adequate and the test was sensitive enough to detect microscopic amounts of disease [4].

Testing for Rare Transcripts

If you have an atypical transcript (like e1a2, e6a2, or e19a2), your results generally cannot be reported on the International Scale because the IS is not validated for these forms [1]. Standard IS milestones like “0.1% MMR” do not apply.

Instead, laboratories must use customized, validated PCR primers or specialized techniques like digital PCR (ddPCR) designed specifically for your exact fusion [8]. Rather than using an international standard, your doctor will track how much your leukemia levels have dropped compared to a reliable baseline from before your treatment started. You might hear this referred to as a “log reduction” (a mathematical way of measuring a large drop) or an individualized response [1][9].

Feature Common Transcripts (e13a2, e14a2) Rare Transcripts (e.g., e1a2, e6a2, e19a2)
Testing Standard Standardized RT-qPCR Customized RT-qPCR or ddPCR
Reporting Scale International Scale (IS) Patient-specific change from baseline
Milestones Standard (e.g., 0.1% MMR) Individualized (e.g., specific log reduction)

The Importance of Consistency

Fluctuating PCR numbers can be stressful, but small changes can simply reflect normal biological variation or laboratory differences rather than your leukemia getting worse [3]. Because of this, it is highly recommended to use the same laboratory consistently [9]. If you must change laboratories, provide the new lab with your original transcript details and ask if their method is comparable to your previous one. Also, never stop or change your medication based on a single PCR result without discussing it with your doctor.

Do Transcripts Affect Prognosis?

Different transcripts have been associated with slight differences in how the disease behaves, though these are just general, observational trends and not strict rules for any individual patient. Your actual response to treatment over time is far more informative than your transcript type.

  • e14a2 vs e13a2: Some observational studies have shown that patients with the e14a2 transcript often achieve faster and deeper molecular responses than those with e13a2 [10]. e14a2 is also associated with a higher likelihood of maintaining a Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) [10][11]. However, TFR depends on maintaining a very deep molecular response for a long time, alongside strict clinical criteria. Your transcript type alone does not determine if you can safely stop your TKI. Furthermore, large studies show no significant long-term survival differences between e14a2 and e13a2 [12][13].
  • Rare Transcripts (e1a2, e6a2, e19a2): The data on atypical transcripts is of lower certainty, coming mostly from small retrospective studies and case reports [14]. Some small studies suggest e1a2 and e19a2 might have lower TKI response rates, and e6a2 has occasionally been linked to more aggressive disease presentations [15][14]. However, there are also reports of patients with rare transcripts achieving excellent, deep responses to modern TKIs [16][17]. An atypical transcript does not by itself determine a poor outcome or dictate that you need a specific TKI.

Common questions in this guide

What is a BCR::ABL1 transcript in CML?
A BCR::ABL1 transcript is the specific genetic message made when parts of the BCR and ABL1 genes join. The exon junction is named with labels such as e13a2 or e14a2 and is identified when CML is diagnosed. Knowing the exact transcript helps the laboratory choose a test that can detect it.
Why do rare e1a2, e6a2, and e19a2 transcripts need a different CML test?
Routine PCR tests are designed for the common e13a2 and e14a2 transcripts and may miss atypical transcripts. A laboratory should use validated primers or digital PCR designed for the exact fusion. Otherwise, an undetectable result could be falsely reassuring.
Can CML results for rare transcripts be reported on the International Scale?
Usually not, because the International Scale has not been validated for rare BCR::ABL1 transcripts. Instead, the laboratory tracks the change from your pretreatment level, often using a log reduction or another individualized response measure. Your doctor sets milestones based on that baseline.
How often should BCR::ABL1 PCR testing be done for CML?
For common transcripts, testing is typically performed every three months early in treatment and every three to six months after treatment milestones are reached. Rare transcripts may require an individualized schedule based on the assay and your response. Follow the monitoring plan set by your CML care team.
Does my BCR::ABL1 transcript determine my CML prognosis?
Not by itself. Some studies associate e14a2 with faster or deeper responses than e13a2, but long-term survival differences have not been consistently shown, and patients with rare transcripts can also respond very well. Your response over time is more informative than the transcript alone.
Should I use the same laboratory for every CML PCR test?
Using the same laboratory and method makes results easier to compare because small changes can reflect laboratory or normal biological variation. If you change laboratories, provide your exact transcript details and earlier results so the new test can be compared appropriately. Do not stop or change a TKI based on one PCR result without speaking with your doctor.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Philadelphia-positive myelogenous leukemia.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (17)
  1. 1

    Assessment of individual molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with atypical BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts: recommendations by the EUTOS cooperative network.

    Schäfer V, White HE, Gerrard G, et al.

    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2021; (147(10)):3081-3089 doi:10.1007/s00432-021-03569-8.

    PMID: 33677711
  2. 2

    Characterization of a novel variant BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia: Implications for molecular monitoring.

    Crampe M, Haslam K, Kelly J, et al.

    Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy 2017; (10(2)):85-88 doi:10.1016/j.hemonc.2016.02.002.

    PMID: 27013275
  3. 3

    Results of the European survey on the assessment of deep molecular response in chronic phase CML patients during tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (EUREKA registry).

    Möbius S, Schenk T, Himsel D, et al.

    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2019; (145(6)):1645-1650 doi:10.1007/s00432-019-02910-6.

    PMID: 30941573
  4. 4

    Molecular monitoring of chronic myeloid leukemia: principles and interlaboratory standardization.

    Cross NC, Hochhaus A, Müller MC

    Annals of hematology 2015; (94 Suppl 2()):S219-25 doi:10.1007/s00277-015-2315-1.

    PMID: 25814088
  5. 5

    Laboratory recommendations for scoring deep molecular responses following treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia.

    Cross NC, White HE, Colomer D, et al.

    Leukemia 2015; (29(5)):999-1003 doi:10.1038/leu.2015.29.

    PMID: 25652737
  6. 6

    A new highly sensitive real-time quantitative-PCR method for detection of BCR-ABL1 to monitor minimal residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia after discontinuation of imatinib.

    Kitamura H, Tabe Y, Ai T, et al.

    PloS one 2019; (14(3)):e0207170 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207170.

    PMID: 30835732
  7. 7

    Reverse Transcription Can Critically Impact the Diagnostic Outcome of BCR::ABL1 Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR.

    Spiess B, Kleiner H, Tarnopolscaia I, et al.

    Cancers 2023; (15(15)) doi:10.3390/cancers15153914.

    PMID: 37568730
  8. 8

    Novel Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR Assays to Monitor Minimal Residual Disease in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Showing Atypical BCR-ABL1 Transcripts.

    Petiti J, Lo Iacono M, Dragani M, et al.

    Journal of clinical medicine 2020; (9(5)) doi:10.3390/jcm9051457.

    PMID: 32414125
  9. 9

    Navigating Challenges in Monitoring Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Multiple BCR-ABL1 Transcripts.

    Smith BM, Brewer D, Druker BJ, Braun TP

    Case reports in oncology 2021; (14(3)):1707-1711 doi:10.1159/000520400.

    PMID: 35082629
  10. 10

    Impact of BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type on Outcome in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Pairwise and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

    Chen K, Ruan Y, Tian K, et al.

    Frontiers in oncology 2022; (12()):841546 doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.841546.

    PMID: 35223524
  11. 11

    The e13a2 BCR-ABL transcript negatively affects sustained deep molecular response and the achievement of treatment-free remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who receive tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

    D'Adda M, Farina M, Schieppati F, et al.

    Cancer 2019; (125(10)):1674-1682 doi:10.1002/cncr.31977.

    PMID: 30707758
  12. 12

    No influence of BCR-ABL1 transcript types e13a2 and e14a2 on long-term survival: results in 1494 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib.

    Pfirrmann M, Evtimova D, Saussele S, et al.

    Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology 2017; (143(5)):843-850 doi:10.1007/s00432-016-2321-2.

    PMID: 28083711
  13. 13

    Comparison of molecular responses and outcomes between BCR::ABL1 e14a2 and e13a2 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia.

    Su YJ, Kuo MC, Chen TY, et al.

    Cancer science 2022; (113(10)):3518-3527 doi:10.1111/cas.15501.

    PMID: 35869805
  14. 14

    Clinical features and treatment response to TKIs in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with atypical BCR::ABL1 transcripts.

    Wang H, Han C, Gong B, et al.

    Leukemia research 2025; (155()):107733 doi:10.1016/j.leukres.2025.107733.

    PMID: 40482586
  15. 15

    Prevalence and outcomes of uncommon BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: data from a single centre.

    Qin YZ, Jiang Q, Jiang H, et al.

    British journal of haematology 2018; (182(5)):693-700 doi:10.1111/bjh.15453.

    PMID: 29974949
  16. 16

    Molecular response of a patient with e19a2-positive chronic myeloid leukemia to flumatinib: a case report and literature review.

    Feng Y, Wang H, Zhang L, et al.

    Frontiers in medicine 2025; (12()):1515002 doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1515002.

    PMID: 40166069
  17. 17

    [Chronic myeloid leukemia with e6a2 fusion gene: a case report and literature review].

    Li JJ, Yue LL, Zeng PY, et al.

    Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi 2024; (45(3)):299-302 doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20230930-00156.

    PMID: 38716604

This page is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your hematology team should interpret your BCR::ABL1 results and guide any CML treatment decisions.