Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 7 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Neurology

What Is the mFARS Rating Scale in Friedreich Ataxia?

At a Glance

The mFARS is a clinician-administered exam that tracks selected neurological effects of Friedreich ataxia, including speech, basic swallowing, arm and leg coordination, and balance. Higher scores indicate more impairment in the tested functions, but the scale does not measure the whole disease.

The modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) is a standardized, clinician-administered neurological examination used to measure specific physical effects of Friedreich ataxia (FA). It is a streamlined version of the older, original FARS test [1].

By testing certain physical movements during your appointments, your care team can track changes in your neurological function [2]. However, it is important to know that the mFARS is just one tool used alongside your own self-reported symptoms and other medical tests. It measures selected neurological functions, not how FA affects your entire body, and should not be used alone to judge your overall health or treatment response.

What Does the mFARS Measure?

The exam is broken down into four main categories, called subscores, that evaluate specific nerve and muscle functions [1]:

  • Bulbar function: This is a brief rating of your facial and throat muscles, testing speech clarity and basic swallowing ability [1]. Note: This is not a comprehensive swallow safety study. If you have coughing during meals, choking, or a wet-sounding voice, tell your doctor—you may need a formal swallowing assessment by a specialist.
  • Upper limb coordination: This tests how well you can control your arms and hands, usually through tasks like touching your finger to your nose or rapidly moving your hands [1].
  • Lower limb coordination: This tests your ability to control your legs and feet, such as sliding your heel down your opposite shin [1].
  • Upright stability: This evaluates your functional postural control and balance—such as sitting, standing stance, and gait-related tasks [3].

(To make the overall scale more focused, the mFARS omits the peripheral nervous system subscore and specific bulbar items that were included in the complete FARS test [1]).

What the mFARS Does Not Measure

The mFARS provides a specific neurological snapshot, but it does not capture the full impact of FA. A stable mFARS score does not mean that everything is stable. The mFARS does not measure:

  • Heart disease (cardiomyopathy) or arrhythmias
  • Diabetes or blood sugar levels
  • Curvature of the spine (scoliosis)
  • Vision or hearing problems
  • Fatigue, pain, mood, or cognitive changes
  • How the disease impacts your daily quality of life

Understanding Your Score

In the mFARS scoring system, a higher number indicates greater neurological impairment in the tested areas [1][2].

  • Group averages versus you: In one matched natural-history cohort study, scores worsened by an average of about 2.2 points per year over a three-year period [4]. However, this is a group average, not a personal forecast. Your individual progression depends heavily on your age of onset, how long you have had FA, and your overall disease severity [3][5].
  • Walking and balance: For patients who are still able to walk (ambulatory), the upright stability portion of the test is often the main driver of any decline seen in the total score [3].
  • Measurement variability: Your score can fluctuate for reasons unrelated to disease progression. Fatigue, a recent illness, different examiners, or even the time of day can alter your performance.
  • The “practice effect”: If you take the test frequently, your scores in arm and leg coordination might actually improve simply because you are practicing the specific movements [6]. Because of this, clinicians look for long-term trends rather than over-analyzing a single minor change [6].

Safety and What to Expect During the Test

Because the examination includes balance and walking tasks, safety is the top priority. The exam should be supervised by your clinician. Always report recent falls, dizziness, pain, unusual fatigue, or if you use a cane, walker, or wheelchair. The examiner can adapt or stop tasks based on your abilities. Never push yourself to attempt an unsafe movement just to get a better score.

Why Might Your Care Team Repeat the mFARS?

Testing frequency varies by clinician, disease stage, and whether you are in a clinical trial. Neurologists may repeat this examination for a few reasons:

  1. Informing your care: It helps your care team understand which specific physical abilities are changing. This information—alongside your daily experiences—can help guide decisions about physical therapy, mobility aids, or daily routines.
  2. Tracking outcomes in clinical trials: The mFARS is a commonly used and validated clinical outcome measure in FA research. For example, in the MOXIe randomized trial for the medication omaveloxolone, the mFARS was used as a primary endpoint to measure the difference in neurological function between the treatment group and the placebo group over 48 weeks [7].

Common questions in this guide

What is the modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS)?
The mFARS is a standardized examination performed by a trained clinician to track selected physical effects of Friedreich ataxia. It looks at speech and basic swallowing, arm and leg coordination, and sitting, standing, and walking-related balance. It is one part of monitoring and does not show how FA affects the whole body.
What does a higher mFARS score mean?
A higher mFARS score indicates greater neurological impairment in the functions tested by the scale. It does not by itself measure overall health, quality of life, or treatment response. Clinicians usually consider the score alongside symptoms and other medical tests.
Does the mFARS measure heart problems or other complications of Friedreich ataxia?
No. The mFARS does not assess heart muscle disease, abnormal heart rhythms, diabetes or blood sugar, scoliosis, vision or hearing, fatigue, pain, mood, cognition, or quality of life. Separate monitoring is needed for these areas.
Why can my mFARS score change even if my Friedreich ataxia has not progressed?
Performance can vary because of fatigue or a recent illness. Different examiners or test setups and the time of day can also affect results. Repeated testing can create a practice effect, so arm and leg coordination may improve as you become familiar with the movements; clinicians look at longer-term trends rather than a single small change.
Is the mFARS a safe test if I have falls or trouble walking?
The examination should be supervised by a clinician, especially during balance and walking tasks. Tell the examiner about recent falls, dizziness, pain, unusual fatigue, or use of a cane, walker, or wheelchair so tasks can be adapted or stopped. Do not attempt an unsafe movement to improve your score.
Does the mFARS include a full swallowing evaluation?
No. The mFARS includes only a brief check of speech and basic swallowing, not a comprehensive swallow-safety study. Coughing during meals, choking, or a wet-sounding voice should be reported to your doctor because a specialist swallowing assessment may be needed.
How often should the mFARS be repeated?
How often it is repeated depends on your clinician, disease stage, and whether you are taking part in a clinical trial. Your care team may use it to follow physical changes and help plan rehabilitation or daily support. The schedule should be individualized.

Get notified when new evidence is published on Friedreich ataxia.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.

References

References (7)
  1. 1

    Psychometric properties of the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale.

    Rummey C, Corben LA, Delatycki MB, et al.

    Neurology. Genetics 2019; (5(6)):371 doi:10.1212/NXG.0000000000000371.

    PMID: 32042904
  2. 2

    Test-retest reliability of the Friedreich's ataxia rating scale.

    Rummey C, Zesiewicz TA, Perez-Lloret S, et al.

    Annals of clinical and translational neurology 2020; (7(9)):1708-1712 doi:10.1002/acn3.51118.

    PMID: 32779859
  3. 3

    Natural History of Friedreich Ataxia: Heterogeneity of Neurologic Progression and Consequences for Clinical Trial Design.

    Rummey C, Corben LA, Delatycki M, et al.

    Neurology 2022; (99(14)):e1499-e1510 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000200913.

    PMID: 35817567
  4. 4

    Propensity matched comparison of omaveloxolone treatment to Friedreich ataxia natural history data.

    Lynch DR, Goldsberry A, Rummey C, et al.

    Annals of clinical and translational neurology 2024; (11(1)):4-16 doi:10.1002/acn3.51897.

    PMID: 37691319
  5. 5

    Progression of Friedreich ataxia: quantitative characterization over 5 years.

    Patel M, Isaacs CJ, Seyer L, et al.

    Annals of clinical and translational neurology 2016; (3(9)):684-94 doi:10.1002/acn3.332.

    PMID: 27648458
  6. 6

    Domain Specific Placebo Response in the Modified Friedreich's Ataxia Rating Scale.

    Rummey C, Farmer JM, Lynch DR

    Annals of clinical and translational neurology 2026; (13(2)):393-398 doi:10.1002/acn3.70239.

    PMID: 41293985
  7. 7

    Safety and Efficacy of Omaveloxolone in Friedreich Ataxia (MOXIe Study).

    Lynch DR, Chin MP, Delatycki MB, et al.

    Annals of neurology 2021; (89(2)):212-225 doi:10.1002/ana.25934.

    PMID: 33068037

This page explains what the mFARS can and cannot measure for Friedreich ataxia for educational purposes; it does not replace medical advice. Ask your neurologist how to interpret your score and plan monitoring safely.