Skip to content
PubMed This is a summary of 26 peer-reviewed journal articles Updated
Ophthalmology

Testing & Finding the Answer

At a Glance

AAION is a vision-threatening emergency often linked to giant cell arteritis. Doctors combine symptoms with inflammation blood tests, temporal artery biopsy, and ultrasound; normal results do not always rule it out, and suspected cases need prompt steroids.

When doctors suspect Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (AAION), they begin an urgent series of tests to confirm the diagnosis and protect your vision [1][2]. Because this is a medical emergency, the most important rule of the diagnostic workup is that treatment must never be delayed for testing [3][4]. If your doctor strongly suspects Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), they will likely start high-dose steroids first and then perform the tests to confirm the diagnosis [5][6].

The “Big Three” Blood Tests

Blood work is often the first step in checking for the widespread inflammation associated with GCA [7]. Doctors look at three specific markers:

  • ESR (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate): Measures how quickly red blood cells sink to the bottom of a tube; faster sinking indicates more inflammation [8].
  • CRP (C-reactive Protein): A protein produced by the liver that rises sharply when there is inflammation in the body [8].
  • Platelet Count: Platelets are blood-clotting cells that often increase in number when the body is fighting significant inflammation [8][9].

While these tests are very helpful, they are not perfect. In about 3% of patients with biopsy-proven GCA, all three of these tests will come back completely normal [10][8]. Therefore, a normal blood test cannot “rule out” the condition if your symptoms strongly suggest it [11][12].

Temporal Artery Biopsy (TAB): An Important Test

A temporal artery biopsy is currently an important established way to confirm GCA [13]. In this minor surgical procedure, typically done under local anesthesia, a surgeon makes a small incision in the skin near your temple and removes a short segment of the temporal artery to be examined under a microscope [14]. You may experience some local bruising or mild tenderness afterward.

To ensure the test is accurate, doctors follow two critical guidelines:

  1. Specimen Length: The surgeon should remove a piece of the artery that is often 1 to 2 centimeters long, depending on local protocols [15]. This is because the inflammation in GCA is often patchy, with healthy sections of the artery alternating with diseased ones (known as skip lesions) [16][13]. A longer sample reduces the chance of accidentally taking only a healthy section [15].
  2. Timing: The biopsy should ideally be performed within 1 to 2 weeks of starting steroid treatment [3][5]. While steroids can eventually “clear” the signs of inflammation from the artery, the evidence of GCA usually remains visible for several weeks [17][18].

Temporal Artery Ultrasound and the “Halo Sign”

Many medical centers now use specialized Color Doppler Ultrasound as an initial test [19]. This non-invasive scan looks for the halo sign—a dark, ring-like swelling around the wall of the artery caused by inflammation [20][21].

If an experienced specialist finds a clear halo sign, it strongly supports a GCA diagnosis [20]. However, if the ultrasound is normal but the doctor still suspects GCA, neither a negative biopsy nor a negative scan automatically excludes GCA when clinical suspicion remains high, as the ultrasound can sometimes miss the inflammation [22][12].

Distinguishing AAION from NAION

Your doctors must also determine if your vision loss is “Arteritic” (AAION) or “Non-Arteritic” (NAION). While both involve a lack of blood flow to the optic nerve, they have very different causes and treatments [1].

Feature Usual Pattern in AAION Usual Pattern in NAION
Cause Inflammation of the arteries (GCA) [23] Factors like high blood pressure or sleep apnea [24]
Vision Loss Often profound and severe [25] Usually less severe; often affects half the field of vision [26]
Optic Disc Often appears “chalky white” or very pale [25] Usually appears swollen and pink/red [26]
Other Symptoms Headache, jaw pain, fever, or fatigue [7] Usually no other body-wide symptoms [1]

In some tricky cases, AAION can “mimic” the appearance of NAION, so sudden vision loss always requires urgent attention [22][12].

Common questions in this guide

What tests are used to diagnose AAION?
Doctors usually check ESR and CRP blood tests, along with the platelet count, to look for inflammation linked to giant cell arteritis. They may also use a temporal artery ultrasound and a temporal artery biopsy while considering the pattern and severity of vision loss.
Can normal blood tests rule out giant cell arteritis in AAION?
No. A small percentage of people with biopsy-confirmed giant cell arteritis have normal ESR, CRP, and platelet results, so doctors must weigh the laboratory findings alongside symptoms and eye findings.
How soon after starting steroids should a temporal artery biopsy be done?
Ideally, the biopsy is performed within one to two weeks after steroids begin. Steroids can eventually reduce visible inflammation, but signs often remain in the artery for several weeks, so testing should not delay urgent treatment.
What does the halo sign on a temporal artery ultrasound mean?
The halo sign is a dark, ring-like swelling around the artery wall that suggests inflammation from giant cell arteritis. A clear sign supports the diagnosis, but a normal ultrasound does not always exclude it when symptoms keep suspicion high.
How do doctors tell AAION from NAION?
AAION often causes more profound vision loss, a very pale or chalky-white optic disc, and symptoms such as headache, jaw pain, fever, or fatigue. NAION is often less severe, with a swollen pink or red optic disc and no body-wide symptoms, although the patterns can overlap.
What happens during a temporal artery biopsy?
A surgeon usually uses local anesthesia, makes a small incision near the temple, and removes a short segment of the temporal artery for microscopic examination. Mild bruising or tenderness can occur afterward, and a longer sample may reduce the chance of missing patchy inflammation.

Questions to Ask Your Doctor

Curated prompts to bring to your next appointment.

  1. 1.Were my blood samples for ESR and CRP taken before or after I started steroids?
  2. 2.Given that inflammatory markers can sometimes be normal in people with GCA, how are you weighing my lab results against my symptoms?
  3. 3.When is my temporal artery biopsy scheduled, and will the surgeon be taking a sample large enough to reduce false negatives?
  4. 4.If my initial ultrasound or biopsy is negative but my symptoms persist, what is the 'Plan B' for confirming my diagnosis?
  5. 5.Are you also checking my axillary (armpit) arteries during the ultrasound to increase the accuracy of the test?

Questions For You

Tap a prompt to share your answer — we'll use it plus this page's context to start a tailored conversation.

References

References (26)
  1. 1

    Arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy: An update.

    Bajpai V, Madan S, Beri S

    European journal of ophthalmology 2021; (31(6)):2818-2827 doi:10.1177/11206721211009447.

    PMID: 33892603
  2. 2

    Orbital magnetic resonance imaging of giant cell arteritis with ocular manifestations: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Guggenberger KV, Pavlou A, Cao Q, et al.

    European radiology 2023; (33(11)):7913-7922 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09770-2.

    PMID: 37256352
  3. 3

    The Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis.

    Jivraj I, Tamhankar M

    Current treatment options in neurology 2017; (19(1)):2 doi:10.1007/s11940-017-0440-y.

    PMID: 28138903
  4. 4

    Biopsy vs imaging in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Viewpoint 1: in favour of imaging.

    Schmidt WA

    Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2025; (64(Supplement_1)):i71-i73 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keae487.

    PMID: 40071427
  5. 5

    Temporal artery biopsy for suspected giant cell arteritis: A mini review.

    Jiang Z, Ji H, Dong J

    Indian journal of ophthalmology 2023; (71(10)):3299-3304 doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_3163_22.

    PMID: 37787225
  6. 6

    Orbital MRI Findings in a Patient With Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA): A Case Report.

    Alhawiti S, AlSulaim T

    Cureus 2023; (15(11)):e49507 doi:10.7759/cureus.49507.

    PMID: 38152789
  7. 7

    Neuro-ophthalmic Manifestations of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Review.

    Khoury JA, Albreiki D

    Journal of ophthalmic & vision research 2025; (20()) doi:10.18502/jovr.v20.15248.

    PMID: 40689118
  8. 8

    Population-Based Performance of Inflammatory Markers in Giant Cell Arteritis.

    Castillejo Becerra CM, Crowson CS, Langenfeld HE, et al.

    American journal of ophthalmology 2025; (275()):47-51 doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2025.03.022.

    PMID: 40139650
  9. 9

    Is Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Necessary for the Initial Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis?

    Hansen MS, Klefter ON, Terslev L, et al.

    Life (Basel, Switzerland) 2023; (13(3)) doi:10.3390/life13030693.

    PMID: 36983848
  10. 10

    New-onset giant cell arteritis with lower ESR and CRP level carries a similar ischemic risk to other forms of the disease but has an excellent late prognosis: a case-control study.

    Liozon E, Parreau S, Dumonteil S, et al.

    Rheumatology international 2023; (43(7)):1323-1331 doi:10.1007/s00296-023-05299-1.

    PMID: 37024620
  11. 11

    Giant cell arteritis with normal inflammatory markers: case report and review of the literature.

    Martins P, Teixeira V, Teixeira FJ, et al.

    Clinical rheumatology 2020; (39(10)):3115-3125 doi:10.1007/s10067-020-05116-1.

    PMID: 32472460
  12. 12

    Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy as the main manifestation of giant cell arteritis: a case-based literature review.

    Barankiewicz-Tyc N, Wąsik N, Majewski P, et al.

    Reumatologia 2026; (64(1)):65-71 doi:10.5114/reum/207774.

    PMID: 41909066
  13. 13

    Biopsy vs imaging for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. Viewpoint 2: in favour of biopsy.

    Espígol-Frigolé G, Prieto-González S, Marco-Hernández J, et al.

    Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2025; (64(12 Suppl 2)):i74-i78 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keae474.

    PMID: 40071431
  14. 14

    Diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by temporal artery biopsy is associated with biopsy length.

    Ruediger C, Ninan J, Dyer K, et al.

    Frontiers in medicine 2022; (9()):1055178 doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.1055178.

    PMID: 36518741
  15. 15

    Optimal length and usefulness of temporal artery biopsies in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: a 10-year retrospective review of medical records.

    Chu R, Foster C, Ali M, et al.

    The Lancet. Rheumatology 2020; (2(12)):e774-e778 doi:10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30222-8.

    PMID: 38273631
  16. 16

    Association Between Specimen Length and Number of Sections and Diagnostic Yield of Temporal Artery Biopsy for Giant Cell Arteritis.

    Muratore F, Boiardi L, Cavazza A, et al.

    Arthritis care & research 2021; (73(3)):402-408 doi:10.1002/acr.24393.

    PMID: 32741116
  17. 17

    New developments in giant cell arteritis.

    Frohman L, Wong AB, Matheos K, et al.

    Survey of ophthalmology 2016; (61(4)):400-21.

    PMID: 26774550
  18. 18

    Combined bilateral ophthalmic artery occlusion & central retinal vein occlusion from presumed giant cell arteritis.

    Hankins M, Amin S, Gonzalez A, Samy H

    American journal of ophthalmology case reports 2018; (12()):28-31 doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.08.001.

    PMID: 30148234
  19. 19

    Giant Cell Arteritis With Normal Inflammatory Markers and Progressive Visual Disturbance.

    Kalyanasundaram Lakshmi S, Hassan U, Hettiarachchi P, et al.

    Cureus 2026; (18(7)):e111939 doi:10.7759/cureus.111939.

    PMID: 42542798
  20. 20

    Role of the halo sign in the assessment of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Sebastian A, Coath F, Innes S, et al.

    Rheumatology advances in practice 2021; (5(3)):rkab059 doi:10.1093/rap/rkab059.

    PMID: 34514295
  21. 21

    Halo sign on temporal artery ultrasound versus temporal artery biopsy for giant cell arteritis.

    Pouncey AL, Yeldham G, Magan T, et al.

    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2024; (2()):CD013199 doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013199.pub2.

    PMID: 38323659
  22. 22

    Incidence of giant cell arteritis mimicking non-arteritic anterior optic neuropathy.

    Issa M, Donaldson L, Margolin E

    Journal of the neurological sciences 2023; (449()):120661 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2023.120661.

    PMID: 37126919
  23. 23

    Unilateral Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Revealing Giant Cell Arteritis: A Case Report.

    Lazaar H, Moumni A, Aziz A, et al.

    Cureus 2025; (17(3)):e80452 doi:10.7759/cureus.80452.

    PMID: 40225509
  24. 24

    Risk Factors for Non-arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Large Scale Meta-Analysis.

    Liu B, Yu Y, Liu W, et al.

    Frontiers in medicine 2021; (8()):618353 doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.618353.

    PMID: 34671609
  25. 25

    Giant Cell Arteritis Presenting as Unilateral Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

    Mandura RA

    Cureus 2021; (13(7)):e16653 doi:10.7759/cureus.16653.

    PMID: 34462685
  26. 26

    Preserved Visual Acuity in Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Secondary to Giant Cell (temporal) Arteritis.

    Antonio-Santos AA, Murad-Kejbou SJ, Foroozan R, et al.

    Journal of vascular and interventional neurology 2016; (8(5)):17-21.

    PMID: 26958148

This page explains AAION and giant cell arteritis testing for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Sudden vision loss requires urgent medical evaluation.

Get notified when new evidence is published on arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

We monitor PubMed for new peer-reviewed studies on this topic and email a short summary when something meaningful changes.