What Are the WHO, ICC, and ELN CML Phase Definitions?
At a Glance
WHO, ICC, and ELN use different phase rules for Philadelphia-positive CML: WHO recognizes chronic and blast phases, while ICC and ELN retain an accelerated phase. WHO and ICC use 20% blasts for blast phase; ELN uses 30%, and confirmed blast tumors outside the marrow qualify in all three systems.
In this answer
5 sections
When you are diagnosed with Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), your doctor will determine the “phase” of your disease. However, medical experts use three different classification systems to define these phases: the World Health Organization (WHO) 5th edition, the International Consensus Classification (ICC), and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN). The main difference between these systems is how they define the accelerated phase and the exact percentage of leukemia cells (blasts) required to diagnose the blast phase [1][2]. Because these guidelines place the boundaries at different percentages, a patient might be classified as being in the accelerated phase under one system, but in the chronic or blast phase under another [1][2].
Why Are There Different Systems?
The three systems were created for slightly different purposes, which explains why their definitions differ:
- WHO (5th Edition, 2022): This is a pathology and disease classification system. It focuses heavily on the biology of the leukemia cells and recently shifted to a simplified framework [3].
- ELN (2020): This is a clinical management framework designed by leukemia specialists to guide treatment decisions based on how the disease behaves in a patient over time [4].
- ICC (2022): This system attempts to bridge the gap between strict pathology rules and clinical treatment guidelines [5].
The Accelerated Phase Debate
Traditionally, CML has been divided into three phases: chronic, accelerated, and blast. Today, the systems disagree on whether the accelerated phase is still a useful label:
- WHO completely eliminated the accelerated phase in its 2022 update [3][1]. Instead of grouping patients with 10-19% blasts into an accelerated category, the WHO classifies them as being in the chronic phase but requires doctors to document high-risk features so that the patient’s individual risk can be assessed [3][1]. The WHO now recognizes only two phases: chronic and blast [1].
- ICC retains the accelerated phase, defining it primarily by a blast count of 10% to 19% in the blood or bone marrow [5][2].
- ELN also retains the traditional accelerated phase, but sets the threshold slightly higher, requiring 15% to 29% blasts [2][4].
Defining the Blast Phase
The blast phase (often called blast crisis) is the most advanced stage of CML, where immature leukemia cells rapidly multiply.
- Blast Thresholds: Both the WHO and the ICC define the blast phase as having 20% or more blasts in the blood or bone marrow [2][1]. The ELN guidelines, however, use a higher threshold of 30% or more blasts [4][2].
- Extramedullary Disease: All three systems agree that if there is a confirmed proliferation of blasts forming tumors outside of the bone marrow (such as in the skin or lymph nodes)—a condition known as extramedullary blast proliferation—the disease is classified as blast phase, regardless of the blast percentage in the marrow itself [6][4][3]. Note that this requires a confirmed blast tumor, not just an enlarged spleen.
Other Signs of Advanced Disease
In addition to counting blasts, the ICC and ELN systems use other markers to identify accelerated or advanced disease [2][4]:
- Basophils: Having 20% or more basophils (a specific type of white blood cell) in the blood is considered a sign of accelerated phase under both ICC and ELN [2][4].
- Platelets: Persistent platelet counts that are abnormally low (under 100,000) and not caused by treatment, or persistently high (over 1,000,000) and unresponsive to treatment, are criteria for the accelerated phase in both the ICC and ELN frameworks [2][4].
- Additional Chromosome Changes (ACAs): As CML progresses, the leukemia cells can acquire extra chromosomal abnormalities (cytogenetic changes) alongside the original Philadelphia chromosome—a process called clonal evolution [7][4]. This is different from a gene mutation. The ICC and ELN use the presence of clonal evolution (acquiring these ACAs) as a criterion for the accelerated phase [5][4]. High-risk ACAs (such as an extra chromosome 8, a second Philadelphia chromosome, or a complex karyotype) are warning signs of aggressive disease [7][4].
What This Means for Your Care
If your blast count falls in the “gray zone” between definitions, the label you receive will depend on the system your clinic uses. For example, assuming no other advanced features (like platelet issues or ACAs) are present:
- A patient with 12% blasts is in the accelerated phase under ICC, but in the chronic phase under ELN. The WHO would classify this as chronic phase, while noting the 12% blasts for risk assessment [2][1][3].
- A patient with 25% blasts is in the blast phase under WHO and ICC, but still in the accelerated phase under ELN [2][4][1].
| Feature | WHO (5th Edition, 2022) | ICC (2022) | ELN (2020) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accelerated Phase | Not used (Uses 2 phases) | Retained (10-19% blasts, etc.) | Retained (15-29% blasts, etc.) |
| Blast Phase Threshold | |||
| Extramedullary Blasts | Defines Blast Phase | Defines Blast Phase | Defines Blast Phase |
| (Note: This table is a simplified educational summary. Clinicians look at multiple factors beyond just blast percentages). |
While phase labels are important for determining prognosis, urgency, and clinical trial eligibility, the label alone does not dictate your entire care plan [1]. Your treatment is heavily guided by the biological behavior of your disease—such as specific cytogenetic findings, whether you have BCR::ABL1 mutations, and how well you respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) [1][8]. Because these phase labels can be confusing, clinicians are encouraged to clearly document your exact blast percentage, basophil count, cytogenetic changes, and treatment response [1][9]. High-risk or progressing disease requires urgent expert review and an adjusted treatment strategy, which may include combination therapy or preparing for a stem cell transplant, regardless of the classification system used [4][1].
Common questions in this guide
Why do WHO, ICC, and ELN give different CML phase labels?
Does the WHO still recognize an accelerated phase of CML?
What blast percentage defines blast-phase Philadelphia-positive CML?
When does CML meet accelerated-phase criteria?
Can my CML phase change depending on which classification system is used?
Does my CML phase label determine my treatment?
Appointments are short. Make every minute count.
Specialist visits move fast. Let us help you prep so your time goes to what matters.
About phase definitions
Which phase system does my clinic use to assign my label?
Blast phase thresholds
How many blasts would count as blast phase under each system?
Advanced disease markers
Would my platelet counts or basophil levels change my phase label?
Related questions
Show more
Get notified when new evidence is published on Philadelphia-positive myelogenous leukemia.
We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.
References
References (9)
- 1
Advanced-Stage Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Options for Difficult Treatment Situations.
Atallah E, Deininger M
Drugs 2025; (85(1)):41-50 doi:10.1007/s40265-024-02108-2.
PMID: 39638957 - 2
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Review.
Jabbour E, Kantarjian H
JAMA 2025; (333(18)):1618-1629 doi:10.1001/jama.2025.0220.
PMID: 40094679 - 3
The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms.
Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, et al.
Leukemia 2022; (36(7)):1703-1719 doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1.
PMID: 35732831 - 4
European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia.
Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, et al.
Leukemia 2020; (34(4)):966-984 doi:10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2.
PMID: 32127639 - 5
International Consensus Classification of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms: myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Gianelli U, Thiele J, Orazi A, et al.
Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology 2023; (482(1)):53-68 doi:10.1007/s00428-022-03480-8.
PMID: 36580136 - 6
Extramedullary T-Lymphoblastic Blast Crisis in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia: A Unique Cytologic Diagnosis Confirmed by Flow Cytometry.
Radhakrishnan A, Mallik N, Malhotra P, Gupta P
Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology 2026; (37(6)):662-666 doi:10.1111/cyt.70126.
PMID: 42706638 - 7
High-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities at low blast counts herald death by CML.
Hehlmann R, Voskanyan A, Lauseker M, et al.
Leukemia 2020; (34(8)):2074-2086 doi:10.1038/s41375-020-0826-9.
PMID: 32382082 - 8
Pathogenesis and management of accelerated and blast phases of chronic myeloid leukemia.
Senapati J, Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Short NJ
Leukemia 2023; (37(1)):5-17 doi:10.1038/s41375-022-01736-5.
PMID: 36309558 - 9
Accelerated-phase CML: de novo and transformed.
Shanmuganathan N, Hughes TP
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program 2023; (2023(1)):459-468 doi:10.1182/hematology.2023000446.
PMID: 38066863
This page explains WHO, ICC, and ELN phase definitions for Philadelphia-positive CML for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Your hematologist or oncologist should interpret your results and treatment options.